Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Hall" wrote in message news ![]() In article , Brendan DJ Murphy writes: I've always wanted to know how much precipitation (in rain mm) is required to produce 1 foot of snow. I've heard statements such as "1 foot of snow is equivalent to 1 inch of rain" (ie: 12:1 ratio) Ive also heard "1mm of rain is equivalent to 1cm of snow" (ie: 10:1 ratio) Which one is correct? snip The answer is both/neither. The "drier" the snow, the more air it contains and so the lower the water content. Dry snow will have the 10:1 or 12:1 ratio you quote. Really wet snow, close to turning to sleet/rain can have a ratio as low as 4:1. -- John Hall "It is a very sad thing that nowadays there is so little useless information." Oscar Wilde (1854-1900) Harold Brooks in earlier post said "Several years ago, some colleagues and I looked at the snow/liquid ratio for 1650 snowfall events from a number of sites in the US. The ratio ranged from ~2:1 to ~50:1. Our mean was 15.6:1 and the median was 14:1 (we used 6-hour snow accumulation obs-the ratios would be smaller for longer time periods). The paper is online at " http://www.nssl.noaa.gov/~brooks/pap...reetal2006.pdf Harold -- Harold Brooks Head, Mesoscale Applications Group NOAA/National Severe Storms Laboratory this shows the huge range -- 2:1 to 50:1 in1650 events - all over 6hr accumulation periods. Obviously there are many variables - as have been mentioned, apart from the fact that the longer the snow lies the greater it is compacted. His median figure of 14:1 seems about the best on offer as an extremely approximate ratio. With snow lying the 'water equivalent' is very important in assessing risks of flooding when it melts. In years past this value was routinely measured as part of the observational routine...I don't know whether it still is? Cheers John |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
John Whitby writes: "John Hall" wrote in message news ![]() In article , Brendan DJ Murphy writes: I've always wanted to know how much precipitation (in rain mm) is required to produce 1 foot of snow. I've heard statements such as "1 foot of snow is equivalent to 1 inch of rain" (ie: 12:1 ratio) Ive also heard "1mm of rain is equivalent to 1cm of snow" (ie: 10:1 ratio) Which one is correct? snip The answer is both/neither. The "drier" the snow, the more air it contains and so the lower the water content. Dry snow will have the 10:1 or 12:1 ratio you quote. Really wet snow, close to turning to sleet/rain can have a ratio as low as 4:1. Harold Brooks in earlier post said "Several years ago, some colleagues and I looked at the snow/liquid ratio for 1650 snowfall events from a number of sites in the US. The ratio ranged from ~2:1 to ~50:1. Our mean was 15.6:1 and the median was 14:1 (we used 6-hour snow accumulation obs-the ratios would be smaller for longer time periods). The paper is online at " http://www.nssl.noaa.gov/~brooks/pap...reetal2006.pdf Yes, I saw that after writing my post. I was surprise that the mean and median values were so high. I would guess that US experience might be different from that in the UK, because much of their snow falls at lower temperatures than we are used to here and so tends to be drier. -- John Hall "It is a very sad thing that nowadays there is so little useless information." Oscar Wilde (1854-1900) |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"John Hall" wrote:
John Whitby writes: "John Hall" wrote: Brendan DJ Murphy writes: I've always wanted to know how much precipitation (in rain mm) is required to produce 1 foot of snow. I've heard statements such as "1 foot of snow is equivalent to 1 inch of rain" (ie: 12:1 ratio) Ive also heard "1mm of rain is equivalent to 1cm of snow" (ie: 10:1 ratio) Which one is correct? snip The answer is both/neither. The "drier" the snow, the more air it contains and so the lower the water content. Dry snow will have the 10:1 or 12:1 ratio you quote. Really wet snow, close to turning to sleet/rain can have a ratio as low as 4:1. Harold Brooks in earlier post said "Several years ago, some colleagues and I looked at the snow/liquid ratio for 1650 snowfall events from a number of sites in the US. The ratio ranged from ~2:1 to ~50:1. Our mean was 15.6:1 and the median was 14:1 (we used 6-hour snow accumulation obs-the ratios would be smaller for longer time periods). The paper is online at " http://www.nssl.noaa.gov/~brooks/pap...reetal2006.pdf Yes, I saw that after writing my post. I was surprise that the mean and median values were so high. I would guess that US experience might be different from that in the UK, because much of their snow falls at lower temperatures than we are used to here and so tends to be drier. -- Agreed. 10:1 is a reasonable average figure for the UK. I don't think I had ever measured anything above 20:1 until we did a similar experiment on this very newsgroup during the very fluffy snowfall of 27th (I think) December 2000, when I measured 30:1. Last October's snowfall produced 7:1. Philip |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Philip Eden" philipATweatherHYPHENukDOTcom wrote in message ... | -- | Agreed. 10:1 is a reasonable average figure for the UK. I don't | think I had ever measured anything above 20:1 until we did a | similar experiment on this very newsgroup during the very fluffy | snowfall of 27th (I think) December 2000, when I measured | 30:1. Last October's snowfall produced 7:1. | | Philip | When I was at school in 1963, we did a few rather dubious experiments, collecting undisturbed snow from the middle of the sports field in different sized containers (test tubes, mugs, oil cans, etc). Came up with a fairly consistent figure of 11" of snow to 1" of water. Ha, ha. Those were the good days, that is, when it snowed, it meant something!!! Ten foot drifts kept the A34 north of Winchester closed for over a week. By the time they started on it, the army took over a week to clear 4 miles of it. It was completely beyond the capability of the council. jim Now in Northampton |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Results....
Sligthly different filling method: Take a sheet of card and scoop up snow and place it on top of other snow until the depth is about the same as the deph of your glass/container, then cookie-cut the snow (i.e. push your container into the snow), slide the card under the container and invert. This was you should have a reasonably uncompress sample. Of course if your snow is deep enough, just push the container into the snow only as far as it's length. Anyway, two samples: 16.9:1 and 15.4:1 . I'll send my MSc students out this morning! The raito will vary greatly - whether the snow has been wind-blown or settled gently. Back in 1985 (17 March) we has a snowstorm in Grantham where we had 15" in 2 hours (yeap). By the end of the next day this had compacted (not melted) to ~8 inches... Chris "Brendan DJ Murphy" wrote in message news ![]() I've always wanted to know how much precipitation (in rain mm) is required to produce 1 foot of snow. I've heard statements such as "1 foot of snow is equivalent to 1 inch of rain" (ie: 12:1 ratio) Ive also heard "1mm of rain is equivalent to 1cm of snow" (ie: 10:1 ratio) Which one is correct? In order to get the answer I performed the following experiment... I took a pint beer-glass (one with an official pint crown and is 1 pint to the rim, not a lined glass) I filled it as best as I could with snow, taking care not to get air-gaps and also care not to compress the snow. The snow must be kept "fluffy" and not compacted in. I skimmed the top of the glass so that I have a pint of fluffy snow. I brought the glass indoors and watched my pint of snow melt. I was surprised how little water there was left in the glass! I measured the water (in ml) and divided that number in to 568ml (one pint) Before posting my result, I'd be interested to see if somebody else could perform the same experiment and we will then compare our answers. Its just a bit of fun, regards Brendan |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 2, 7:06*pm, Harold Brooks wrote:
In article 8d88d8bd-bbf3-4587-9c25-9593ccc66882 @q30g2000prq.googlegroups.com, says... [deletions] Any tornadoes around 2 pm gmt today 'Arry? Not in the US 'Srigh' I got a volcano instead. Quit 'appy with that. Ta. |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 3, 11:45*am, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Feb 2, 7:06*pm, Harold Brooks wrote: In article 8d88d8bd-bbf3-4587-9c25-9593ccc66882 @q30g2000prq.googlegroups.com, says... [deletions] Any tornadoes around 2 pm gmt today 'Arry? Not in the US 'Srigh' I got a volcano instead. Quit 'appy with that. Not quite: "Beginning at 1:51 a.m. local time, the volcano belched out a mile- high (1.6-kilometer-high) plume and continued smoking all day. Chunks of rock from the eruption were found about 3,300 feet (1,000 meters) from the volcano." http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...ctures-ap.html Japan is about 9 hours ahead of us, more like 37 degrees from the Dateline IIRC. But interesting timing, none the less. Beggars can't be choosers. Musn't grumble, know what I mean? |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Philip Eden" philipATweatherHYPHENukDOTcom wrote in message ... "John Hall" wrote: John Whitby writes: "John Hall" wrote: Brendan DJ Murphy writes: I've always wanted to know how much precipitation (in rain mm) is required to produce 1 foot of snow. I've heard statements such as "1 foot of snow is equivalent to 1 inch of rain" (ie: 12:1 ratio) Ive also heard "1mm of rain is equivalent to 1cm of snow" (ie: 10:1 ratio) Which one is correct? snip The answer is both/neither. The "drier" the snow, the more air it contains and so the lower the water content. Dry snow will have the 10:1 or 12:1 ratio you quote. Really wet snow, close to turning to sleet/rain can have a ratio as low as 4:1. Harold Brooks in earlier post said "Several years ago, some colleagues and I looked at the snow/liquid ratio for 1650 snowfall events from a number of sites in the US. The ratio ranged from ~2:1 to ~50:1. Our mean was 15.6:1 and the median was 14:1 (we used 6-hour snow accumulation obs-the ratios would be smaller for longer time periods). The paper is online at " http://www.nssl.noaa.gov/~brooks/pap...reetal2006.pdf Yes, I saw that after writing my post. I was surprise that the mean and median values were so high. I would guess that US experience might be different from that in the UK, because much of their snow falls at lower temperatures than we are used to here and so tends to be drier. -- Agreed. 10:1 is a reasonable average figure for the UK. I don't think I had ever measured anything above 20:1 until we did a similar experiment on this very newsgroup during the very fluffy snowfall of 27th (I think) December 2000, when I measured 30:1. Last October's snowfall produced 7:1. Philip Well, Here are my results from yesterday's snow samples My pint of snow resulted in 129ml of water. This is a quite surprisng 4.4 : 1 ratio My wife independently took a sample taken from an entirely different area of the garden. Her glass was almost identical. about 125ml. Almost a quarter of the glass! I did not expect to see that much water! regards Brendan |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Suggestion - future climate research involving cosmic ray cloud coverconnection | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Climate Change Experiment (climateprediction.net) | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
BBC NEWS | Science/Nature | Experiment probes climate riddle | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Wyoming cloudseeding experiment,article link | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
New climate prediction experiment - Run a climate model on your computer | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |