Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here's a new movie that could out do Al Gore's
"An Inconvenient Truth." http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/...n4861157.shtml |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Roger Coppock" wrote in message ... Here's a new movie that could out do Al Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth." http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/...n4861157.shtml LOL How desperate can they get? Rather than tell you about the catastrophes, it's time to show you. Then, maybe you will be scared enough. This should be good. Why didn't they get Spielberg? |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Accordingly this movie is based on real science however they are using the
worse case scenario. However remember the worst case scenario forecast 10 years ago is now the most likely. And before anyone states the slight dip over last couple of years this was forecast by all scientists as sun is in an inactive phase and some natural Oceanographic effects countering the AGW effect are happening. Once these phases go into a natural warming then we will start seeing the AGW accelerating. Stan "James" wrote in message ... "Roger Coppock" wrote in message ... Here's a new movie that could out do Al Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth." http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/...n4861157.shtml LOL How desperate can they get? Rather than tell you about the catastrophes, it's time to show you. Then, maybe you will be scared enough. This should be good. Why didn't they get Spielberg? |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 14, 1:41*pm, "Stan Kellett"
wrote: Accordingly this movie is based on real science however they are using the worse case scenario. However remember the worst case scenario forecast 10 years ago is now the most likely. And before anyone states the slight dip over last couple of years this was forecast by all scientists as sun is in an inactive phase and some natural Oceanographic effects countering the AGW effect are happening. Once these phases go into a natural warming then we will start seeing the AGW accelerating. HamSlan Or not, eh HamSlam? |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Stan Kellett" wrote in message ... Accordingly this movie is based on real science however they are using the worse case scenario. However remember the worst case scenario forecast 10 years ago is now the most likely. And before anyone states the slight dip over last couple of years this was forecast by all scientists as sun is in an inactive phase and some natural Oceanographic effects countering the AGW effect are happening. Once these phases go into a natural warming then we will start seeing the AGW accelerating. Stan "James" wrote in message ... "Roger Coppock" wrote in message ... Here's a new movie that could out do Al Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth." http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/...n4861157.shtml LOL How desperate can they get? Rather than tell you about the catastrophes, it's time to show you. Then, maybe you will be scared enough. This should be good. Why didn't they get Spielberg? ================================================== ====== Once these phases go into a natural warming then we will start seeing the AGW accelerating. What does this mean? |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 14, 4:30*am, Roger Coppock wrote:
Here's a new movie that could out do Al Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth." http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/.../main4861157.s... Thanks ... sounds good. I must look out for it ... Fran |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 17:35:52 -0500, "James"
wrote: "Roger Coppock" wrote in message ... Here's a new movie that could out do Al Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth." http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/...n4861157.shtml LOL How desperate can they get? Rather than tell you about the catastrophes, it's time to show you. Then, maybe you will be scared enough. This should be good. Just give up, idiot. The science is long since solid, now. And the political war is nearly over and all you have left to do is fight a few bedraggled skirmishes in your vain attempt at justifying your silly life. The show is over, move on. You lost, already. Why didn't they get Spielberg? Too busy losing money to Madoff. Jon -- If you're willing to be selective in the evidence you consider, you could 'reasonably' conclude that the earth is flat. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 14, 10:41*am, "Stan Kellett"
wrote: Accordingly this movie is based on real science however they are using the worse case scenario. However remember the worst case scenario forecast 10 years ago is now the most likely. And before anyone states the slight dip over last couple of years this was forecast by all scientists as sun is in an inactive phase and some natural Oceanographic effects countering the AGW effect are happening. Once these phases go into a natural warming then we will start seeing the AGW accelerating. Stan: when you filter out the natural noise, the rise in the global mean surface temperature is already accelerating, as it has for some time now. Please see: http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/Slope1952-2007.jpg http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/hadSlope1850-2008.jpg |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 14, 1:41*pm, "Stan Kellett"
wrote: Accordingly this movie is based on real science however they are using the worse case scenario. However remember the worst case scenario forecast 10 years ago is now the most likely. And before anyone states the slight dip over last couple of years this was forecast by all scientists as sun is in an inactive phase and some natural Oceanographic effects countering the AGW effect are happening. A "forecast" means before it happen. Please show where global cooling was forcast in the years just prior to 2000 and tell what model was used to make that forcast. Note that I didn't just say prior to 2000 because back in the 1970's it was forecast that we were going into the next ice age. Once these phases go into a natural warming then we will start seeing the AGW accelerating. Stan "James" wrote in message ... "Roger Coppock" wrote in message .... Here's a new movie that could out do Al Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth." http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/.../main4861157.s.... LOL How desperate can they get? Rather than tell you about the catastrophes, it's time to show you. Then, maybe you will be scared enough. This should be good. Why didn't they get Spielberg?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 15, 11:00*am, Roger Coppock wrote:
On Mar 14, 10:41*am, "Stan Kellett" wrote: Accordingly this movie is based on real science however they are using the worse case scenario. However remember the worst case scenario forecast 10 years ago is now the most likely. And before anyone states the slight dip over last couple of years this was forecast by all scientists as sun is in an inactive phase and some natural Oceanographic effects countering the AGW effect are happening. Once these phases go into a natural warming then we will start seeing the AGW accelerating. Stan: when you filter out the natural noise, the rise in the global mean surface temperature is already accelerating, as it has for some time now. Please see: http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/Slope1952-2007.jpg http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/hadSlope1850-2008.jpg I see that one predicts about five times the acceleration of the other. Great accuracy.......NOT |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
CROCK OF THE WEEK, "In the 70s, They said there'd be an Ice Age" | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
"In the 70s, They said there'd be an Ice Age" and It Is Almost Here! | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
"In the 70s, They said there'd be an Ice Age" and It Is AlmostHere! | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Brian Fagan, a leading historian of climate change, on "The CompleteIce Age" | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
"The Age of Stupid" | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |