Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 19, 11:25*am, Dawlish wrote:
On Apr 19, wrote: On 18 Apr, 13:04, Dawlish wrote: On Apr 18, wrote: On 18 Apr, 02:54, "James" wrote: "Eric Gisin" wrote in message The left is ****ed of that a grass-roots skeptic movement outnumbers the alarmist camp on the web. The solution: organize a campain of alarmism in blog comments. Wonder when they'll invade usenet. I think they are here already. Yes, I was gonna say we've had AGW propagandists active on this NG for ages. They seem to have lost a lot of steam in recent months though.. Giga - are you sure about what you've said here? See other thread. I have to say Dawlish you are one of the few AGW propagandists who have kept up the pretence even in the face of overwhelming evidence of fraud and foolishness. I was referring to a more general trend and did not mean to say that all individuals had started to loose some of their fanatical evirothusiam.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Pretence? It's easy, Giga. What possible reasons have denialists got to smile at present*? Nothing points to what you wish to happen. What do you wish to happen? Don't worry I know. You are hoping and praying temperatures will go up and up. I wonder if you are capable of seeing how insane that is? *That is a serious question and the title of a discussion in which denialists have, again, been very quiet............... Just for you: http://discover.itsc.uah.edu/amsutem...?amsutemps+001 El Nino again. |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Giga2" wrote in message
On Apr 19, 11:25 am, Dawlish wrote: On Apr 19, 9:44 wrote: On 18 Apr, 13:04, Dawlish wrote: On Apr 18, 11:51 wrote: On 18 Apr, 02:54, "James" wrote: "Eric Gisin" wrote in message The left is ****ed of that a grass-roots skeptic movement outnumbers the alarmist camp on the web. The solution: organize a campain of alarmism in blog comments. Wonder when they'll invade usenet. I think they are here already. Yes, I was gonna say we've had AGW propagandists active on this NG for ages. They seem to have lost a lot of steam in recent months though. Giga - are you sure about what you've said here? See other thread. I have to say Dawlish you are one of the few AGW propagandists who have kept up the pretence even in the face of overwhelming evidence of fraud and foolishness. I was referring to a more general trend and did not mean to say that all individuals had started to loose some of their fanatical evirothusiam.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Pretence? It's easy, Giga. What possible reasons have denialists got to smile at present*? Nothing points to what you wish to happen. What do you wish to happen? Don't worry I know. You are hoping and praying temperatures will go up and up. I wonder if you are capable of seeing how insane that is? He also cannot see that it's political. The climate farce is merely the vehicle to get them to where they want to be so they compalin endlessly when holes are spotted in their theory or something comes out debunking one of their claims. The corruption found in the ones dealing in all this never happened or was only minutia and isn't worth considering according to most of them. As I posted a week or two ago, there are several flavors of players in the enviro con game. |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 19, 3:52*pm, "James" wrote:
"Giga2" wrote in message On Apr 19, 11:25 am, Dawlish wrote: On Apr 19, 9:44 wrote: On 18 Apr, 13:04, Dawlish wrote: On Apr 18, 11:51 wrote: On 18 Apr, 02:54, "James" wrote: "Eric Gisin" wrote in message The left is ****ed of that a grass-roots skeptic movement outnumbers the alarmist camp on the web. The solution: organize a campain of alarmism in blog comments. Wonder when they'll invade usenet. I think they are here already. Yes, I was gonna say we've had AGW propagandists active on this NG for ages. They seem to have lost a lot of steam in recent months though. Giga - are you sure about what you've said here? See other thread. I have to say Dawlish you are one of the few AGW propagandists who have kept up the pretence even in the face of overwhelming evidence of fraud and foolishness. I was referring to a more general trend and did not mean to say that all individuals had started to loose some of their fanatical evirothusiam.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Pretence? It's easy, Giga. What possible reasons have denialists got to smile at present*? Nothing points to what you wish to happen. What do you wish to happen? Don't worry I know. You are hoping and praying temperatures will go up and up. I wonder if you are capable of seeing how insane that is? He also cannot see that it's political. The climate farce is merely the vehicle to get them to where they want to be so they compalin endlessly when holes are spotted in their theory or something comes out debunking one of their claims. The corruption found in the ones dealing in all this never happened or was only minutia and isn't worth considering according to most of them. As I posted a week or two ago, there are several flavors of players in the enviro con game.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Ah, the political conspiracy theory raises it's ugly but strangely- difficult-to-quantify-or provide-evidence-for head. I don't see you debunking any theory James by finding these "holes"? Neither do I see you producing evidence of "corruption" James? I do see you hugely upset about the world. It's a nice place really. |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 19, 2:09*pm, Giga2 wrote:
On Apr 19, 11:25*am, Dawlish wrote: On Apr 19, wrote: On 18 Apr, 13:04, Dawlish wrote: On Apr 18, wrote: On 18 Apr, 02:54, "James" wrote: "Eric Gisin" wrote in message The left is ****ed of that a grass-roots skeptic movement outnumbers the alarmist camp on the web. The solution: organize a campain of alarmism in blog comments. Wonder when they'll invade usenet. I think they are here already. Yes, I was gonna say we've had AGW propagandists active on this NG for ages. They seem to have lost a lot of steam in recent months though. Giga - are you sure about what you've said here? See other thread. I have to say Dawlish you are one of the few AGW propagandists who have kept up the pretence even in the face of overwhelming evidence of fraud and foolishness. I was referring to a more general trend and did not mean to say that all individuals had started to loose some of their fanatical evirothusiam.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Pretence? It's easy, Giga. What possible reasons have denialists got to smile at present*? Nothing points to what you wish to happen. What do you wish to happen? Don't worry I know. You are hoping and praying temperatures will go up and up. I wonder if you are capable of seeing how insane that is? *That is a serious question and the title of a discussion in which denialists have, again, been very quiet............... Just for you: http://discover.itsc.uah.edu/amsutem...?amsutemps+001 El Nino again.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Here we go again - same question to you as I've asked many times. a) If it is due to this moderate El Nino, why wasn't it warmer in 1998 during the super El Nino? b) How has this moderate El Nino managed to create record global temperatures when we have an extended solar minimum and a negative PDO? Any answers Giga? |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dawlish" wrote in message
On Apr 19, 3:52 pm, "James" wrote: "Giga2" wrote in message On Apr 19, 11:25 am, Dawlish wrote: On Apr 19, 9:44 wrote: On 18 Apr, 13:04, Dawlish wrote: On Apr 18, 11:51 wrote: On 18 Apr, 02:54, "James" wrote: "Eric Gisin" wrote in message The left is ****ed of that a grass-roots skeptic movement outnumbers the alarmist camp on the web. The solution: organize a campain of alarmism in blog comments. Wonder when they'll invade usenet. I think they are here already. Yes, I was gonna say we've had AGW propagandists active on this NG for ages. They seem to have lost a lot of steam in recent months though. Giga - are you sure about what you've said here? See other thread. I have to say Dawlish you are one of the few AGW propagandists who have kept up the pretence even in the face of overwhelming evidence of fraud and foolishness. I was referring to a more general trend and did not mean to say that all individuals had started to loose some of their fanatical evirothusiam.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Pretence? It's easy, Giga. What possible reasons have denialists got to smile at present*? Nothing points to what you wish to happen. What do you wish to happen? Don't worry I know. You are hoping and praying temperatures will go up and up. I wonder if you are capable of seeing how insane that is? He also cannot see that it's political. The climate farce is merely the vehicle to get them to where they want to be so they compalin endlessly when holes are spotted in their theory or something comes out debunking one of their claims. The corruption found in the ones dealing in all this never happened or was only minutia and isn't worth considering according to most of them. As I posted a week or two ago, there are several flavors of players in the enviro con game.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Ah, the political conspiracy theory raises it's ugly but strangely- difficult-to-quantify-or provide-evidence-for head. It's hard to believe you are that stupid. I don't see you debunking any theory James by finding these "holes"? Neither do I see you producing evidence of "corruption" James? The evidence has been everywhere whether I produced it or not. The fact that you don't want to know about it is typical for any troll or liar who comes to the group and feigns surprise at things he says he knows all about and proceeds to set them all straight. You really aren't very good at this. I do see you hugely upset about the world. It's a nice place really. -- In my long career, knowing hundreds and hundreds of scientists..... Dawlish - 4/9/2010 The fact that I've known hundreds of university educated scientists and come into contact with them on a professional basis daily, allowed me to judge a sense of feeling about their capacity for scepticism.. Dawlish 4/17/2010 |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 19, 4:48*pm, "James" wrote:
"Dawlish" wrote in message On Apr 19, 3:52 pm, "James" wrote: "Giga2" wrote in message On Apr 19, 11:25 am, Dawlish wrote: On Apr 19, 9:44 wrote: On 18 Apr, 13:04, Dawlish wrote: On Apr 18, 11:51 wrote: On 18 Apr, 02:54, "James" wrote: "Eric Gisin" wrote in message The left is ****ed of that a grass-roots skeptic movement outnumbers the alarmist camp on the web. The solution: organize a campain of alarmism in blog comments. Wonder when they'll invade usenet. I think they are here already. Yes, I was gonna say we've had AGW propagandists active on this NG for ages. They seem to have lost a lot of steam in recent months though. Giga - are you sure about what you've said here? See other thread. I have to say Dawlish you are one of the few AGW propagandists who have kept up the pretence even in the face of overwhelming evidence of fraud and foolishness. I was referring to a more general trend and did not mean to say that all individuals had started to loose some of their fanatical evirothusiam.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Pretence? It's easy, Giga. What possible reasons have denialists got to smile at present*? Nothing points to what you wish to happen. What do you wish to happen? Don't worry I know. You are hoping and praying temperatures will go up and up. I wonder if you are capable of seeing how insane that is? He also cannot see that it's political. The climate farce is merely the vehicle to get them to where they want to be so they compalin endlessly when holes are spotted in their theory or something comes out debunking one of their claims. The corruption found in the ones dealing in all this never happened or was only minutia and isn't worth considering according to most of them. As I posted a week or two ago, there are several flavors of players in the enviro con game.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Ah, the political conspiracy theory raises it's ugly but strangely- difficult-to-quantify-or provide-evidence-for head. It's hard to believe you are that stupid. I don't see you debunking any theory James by finding these "holes"? Neither do I see you producing evidence of "corruption" James? The evidence has been everywhere whether I produced it or not. The fact that you don't want to know about it is typical for any troll or liar who comes to the group and feigns surprise at things he says he knows all about and proceeds to set them all straight. You really aren't very good at this. I do see you hugely upset about the world. It's a nice place really. -- In my long career, knowing hundreds and hundreds of scientists..... Dawlish - 4/9/2010 The fact that I've known hundreds of university educated scientists and come into contact with them on a professional basis daily, allowed me to judge a sense of feeling about their capacity for scepticism.. Dawlish 4/17/2010- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Ah! The evidence is everywhere! Damn.Must have missed it then, together with the rest of the scientific world. Troll, liar........ nice insults. Evidence/science: none. Oh well. *)) |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 19 Apr, 07:35, josephus wrote:
Giga2 wrote: On 18 Apr, 13:04, Dawlish wrote: On Apr 18, 11:51 am, Giga2 wrote: On 18 Apr, 02:54, "James" wrote: "Eric Gisin" wrote in message The left is ****ed of that a grass-roots skeptic movement outnumbers the alarmist camp on the web. The solution: organize a campain of alarmism in blog comments. Wonder when they'll invade usenet. I think they are here already. Yes, I was gonna say we've had AGW propagandists active on this NG for ages. They seem to have lost a lot of steam in recent months though. Giga - are you sure about what you've said here? See other thread. I have to say Dawlish you are one of the few AGW propagandists who have kept up the pretence even in the face of overwhelming evidence of fraud and foolishness. I was referring to a more general trend and did not mean to say that all individuals had started to loose some of their fanatical evirothusiam. ok *give us the emails with the fraud, *wait those are from gig2. *he lies about the emails *he claims they were running a fraud. *and that statement alone is indicative of a deliberate intention to LIE. josephus -- ’žI At some point a sensible person has to say 'so many mistakes amount to deliberate fraud'. |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 19 Apr, 15:52, "James" wrote:
"Giga2" wrote in message On Apr 19, 11:25 am, Dawlish wrote: On Apr 19, 9:44 wrote: On 18 Apr, 13:04, Dawlish wrote: On Apr 18, 11:51 wrote: On 18 Apr, 02:54, "James" wrote: "Eric Gisin" wrote in message The left is ****ed of that a grass-roots skeptic movement outnumbers the alarmist camp on the web. The solution: organize a campain of alarmism in blog comments. Wonder when they'll invade usenet. I think they are here already. Yes, I was gonna say we've had AGW propagandists active on this NG for ages. They seem to have lost a lot of steam in recent months though. Giga - are you sure about what you've said here? See other thread. I have to say Dawlish you are one of the few AGW propagandists who have kept up the pretence even in the face of overwhelming evidence of fraud and foolishness. I was referring to a more general trend and did not mean to say that all individuals had started to loose some of their fanatical evirothusiam.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Pretence? It's easy, Giga. What possible reasons have denialists got to smile at present*? Nothing points to what you wish to happen. What do you wish to happen? Don't worry I know. You are hoping and praying temperatures will go up and up. I wonder if you are capable of seeing how insane that is? He also cannot see that it's political. The climate farce is merely the vehicle to get them to where they want to be so they compalin endlessly when holes are spotted in their theory or something comes out debunking one of their claims. The corruption found in the ones dealing in all this never happened or was only minutia and isn't worth considering according to most of them. As I posted a week or two ago, there are several flavors of players in the enviro con game. Its worth remembering how many different warped motivations are behind AGW fundamentalism. |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 19 Apr, 16:05, Dawlish wrote:
On Apr 19, 2:09*pm, Giga2 wrote: On Apr 19, 11:25*am, Dawlish wrote: On Apr 19, wrote: On 18 Apr, 13:04, Dawlish wrote: On Apr 18, wrote: On 18 Apr, 02:54, "James" wrote: "Eric Gisin" wrote in message The left is ****ed of that a grass-roots skeptic movement outnumbers the alarmist camp on the web. The solution: organize a campain of alarmism in blog comments. Wonder when they'll invade usenet. |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dawlish" wrote in message
On Apr 19, 2:09 pm, Giga2 wrote: On Apr 19, 11:25 am, Dawlish wrote: On Apr 19, 9:44 wrote: On 18 Apr, 13:04, Dawlish wrote: On Apr 18, 11:51 wrote: On 18 Apr, 02:54, "James" wrote: "Eric Gisin" wrote in message The left is ****ed of that a grass-roots skeptic movement outnumbers the alarmist camp on the web. The solution: organize a campain of alarmism in blog comments. Wonder when they'll invade usenet. I think they are here already. Yes, I was gonna say we've had AGW propagandists active on this NG for ages. They seem to have lost a lot of steam in recent months though. Giga - are you sure about what you've said here? See other thread. I have to say Dawlish you are one of the few AGW propagandists who have kept up the pretence even in the face of overwhelming evidence of fraud and foolishness. I was referring to a more general trend and did not mean to say that all individuals had started to loose some of their fanatical evirothusiam.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Pretence? It's easy, Giga. What possible reasons have denialists got to smile at present*? Nothing points to what you wish to happen. What do you wish to happen? Don't worry I know. You are hoping and praying temperatures will go up and up. I wonder if you are capable of seeing how insane that is? *That is a serious question and the title of a discussion in which denialists have, again, been very quiet............... Just for you: http://discover.itsc.uah.edu/amsutem...?amsutemps+001 El Nino again.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Here we go again - same question to you as I've asked many times. a) If it is due to this moderate El Nino, why wasn't it warmer in 1998 during the super El Nino? b) How has this moderate El Nino managed to create record global temperatures when we have an extended solar minimum and a negative PDO? Any answers Giga? Old stuff. It must be AGW. What else could it be? That is an admission that faith rules in the AGW issue. May Gaia be with you. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
NEWSFLASH !!! Daily Express suffers apoplexy | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Dolphins rise up against NOAA; Americans Protest against Fannie Mae T-bond swindles | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Dolphins rise up against NOAA; Americans Protest against Fannie Mae T-bond swindles | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Dolphins rise up against NOAA; Americans Protest against Fannie Mae T-bond swindles | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Dolphins rise up against NOAA; Americans Protest against Fannie Mae T-bond swindles | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) |