Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Snow in your area?
26 December 2005 Snow showers are forecast for certain areas during the next few days. Some places could well see significant falls of snow, particularly parts of East and South-east England, but many of us will see very little as the distribution of snow can vary enormously from place to place. Have you got snow in your area? Why not let the Met Office know by telling us where you are and how much snow is on the ground? You can help build the national picture by submitting your report using the form below. An asterisk (*) indicates a required field. Your name Town* County* Postcode* Depth of level snow on a grass surface* centimetres Date and time of observation* dd/mm/yyyy hhmm Data Protection Act We will not use your personal data for marketing purposes. The Met Office is an Executive Agency of the UK Ministry of Defence. The Met Office is registered under the Data Protection Act 1998. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() flybywire wrote: Snow in your area? 26 December 2005 Snow showers are forecast for certain areas during the next few days. Some places could well see significant falls of snow, particularly parts of East and South-east England, but many of us will see very little as the distribution of snow can vary enormously from place to place. Have you got snow in your area? Why not let the Met Office know by telling us where you are and how much snow is on the ground? Employ more staff to get the information if you need it. If any member of the public wants data from the Met Office they have to pay through the nose for it so why should anyone give you free information? Behave like a public service and we'll willingly help but until that ethos is restored then any data you want from me you can bloody sing for. Or pay, of course. :-) Tudor Hughes, Warlingham, Surrey. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
too right my son
how come it's all free in the US and Canada oh and it has been snowing here near Nottm M "Tudor Hughes" wrote in message ups.com... flybywire wrote: Snow in your area? 26 December 2005 Snow showers are forecast for certain areas during the next few days. Some places could well see significant falls of snow, particularly parts of East and South-east England, but many of us will see very little as the distribution of snow can vary enormously from place to place. Have you got snow in your area? Why not let the Met Office know by telling us where you are and how much snow is on the ground? Employ more staff to get the information if you need it. If any member of the public wants data from the Met Office they have to pay through the nose for it so why should anyone give you free information? Behave like a public service and we'll willingly help but until that ethos is restored then any data you want from me you can bloody sing for. Or pay, of course. :-) Tudor Hughes, Warlingham, Surrey. ts all free |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Some automatic stations do have snow depth reporting capabilities but the
additional reports from the public are very useful and a lot have been sent through via the website again. In the past reports were phoned through voluntarily so in that sense it's nothing new. Jon. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jon O'Rourke" wrote in message ... Some automatic stations do have snow depth reporting capabilities but the additional reports from the public are very useful and a lot have been sent through via the website again. In the past reports were phoned through voluntarily so in that sense it's nothing new. Jon. The Met Office Ops Centre are also avid readers of this newsgroup. Some more than others I suspect VBG. Will. -- |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Jon O'Rourke writes: Some automatic stations do have snow depth reporting capabilities but the additional reports from the public are very useful and a lot have been sent through via the website again. In the past reports were phoned through voluntarily so in that sense it's nothing new. Entering something on a website requires less effort than phoning in a report. From one point of view that's good, but it will also tend to make hoax reports more likely. I would hope that some sort of quality control is carried out on the reports received, but it must sometimes be very difficult to tell whether a report is genuine, given how localised heavy snow can sometimes be. -- John Hall "I am not young enough to know everything." Oscar Wilde (1854-1900) |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"John Hall" wrote in message
... In article , Entering something on a website requires less effort than phoning in a report. From one point of view that's good, but it will also tend to make hoax reports more likely. I would hope that some sort of quality control is carried out on the reports received, but it must sometimes be very difficult to tell whether a report is genuine, given how localised heavy snow can sometimes be. Yes, they're scrutinised by the nowcasting and chief forecaster. They'll attempt to weedle out anything dodgy and prevent it being presented elsewhere. But it's not 100% foolproof as you suggest, John. Jon. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I struggle with the fact that we as taxpayers pour millions into the met
Office for poor weather reports and still have to pay for the results "Jon O'Rourke" wrote in message ... "John Hall" wrote in message ... In article , Entering something on a website requires less effort than phoning in a report. From one point of view that's good, but it will also tend to make hoax reports more likely. I would hope that some sort of quality control is carried out on the reports received, but it must sometimes be very difficult to tell whether a report is genuine, given how localised heavy snow can sometimes be. Yes, they're scrutinised by the nowcasting and chief forecaster. They'll attempt to weedle out anything dodgy and prevent it being presented elsewhere. But it's not 100% foolproof as you suggest, John. Jon. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 28 Dec 2005 10:28:09 -0000, Will Hand wrote:
The Met Office Ops Centre are also avid readers of this newsgroup. Some more than others I suspect VBG. I suspect they also spend a lot of time looking at private weather stations that are on the web as well. meto.gov.uk is always in the top 5 sites visiting my pages... -- Cheers Dave. pam is missing e-mail |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
We might not have 2ft of snow but we do have 14°C! | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Now What Excuse Do We Make | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
What ambulance chasing lawyer did Belfort hire to further harass one of their employees? Can anyone provide their name and information? This guy must not have any work, or be desperate for business! I bet he is telling Belfort that they have such | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Feeblest excuse heard for closing a school? | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
until Jay plays the buttons dully, Marty won't excuse any tired roads | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |