On Dec 14, 2:38*pm, .C wrote:
On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 19:17:45 +0000, .C wrote:
Know summat? This guy is as pompous in real life as he is here. I've
had quite a few emails from him over the years. Wonder if he
recognizes this first line of one he sent out about 3 months ago?

Hello all,
All the secondary headteachers and many of the primary and special
school headteachers know .....

What came next Garvey?

Still waiting for your reply Garvey. *It begins "me through the work
I've done in supporting ...."

BTW you've been outed as a charlatan and bully in this news group.

Each time, you won't get a reply, You'll get this, my stalker from
TWO.

C. Time to come clean, reveal yourself, or go back to where you have
come from. The title of the thread is "Global Sea Ice". Please stick
to that and try to add to the nothing that you have contributed to
the
weather on this weather newsgroup. Someone's personal and
professional
lives should not form a part of the only reason you feel compelled to
post. Understandably, you will not get no further reply from me
unless
you do.

In article ,
says...
Hello all,
All the secondary headteachers and many of the primary and special
school headteachers know .....

What came next Garvey?

Still waiting for your reply Garvey. It begins "me through the work
I've done in supporting ...."

BTW you've been outed as a charlatan and bully in this news group.


Paul is a pratt. He has his head so far up his own arse he is
constantly blinded to reality by the artificial whiteness of
his own teeth. He is not as knowledgeable or talented as he
would like everyone to believe and considers himself to have a
much higher social standing than he actually receives. It is
who he is. Nobodies perfect.

You however, are a coward, and whereas Paul's bullying is not
seen as such by himself and backed by an erroneous sense of
righteousness, yours is intentional and appears to be fed by
either a bilious need for vengeance or quite possibly, some
sort of insane jealousy for the man. In short, Paul may be a
little sad (and a bit of a pratt) but you are just not nice
(and a bit of a pratt).

Please do it somewhere else.

--
Alan LeHun

On Dec 13, 4:42*pm, Dawlish wrote:
On Dec 13, 4:32*pm, "Lawrence Jenkins" wrote:





"Ned" wrote in message

...

"Dawlish" wrote in message
....
........and you've failed yet again (24 times being asked is quite
unbelievable Lawrence) to explain what you feel Antarctic sea ice has
to do with your left field ideas about GW!
Bit like you claiming to know all about baroclinic leaf cyclogenesis yet
making a ricket of it as you also did claiming the midday summer sun
didn't cause sunburn. *You either go so quiet when you make mistakes, or
abuse other posters.

--
Ned

I should say he reminds me of a funeral hearse driver I once knew who had no
sense of direction -he kept losing the plot.

Back to the plot Lawrence; don't try to draw succour from this stalker
who *only* posts on here to try to have a go at me. He has no use.

The plot and the thread is about Global Sea ice; would you mind giving
your views on the link between Antarctic Sea ice and GW?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

No it isn't, it's about you, and the reason is as follows:-
Lawrence made a perfectly reasonable reply to your initial posting and
got a sarcastic response. Why? He then put up a good-humoured
response to your rudeness, above and beyond the call of duty. He
quickly came to the conclusion that this was more than you deserved
and put up something rather amusing. But the initial rudeness in this
thread was on your part. You have ruined your own thread; pooed on
your own doorstep. Take responsibility for your own actions, you
great baby. Your are nothing more than a latter-day Violet Elizabeth
Bott.
Look, I'll save you the trouble:- Safely ignored.

Tudor Hughes, Warlingham, Surrey.

On Dec 15, 4:39*am, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Dec 13, 4:42*pm, Dawlish wrote:





On Dec 13, 4:32*pm, "Lawrence Jenkins" wrote:

"Ned" wrote in message

...

"Dawlish" wrote in message
...
........and you've failed yet again (24 times being asked is quite
unbelievable Lawrence) to explain what you feel Antarctic sea ice has
to do with your left field ideas about GW!
Bit like you claiming to know all about baroclinic leaf cyclogenesis yet
making a ricket of it as you also did claiming the midday summer sun
didn't cause sunburn. *You either go so quiet when you make mistakes, or
abuse other posters.

--
Ned

I should say he reminds me of a funeral hearse driver I once knew who had no
sense of direction -he kept losing the plot.

Back to the plot Lawrence; don't try to draw succour from this stalker
who *only* posts on here to try to have a go at me. He has no use.

The plot and the thread is about Global Sea ice; would you mind giving
your views on the link between Antarctic Sea ice and GW?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

* * *No it isn't, it's about you, and the reason is as follows:-
Lawrence made a perfectly reasonable reply to your initial posting and
got a sarcastic response. Why? *He then put up a good-humoured
response to your rudeness, above and beyond the call of duty. *He
quickly came to the conclusion that this was more than you deserved
and put up something rather amusing. *But the initial rudeness in this
thread was on your part. *You have ruined your own thread; pooed on
your own doorstep. *Take responsibility for your own actions, you
great baby. *Your are nothing more than a latter-day Violet Elizabeth
Bott.
* * * Look, I'll save you the trouble:- *Safely ignored.

Tudor Hughes, Warlingham, Surrey.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Maybe you could say something about Antarctic Sea ice, as Lawrence has
failed to do 46 times - hence my sarcasm (not foul-mouthed,
threatening and foul abuse, as is your recorded wont,
note). .....maybe not. The sarcasm will probably be there at 47 too,
unless Lawrence would like to explain, or I give up asking!

As you say and you can be; safely ignored

Alan; You are welcome to whatever opinions you hold about me but
resorting to mild name calling is a little pathetic. A contribution of
your thoughts on the present state of global sea ice would be good
though.

In article 996fa864-2486-477c-8b06-e70d1f596fe9
@m26g2000yqb.googlegroups.com, says...

Alan;


To which Alan do you refer?

--
Alan LeHun

On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:22:09 -0000, Alan LeHun wrote:

Paul is a pratt. He has his head so far up his own arse he is
constantly blinded to reality by the artificial whiteness of
his own teeth. He is not as knowledgeable or talented as he
would like everyone to believe and considers himself to have a
much higher social standing than he actually receives. It is
who he is. Nobodies perfect.

Agreed in toto apart from "nobodies":-)

You however, are a coward, and whereas Paul's bullying is not
seen as such by himself and backed by an erroneous sense of
righteousness, yours is intentional and appears to be fed by
either a bilious need for vengeance or quite possibly, some
sort of insane jealousy for the man. In short, Paul may be a
little sad (and a bit of a pratt) but you are just not nice
(and a bit of a pratt).

Certainly not jealousy I can assure you. But I agree this forum has
suffered too much of late, so I'll back off.

BTW I note he didn't answer your question about which Alan he was
referring to in
I think it was you in fact.

Currently 3 degrees with rain/drizzle here