| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
NASA: Environmental disaster avoided on ozone loss
NASA: Environmental disaster avoided on ozone loss
By SETH BORENSTEIN WASHINGTON (AP) — Here's rare good news about an environmental crisis: We dodged disaster with the ozone layer. A NASA study about ozone- munching chemicals from aerosol sprays and refrigeration used a computer model to play a game of what-if. What if the world 22 years ago didn't agree to cut back on chlorofluorocarbons which cause a seasonal ozone hole to form near the South Pole? NASA atmospheric scientist Paul Newman said the answer is a "bizarre world." By 2065, two-thirds of the protective ozone layer would have vanished and "the ozone hole covers the Earth." And the CFCs, which are long- lived potent greenhouse gases, would have pushed the world's temperature up an extra 4 degrees. [ . . . ] "It is a real horrible place," Newman told The Associated Press. But that dreadful scenario was "a world avoided," according to the paper published this week in the journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. After scientists raised warnings in the early 1970s — later earning a Nobel Prize — 193 nations agreed in the1987 treaty called the Montreal Protocol to cut CFC emissions. CFCs had been used in air conditioning, aerosol sprays, foam packaging and other products. Newman, the co-chair of the protocol's scientific panel, said the study provides hope that the world can do the same thing on another looming but even harder to solve environmental problem: Global warming. "There's a huge lesson to be learned here," said Paul Wapner, director of Global Environmental Politics at American University. "In significant cases, human beings can get together and arrive at international or global principles and avoid ecological catastrophe." On the Net: NASA's ozone study: http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/fea...d_avoided.html The United Nations' ozone page: http://ozone.unep.org/ The entire article is he http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/...TuUxQD971B8U02 |
NASA: Environmental disaster avoided on ozone loss
On Mar 20, 1:14*am, Roger Coppock wrote:
NASA: Environmental disaster avoided on ozone loss By SETH BORENSTEIN WASHINGTON (AP) — Here's rare good news about an environmental crisis: We dodged disaster with the ozone layer. A NASA study about ozone- munching chemicals from aerosol sprays and refrigeration used a computer model to play a game of what-if. What if the world 22 years ago didn't agree to cut back on chlorofluorocarbons which cause a seasonal ozone hole to form near the South Pole? NASA atmospheric scientist Paul Newman said the answer is a "bizarre world." By 2065, two-thirds of the protective ozone layer would have vanished and "the ozone hole covers the Earth." And the CFCs, which are long- lived potent greenhouse gases, would have pushed the world's temperature up an extra 4 degrees. [ . . . ] "It is a real horrible place," Newman told The Associated Press. But that dreadful scenario was "a world avoided," according to the paper published this week in the journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. After scientists raised warnings in the early 1970s — later earning a Nobel Prize — 193 nations agreed in the1987 treaty called the Montreal Protocol to cut CFC emissions. CFCs had been used in air conditioning, aerosol sprays, foam packaging and other products. Newman, the co-chair of the protocol's scientific panel, said the study provides hope that the world can do the same thing on another looming but even harder to solve environmental problem: Global warming. "There's a huge lesson to be learned here," said Paul Wapner, director of Global Environmental Politics at American University. "In significant cases, human beings can get together and arrive at international or global principles and avoid ecological catastrophe." On the Net: NASA's ozone study: http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/fea...d_avoided.html The United Nations' ozone page: http://ozone.unep.org/ The entire article is he http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/...h9TB0qV69YNVYL... No kidding. Computer models prove that? Amazing. Considering that they've been clearly shown to be unable to predict anything useful in terms of the climate. But they can be used to confirm the horrors of ozone on the world. Dr Susan Solomon ought to be propud of her work on behalf of the anti-ozone movement and now on behalf of the IPCC. Just more garbage-in garbage-out Mannian manipulation of data and algorithems to fake some modicum of credibility. It has failed as usual. Some people just have no professional pride. That they would actually go thru that kind of charade and actually put their signatures on it. Shame. |
Environmental disaster avoided on ozone loss
"Roger Coppock" wrote in message ... NASA: Environmental disaster avoided on ozone loss By SETH BORENSTEIN WASHINGTON (AP) — Here's rare good news about an environmental crisis: We dodged disaster with the ozone layer. A NASA study about ozone- munching chemicals from aerosol sprays and refrigeration used a computer model to play a game of what-if. What if the world 22 years ago didn't agree to cut back on chlorofluorocarbons which cause a seasonal ozone hole to form near the South Pole? --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Uh huh!!! Did anyone notice that this ozone hole crisis, DuPont's patent on it's (Prestone) antifreeze ran out, and DuPont just coincidentally had an acceptable substitute ready for market at just about the same time??? At least, unlike the ban on DDT, this one didn't kill millions of people! |
NASA: Environmental disaster avoided on ozone loss
On Mar 20, 2:14*am, Roger Coppock wrote:
