Glaciers Were Smaller Before They Were Bigger Before They Were Smaller
 

On Jan 21, 1:57*pm, "AGWLies" AGWLies@AGWLies wrote:
Scientific American: Glaciers Were Smaller Before They Were Bigger
Before They Were Smaller
2011/12/29 Maurizio Morabito

Not unexpectedly, Scientific American has gone full-moron with just 4
scientific stories in the Top 10 science stories of 2011.
Of those 4, one is a paid-up baseless list of conjectures about climate
change, officially making Scientific American now worse than "New
Scientist".

Incredibly though, it's the same Scientific American that just allowed a
blog post describing vast increases in Alpine glaciers during the Little
Ice Age, thereby undermining the magazine's own scream-in-panic policy
on climate change.

I guess it's just another case of "stopped clock". In fact, I'm quite
happy of having unsubscribed from what appears to have become just
another general-interest magazine.

I stopped subscribing to SA in about 1978. It tried to become a
wordier
version of OMNI.

OMNI had better graphics. NG had more tits ;-)

Mark Addinall.