On Dec 10, 7:16 pm, "Dave Cornwell"
wrote:
"rick++" wrote in message

...

I've found that 94% of quakes occur within seven days a full or new
moon.
Amazing!

------------------
Piffle! Next you'll be trying to tell me the moon affects the height of sea
level every day.

Roughly twice a day.

And now ClimateLiar is barking inanely at new moons as well as full
moons. Bad sign!
His ravings are almost as incoherent as vintage creationist net kook
Ed Conman (man as old as coal).

Regards,
Martin Brown

"Weatherlawyer" wrote in message

You get hold o.......

............please


I snipped your waffle Mikey.

You failed :-(

At least while your posting we know you are OK, if not a little tortured!

Paulus

I sniped your snippage because I am a much better sniper than you,
whoever you were.

To the rest of you shmucks following me with the intent of insulting
me.

I DON'T CARE.

In the words of the immordant Felix Tilley:

"Don't feed the troll."

I thrive on the attention.

But I thrive on inattention too.

On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 09:52:04 -0000, "paulus"
wrote:


"Weatherlawyer" wrote in message
...
Here's the full list so far:

2001

7.5 Mw 2001/01/01 06:57:04.17 6.9 126.58 NEI
2 Jan 22:31

snip garbage

OK I'll play with you Mike.

What exactly do you think you see, or want us to believe that you see, in
all these dates and times?

I dare you to drop the wordy clap trap and actually express in plain English
what you want us to do with all this.

Once I've cottoned on to your drift I'll let you revert back to your
drooling piffle.

You're not allowed to use " time of the phase" in your explanation. That is
just way too technical for this group.

Come, come. It's already a well established fact that all major
earthquakes have occured within a week of either a new or full
moon.

--
************* DAVE HATUNEN ) *************
* Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow *
* My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *

On Dec 9, 10:28 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:
Here's the full list so far:

7.2 ....Rather
1 Nov 21:18
9 Nov too 23:03
17 Nov much22:32
24 Nov 14:30
information
1 Dec 12:44
9 Dec 17:40
here 17 for Dec 10:17
24 Dec 01:16
31 Deca 07:51
newsgroup posting.

Perhaps here is a more suitable location:
http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?k...p3XjO6VaAdqhGA

I am not savvy enough to handle OpenOffice the way it might be best
handled for my aims but there are other alternative, if elaborate,
work-arounds.

Using the text editor RoughDraught for example allows me to treat
paragraph spacing and tabs the way I like to in Word. Microsoft
products though, in my opinion and on my previous computer, do not
work well together.

So I am not installing Office on this one.

Maybe I will have learned sufficient of Access to manage things as
though the computer was doing what they are designed for one day.
Meantime I waste my time trying to fold these things in with each
other:

http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?k...p3XjO6VaAdqhGA
http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?k...p3XOPqOScOLOIA

This last one ^, shows the storms for 2007 given he

http://www.gdacs.org/cyclones/

....archived when I was working on them.

I deleted the ones lower than Cat 1 on the Saffir Simpson scale but
feel I could have got rid of those in the F1 and F 2 bracket also.

However there is a lot to learn and they impact the Mag 6 quakes (if
anyone is interested) in the NEIC lists he

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/...quakes_big.php

I'd leave the lot in for elaboration but the archived storms don't
include the winter hurricanes for example (which are intense from
September through March and run counter to the accepted meteorological
dogma in heading west to east and at high latitudes.)

Who knows what other severe storms are not tracked at all? (Besides
god, that is.)

And anyway, their impact is on the middle range earthquakes and there
are just too many of them to bother with.

Google Documents can be found he
http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&ct=...2vdguoOd9Prg3A
Open Office he
http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&ct=...BJIlC7DGyPlwvw
And RoughDraft, he
http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&ct=...pfpM0y8tO-9Aeg

On Dec 11, 4:06 am, Hatunen wrote:

May I ask you why you saw fit to post this?

Come, come. It's already a well established fact that all major
earthquakes have occurred within a week of either a new or full
moon.

You haven't been reading the thread have you?

You haven't been reading the thread have you.

On Dec 11, 9:15 am, wrote:

Isn't Care In The Community a wonderful thing? In days of old many
people would have been forgotten behind the large oak doors of an
institution.

You seem schooled in the arts of non USAn aid for the afflicted. Tell
us about the oak doors.

Are they very stable?

rick++ wrote:
I've found that 94% of quakes occur within seven days a full or new
moon.
Amazing!



And so we should, with an astrological orb of 4*7=28 days,
and 29 days 19 and a half hours between each new moon etc.

Astrology etc. debunkers here may have their debunking debunked. :]



.................................................


" Conrad Black is even scarier than Cilla Black! "

" You're so sadistic, you'd say the M25 is the road to London! "

" You're almost as sensible as Boris Johnson! "

" If you're inexperienced with computers, your sessions will take
ages to get things right! "

" If you're experienced with computers, your sessions will take
ages because you'll get sidetracked! "

" You're only a professional if you spin things round in circles until retirement! "

" Percentages are for people who don't understand numbers! "

---------------------------------------------
| BRITISH AIRWAYS |
| |
| GORDON BROWN H M GOVT |
| |
|HEATHROW TO CHERNOBYL ONE WAY |
---------------------------------------------

" If you say someone's 'mentally ill', you can't stand the
fact that they're making more real progress than you! "

" Romford Airport? "

On 11 Dec, 10:57, Mike Hatton wrote:
rick++ wrote:
I've found that 94% of quakes occur within seven days a full or new
moon.
Amazing!

And so we should, with an astrological orb of 4*7=28 days,
and 29 days 19 and a half hours between each new moon etc.

Astrology etc. debunkers here may have their debunking debunked. :]

It helps if you remove your Aries from Uranus.