Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
It was always fun landing at Aberdeen in these conditions:
EGPD 130950Z 28026G40KT 9999 FEW030 11/00 Q0990 NOSIG= Splendidly turbulent wind some 60° off the runway. Real pilots' weather. (I don't suppose these cheapskate airlines even give out sick bags nowadays. A quick spray of the cabin floor afterwards is apparently considered adequate). Note that low dewpoint of 0°C, a typical feature of foehn conditions. Jack |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
It was always fun landing at Aberdeen in these conditions: EGPD 130950Z 28026G40KT 9999 FEW030 11/00 Q0990 NOSIG= Splendidly turbulent wind some 60° off the runway. Real pilots' weather. (I don't suppose these cheapskate airlines even give out sick bags nowadays. A quick spray of the cabin floor afterwards is apparently considered adequate). Note that low dewpoint of 0°C, a typical feature of foehn conditions. Jack There is a nice item about the Föhn effect he http://www.bbc.co.uk/weather/features/fohn_effect.shtml Not especially warm here today (11) although generally in keeping with recent days. For those with english keyboards, Alt-0246 gives ö -- Gianna |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Gianna wrote: There is a nice item about the Föhn effect he http://www.bbc.co.uk/weather/features/fohn_effect.shtml -- Gianna The explanation of the föhn is not really adequate. The air in the lee of the mountains has mostly *not* risen, condensed out its moisture and descended again, but comes from a higher level to the windward of the mountains and descends in the lee. The simple explanation given cannot explain the high temperatures and low humidities experienced, at least in most cases. No-one is going to convince me that an airstream climbs up the Alps and then drops down again. Air doesn't like going uphill unless very unstable, in which case it wouldn't descend the other side. Tudor Hughes, Warlingham, Surrey |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
My degree symbol is made by Alt +248
Alt 0246 does indeed give ö so Föhn if you prefer. But Alt+246 (no leading zero) gives ÷ This is all horribly off-topic, but isn't it fun? For all the codes (I love the url - "stuff") http://www.theworldofstuff.com/characters/ Jack |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would agree with most of your comments concerning descending air from
orographic effects. However, for convection, and especially deep convection, much of air that ascends within the cloud descends over a much larger volume, and mostly sinks rather slowly, if at all. Much of the cloud material that was once the active cloud spreads out quasi-horizontally near the cloud top, while a good deal is also mixed into the close environment of where the cloud had been. Unless it is dynamically driven, it will tend to soon spread out rather than descend very far, as it will mostly find itself warmer than its environment due to adibatic heating, inhibiting descent. Descent in and around deep convection is generated mainly by evaporative cooling, as precipitation falls into dry air beneath, or where drier air is entrained into the precipitation from the cloud's surroundings. This cooled air leads to acceleration downwards, and can produce very strong surface gusts when it is constrained to flow horizontally at the surface. It is also the reason for the well documented 'downburst' phenomenon, that has led to several aircraft accidents. It should also be noted that precipitation itself drags air down as it falls, contributing to any acceleration due to evaporation. On occasions, air accelerated downwards by evaporative cooling can continue to descend for a while after all the precipitation has evaporated, and increasing temperature at the dry lapse rate may lead to it becoming warmer than its environment. Then its arrival at the surface can lead to a rise in temperature there, as the deceleration of the descending air takes time, the restoring force not being very strong. A very similar effect can occur near showers and storms. The air spilling out near the tops of clouds heats at the dry adiabatic as it descends. It kills the thermals (big clear holes on satpics) and can on occasions manifest itself as a sudden rapid rise in surface temperature. I have seen documented examples (Jersey rings a bell) when the surface temperature rose several degrees in a matter of minutes. Jack -- Bernard Burton Wokingham, Berkshire, UK. Satellite images at: www.btinternet.com/~wokingham.weather/wwp.html wrote in message oups.com... |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
It is doubtless true that in general there is little descent round the
edges of active growing large cumulus. The received wisdom is for pilots to steer well clear of such clouds. I found over years of experience that you could fly with the wingtip almost brushing the cloud and not feel a burble of turbulence. You do of course keep much further away from active cunims but the risk here is not so much turbulences as lightning strikes. I expect to be taken to task for flying so close to large cumulus, but I can't have been so wrong. 40 years as a professional (survivor) Jack |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Bernard Burton wrote: On occasions, air accelerated downwards by evaporative cooling can continue to descend for a while after all the precipitation has evaporated, and increasing temperature at the dry lapse rate may lead to it becoming warmer than its environment. Then its arrival at the surface can lead to a rise in temperature there, as the deceleration of the descending air takes time, the restoring force not being very strong. Bernard Burton Wokingham, Berkshire, UK. Satellite images at: www.btinternet.com/~wokingham.weather/wwp.html wrote in message oups.com... This "downdraught overshoot" is quite rare, at least as far as I know, but there was a notable case in Guernsey on 30 Jul 1983 (I think). It must require a very high cloudbase. Tudor Hughes, Warlingham, Surrey. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Gianna wrote: I just use the character map (Start|Programs|Accessories|System Tools|Character Map). But then of course you have a Windows machine with Office. (As you have every right to.) There are other operating systems (and offices) out there. Mind you getting into OOo's character map is a pain if you just want to be exact on a newsgroup. (OOo Writer Insert Special Character) |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Tudor Hughes wrote: The explanation of the föhn is not really adequate. The use of the term "record" isn't much better. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Looking for something like windchill for paragliding pilots | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Bushy Salami states that pilots should lie to Medical Examiniers during their physical exams! By this type of behavior, the process is screwed up when individuals do such things! This is the same guy who praises Belfort Instruments and loves to hea | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Lynmouth flood and glider pilots | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
foehn E Scotland | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Foehn NE Scotland | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |