On Nov 25, 7:39*pm, Bruce Richmond wrote:

You're just digging your hole deeper. *

Exactly the anaology I used a couple of hours ago with giga. Have you
noticed how deniers do this so often. They parrot. To come up with an
original analogy would require brains and independent thought. That's
hard, so brucie copies from dawlish. Nice. I don't mind brucie.
Whatever helps you out really.

Did you really use the word "physics" too? Someone who believes that
GW has stopped because a few local temperature records have lasted a
long time shouldn't be allowed to use that word. Wash your mouth out
boy!

On Nov 25, 3:01*pm, Dawlish wrote:
On Nov 25, 7:39*pm, Bruce Richmond wrote:

You're just digging your hole deeper. *

Exactly the anaology I used a couple of hours ago with giga. Have you
noticed how deniers do this so often. They parrot. To come up with an
original analogy would require brains and independent thought. That's
hard, so brucie copies from dawlish. Nice. I don't mind brucie.
Whatever helps you out really.

Oh, I'm so sorry, I didn't know that was your very own original
"anaology". I see you have also come up with your own original way of
spelling analogy. Get over yourself you stupid lying troll.

Did you really use the word "physics" too? Someone who believes that
GW has stopped because a few local temperature records have lasted a
long time shouldn't be allowed to use that word. Wash your mouth out
boy!

Any time you want to discuss physics....... well, I guess you would
have to learn some first.

On Nov 25, 12:34*pm, Bruce Richmond wrote:" Any
time you want to discuss physics"

Interesting reply from somebody who ingores the stratosphere. Any
time you want to discuss gravity waves, Quasi-Biennial Oscillation,
Sudden Stratospheric Warming Events, and Stratospheric-Tropospheric
exchange, come back. But i know you need to hide behind your smear
tactics, as to ensure your idiocy is preserved. Dont worry, your
secret is safe here, i wont reveal to anybody how you need to avoid
physics just so you continue to act like a troll.

On Nov 25, 4:38*pm, columbiaaccidentinvestigation
wrote:
On Nov 25, 12:34*pm, Bruce Richmond wrote:" Any
time you want to discuss physics"

Interesting reply from somebody who ingores the stratosphere. *Any
time you want to discuss gravity waves, Quasi-Biennial Oscillation,
Sudden Stratospheric Warming Events, and Stratospheric-Tropospheric
exchange, come back. *But i know you need to hide behind your smear
tactics, as to ensure your idiocy is preserved. *Dont worry, your
secret is safe here, i wont reveal to anybody how you need to avoid
physics just so you continue to act like a troll.

And once again you have ignored the energy resource of OTEC. I
suppose that could be because we weren't discussing it, but that
doesn't seem to be a valid reason in your book.

On Nov 25, 2:59*pm, Bruce Richmond wrote:
On Nov 25, 4:38*pm, columbiaaccidentinvestigation

wrote:
On Nov 25, 12:34*pm, Bruce Richmond wrote:" Any
time you want to discuss physics"

Interesting reply from somebody who ingores the stratosphere. *Any
time you want to discuss gravity waves, Quasi-Biennial Oscillation,
Sudden Stratospheric Warming Events, and Stratospheric-Tropospheric
exchange, come back. *But i know you need to hide behind your smear
tactics, as to ensure your idiocy is preserved. *Dont worry, your
secret is safe here, i wont reveal to anybody how you need to avoid
physics just so you continue to act like a troll.

And once again you have ignored the energy resource of OTEC. *I
suppose that could be because we weren't discussing it, but that
doesn't seem to be a valid reason in your book.

the key is energy transfer, gravity waves are generated in the
troposphere and travel through the stratosphere. (please note the
atmosphere is a type of fluid subject to gravity waves, and so is the
ocean Rossby-gravity waves). So, if you would take the time, you
would understand things a little better.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rossby_wave
"...Oceanic waves
Oceanic Rossby waves are thought to communicate climatic changes due
to variability in forcing, due to both the wind and buoyancy. Both
barotropic and baroclinic waves cause variations of the sea surface
height, although the length of the waves made them difficult to detect
until the advent of satellite altimetry. Observations by the NASA/CNES
TOPEX/Poseidon satellite confirmed the existence of oceanic Rossby
waves.[1]

Baroclinic waves also generate significant displacements of the
oceanic thermocline, often of tens of meters. Satellite observations
have revealed the stately progression of Rossby waves across all the
ocean basins, particularly at low- and mid-latitudes. These waves can
take months or even years to cross a basin like the Pacific.

Rossby waves have been suggested as an important mechanism to account
for the heating of Europa's ocean.[2]"



http://www.ask.com/wiki/Gravity_waves?qsrc=3044

On Nov 25, 7:32*pm, columbiaaccidentinvestigation
wrote:
On Nov 25, 2:59*pm, Bruce Richmond wrote:





On Nov 25, 4:38*pm, columbiaaccidentinvestigation

wrote:
On Nov 25, 12:34*pm, Bruce Richmond wrote:" Any
time you want to discuss physics"

Interesting reply from somebody who ingores the stratosphere. *Any
time you want to discuss gravity waves, Quasi-Biennial Oscillation,
Sudden Stratospheric Warming Events, and Stratospheric-Tropospheric
exchange, come back. *But i know you need to hide behind your smear
tactics, as to ensure your idiocy is preserved. *Dont worry, your
secret is safe here, i wont reveal to anybody how you need to avoid
physics just so you continue to act like a troll.

And once again you have ignored the energy resource of OTEC. *I
suppose that could be because we weren't discussing it, but that
doesn't seem to be a valid reason in your book.

the key is energy transfer, gravity waves are generated in the
troposphere and travel through the stratosphere. *(please note the
atmosphere is a type of fluid subject to gravity waves, and so is the
ocean Rossby-gravity waves). *So, if you would take the time, you
would understand things a little better.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rossby_wave
"...Oceanic waves
Oceanic Rossby waves are thought to communicate climatic changes due
to variability in forcing, due to both the wind and buoyancy. Both
barotropic and baroclinic waves cause variations of the sea surface
height, although the length of the waves made them difficult to detect
until the advent of satellite altimetry. Observations by the NASA/CNES
TOPEX/Poseidon satellite confirmed the existence of oceanic Rossby
waves.[1]

Baroclinic waves also generate significant displacements of the
oceanic thermocline, often of tens of meters. Satellite observations
have revealed the stately progression of Rossby waves across all the
ocean basins, particularly at low- and mid-latitudes. These waves can
take months or even years to cross a basin like the Pacific.

Rossby waves have been suggested as an important mechanism to account
for the heating of Europa's ocean.[2]"

http://www.ask.com/wiki/Gravity_waves?qsrc=3044- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yes, all of which have nothing to do with what John and I were
discussing, which gets you plonked again.

On Nov 25, 4:45*pm, Bruce Richmond wrote:
On Nov 25, 7:32*pm, columbiaaccidentinvestigation





wrote:
On Nov 25, 2:59*pm, Bruce Richmond wrote:

On Nov 25, 4:38*pm, columbiaaccidentinvestigation

wrote:
On Nov 25, 12:34*pm, Bruce Richmond wrote:" Any
time you want to discuss physics"

Interesting reply from somebody who ingores the stratosphere. *Any
time you want to discuss gravity waves, Quasi-Biennial Oscillation,
Sudden Stratospheric Warming Events, and Stratospheric-Tropospheric
exchange, come back. *But i know you need to hide behind your smear
tactics, as to ensure your idiocy is preserved. *Dont worry, your
secret is safe here, i wont reveal to anybody how you need to avoid
physics just so you continue to act like a troll.

And once again you have ignored the energy resource of OTEC. *I
suppose that could be because we weren't discussing it, but that
doesn't seem to be a valid reason in your book.

the key is energy transfer, gravity waves are generated in the
troposphere and travel through the stratosphere. *(please note the
atmosphere is a type of fluid subject to gravity waves, and so is the
ocean Rossby-gravity waves). *So, if you would take the time, you
would understand things a little better.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rossby_wave
"...Oceanic waves
Oceanic Rossby waves are thought to communicate climatic changes due
to variability in forcing, due to both the wind and buoyancy. Both
barotropic and baroclinic waves cause variations of the sea surface
height, although the length of the waves made them difficult to detect
until the advent of satellite altimetry. Observations by the NASA/CNES
TOPEX/Poseidon satellite confirmed the existence of oceanic Rossby
waves.[1]

Baroclinic waves also generate significant displacements of the
oceanic thermocline, often of tens of meters. Satellite observations
have revealed the stately progression of Rossby waves across all the
ocean basins, particularly at low- and mid-latitudes. These waves can
take months or even years to cross a basin like the Pacific.

Rossby waves have been suggested as an important mechanism to account
for the heating of Europa's ocean.[2]"

http://www.ask.com/wiki/Gravity_waves?qsrc=3044-Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yes, all of which have nothing to do with what John and I were
discussing, which gets you plonked again.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

really, because in his reply to you he mentioned the thermocline, and
the source i linked showed that " Baroclinic waves also generate
significant displacements of the oceanic thermocline." (SEE ABOVE)
So you seem rather quick to dismiss a phenomena you are ignorant of
until it until i mentioned it. So that would mean your desire to
limit your conversation is only a function of your ignorance, and not
a true desire to explore the science at hand. Dude you are troll in
this group, and no lame plonking by you will avoid that fact.

On Nov 25, 8:01*pm, Dawlish wrote:
On Nov 25, 7:39*pm, Bruce Richmond wrote:

You're just digging your hole deeper. *

Exactly the anaology I used a couple of hours ago with giga.

Is that under your copyright then Drawlish?

On Nov 26, 8:22*am, Giga2 wrote:
On Nov 25, 8:01*pm, Dawlish wrote:

On Nov 25, 7:39*pm, Bruce Richmond wrote:

You're just digging your hole deeper. *

Exactly the anaology I used a couple of hours ago with giga.

Is that under your copyright then Drawlish?

hey giga, if you are going to troll in these waters you are going to
need a bigger boat.

On Nov 26, 4:24*pm, columbiaaccidentinvestigation
wrote:
On Nov 26, 8:22*am, Giga2 wrote:

On Nov 25, 8:01*pm, Dawlish wrote:

On Nov 25, 7:39*pm, Bruce Richmond wrote:

You're just digging your hole deeper. *

Exactly the anaology I used a couple of hours ago with giga.

Is that under your copyright then Drawlish?

hey giga, if you are going to troll in these waters you are going to
need a bigger boat.

Stepping on your and Droolish's toes?