![]() |
|
Greenie Desal Insanity, Just Like All Other Greenie Schemes, Will Cripple Us
In sci.skeptic Sylvia Else wrote:
[...] If reticulated water is unavailable, then you have no choice, and the cheaper option is not available. A few install water tanks to make them [...] Well, that tends to put paid to your simplistic model of everyone shopping at target. :) -- R Kym Horsell If your ideas are any good you'll have to ram them down people's throats. -- Howard Aiken |
Greenie Desal Insanity, Just Like All Other Greenie Schemes, Will Cripple Us
In sci.skeptic Sylvia Else wrote:
[...] If reticulated water is unavailable, then you have no choice, and the cheaper option is not available. A few install water tanks to make them [...] Well, that tends to put paid to your simplistic model of everyone shopping at target. :) The "vast majority" (65%) of households seem to ignore cost in this matter. -- R Kym Horsell If your ideas are any good you'll have to ram them down people's throats. -- Howard Aiken |
Greenie Desal Insanity, Just Like All Other Greenie Schemes, Will Cripple Us
|
Greenie Desal Insanity, Just Like All Other Greenie Schemes,Will Cripple Us
|
Greenie Desal Insanity, Just Like All Other Greenie Schemes,Will Cripple Us
|
Greenie Desal Insanity, Just Like All Other Greenie Schemes, Will Cripple Us
In sci.skeptic Sylvia Else wrote:
On 13/11/2010 1:16 AM, wrote: In sci.skeptic Sylvia wrote: [...] I'm maintaining that for the vast majority of consumers, who value water purely based on the minimum amount they have to pay for it, from whatever source, a price for water from water tanks does not exist. [...] Then, again, your beliefs are at variance with the actual case. Evidence? Why is that people who start agument-by-assertion always call for evidence from the *other* person. :) -- R Kym Horsell If your ideas are any good you'll have to ram them down people's throats. -- Howard Aiken |
Greenie Desal Insanity, Just Like All Other Greenie Schemes, Will Cripple Us
In sci.skeptic Sylvia Else wrote:
[...] A desalinator has a significant capital cost, which has to be covered in the price charged for water. Expressing the price charged by reference to the running cost is just silly. [...] You're just contradicting your own arguments ahain. In your own Googled value-cum-price theory you talk of "cost" and "value" with "price" some vague place in between. I guess you just ack it must be "silly". -- R Kym Horsell If your ideas are any good you'll have to ram them down people's throats. -- Howard Aiken |
Greenie Desal Insanity, Just Like All Other Greenie Schemes, Will Cripple Us
In sci.skeptic Sylvia Else wrote:
On 13/11/2010 1:16 AM, wrote: In sci.skeptic Sylvia wrote: [...] I'm maintaining that for the vast majority of consumers, who value water purely based on the minimum amount they have to pay for it, from whatever source, a price for water from water tanks does not exist. [...] Then, again, your beliefs are at variance with the actual case. Evidence? Why is that people who start agument-by-assertion always call for evidence from the *other* person. :) Sylvia Else, 12:43 12 Nov 2010: Rainwater tanks are certainly not the solution. They are one of the most expensive ways of providing water. Sylvia Else, 16:42 12 Nov 2010: [Argument by assertion:] Lead acid batteries continue to have a high price despite the large supply and demand because they are inherently expensive to manufacture. [Or demand is falling? :)] Sylvia Else, 20:53 12 Nov 2010: [Price, value, cost] are completely independent of each other, but in a real market, if price does not lie between cost and value [so not so "completely independent" :)], then there will be no transaction. If the price exceeds value, then the purchaser won't proceed with a transaction. If it is less than cost, then the seller won't proceed. -- R Kym Horsell If your ideas are any good you'll have to ram them down people's throats. -- Howard Aiken |
Greenie Desal Insanity, Just Like All Other Greenie Schemes, Will Cripple Us
In sci.skeptic Sylvia Else wrote:
[...] A desalinator has a significant capital cost, which has to be covered in the price charged for water. Expressing the price charged by reference to the running cost is just silly. [...] Pot, kettle, black. You're just contradicting your own arguments again. In your own Googled value-cum-price "theory" (somwhat too lacking in predictive power to be called such, but I'm generous :) you talk of "cost" and a subjective "value" with "price" some vague place in between. I guess you just ack it must be "silly". Sylvia Else, 20:53 12 Nov 2010: [Price, value, cost] are completely independent of each other, but in a real market, if price does not lie between cost and value [so not so "completely independent" :)], then there will be no transaction. If the price exceeds value, then the purchaser won't proceed with a transaction. If it is less than cost, then the seller won't proceed. Sylvia Else, 15:56 13 Nov 2010 Expressing the price charged by reference to the running cost is just silly. -- R Kym Horsell If your ideas are any good you'll have to ram them down people's throats. -- Howard Aiken |
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:50 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 WeatherBanter.co.uk