Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bill Carter" wrote in message ... Marvin the Martian wrote: On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 01:41:14 +0200, qqq_qqq wrote: The same thing in multiple posts, with the only difference being who gets the gratuitous insult. This coming from someone who never posts anything with content worth reading. A few insults and - run awaay! Which one of those cites you've given points to the proof of global warming being man made? Even the IPCC doesn't claim to have that. What, specifically, would constitute proof? A constant, evenly distributed temperature for 20 years, followed by an increase in CO2 and an evenly distributed rising temperate. Polar water at -32 F and Mexican Gulf water at 80 F is not an even distribution, nor is it constant, but it would, specifically, constitute proof. Any more questions? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Some of the AGW science really is settled | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Perry Speaks Out Against Fake, Manipulated AGW "Science" | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Lindzen on climate science advocacy and modeling - "at this point, the models seem to be failing" | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Five Small Problems with AGW "science" | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Ducking the Point (AGW "settled science") | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) |