NASA: Environmental disaster avoided on ozone loss By SETH BORENSTEIN WASHINGTON (AP) — Here's rare good news about an environmental crisis: We dodged disaster with the ozone layer. A NASA study about ozone- munching chemicals from aerosol sprays and refrigeration used a computer model to play a game of what-if. [garbage flushed] "computer model to play a game of what-if"??? Professional wrestlers have more credibility than NASA. |
Environmental disaster avoided on ozone loss
Birdog wrote:
"Roger Coppock" wrote in message ... NASA: Environmental disaster avoided on ozone loss By SETH BORENSTEIN WASHINGTON (AP) - Here's rare good news about an environmental crisis: We dodged disaster with the ozone layer. A NASA study about ozone- munching chemicals from aerosol sprays and refrigeration used a computer model to play a game of what-if. What if the world 22 years ago didn't agree to cut back on chlorofluorocarbons which cause a seasonal ozone hole to form near the South Pole? --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Uh huh!!! Did anyone notice that this ozone hole crisis, DuPont's patent on it's (Prestone) antifreeze ran out, and DuPont just coincidentally had an acceptable substitute ready for market at just about the same time??? Relevance? lol At least, unlike the ban on DDT, this one didn't kill millions of people! The "ban on DDT" didn't kill millions of people, sad sick serial liar. DDT was never banned for disease control. |
NASA: Environmental disaster avoided on ozone loss
mrbawana2u wrote:
On Mar 20, 2:14 am, Roger Coppock wrote: NASA: Environmental disaster avoided on ozone loss By SETH BORENSTEIN WASHINGTON (AP) — Here's rare good news about an environmental crisis: We dodged disaster with the ozone layer. A NASA study about ozone- munching chemicals from aerosol sprays and refrigeration used a computer model to play a game of what-if. [garbage flushed] "computer model to play a game of what-if"??? Professional wrestlers have more credibility than NASA. A completely insane lie. lol |
NASA: Environmental disaster avoided on ozone loss
On Mar 20, 9:39*am, "marcodbeast" wrote:
wrote: On Mar 20, 1:14 am, Roger Coppock wrote: NASA: Environmental disaster avoided on ozone loss By SETH BORENSTEIN WASHINGTON (AP) — Here's rare good news about an environmental crisis: We dodged disaster with the ozone layer. A NASA study about ozone- munching chemicals from aerosol sprays and refrigeration used a computer model to play a game of what-if. What if the world 22 years ago didn't agree to cut back on chlorofluorocarbons which cause a seasonal ozone hole to form near the South Pole? NASA atmospheric scientist Paul Newman said the answer is a "bizarre world." By 2065, two-thirds of the protective ozone layer would have vanished and "the ozone hole covers the Earth." And the CFCs, which are long- lived potent greenhouse gases, would have pushed the world's temperature up an extra 4 degrees. [ . . . ] "It is a real horrible place," Newman told The Associated Press. But that dreadful scenario was "a world avoided," according to the paper published this week in the journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. After scientists raised warnings in the early 1970s — later earning a Nobel Prize — 193 nations agreed in the1987 treaty called the Montreal Protocol to cut CFC emissions. CFCs had been used in air conditioning, aerosol sprays, foam packaging and other products. Newman, the co-chair of the protocol's scientific panel, said the study provides hope that the world can do the same thing on another looming but even harder to solve environmental problem: Global warming. "There's a huge lesson to be learned here," said Paul Wapner, director of Global Environmental Politics at American University. "In significant cases, human beings can get together and arrive at international or global principles and avoid ecological catastrophe." On the Net: NASA's ozone study: http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/fea...d_avoided.html The United Nations' ozone page: http://ozone.unep.org/ The entire article is he http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/...h9TB0qV69YNVYL.... No kidding. Computer models prove that? Amazing. Considering that they've been clearly shown to be unable to predict anything useful in terms of the climate. * A completely insane lie. *lol *But they can be used to confirm the horrors of ozone on the world. Dr Susan Solomon ought to be propud of her work on behalf of the anti-ozone movement and now on behalf of the IPCC. Just more garbage-in garbage-out Mannian manipulation of data and algorithems to fake some modicum of credibility. It has failed as usual. * A completely insane lie. *lol Some people just have no professional pride. That they would actually go thru that kind of charade and actually put their signatures on it. Shame. * A completely insane lie. *lol- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - nice trolling.... moron. You make us look like geniuses by comparison, keep up the good work. |
NASA: Environmental disaster avoided on ozone loss
wrote:
On Mar 20, 9:39 am, "marcodbeast" wrote: wrote: On Mar 20, 1:14 am, Roger Coppock wrote: NASA: Environmental disaster avoided on ozone loss By SETH BORENSTEIN WASHINGTON (AP) — Here's rare good news about an environmental crisis: We dodged disaster with the ozone layer. A NASA study about ozone- munching chemicals from aerosol sprays and refrigeration used a computer model to play a game of what-if. What if the world 22 years ago didn't agree to cut back on chlorofluorocarbons which cause a seasonal ozone hole to form near the South Pole? NASA atmospheric scientist Paul Newman said the answer is a "bizarre world." By 2065, two-thirds of the protective ozone layer would have vanished and "the ozone hole covers the Earth." And the CFCs, which are long- lived potent greenhouse gases, would have pushed the world's temperature up an extra 4 degrees. [ . . . ] "It is a real horrible place," Newman told The Associated Press. But that dreadful scenario was "a world avoided," according to the paper published this week in the journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. After scientists raised warnings in the early 1970s — later earning a Nobel Prize — 193 nations agreed in the1987 treaty called the Montreal Protocol to cut CFC emissions. CFCs had been used in air conditioning, aerosol sprays, foam packaging and other products. Newman, the co-chair of the protocol's scientific panel, said the study provides hope that the world can do the same thing on another looming but even harder to solve environmental problem: Global warming. "There's a huge lesson to be learned here," said Paul Wapner, director of Global Environmental Politics at American University. "In significant cases, human beings can get together and arrive at international or global principles and avoid ecological catastrophe." On the Net: NASA's ozone study: http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/fea...d_avoided.html The United Nations' ozone page: http://ozone.unep.org/ The entire article is he http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/...h9TB0qV69YNVYL... No kidding. Computer models prove that? Amazing. Considering that they've been clearly shown to be unable to predict anything useful in terms of the climate. A completely insane lie. lol But they can be used to confirm the horrors of ozone on the world. Dr Susan Solomon ought to be propud of her work on behalf of the anti-ozone movement and now on behalf of the IPCC. Just more garbage-in garbage-out Mannian manipulation of data and algorithems to fake some modicum of credibility. It has failed as usual. A completely insane lie. lol Some people just have no professional pride. That they would actually go thru that kind of charade and actually put their signatures on it. Shame. A completely insane lie. lol- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - nice trolling.... moron. You make us look like geniuses by comparison, keep up the good work. Denialist for "I cannot refute a thing you said." |
NASA: Environmental disaster avoided on ozone loss
On Mar 20, 11:16*am, "marcodbeast" wrote:
wrote: On Mar 20, 9:39 am, "marcodbeast" wrote: wrote: On Mar 20, 1:14 am, Roger Coppock wrote: NASA: Environmental disaster avoided on ozone loss By SETH BORENSTEIN WASHINGTON (AP) — Here's rare good news about an environmental crisis: We dodged disaster with the ozone layer. A NASA study about ozone- munching chemicals from aerosol sprays and refrigeration used a computer model to play a game of what-if. What if the world 22 years ago didn't agree to cut back on chlorofluorocarbons which cause a seasonal ozone hole to form near the South Pole? NASA atmospheric scientist Paul Newman said the answer is a "bizarre world." By 2065, two-thirds of the protective ozone layer would have vanished and "the ozone hole covers the Earth." And the CFCs, which are long- lived potent greenhouse gases, would have pushed the world's temperature up an extra 4 degrees. [ . . . ] "It is a real horrible place," Newman told The Associated Press. But that dreadful scenario was "a world avoided," according to the paper published this week in the journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. After scientists raised warnings in the early 1970s — later earning a Nobel Prize — 193 nations agreed in the1987 treaty called the Montreal Protocol to cut CFC emissions. CFCs had been used in air conditioning, aerosol sprays, foam packaging and other products. Newman, the co-chair of the protocol's scientific panel, said the study provides hope that the world can do the same thing on another looming but even harder to solve environmental problem: Global warming. "There's a huge lesson to be learned here," said Paul Wapner, director of Global Environmental Politics at American University. "In significant cases, human beings can get together and arrive at international or global principles and avoid ecological catastrophe." On the Net: NASA's ozone study: http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/fea...d_avoided.html The United Nations' ozone page: http://ozone.unep.org/ The entire article is he http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/...h9TB0qV69YNVYL.... No kidding. Computer models prove that? Amazing. Considering that they've been clearly shown to be unable to predict anything useful in terms of the climate. A completely insane lie. lol But they can be used to confirm the horrors of ozone on the world. Dr Susan Solomon ought to be propud of her work on behalf of the anti-ozone movement and now on behalf of the IPCC. Just more garbage-in garbage-out Mannian manipulation of data and algorithems to fake some modicum of credibility. It has failed as usual. A completely insane lie. lol Some people just have no professional pride. That they would actually go thru that kind of charade and actually put their signatures on it. Shame. A completely insane lie. lol- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - nice trolling.... moron. You make us look like geniuses by comparison, keep up the good work. * Denialist for "I cannot refute a thing you said."- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - .... says the troll that has never posted anything of substance but continual false accusations of lying.... moron....another post that shows the stark contrast between the activist rantings of idiotic agwers and the steady strong reason of us non-alarmists. You make us look like geniuses by contrast. |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 11:05 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 WeatherBanter.co.uk