Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
There is something about them on BBC 2 tonight. Bound to show pretty
pictures but if you really want to know more, you'd be better off watching the film on Five at 13:40. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 20 Nov, 02:30, Weatherlawyer wrote:
There is something about them on BBC 2 tonight. Bound to show pretty pictures but if you really want to know more, you'd be better off watching the film on Five at 13:40. You can get a preview of tonight's volcano program here, but it's not for the faint hearted or global warming sceptics. http://news.bbc.co.uk/player/nol/new...m&asb=1&news=1 Cheers, Alastair. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 20, 2:21 pm, Alastair wrote:
You can get a preview of tonight's volcano program here, but it's not for the global warming sceptics. http://news.bbc.co.uk/player/nol/new...7103300/710330... Quite. A series of articles on The Register describe how the BBC has lost its way. For instance: It repeatedly puts reporters in front of fast-dripping glaciers or spreading deserts and gets them to express their personal shock, awe, loss, and disgust. Then, back in the studio, a gnarled "sceptic" may occasionally be wheeled on to show that the Beeb still gives a voice to Creatures From Another Planet. What we need from the BBC is dispassionate enquiry, objective facts, and dispassionate presentation of those facts. Instead, we get dumbed-down moral absolutes, far-out footage, and a sprinkling of "balance". Nobody at the BBC says this is the strategy; but BBC News, in particular, applies it with the utmost vigour. http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/11...ity/page2.html |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 20 Nov, 14:52, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Nov 20, 2:21 pm, Alastair wrote: You can get a preview of tonight's volcano program here, but it's not for the global warming sceptics. http://news.bbc.co.uk/player/nol/new...7103300/710330... Quite. A series of articles on The Register describe how the BBC has lost its way. For instance: It repeatedly puts reporters in front of fast-dripping glaciers or spreading deserts and gets them to express their personal shock, awe, loss, and disgust. Then, back in the studio, a gnarled "sceptic" may occasionally be wheeled on to show that the Beeb still gives a voice to Creatures From Another Planet. What we need from the BBC is dispassionate enquiry, objective facts, and dispassionate presentation of those facts. Instead, we get dumbed-down moral absolutes, far-out footage, and a sprinkling of "balance". Nobody at the BBC says this is the strategy; but BBC News, in particular, applies it with the utmost vigour. http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/11...impartiality/p... Dr Iain Stewart is a geologist not a reporter. But if you are not willing to listen to what a geologist has to say about the climate of the past then the program is not for you. Why don't you write to Radio 4's Feedback program if all you want to do is whinge about the BBC? Cheers, Alastair. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 12:07:23 -0800 (PST), Alastair
wrote: Dr Iain Stewart is a geologist not a reporter. But if you are not willing to listen to what a geologist has to say about the climate of the past then the program is not for you. Why don't you write to Radio 4's Feedback program if all you want to do is whinge about the BBC? Nobody told him how to pronounce Žingvellir. -- Regards, Paul Herber, Sandrila Ltd. Unicode characters http://www.diacrit.sandrila.co.uk/ |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 20, 8:07 pm, Alastair wrote:
On 20 Nov, 14:52, Weatherlawyer wrote: On Nov 20, 2:21 pm, Alastair wrote: You can get a preview of tonight's volcano program here, but it's not for the global warming sceptics. http://news.bbc.co.uk/player/nol/new...7103300/710330... Quite. A series of articles on The Register describe how the BBC has lost its way. For instance: It repeatedly puts reporters in front of fast-dripping glaciers or spreading deserts and gets them to express their personal shock, awe, loss, and disgust. Then, back in the studio, a gnarled "sceptic" may occasionally be wheeled on to show that the Beeb still gives a voice to Creatures From Another Planet. What we need from the BBC is dispassionate enquiry, objective facts, and dispassionate presentation of those facts. Instead, we get dumbed-down moral absolutes, far-out footage, and a sprinkling of "balance". Nobody at the BBC says this is the strategy; but BBC News, in particular, applies it with the utmost vigour. http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/11...impartiality/p... Dr Iain Stewart is a geologist not a reporter. But if you are not willing to listen to what a geologist has to say about the climate of the past then the program is not for you. Why don't you write to Radio 4's Feedback program if all you want to do is whinge about the BBC? Oh he's a geologist is he? That means what, exactly? |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 20 Nov, 20:07, Alastair wrote:
Dr Iain Stewart is a geologist not a reporter. But if you are not willing to listen to what a geologist has to say about the climate of the past then the program is not for you. Why don't you write to Radio 4's Feedback program if all you want to do is whinge about the BBC? I thought it was a very enoyable, informative programme. Weatherlawyer Bingo, anyone? BBC Whinge: Score 5 points. Richard |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2007-11-21, Richard Dixon wrote:
On 20 Nov, 20:07, Alastair wrote: Dr Iain Stewart is a geologist not a reporter. But if you are not willing to listen to what a geologist has to say about the climate of the past then the program is not for you. Why don't you write to Radio 4's Feedback program if all you want to do is whinge about the BBC? I thought it was a very enoyable, informative programme. I liked it as well, although I'm in no way qualified to comment on its accuracies with regard to climate. I imagine next week's will be scrutanised quite closely..! Jim -- http://www.ursaMinorBeta.co.uk WHASSET (n.) A business car in you wallet belonging to someone whom you have no recollection of meeting. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 21 Nov, 09:56, Jim wrote:
I imagine next week's will be scrutanised quite closely..! And probably whined about... Richard |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Oh he's a geologist is he? That means what, exactly? He knows what he is talking about when it comes to Earth Science ie the subjects listed here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth_s...ie nce_topics Cheers, Alastair. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Wet spells and volcanoes | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Volcanoes | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Iceland volcanoes erupting? | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Volcanoes & Wet Winters | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Hurricanes, earthquakes, volcanoes, and meteorites: Is there a link? | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |