Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
MARLOW 0850Z W-NW F2-3 9999 (20KM) 1CU020 7SC050 5.2/2.7 1020.5
RMK:Rain on weak cold front clearing by 0745. Max temp 09-21=6.8C Min temp 21-09=+0.3C Rainfall 09-09=0.2 mm Site details: Sheltered back garden near centre of Town, 1 mile from River Thames. N51:34:28 W0:46:38 SU848868 Regards Richard Bailey |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ricardo" wrote in message
... MARLOW 0850Z W-NW F2-3 9999 (20KM) 1CU020 7SC050 5.2/2.7 1020.5 RMK:Rain on weak cold front clearing by 0745. Max temp 09-21=6.8C Min temp 21-09=+0.3C Rainfall 09-09=0.2 mm Site details: Sheltered back garden near centre of Town, 1 mile from River Thames. N51:34:28 W0:46:38 SU848868 Regards Richard Bailey .... Richard, by the time the front got down here in the south coastal area, it was even weaker: sporadic, very light rain between 06 & 0730Z ... nothing in gauge (notional 'trace') and surfaces not affected. 11 days with no measureable rain. I still use Beaufort letters to record my weather, and for that rain, it should go down as "iro" (the 'o' being a suffix/subscript lower-case o); it occurs to me that we need a method to distinguish between light rain which *has* an impact (i.e. produces at least a dribble of rain in the gauge/wets the surface, even if temporarily), and the event of this morning when if you hadn't been looking closely, you might have entered 'nil PPN'. I always make a note of such events, but as a shorthand, I've started using 'ox', i.e., lower case x, lower case o, on the same principle that in clothing measurements, XL is 'extra large', XXL is 'extra, extra large' etc. So 'xo' is extra slight !? Anyone else have such a system or a better one? It would also apply to snow - for example you can have light snow which does impact on the surface, and the occasion when just a few flakes fall with no impact - same Beaufort letters, "s(suffix)o". Martin. -- Martin Rowley West Moors, East Dorset (UK): 17m (56ft) amsl Lat: 50.82N Long: 01.88W NGR: SU 082 023 |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12 Mar, 10:17, "Martin Rowley"
wrote: "Ricardo" wrote in message ... MARLOW 0850Z W-NW F2-3 9999 (20KM) 1CU020 7SC050 5.2/2.7 1020.5 RMK:Rain on weak cold front clearing by 0745. Max temp 09-21=6.8C Min temp 21-09=+0.3C Rainfall 09-09=0.2 mm Site details: Sheltered back garden near centre of Town, 1 mile from River Thames. N51:34:28 W0:46:38 SU848868 Regards Richard Bailey ... Richard, by the time the front got down here in the south coastal area, it was even weaker: sporadic, very light rain between 06 & 0730Z .. nothing in gauge (notional 'trace') and surfaces not affected. 11 days with no measureable rain. I still use Beaufort letters to record my weather, and for that rain, it should go down as "iro" (the 'o' being a suffix/subscript lower-case o); it occurs to me that we need a method to distinguish between light rain which *has* an impact (i.e. produces at least a dribble of rain in the gauge/wets the surface, even if temporarily), and the event of this morning when if you hadn't been looking closely, you might have entered 'nil PPN'. I always make a note of such events, but as a shorthand, I've started using 'ox', i.e., lower case x, lower case o, on the same principle that in clothing measurements, XL is 'extra large', XXL is 'extra, extra large' etc. So 'xo' is extra slight !? Anyone else have such a system or a better one? It would also apply to snow - for example you can have light snow which does impact on the surface, and the occasion when just a few flakes fall with no impact - same Beaufort letters, "s(suffix)o". Martin. -- Martin Rowley West Moors, East Dorset (UK): 17m (56ft) amsl Lat: 50.82N * Long: 01.88W NGR: SU 082 023 Hi Martin. Excellent idea, I will use ox in future, showers overhead (12:21)- upper cold pool. Regards Richard |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ricardo" wrote ...
snip Hi Martin. Excellent idea, I will use ox in future, showers overhead (12:21)- upper cold pool. Regards Richard .... getting away with it so far (1350Z): some 'perky' Cu med to the south (over Channel) but a lot of Sc so there's a stable layer to be broken. However, I see from the IR sequence that there is a line of markedly colder tops just to the north, so perhaps a shower before too long. Martin. -- Martin Rowley West Moors, East Dorset (UK): 17m (56ft) amsl Lat: 50.82N Long: 01.88W NGR: SU 082 023 |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I wouldn't use x Martin, as that is already used for hoar frost.
-- Bernard Burton Wokingham, Berkshire, UK. Weather satellite images at: www.woksat.info/wwp.html "Martin Rowley" wrote in message ... "Ricardo" wrote ... snip Hi Martin. Excellent idea, I will use ox in future, showers overhead (12:21)- upper cold pool. Regards Richard ... getting away with it so far (1350Z): some 'perky' Cu med to the south (over Channel) but a lot of Sc so there's a stable layer to be broken. However, I see from the IR sequence that there is a line of markedly colder tops just to the north, so perhaps a shower before too long. Martin. -- Martin Rowley West Moors, East Dorset (UK): 17m (56ft) amsl Lat: 50.82N Long: 01.88W NGR: SU 082 023 |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Martin Rowley" wrote in
message ... "Ricardo" wrote ... snip Hi Martin. Excellent idea, I will use ox in future, showers overhead (12:21)- upper cold pool. Regards Richard ... getting away with it so far (1350Z): some 'perky' Cu med to the south (over Channel) but a lot of Sc so there's a stable layer to be broken. However, I see from the IR sequence that there is a line of markedly colder tops just to the north, so perhaps a shower before too long. .... indeed, we got a light shower (genuine one - just about dampened the ground), between 1420 & 1440Z; bright sunshine now - but I see that there were heftier showers to the east - some Sferics too along the Thames Valley and north Hampshire. Martin. -- Martin Rowley West Moors, East Dorset (UK): 17m (56ft) amsl Lat: 50.82N Long: 01.88W NGR: SU 082 023 |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bernard Burton" wrote in message
... I wouldn't use x Martin, as that is already used for hoar frost. .... agreed it might seem confusing, but written immediately adjacent to the precipitation type, it doesn't look too bad. Martin. -- Martin Rowley West Moors, East Dorset (UK): 17m (56ft) amsl Lat: 50.82N Long: 01.88W NGR: SU 082 023 |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
0850Z OBS Marlow (Bucks)-15th March 2010 | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
0850Z OBS Marlow (Bucks)-13th March 2010 | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
0850Z OBS Marlow (Bucks)-2nd March 2010 | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
0850Z OBS Marlow (Bucks)-1st March 2010 | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
0850Z OBS Marlow (Bucks)-12th January 2010 | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |