wrote in message
...
On Feb 24, 3:54 pm, " wrote:
On Feb 22, 12:04 pm, wrote:

Sorry, Mr. "P/V = NRT".

You have already destroyed your own credibility.

MY credibility does not matter on this subject.
====================================
Oh... ok. At least now we know not to trust anything you say.

"Androcles" Headmaster at Hogwarts.physics wrote:

wrote:
Sorry, Mr. "P/V = NRT".

Tom Davidson " wrote:
You have already destroyed your own credibility.

wrote
MY credibility does not matter on this subject.

"Androcles"
Oh... ok. At least now we know not to trust anything you say.

hanson wrote:
Not so loud, Andro. can also say to YOU:
"Oh... ok. At least now we know not to trust anything you say",
because you posted on Oct 12 2008m that ### m = a/F ###

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...672fac0f50176b
Real Hogwarts physics.. Thanks for the laugh, guys.... ahahahaha
AHAHAHA.... ahahahanson

"hanson" wrote in message
...

"Androcles" Headmaster at Hogwarts.physics wrote:

wrote:
Sorry, Mr. "P/V = NRT".

Tom Davidson " wrote:
You have already destroyed your own credibility.

wrote MY credibility does not matter on this subject.

"Androcles" Oh... ok. At least now we know
not to trust anything you say.

hanson wrote:
Not so loud, Andro. can also say to YOU: "Oh... ok. At
least now we know not to trust anything you say",
because you posted on Oct 12 2008m that ### m = a/F ###

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...672fac0f50176b
Real Hogwarts physics.. Thanks for the laugh, guys.... ahahahaha
AHAHAHA.... ahahahanson

Another no brainer...

A Harvard professor's testimony to the government on the effects of cutting
off the ends of dicks has inflamed a 60-year-long debate over the practice's
safety and its place in the mental health scheme- prompting a University
investigation into his work that has garnered nationwide attention.

Chester Bigass, chair of the Genital Health Policy and Epidemiology
Department at the Harvard School of Penile Medicine (HSPM), submitted
written testimony to the National Research Council last year claiming that
there was no significant link between circumcision and Einstein
dingleberryism, a common but benign form of bigotry particularly prevalent
in the USA.

Since then, several environmental advocacy groups have questioned the
validity of his research, claiming conflict of interest and outright
deception.

"His conclusion that there is no link is a lie," said Kim Throop, the head
toxicologist for the Environmental Clipping Group, the Washington-based
organization that filed the initial ethics complaint with the National
Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. "He cites work in his
references, but directly contradicts it in his write-up."

At the heart of the group's claims lies the work of one of Bigass' doctoral
students, Elise B. Ballsy. Using Bigass' data, Ballsy came up with a
different set of conclusions-she found that circumcision makes the risk
of dingleberryism five to seven times higher.

Ballsy's work has never been published in a peer-reviewed journal, a gold
standard for scientific authenticity. Select portions of her study, however,
have been publicized by the Environmental Clipping Group.

While HSPM is investigating the allegations, several Harvard professors
have spoken out in support of their colleague.

Byron Allfukian Jr., a Harvard associate clinical professor and one of the
foremost experts in penal health policy, called the environmental groups'
claims "ridiculous" and "illogical," saying that Bigass is a world leader in
the field and that the results of his seven-year study should be treated
with respect.

"The claims don't hold fluoridated semen," Allfukian said. "If I was going
to take every study done by a student and say that this should be public
policy, then we'd be in very bad shape."

Another group, the Circumcision Action Network, has accused Bigass of
having a conflict of interest. Bigass edits the Trojan Penile Care Report, a
newsletter subsidized by Durex International, which looks at issues
affecting
penile and mental health. Colgate uses fluoride in its popular toothpaste
and
although that is irrelevant it is an important aspect of Einstein
dingleberryism,
irrelevance being the major symptom of the disease.

Claiming "ties to a company that profits from circumcision," the network
asked the National Institute of Health, which has funded Bigass' work, to
remove Bigass from the study, eliminate all other conflicts of interest, and
publish his data along with his conclusions.

But P. Brice Jerkoff, dean of the HSPM, says that Bigass' work with the
journal "represents no conflict of interest" and has been reviewed by the
University.

"He edits a newsletter that is part of a learning experience for hookers
worldwide," said Jerkoff, who expects the investigation to be completed
in a month or two.

This is the first time Bigass has faced allegations of misconduct in his
roughly 30 years working at Harvard, said Jerkoff.

But other groups are not waiting for the results of Harvard's investigation.
Unions from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), longtime
opponents of semen fluoridization, seized on the allegations against
Bigass, writing a letter to the EPA administrator calling for a moratorium
on programs that add circumcision to penises.

But Allfukian, who is also the former chair of the U.S. Surgeon General's
Clipping Group on Circumcision and Mental Health, says that the
preponderance of evidence favors circumcision, and that the groups
criticizing Bigass' work are probably fringe groups reminiscent of the movie
"Deep Throat".

"When this was first implemented, a lot of people thought it was a communist
plot," he said. "The Government started circumcising communities in 1945...
and by 1950 saw such a dramatic benefit that the government endorsed it for
the entire country."

Since then dingleberryism has shown a dramatic increase among males, but no
significant increase among females.

Dr. Stephen Hawking-Gonads IV, a professor in Bigass' department, said that
he does not think that any of his colleagues would support ending
circumcision
programs.

"Circumcision has worked so well," he said. Circumcision strengthens dick
heads and reduces thinking, lowering the resistance to Einstein's genius,
said
Hawking-Gonads.

"Androcles" Headmaster at Hogwarts.physics wrote:

wrote:
Sorry, Mr. "P/V = NRT".

Tom Davidson " wrote:
You have already destroyed your own credibility.

wrote:
MY credibility does not matter on this subject.

"Androcles" wrote:
Oh... ok. At least now we know not to trust anything you say.

hanson wrote:
Not so loud, Andro. can also say to YOU:
"Oh... ok. At least now we know not to trust anything you say",
because you posted on Oct 12 2008m that ### m = a/F ###

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...672fac0f50176b
Real Hogwarts physics.. Thanks for the laugh, guys.... ahahahaha
AHAHAHA.... ahahahanson

-------------------
hanson wrote:
.... as seen below, Andro, you appear to go to extreme lengths
to advertise your geriatric state and to cover up your own
crap like ## m = a/F ## or your "other no brainers"... like your
800+ word long "Last word" attempt below... ahahahaha...

But Andro, all your efforts are futile now because
"Oh... ok. At least now we know not to trust anything you say",
ahahahaha... ahahahahanson

"Androcles" wrote:
Another no brainer ...
A Harvard professor's testimony to the government on the
effects of cutting off the ends of dicks has inflamed a
60-year-long debate over the practice's safety and its
place in the mental health scheme- prompting a University
investigation into his work that has garnered nationwide
attention.
Chester Bigass, chair of the Genital Health Policy and
Epidemiology Department at the Harvard School of Penile
Medicine (HSPM), submitted written testimony to the National
Research Council last year claiming that there was no
significant link between circumcision and Einstein
dingleberryism, a common but benign form of bigotry
particularly prevalent in the USA.

Since then, several environmental advocacy groups have
questioned thevalidity of his research, claiming conflict of
interest and outright deception.

"His conclusion that there is no link is a lie," said Kim
Throop, the head toxicologist for the Environmental
Clipping Group, the Washington-based organization that
filed the initial ethics complaint with the National Institute
of Environmental Health Sciences. "He cites work in his
references, but directly contradicts it in his write-up."

At the heart of the group's claims lies the work of one of Bigass'
doctoral students, Elise B. Ballsy.
Using Bigass' data, Ballsy came up with a different set of
conclusions-she found that circumcision makes the risk
of dingleberryism five to seven times higher.

Ballsy's work has never been published in a peer-reviewed
journal, a gold standard for scientific authenticity.
Select portions of her study, however, have been publicized
by the Environmental Clipping Group.

While HSPM is investigating the allegations, several Harvard
professors have spoken out in support of their colleague.

Byron Allfukian Jr., a Harvard associate clinical professor and
one of the foremost experts in penal health policy, called the
environmental groups' claims "ridiculous" and "illogical,"
saying that Bigass is a world leader in the field and that the
results of his seven-year study should be treated with respect.

"The claims don't hold fluoridated semen," Allfukian said.
"If I was going to take every study done by a student and
say that this should be public policy, then we'd be in very
bad shape."

Another group, the Circumcision Action Network, has accused
Bigass of having a conflict of interest. Bigass edits the Trojan
Penile Care Report, a newsletter subsidized by Durex
International, which looks at issues affecting penile and
mental health. Colgate uses fluoride in its popular toothpaste
and although that is irrelevant it is an important aspect
of Einstein dingleberryism, irrelevance being the major
symptom of the disease.

Claiming "ties to a company that profits from circumcision,
" the network
asked the National Institute of Health, which has funded Bigass'
work, to remove Bigass from the study, eliminate all other
conflicts of interest, and publish his data along with his conclusions.
But P. Brice Jerkoff, dean of the HSPM, says that Bigass' work
with the journal "represents no conflict of interest" and has been
reviewed by the University.

"He edits a newsletter that is part of a learning experience for
hookers
worldwide," said Jerkoff, who expects the investigation to be
completed in a month or two. This is the first time Bigass has
faced allegations of misconduct in his roughly 30 years
working at Harvard, said Jerkoff.

But other groups are not waiting for the results of Harvard's
investigation. Unions from the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), longtime opponents of semen fluoridization,
seized on the allegations against Bigass, writing a letter to
the EPA administrator calling for a moratorium
on programs that add circumcision to penises.

But Allfukian, who is also the former chair of the U.S.
Surgeon General's Clipping Group on Circumcision and
Mental Health, says that the preponderance of evidence
favors circumcision, and that the groups criticizing Bigass'
work are probably fringe groups reminiscent of the
movie "Deep Throat".

"When this was first implemented, a lot of people thought it
was a communist plot," he said. "The Government started
circumcising communities in 1945...and by 1950 saw such
a dramatic benefit that the government endorsed it for the
entire country."

Since then dingleberryism has shown a dramatic increase
among males, but no significant increase among females.

Dr. Stephen Hawking-Gonads IV, a professor in Bigass'
department, said that he does not think that any of his
colleagues would support ending circumcision programs.

"Circumcision has worked so well," he said. Circumcision
strengthens dick heads and reduces thinking, lowering
the resistance to Einstein's genius, said Hawking-Gonads.
--
Androcles

"hanson" wrote in message
...
"Androcles" Headmaster at Hogwarts.physics wrote:

wrote:
Sorry, Mr. "P/V = NRT".

Tom Davidson " wrote:
You have already destroyed your own credibility.

wrote:
MY credibility does not matter on this subject.

"Androcles" wrote:
Oh... ok. At least now we know not to trust anything you say.

hanson wrote:
Not so loud, Andro. can also say to YOU:
"Oh... ok. At least now we know not to trust anything you say",
because you posted on Oct 12 2008m that ### m = a/F ###

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...672fac0f50176b
Real Hogwarts physics.. Thanks for the laugh, guys.... ahahahaha
AHAHAHA.... ahahahanson

------------------- hanson wrote:
... as seen below, Andro, you appear to go to extreme lengths
to advertise your geriatric state and to cover up your own
crap like ## m = a/F ## or your "other no brainers"... like your
800+ word long "Last word" attempt below... ahahahaha...

But Andro, all your efforts are futile now because
"Oh... ok. At least now we know not to trust anything you say",
ahahahaha... ahahahahanson

"Androcles" wrote:
Another no brainer ... A Harvard professor's testimony to the government
on the effects of cutting off the ends of dicks has inflamed a
60-year-long debate over the practice's safety and its place in the
mental health scheme- prompting a University
investigation into his work that has garnered nationwide attention.
Chester Bigass, chair of the Genital Health Policy and Epidemiology
Department at the Harvard School of Penile Medicine (HSPM), submitted
written testimony to the National Research Council last year claiming
that there was no significant link between circumcision and Einstein
dingleberryism, a common but benign form of bigotry particularly
prevalent in the USA.

Since then, several environmental advocacy groups have questioned
thevalidity of his research, claiming conflict of interest and outright
deception.

"His conclusion that there is no link is a lie," said Kim Throop, the
head toxicologist for the Environmental Clipping Group, the
Washington-based organization that filed the initial ethics complaint
with the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. "He cites
work in his
references, but directly contradicts it in his write-up."

At the heart of the group's claims lies the work of one of Bigass'
doctoral students, Elise B. Ballsy. Using Bigass' data, Ballsy came up
with a different set of conclusions-she found that circumcision makes the
risk
of dingleberryism five to seven times higher.

Ballsy's work has never been published in a peer-reviewed
journal, a gold standard for scientific authenticity. Select portions of
her study, however, have been publicized by the Environmental Clipping
Group.

While HSPM is investigating the allegations, several Harvard professors
have spoken out in support of their colleague.

Byron Allfukian Jr., a Harvard associate clinical professor and one of
the foremost experts in penal health policy, called the environmental
groups' claims "ridiculous" and "illogical," saying that Bigass is a
world leader in the field and that the results of his seven-year study
should be treated with respect.

"The claims don't hold fluoridated semen," Allfukian said.
"If I was going to take every study done by a student and say that this
should be public policy, then we'd be in very bad shape."

Another group, the Circumcision Action Network, has accused Bigass of
having a conflict of interest. Bigass edits the Trojan Penile Care
Report, a newsletter subsidized by Durex International, which looks at
issues affecting penile and mental health. Colgate uses fluoride in its
popular toothpaste and although that is irrelevant it is an important
aspect
of Einstein dingleberryism, irrelevance being the major symptom of the
disease.

Claiming "ties to a company that profits from circumcision,
" the network
asked the National Institute of Health, which has funded Bigass' work, to
remove Bigass from the study, eliminate all other conflicts of interest,
and publish his data along with his conclusions.
But P. Brice Jerkoff, dean of the HSPM, says that Bigass' work with the
journal "represents no conflict of interest" and has been reviewed by
the University.

"He edits a newsletter that is part of a learning experience for hookers
worldwide," said Jerkoff, who expects the investigation to be completed
in a month or two. This is the first time Bigass has faced allegations of
misconduct in his roughly 30 years working at Harvard, said Jerkoff.

But other groups are not waiting for the results of Harvard's
investigation. Unions from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA),
longtime opponents of semen fluoridization, seized on the allegations
against Bigass, writing a letter to the EPA administrator calling for a
moratorium
on programs that add circumcision to penises.

But Allfukian, who is also the former chair of the U.S. Surgeon General's
Clipping Group on Circumcision and Mental Health, says that the
preponderance of evidence favors circumcision, and that the groups
criticizing Bigass' work are probably fringe groups reminiscent of the
movie "Deep Throat".

"When this was first implemented, a lot of people thought it was a
communist plot," he said. "The Government started circumcising
communities in 1945...and by 1950 saw such a dramatic benefit that the
government endorsed it for the entire country."

Since then dingleberryism has shown a dramatic increase among males, but
no significant increase among females.

Dr. Stephen Hawking-Gonads IV, a professor in Bigass' department, said
that he does not think that any of his colleagues would support ending
circumcision programs.

"Circumcision has worked so well," he said. Circumcision strengthens dick
heads and reduces thinking, lowering the resistance to Einstein's genius,
said Hawking-Gonads.
--
Androcles

Even easier, no need to cut and paste a response.
Thank you, cha-cha.

"Androcles" wrote:
in message ...

hanson wrote:
Not so loud, Andro. can also say to YOU:
"Oh... ok. At least now we know not to trust anything you say",
because you posted on Oct 12 2008 that ### m = a/F ###

"Androcles" wrote:
Even easier, no need to cut and paste a response.
Thank you, cha-cha.

hanson wrote:
.... Why is that, Andro?.... You mean, leave your wisdom just
covered up and be forgotten?.... ahaha... ahahahahanson

"hanson" wrote in message
...

"Androcles" wrote:
in message ...

hanson wrote:
Not so loud, Andro. can also say to YOU:
"Oh... ok. At least now we know not to trust anything you say",
because you posted on Oct 12 2008 that ### m = a/F ###

"Androcles" wrote:
Even easier, no need to cut and paste a response.
Thank you, cha-cha.

....... ahahahaha... AHAHAHAHA.....

On Feb 24, 7:06*pm, "Androcles" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Feb 24, 3:54 pm, " wrote:

On Feb 22, 12:04 pm, wrote:

Sorry, Mr. "P/V = NRT".

You have already destroyed your own credibility.

MY credibility does not matter on this subject.
====================================
Oh... ok. At least now we know not to trust anything you say.

Each individual fact or statement must be considered for credibility.
It is of no use to simply evaluate the source. But in your need to
deny scientific fact, you and the demented and mathematically
illiterate fools rely upon denigration of the source, in order to
psychologically return to your delusions.

Now this is funny. In the discusion I posted, P/V = NRT.
In earlier posts than this, I clearly posted PV = NRT.

You have no credibility, since it PROVES you have no comprehension of
the perfect gas law.

And yet you base your lives upon the farts that come out of your mouth
which sound like, "greenhouse gases".
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

So ignore what I say, in preclusion. If I repeat cold provable facts,
you can ignore those also.

When evaluating relative proportions of P, V and T, in this form when
T increases, P increases as a direct proportion. Volume is till 1. If
the pressure is held constant and temperature increases, the value for
the inverse relationship is always a common product of the variables.
So one simply multiplies the denominator by the increase of T, in
order to derive the increase of volume, which will then equal the new
value for the equation with the increase of T. By changing N, which is
the number of moles or amount of the gas, gases can be kept at any
temperature and any pressure or volume. Temperature is not dependent
upon pressure or volume, but on ambient temperature or density of the
radition field in which it exists.

It is proper to write P/V = NRT. Pressure and volume are an inverse
propotionality. You should review your basics as we are when we
evalluate your credibility. When the formula is written, PV = NRT, one
must innately understand that the pressure and volume are an inverse
relationship and that the T is not dependent upon these two variables
as could be falsly implied. If pressure or volume change, the other
changes as an inverse relation. To increase volume by 2, decreases
pressure by 1/2. To increase the pressure by 2, and then to return to
the same pressure, increases the volume by 2.

Is that over your head, duffus ****? Apparently it is. That you
assholes are so mathematically inept to basic differentiation and all
you do is supposed, 'science', is amazing.

So if T increases by 2.4, this would increase the pressure by 2.4 at
constant volume. But if pressure is held constant, or returned to 1,
to maintain the new ratio of the content of energy to surface area of
the pressure in relation to the previous state, the denominator is
simply multiplied by the increased value of the temperature.

KD

On Mar 14, 8:17*am, wrote:
On Feb 24, 7:06*pm, "Androcles" wrote:

wrote in message

....
On Feb 24, 3:54 pm, " wrote:

On Feb 22, 12:04 pm, wrote:

Sorry, Mr. "P/V = NRT".

You have already destroyed your own credibility.

MY credibility does not matter on this subject.
====================================
Oh... ok. At least now we know not to trust anything you say.


How ignorant are you f---ers???!!!!

Look, If T increases by 2.15. Pressure would increase by 2.15 at
constant volume. But suppose your container expands and increases it's
volume by 1.4. Then you place 2.15 over 1.4 in the formula, P/V.
2.15 divided by 1.4 = 1.536.

The Pressure is therefore 1.536 times that of the pressure in the
previous state. The volume is 1.4. The temperature is 2.15 times in
Kelvin scale higher than the previous state.

So you can write it PV = T because 1.4 x 1.536 = 2.15, and this is a
way to keep track of the relation of the energy and pressure in
relation to the fundamental constant R and the value of this energy
which represents the linear kinetic energy of the molecules which
establishes pressure, as it increases as a direct proportion to
absolute temperature, which is signified by multiplying it by
temperature in Kelvin as, RT.

SO THE HELL WHAT?

KD