Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 4, 4:58*pm, David wrote:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2173271/posts David Christainsen - Meteorologist They also mean that there should be less CO2 |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
chemist wrote:
On Feb 4, 4:58 pm, David wrote: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2173271/posts David Christainsen - Meteorologist They also mean that there should be less CO2 But there's more. Wierd, huh? |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 4, 9:12*pm, "marcodbeast" wrote:
chemist wrote: On Feb 4, 4:58 pm, David wrote: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2173271/posts David Christainsen - Meteorologist They also mean that there should be less CO2 * But there's more. *Wierd, huh? Where is the data that proves that there is more? |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
chemist wrote:
On Feb 4, 9:12 pm, "marcodbeast" wrote: chemist wrote: On Feb 4, 4:58 pm, David wrote: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2173271/posts David Christainsen - Meteorologist They also mean that there should be less CO2 But there's more. Wierd, huh? Where is the data that proves that there is more? Same place as been linked to from here a hundred times. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 4, 9:54*pm, "marcodbeast" wrote:
chemist wrote: On Feb 4, 9:12 pm, "marcodbeast" wrote: chemist wrote: On Feb 4, 4:58 pm, David wrote: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2173271/posts David Christainsen - Meteorologist They also mean that there should be less CO2 But there's more. Wierd, huh? Where is the data that proves that there is more? * Same place as been linked to from here a hundred times. There is no direct comparison of CO2 in the sea with that of some years earlier in any of those papers. That is the only thing that will prove it. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 4, 12:53*pm, chemist wrote:
On Feb 4, 4:58*pm, David wrote: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2173271/posts David Christainsen - Meteorologist They also mean that there should be less CO2 Sorry but the CO2 atoms are displacing the dissolved oxygen. Your theory is in the toilet dummy |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
More Efficiency ,More Benefit, Less Risk, Less Work! | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Scientist argues less stations mean underestimated warming. | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Integrated or (Max+Min)/2 ??? and Help! When we say Mean do we mean Average - I always get confused? | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Integrated or (Max+Min)/2 - and when we say Mean do we mean Average | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
OT-High winds suck oxygen from Everest | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |