![]() |
Comparing February averages
I had an odd thought just now: suppose this year was a leap year - what
would the mean temperature for February be? The mean temperature for the 1st March was -0.5C - adding this to February's temperatures as though it was the 29th February brings the February mean down by 0.2C. As February was 0.1C above the eLTA, that would be the difference between a slightly above average month and a slightly below average month temperature-wise. Then I thought: but the end of February is quite often cold. So does the leap-year effect show up? Are there statistically more cold Februaries attributed to leap-years than other years? I might be wrong, but as least it might provide someone with a few interesting minutes to find out ;) -- Jonathan Stott Canterbury Weather: http://www.canterburyweather.co.uk/ Reverse my e-mail address to reply by e-mail |
Comparing February averages
In article ,
Jonathan Stott writes: I had an odd thought just now: suppose this year was a leap year - what would the mean temperature for February be? The mean temperature for the 1st March was -0.5C - adding this to February's temperatures as though it was the 29th February brings the February mean down by 0.2C. As February was 0.1C above the eLTA, that would be the difference between a slightly above average month and a slightly below average month temperature-wise. Then I thought: but the end of February is quite often cold. So does the leap-year effect show up? Are there statistically more cold Februaries attributed to leap-years than other years? I might be wrong, but as least it might provide someone with a few interesting minutes to find out ;) I would have thought that on average Leap Year Februaries would be warmer, in that being at the end of the month the 29th would be more likely to be above the average for 1st-28th than below it. But the average effect would be very small, so I doubt would be discernible. -- John Hall "Three o'clock is always too late or too early for anything you want to do." Jean-Paul Sartre (1905-1980) |
Comparing February averages
Felly sgrifennodd John Hall :
In article , I would have thought that on average Leap Year Februaries would be warmer, in that being at the end of the month the 29th would be more likely to be above the average for 1st-28th than below it. But the average effect would be very small, so I doubt would be discernible. Because a leap-year is a re-adjustment of our calendar to keep it in synch with the earth's rotation around the sun, a leap year February 1st is earlier in the (astronomical) year than any other February 1st, so might be statistically cooler. This would presumably outweigh the effect you suggest above. One might try to make a case for the year after a leap year having a milder February (or for that matter any spring month), and the one before having a cooler February, but the difference from the mean astronomical time is only around 12 hours, so I guess won't be noticeable. Adrian -- Adrian Shaw ais@ Adran Cyfrifiadureg, Prifysgol Cymru, aber. Aberystwyth, Ceredigion, Cymru ac. http://users.aber.ac.uk/ais uk |
Comparing February averages
"Jonathan Stott" wrote in message ... I had an odd thought just now: suppose this year was a leap year - what would the mean temperature for February be? The mean temperature for the 1st March was -0.5C - adding this to February's temperatures as though it was the 29th February brings the February mean down by 0.2C. As February was 0.1C above the eLTA, that would be the difference between a slightly above average month and a slightly below average month temperature-wise. Then I thought: but the end of February is quite often cold. So does the leap-year effect show up? Are there statistically more cold Februaries attributed to leap-years than other years? I might be wrong, but as least it might provide someone with a few interesting minutes to find out ;) That is an interesting point but John and Adrian seem to think the effect is small. There is a similar problem that I have identified with 30 year averages. One of the main drivers of climate is the 22 year solar cycle. But if you compare two consecutive 30 year averages one will contain three solar maximums and two solar minimums, whereas the other will contain two maximums and three minimums. Thus the two 30 year averages are not directly comparable. Does anyone know if this has been pointed out before, and is it taken into account when producing climate data? Cheers, Alastair. |
Comparing February averages
"Jonathan Stott" wrote in message ... I had an odd thought just now: suppose this year was a leap year - what would the mean temperature for February be? The mean temperature for the 1st March was -0.5C - adding this to February's temperatures as though it was the 29th February brings the February mean down by 0.2C. As February was 0.1C above the eLTA, that would be the difference between a slightly above average month and a slightly below average month temperature-wise. Then I thought: but the end of February is quite often cold. So does the leap-year effect show up? Are there statistically more cold Februaries attributed to leap-years than other years? I might be wrong, but as least it might provide someone with a few interesting minutes to find out ;) February is of course one of the driest months of the year but this is helped by it (usually) being up to 10% shorter than other months. Col -- Bolton, Lancashire. 160m asl. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:39 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 WeatherBanter.co.uk