sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics.

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10   Report Post  
Old August 6th 09, 04:16 AM posted to alt.global-warming,sci.environment,sci.geo.meteorology,sci.skeptic
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jul 2009
Posts: 438
Default RSS Satellite Data Clearly Show A Warming Global Climate (or not)

On Wed, 5 Aug 2009 18:37:21 -0700 (PDT), Roger Coppock
wrote:

On Aug 5, 12:36Â*pm, Joern Abatz wrote:
On Wed, 05 Aug 2009 04:16:30 -0700, Roger Coppock wrote:
RSS Satellite Data Clearly Show A Warming Global Climate
[...]
Coefficients:
Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â*Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(|t|)
(Intercept) -30.38442 Â* Â*2.02506 Â* -15.0 Â* 2e-16
YEARMON Â* Â* Â* 0.01528 Â* Â*0.00102 Â* Â*15.1 Â* 3.8e-40


Residual standard error: 0.172 on 365 degrees of freedom
Multiple R-Squared: 0.38
F-statistic: Â*226 on 1 and 365 DF, Â*p-value: 3.8e-40


Why those much discussed trendlines are probably insignificant
--------------------------------------------------------------

Data sources:
-------------
UAH:http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/public/m.../tltglhmam_5.2
RSS:ftp://ftp.ssmi.com/msu/monthly_time_...msu_amsu_chann...

Regression:
-----------
UAH y = Â*0.01268 * x + -25.21167 ; r² = Â*0.26293 ; sd = Â*0.18073 ;
Â* Â* n1 = 68.08 ; n2 = 95.20

RSS y = Â*0.01528 * x + -30.38425 ; r² = 0.38279 ; sd = Â*0.17127 ;
Â* Â* n1 = 71.66 ; n2 = 94.82

Variables:
----------
x: the month (as a number, 2009.0 is January 2009, 2009.5 is July 2009,
Â* Â*half a year later)

y: expected value for month x (i.e. what the trendline says)

r²: correlation between time line and observed values (1 = perfect, 0 =
Â* Â* no correlation at all)

sd: standard deviation (calculated from the difference between observed
Â* Â* and expected values)

n1: percentage of values within plus/minus one standard deviation

n2: same for two standard deviations

The point is:
-------------
In theory, n2 is 95 percent, if the observed values are completely random
(no correlation, no causation, no real connection).

As the n2 values are in fact still near 95 percent, we still are on the
edge of pure noise. Or, maybe, the whole idea of a linear trend is just
not what's going on in the real world.

Joern


Gee you're a good spin doctor, Joern!
Someone without any training in statistics
might think you found something wrong.
These data show a warming trend, PERIOD.



Its so hot, I'm freezing,

Its getting hotter all the time.








 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RSS Satellite Data Very Clearly Show A Warming Global Climate Roger Coppock sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 20 May 7th 10 12:30 AM
RSS Satellite Data Clearly Show A Warming Global Climate Roger Coppock sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 0 April 16th 10 11:38 PM
RSS Satellite Data Clearly Show A Warming Global Climate Roger Coppock sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 25 September 12th 09 01:50 PM
RSS Satellite Data Show A Warming Global Climate Roger Coppock sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 2 May 3rd 09 02:53 PM
RSS Satellite Data Show A Warming Global Climate Roger Coppock sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 7 April 5th 09 06:56 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 Weather Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Weather"

 

Copyright © 2017