![]() |
Climate Models Fail Again! Scientists 'Startled' to Discover 50% ofOzone Destroyed in Lower Atmosphere
0Z0NB wrote: June 27, 2008 I don't know what group you post from but can you cut the crackhead groups like alt.conspiracy, alt.global-warming, sci.skeptic, alt.politics.bush etc if you expect to be taken even HALF seriously ? And why the aus groups ? And don't 'ultra-space' your text. It's unreadably long. Graham |
Climate Models Fail Again! Scientists 'Startled' to Discover 50% of Ozone Destroyed in Lower Atmosphere
"Eeyore" wrote in message ... 0Z0NB wrote: June 27, 2008 I don't know what group you post from but can you cut the crackhead groups like alt.conspiracy, alt.global-warming, sci.skeptic, alt.politics.bush etc if you expect to be taken even HALF seriously ? And why the aus groups ? And don't 'ultra-space' your text. It's unreadably long. Graham What are you the net nanny? What the hell difference does it make what groups he posts to. If you don't like his ****, don't read it. |
Climate Models Fail Again! Scientists 'Startled' to Discover 50% ofOzone Destroyed in Lower Atmosphere
Bob Eld wrote: What are you the net nanny? YES |
Climate Models Fail Again! Scientists 'Startled' to Discover 50% of
"Eeyore" wrote I don't know what group you post from but can you cut the crackhead groups like alt.conspiracy, alt.global-warming, sci.skeptic, alt.politics.bush etc if you expect to be taken even HALF seriously ? His goal is to spam you with bull****. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:19 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 WeatherBanter.co.uk