"Weatherlawyer" wrote in message
ps.com...

Col wrote:


OF COURSE I know better. What on earth did you consider to be the
purpose of the OP?

Well the forecasts are still going for sunny and increasingly warm weather
towards the end of this week and indeed now into the weekend.
I guess we will just have to wait and see who's right.
We will speak again on Saturday

Col
--
Bolton, Lancashire.
160m asl.

Col wrote:

We will speak again on Saturday

We will will we? Just remember that on here I am the one who is superb,
not you. If anyone is going to prat around acting imperial, it's me.
Got it?

As you well know, if I am wrong there are very good reasons for that.
(Notable in this year are going to be volcanic events. But I am
guessing about that.)

Even so, if the thunder fails to materialise, look elsewhere and be
enlightened rather than try and work one over on me. I am just far too
good at this stuff and this spell is an easy one. Beware! You have been
told about this sort of thing before.

"Weatherlawyer" wrote in message
ups.com...

Col wrote:

We will speak again on Saturday


Even so, if the thunder fails to materialise, look elsewhere and be
enlightened rather than try and work one over on me. I am just far too
good at this stuff and this spell is an easy one. Beware! You have been
told about this sort of thing before.

Oh I hve been *told* have I?
You arrogant, pompous little man.

I am reminded why I killfilled you before.
Now be gone you clueless buffoon.

*plonk*.

Col
--
Bolton, Lancashire.
160m asl.

Col wrote:

You arrogant, pompous little man.

Little?

I am 15 1/2 stone of unadulterated fat.

I am reminded why I killfilled you before.
Now be gone you clueless buffoon.

Who gave him permission to remove me from his killfile? (Can someone go
and wind him up for me, please?)

But on to the less mundane dayalities. Having forgotten more than he
seems likely to learn:

Can any of my fans remember what the weatherlore is for when my method
is at odds with the weatherforecast and the weathermodellers are closer
than I?

I seem to remember that if they are wrong and I am right, there is a
likelihood of earthquakes and that if they are right and I am wrong,
there is a larger likelihood for tropical storms.

Something to do with their models having the corrections for
meteorologisticae rather than seismo-logic.

"Col" wrote in message
...

"Weatherlawyer" wrote in message
ups.com...

Col wrote:

We will speak again on Saturday


Even so, if the thunder fails to materialise, look elsewhere and be
enlightened rather than try and work one over on me. I am just far too
good at this stuff and this spell is an easy one. Beware! You have been
told about this sort of thing before.

Oh I hve been *told* have I?
You arrogant, pompous little man.

I am reminded why I killfilled you before.
Now be gone you clueless buffoon.

*plonk*.

Col

He he I love the cut and thrust of scientific debate :-)

Will.
--

"Will Hand" wrote in message
...


He he I love the cut and thrust of scientific debate :-)

Yeah, I know

But I really wasn't trying to catch him out or going to start gloating
if his forecast didn't turn out right. I know full well I am in no
position to do that, but I am able to *discuss* it.
That's why my comment about speaking on Saturday was
qulified with a smiley to indicate it was a light-hearted
'Well we'll see who's right' type of thing.
But you just can't reason with him.....

Col
--
Bolton, Lancashire.
160m asl.

"Weatherlawyer" wrote in message
oups.com...

Col wrote:

You arrogant, pompous little man.

Little?

I am 15 1/2 stone of unadulterated fat.

I am reminded why I killfilled you before.
Now be gone you clueless buffoon.

Who gave him permission to remove me from his killfile? (Can someone go
and wind him up for me, please?)

But on to the less mundane dayalities. Having forgotten more than he
seems likely to learn:

Can any of my fans remember what the weatherlore is for when my method
is at odds with the weatherforecast and the weathermodellers are closer
than I?

I seem to remember that if they are wrong and I am right, there is a
likelihood of earthquakes and that if they are right and I am wrong,
there is a larger likelihood for tropical storms.

Something to do with their models having the corrections for
meteorologisticae rather than seismo-logic.


Weatherlawyer, you could write scripts for John Prescot if you ever get
bored with trying to educate us.

Paulus

paulus wrote:
"Weatherlawyer" wrote in message
oups.com...

Can any of my fans remember what the weatherlore is for when my method is
at odds with the weatherforecast and the weathermodellers are closer than I?

Weatherlawyer, you could write scripts for John Prescot if you ever get
bored with trying to educate us.

Shall I put you down as a don't know? One gets that impression however
brief.
If I ever get bored I shall put myself to sleep counting tonsils. Do
you have to open your gob so wide to void?

May I ask what exactly gives you the impression that I am attempting to
educates fools? Or would that be another pointless excersize?

Weatherlawyer wrote:

Can any of my fans remember what the weatherlore is for when my method
is at odds with the weatherforecast and the weathermodellers are closer
than I?

I seem to remember that if they are wrong and I am right, there is a
likelihood of earthquakes and that if they are right and I am wrong,
there is a larger likelihood for tropical storms.

Seeing that humid weather is not on the menu so far. It might be worth
asking if there is any mist on the shores of Europe propre. Any mists
or fogs in Scandinavia, Iberia or France and the Low Countries?

There must be some indication of cyclonic activity in the North
Atrlantic that doesn't require satellia and supercomputae.

Weatherlawyer wrote:

Can any of my fans remember what the weatherlore is for when my method
is at odds with the weatherforecast and the weathermodellers are closer
than I?

I seem to remember that if they are wrong and I am right, there is a
likelihood of earthquakes and that if they are right and I am wrong,
there is a larger likelihood for tropical storms.

Seeing that humid weather is not on the menu so far. It might be worth
asking if there is any mist on the shores of Europe propre. Any mists
or fogs in Scandinavia, Iberia or France and the Low Countries?

There must be some indication of cyclonic activity in the North
Atlantic that doesn't require satellia and supercomputae.

Interesting that a deep low at the moment in the North Atlantic is 994
and that on the 18th there will be one in the same region at 1002.
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/weather/charts/index.html

Wow!

But what is interesting (if that is normal) is the change of phase on
the 17th is also a wet spell. So if that synergy can be over-ridden by
the highs also shown on the above link, then the whizz bang that
follows it shall be a real doosey.
http://aa.usno.navy.mil/data/docs/MoonPhase.html#y2006
(Can anybody remember what the weather was like between the 3rd and the
11th of July?)

The only question is: What, where and when will the disaster be?

If things haven't changed radically by the end of August...
In the meantime it will be interesting to see if the SE of England gets
a small relief on the 9th of August.