Stole this from a post on two
 

..
Had a chuckle this morning reading the met office 10-day outlook for
South-East England:

"Becoming rather cold with a risk of very cold conditions developing."
..


Anyone got a link for this met office 10day ? :)

Stole this from a post on two
 

Why the chuckle, Neil? Isn't that feasible at this stage - or were you just
pleased to see it?

Dave
"nguk" wrote in message
...
.
Had a chuckle this morning reading the met office 10-day outlook for
South-East England:

"Becoming rather cold with a risk of very cold conditions developing."
.


Anyone got a link for this met office 10day ? :)

Stole this from a post on two
 

"Dave.C" wrote in message
...
Why the chuckle, Neil? Isn't that feasible at this stage - or were you
just
pleased to see it?

Dave
"nguk" wrote in message
...
.
Had a chuckle this morning reading the met office 10-day outlook for
South-East England:

"Becoming rather cold with a risk of very cold conditions developing."
.

Depends on your definition of "rather cold" really... :)

Stole this from a post on two
 

"JamesB" james. wrote in message
...

"Dave.C" wrote in message
...
Why the chuckle, Neil? Isn't that feasible at this stage - or were you
just
pleased to see it?

Dave
"nguk" wrote in message
...
.
Had a chuckle this morning reading the met office 10-day outlook for
South-East England:

"Becoming rather cold with a risk of very cold conditions developing."
.

Depends on your definition of "rather cold" really... :)


I'm cold

Stole this from a post on two
 

"Dave.C" wrote in message
...
Why the chuckle, Neil? Isn't that feasible at this stage - or were you
just
pleased to see it?

Dave
"nguk" wrote in message
...
.
Had a chuckle this morning reading the met office 10-day outlook for
South-East England:

"Becoming rather cold with a risk of very cold conditions developing."
.


Anyone got a link for this met office 10day ? :)





I didnt Chuckle that was the copied post :)

That guy would chuckle looking down his own pants!

Stole this from a post on two
 

JamesB wrote:

"Dave.C" wrote in message
...
Why the chuckle, Neil? Isn't that feasible at this stage - or were you
just
pleased to see it?

Dave
"nguk" wrote in message
...
.
Had a chuckle this morning reading the met office 10-day outlook for
South-East England:

"Becoming rather cold with a risk of very cold conditions developing."
.

Depends on your definition of "rather cold" really... :)

In days of yore, when the Met Office computers were ECL or TTL rather
than high speed CMOS, forecast expressions such as cold, rather cold,
very cold, mild, exceptionally mild, warm etc were very strictly
defined in terms of the deviation from the seasonal average. This
order was held in the pages of the venerable "Met Office Manual for
Forecasts to the General Public" version 7(i)a (or some-such) and woe
betide any maverick forecaster showing any individuality, using words
or expressions such as "showers pecking at the coast".

Martin

Stole this from a post on two
 

In message .com, JPG
writes

JamesB wrote:

"Dave.C" wrote in message
...
Why the chuckle, Neil? Isn't that feasible at this stage - or were you
just
pleased to see it?

Dave
"nguk" wrote in message
...
.
Had a chuckle this morning reading the met office 10-day outlook for
South-East England:

"Becoming rather cold with a risk of very cold conditions developing."
.

Depends on your definition of "rather cold" really... :)

In days of yore, when the Met Office computers were ECL or TTL rather
than high speed CMOS, forecast expressions such as cold, rather cold,
very cold, mild, exceptionally mild, warm etc were very strictly
defined in terms of the deviation from the seasonal average. This
order was held in the pages of the venerable "Met Office Manual for
Forecasts to the General Public" version 7(i)a (or some-such) and woe
betide any maverick forecaster showing any individuality, using words
or expressions such as "showers pecking at the coast".

Martin

The strict definitions are still on the Met Office website, though I
can't remember exactly where.

Norman
(delete "thisbit" twice to e-mail)
--
Norman Lynagh Weather Consultancy
Chalfont St Giles 85m a.s.l.
England

Stole this from a post on two
 

"nguk" wrote in message
...

"Dave.C" wrote in message
...
Why the chuckle, Neil? Isn't that feasible at this stage - or were you
just
pleased to see it?

Dave
"nguk" wrote in message
...
.
Had a chuckle this morning reading the met office 10-day outlook for
South-East England:

"Becoming rather cold with a risk of very cold conditions developing."
.


Anyone got a link for this met office 10day ? :)





I didnt Chuckle that was the copied post :)

That guy would chuckle looking down his own pants!



LOL you are rude sometimes Neil :-)

Will.
--

Stole this from a post on two
 

"nguk" wrote in message
...
.
Had a chuckle this morning reading the met office 10-day outlook for
South-East England:

"Becoming rather cold with a risk of very cold conditions developing."
.


Anyone got a link for this met office 10day ? :)



http://www.metoffice.com/weather/eur...ook/index.html

Will.
--

Stole this from a post on two
 

"Norman Lynagh" wrote in message
...
In message .com, JPG
writes

JamesB wrote:

In days of yore, when the Met Office computers were ECL or TTL rather
than high speed CMOS, forecast expressions such as cold, rather cold,
very cold, mild, exceptionally mild, warm etc were very strictly
defined in terms of the deviation from the seasonal average. This
order was held in the pages of the venerable "Met Office Manual for
Forecasts to the General Public" version 7(i)a (or some-such) and woe
betide any maverick forecaster showing any individuality, using words
or expressions such as "showers pecking at the coast".

Martin

The strict definitions are still on the Met Office website, though I
can't remember exactly where.


http://www.metoffice.com/weather/europe/uk/guide.html

Will.
--