Denialist # 1, Bjorn Lomborg FLIP FLOPS on GW !! - The Sciencebehind global warming - 9 hours ago
 

tunderbar wrote:
Every BLOG depends on the writer for its credibility, same with
opinions. One can't discount a BLOG just because it is a BLOG. Just

A BLOG is just one step up from a posting to a newsgroup, it has no
inherent credibility. A blog is just some guy posting his personal
opinions online, and unless they are backed up with data and studies
they are worthless and not worth reading, much less responding to.
Yet this is the kind of source that AGW deniers so often rely upon.

like one can't discount an opinion just because it is an opinion. It
depends what that opinion is based on. If you base your opinion on the
crap science of the IPCC, then it must be discounted.

That's your crap opinion, you bring nothing to support it as usual,
it is utterly worthless.

Weather reports are just that, weather reports. But when taken in
context, they can be useful. For example, if, in an allegedly warming
world, a massive tract of land, as in the most of North America,
experiences record cold and early cold, you kind of wonder if most of
North America is part of the globe as per the IPCC definitions.

North America may seem real big to you, but it represents only about
16% of the Earth's surface. You do actually have to look at the rest
of the Earth as well, not just the little place where you happen to live.

Wildfires in sw US is proof of global warming. Record highs in
Washington is too. Any record high temperatures in any one location of
the world is proof of global warming. A specific glacier receding a
wee bit, for any reason, is proof of global warming. Slightly warmer
summers and thinning ice in areas of the Arctic is proof of global
warming. But record cold and record early cold across most of North
America and other continents is just weather. Right?

This is the typical mealymouth denialist bull**** you always post. There's
a cold snap, so no global warming. Lol!