![]() |
Statistical accuracy of online weather forecasts
http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/...204/article.pl
"Brandon Hansen considers the statistical accuracy of popular on-line weather forecast sources and shows who's on target, and on who you probably shouldn't rely. Motivated by a trip to a water park that was spoiled with hail despite a 'clear sky' forecast, he does a nice job of depicting deviations, averages, and overall accuracy in a manner that stats junkies are sure to love." Might be interesting to some to read the article and some of the comments! -- Jonathan Stott Canterbury, Kent http://www.canterburyweather.co.uk/ |
Statistical accuracy of online weather forecasts
Jonathan Stott wrote:
http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/...204/article.pl "Brandon Hansen considers the statistical accuracy of popular on-line weather forecast sources and shows who's on target, and on who you probably shouldn't rely. Motivated by a trip to a water park that was spoiled with hail despite a 'clear sky' forecast, he does a nice job of depicting deviations, averages, and overall accuracy in a manner that stats junkies are sure to love." Might be interesting to some to read the article and some of the comments! Ooh thank you for that! Noting the results for the BBC web site in particular, and given that their 5-day forecasts are generally identical (whenever I have checked) to those on the Met. Office web site, the article would seem to support the view to which I, and no doubt many other people, subscribe: Accurately forecasting the weather is not possible. Having said that, I am not sure that looking primarily at temperature is adequate. -- Gianna |
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:35 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 WeatherBanter.co.uk