Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is probably a stupid question but I am having trouble getting my head
round what happens when two big HP's link. For example the MO chart for Sunday has the large HP west of Ireland and the displaced Siberian High nearly linking. Both have similar central pressures. Both obviously have a clockwise flow, sort of going in opposite directions not far from the merging area. If they did link where would the centre of the new HP be and why? Meteorologists amongst you probably think this is obvious but I am interested as there has been conjecture that this might happen and would be wintry. Dave. 6.6C, wet and thoroughly horrible, especially after yesterday's great winter day. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave.
Its Len from sunny Basildon, my view is that it would be like two soap bubbles colliding, each would maintain its own central pressure until an outer air circulation occured and then the centres would combine and equalise. I am sure that I am over simplifying the scenario, but as you say, at the point of contact there would be an opposing flow. I feel the combining would be a lot more likely if both areas of high pressure were very flabby with little if any oppositional flow at that point. Best regards. Len. "Dave.C" wrote in message . .. This is probably a stupid question but I am having trouble getting my head round what happens when two big HP's link. For example the MO chart for Sunday has the large HP west of Ireland and the displaced Siberian High nearly linking. Both have similar central pressures. Both obviously have a clockwise flow, sort of going in opposite directions not far from the merging area. If they did link where would the centre of the new HP be and why? Meteorologists amongst you probably think this is obvious but I am interested as there has been conjecture that this might happen and would be wintry. Dave. 6.6C, wet and thoroughly horrible, especially after yesterday's great winter day. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Hi Len - didn't realise you were GKN now. Yes, sort of what I thought but hopefully more answers later. Sunny Basidon - we wish! Dave |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes Dave. I work in Laindon on Southfields and it ain't been very sunny
lately. "Dave.C" wrote in message ... Hi Len - didn't realise you were GKN now. Yes, sort of what I thought but hopefully more answers later. Sunny Basidon - we wish! Dave |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'll look out for you then as that's where I walk my dog!
Perhaps my question is not that simple as there have been few answers. Dave "GKN" wrote in message news ![]() Yes Dave. I work in Laindon on Southfields and it ain't been very sunny lately. "Dave.C" wrote in message ... Hi Len - didn't realise you were GKN now. Yes, sort of what I thought but hopefully more answers later. Sunny Basidon - we wish! Dave |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave.C" wrote in message . .. This is probably a stupid question but I am having trouble getting my head round what happens when two big HP's link. For example the MO chart for Sunday has the large HP west of Ireland and the displaced Siberian High nearly linking. Both have similar central pressures. Both obviously have a clockwise flow, sort of going in opposite directions not far from the merging area. If they did link where would the centre of the new HP be and why? Meteorologists amongst you probably think this is obvious but I am interested as there has been conjecture that this might happen and would be wintry. Not sure if I have interpreted your question correctly (which is always a bad start!) but I think you are expecting these two features somehow to 'fuse' together - much as two blobs of ink on a bit of paper might amalgamate if brought together, with a single 'blob' resulting? We are talking here about two different 'animals' in the meteorological world, even if the pattern on the surface chart (and therein lies a clue to the difference) appear the same. In days gone by, we used to talk much more about 'warm' and 'cold' highs in strict terms defining the *vertical* distribution of temperature, not what sort of weather they brought. Bernard Burton discussed this recently in an answer in the thread entitled "Warm High/Cold High", and that is worth looking at. The (warm) high pressure west of Ireland is coupled to the broadscale circulation, with a strong 'dome' of high contours aloft (where the cold/dense air is that produces the surface high), and until the long-wave pattern changes, or is eroded (coupled to changes over North America and the North Pacific), it isn't going to go very far or change too markedly in intensity. Latest model output certainly keep it there or thereabouts until well into February, though there are signs of retrogression (retreat backwards) at later time-steps. The high pressure over northern Russia is a more complex affair - primarily a cold High (central values around 1056mbar/ surface temperatures -30degC or below), though there is weak ridging aloft as well - so this is a bit of a hybrid. It will need a major change in the surface temperature regime / dispersal of snow cover etc., for it to be thrust aside/weaken - in the sort term, it might do the opposite: see next paragraph. In between these two, we have a whole mess of fronts, troughs etc. (bringing snow to the Med/N Africa), and 'linking' between the two will depend upon how these behave. Behind cold air intrusions (on the northerly), pressure will rise, and it will also rise if new snow is dumped on the existing cover, which then favours extended radiation to space, further anchoring and allowing extension of the Russian high. This is the time of year to watch for this, but it needs the Atlantic/NW European pattern to *remain* meridional (i.e. more north-south movement than west to east); if a strongly zonal pattern were to be re-established (as we had earlier in the winter), then maritime/milder air would drive across the North European/Scandinavia region into Russia, allowing the aforementioned erosion of the 'cold' high. The two highs won't 'mix' in the sense that it might be thought - the pattern could just remain 'as is' for some weeks, though in practice I think there will be some movement; where the surface outflow from the highs conflict, then you will find surface fronts (albeit probably of limited vertical extent and not always shown on classic analysis charts) - ex Polar Continental (Pc) air-mass from the Russian high and variants on Polar Maritime/Arctic Maritime (Pm/Am) from the Atlantic high - or if the latter sinks south, a highly modified Tropical Maritime (Tm) perhaps. Isn't meteorology wonderful ;-) HTH Martin. -- FAQ & Glossary for uk.sci.weather at:- http://homepage.ntlworld.com/booty.weather/uswfaqfr.htm |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thank you for taking the time for such a comprehensive answer Martin and
answering the question I was trying to ask! I can more or less understand it and I think it will help several other people grasp a wider synoptic view of the current situation. I didn't expect them to merge simply but wasn't really sure what would happen when people talk about the two HP's "linking". Dave |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave.C" wrote in message k... snipbut wasn't really sure what would happen when people talk about the two HP's "linking". .... what I should have said (but it was already an overlong post), was that two *similar* high cells could indeed appear to link up - this often can be seen over the Atlantic for example when the forcing is (initially) weak and a couple of discrete warm high cells are replaced by a single slightly stronger cell as the upper air drives subsidence over a wider area and the surface high intensifies - often though even here you can find that one of the cells is the dominant one. It is tempting to regard surface pressure features as 'ring-fenced' because they are defined by isobaric patterns; it is more useful to try and picture any atmospheric phenomenon as multi-dimensional; advances in forecasting didn't really come about until a good grasp of upper air structure was gained by the early balloon flights latter 19th/very early 20th century. One of the best displays of model output BTW that allows you to display surface and upper-air features in a strip side-by-side is at:- http://www2.wetter3.de/ where you can select the run you require then display 3 'strips' of various fields together. Martin. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
forecasting cloudiness and why are some high pressures cloudy | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
The days of sunny high pressures have gone. | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
High pressures and uncertainty | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Why so high pressures over the UK in 2003? | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Why so high pressures over the UK in 2003? | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |