Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 29 Aug, 19:46, "Nick Gardner"
wrote: I haven't made any allowances for the low angle of the sun when rising and setting as I find this varies due to distant hills to the ENE which means that the sunshine recorder doesn't turn on until 17 - 20 mins after sunrise during the summer months. During the winter this is less of a problem and the sunshine recorder can switch on just 12 - 14 minutes after sunrise with very clear skies. Yes, electronic sensors are definitely quicker to pick up those early rays, certainly when compared to a Campbell-Stokes recorder (bless 'em) with a dew-fogged sphere and a dew-sodden card taking much longer to scorch than a dry card would. My sensor - exposed on a high mast above the house - has twice picked up sunshine within 2 minutes of sunrise, but both occasions involved reflected rays off a cloud layer stretching almost to the horizon. Even with a completely clear horizon and clear skies in summer I find 10-12 minutes is about the earliest that can be expected, and 20 minutes more typical; with the solar elevation only around 1 degree 15 minutes after sunrise (only twice the solar diameter) anything more is pushing detection methods based on sensors with plane surfaces to their limit. What has surprised me ever since I first installed the instrument (in Jan 2001) how little it is affected by dewfall or even a moderate hoar frost. Only a snowcover seems to defeat it completely - my C/S was much more sensitive to the slightest optical empairment of the sphere. -- Stephen Burt Stratfield Mortimer, Berkshire |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, electronic sensors are definitely quicker to pick up those early
rays, certainly when compared to a Campbell-Stokes recorder (bless 'em) with a dew-fogged sphere and a dew-sodden card taking much longer to scorch than a dry card would. It is also interesting to note that the CS recorders seem to record amazing amounts of sunshine when compared to the electronic sensors during weather that is dominated by a high frequency of brief bursts of sunshine. Also my R&D recorder switches off during hazy conditions even though I can still see shadows. We had a run earlier in the year of days with such conditions and I recorded virtually no sunshine whilst I would think that the hazy sun would still be strong enough to scorch the card on the CS recorder. ________________ Nick. Otter Valley, Devon 83 m amsl http://www.ottervalley.co.uk |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
07 UTC winds (ranked by gust) | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
[WR] August Sunniest Month So Far | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
What is the sunniest place in the United Kingdom? | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Ranked Probability Skill Score problem | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Sunniest in Western Scotland | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |