Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 8, 9:53*am, Dawlish wrote:
On Dec 8, 9:23*am, Lawrence13 wrote: On Dec 7, 8:07*pm, Dawlish wrote: On Dec 7, 7:50*pm, "Will Hand" wrote: "Lawrence Jenkins" wrote in message web.com... Some amazing charts tonight there's one synoptic set up showing as Steve Murr said on TWO -a cross polar flow. Now that really does look grotesquely special http://www.meteociel.fr/modeles/ecmw...1-216.GIF?07-0 Mega!!! :-) This winter is going to be historic. Already records are being smashed. Does anyone know where I can get some *really strong* tranquilisers, I'm so excited nowadays looking at the charts and photos I'm shaking? Eskimo Will -- Will, calm down. This ramping is getting silly. It's only 3 weeks since you forecast an average winter and were seeing no signs that it would be as cold as the last one. Now the winter is going to be "historic". Which is correct and what has changed in 3 weeks? The charts show cold out to 10 days. No-one knows what the weather will be like much after that. The winter may indeed be "historic", but as absolutely no-one was forecasting that for the UK 3 weeks ago, why should we believe anyone who is now forecasting it 3 weeks later? What this proves is that either your original forecast is a guess (unless it turns milder by Christmas and stays reasonabley mild with a few colder spells, which it could do, of course) or this spot of ramping is a hopecast. Happens every winter. It's just that this winter, it is presently cold, so we get this silly desperate hoping that we'll see a winter of epic proportions. We may, but at this stage, just like 3 weeks ago, no- one knows.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Will openly accepts he gets excited and openly accepts that no one including himself could have forecaste what has just happened, the difference with Will and others is the synoptics all the models are throwing up. of they may not come off but at least in the last three winter the synoptics are consistently being produced and so far delivered . I will also say that in ten years of using this group I can't recall anything as exciting as we are seeing now. It is a weather NG and without looking at the rules I doubt there's anything there that says *enthusiasm. excitement, eager expectation and eulogising on potential exceptional circumstatnces are not according to the forum rules-acceptable. So the pair of you-give him and us a break we want to get excited and yes it may all end in tears. Anyhow Tudor's trombone may benefit from so cryogenics.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - errrrrrrrr. No. Not when it is daft. Like I said; calm down. People have just as much right to criticise the ramping as the rampers have to ramp. (I do hate that word, but that's what coldies do when it is cold, or further cold is possible!). No-one can forecast at 2 weeks with any record of reasonable accuracy, so best not to believe the ones that do, even when they are "forecasting" exactly what you want to see forecast. Will = Cold Winter Ramping Dawlish = Global Warming Ramping What's the difference? |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article
, Lawrence13 writes: On Dec 8, 9:29*am, Richard Dixon wrote: On Dec 8, 9:23*am, Lawrence13 wrote: Anyhow Tudor's trombone may benefit from so cryogenics. Was that a euphemism (or a euphonium)? Richard I think Tudor just gets brassed off with all of us acting like kids. But acting like kids is what newsgroups are /for/. ![]() Anyhow its good to see him and Dawlish building bridges, ice bridges that is. ![]() -- John Hall "I look upon it, that he who does not mind his belly, will hardly mind anything else." Dr Samuel Johnson (1709-84) |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 8, 10:15*am, Teignmouth wrote:
Will = Cold Winter Ramping Dawlish = Global Warming Ramping What's the difference?- The only difference is that Will is a respected meteorologist who speaks with authority and credibility. He also has a sense of humour. Dawlish - ahh bless him! |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 8, 10:46*am, Seany McD wrote:
On Dec 8, 10:15*am, Teignmouth wrote: Will = Cold Winter Ramping Dawlish = Global Warming Ramping What's the difference?- The only difference is that Will is a respected meteorologist who speaks with authority and credibility. He also has a sense of humour. Dawlish - ahh bless him! I thought these comments might start as soon as I pointed out the reality. *(( |
#25
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 8, 10:15*am, Teignmouth wrote:
On Dec 8, 9:53*am, Dawlish wrote: On Dec 8, 9:23*am, Lawrence13 wrote: On Dec 7, 8:07*pm, Dawlish wrote: On Dec 7, 7:50*pm, "Will Hand" wrote: "Lawrence Jenkins" wrote in message web.com... Some amazing charts tonight there's one synoptic set up showing as Steve Murr said on TWO -a cross polar flow. Now that really does look grotesquely special http://www.meteociel.fr/modeles/ecmw...1-216.GIF?07-0 Mega!!! :-) This winter is going to be historic. Already records are being smashed. Does anyone know where I can get some *really strong* tranquilisers, I'm so excited nowadays looking at the charts and photos I'm shaking? Eskimo Will -- Will, calm down. This ramping is getting silly. It's only 3 weeks since you forecast an average winter and were seeing no signs that it would be as cold as the last one. Now the winter is going to be "historic". Which is correct and what has changed in 3 weeks? The charts show cold out to 10 days. No-one knows what the weather will be like much after that. The winter may indeed be "historic", but as absolutely no-one was forecasting that for the UK 3 weeks ago, why should we believe anyone who is now forecasting it 3 weeks later? What this proves is that either your original forecast is a guess (unless it turns milder by Christmas and stays reasonabley mild with a few colder spells, which it could do, of course) or this spot of ramping is a hopecast. Happens every winter. It's just that this winter, it is presently cold, so we get this silly desperate hoping that we'll see a winter of epic proportions. We may, but at this stage, just like 3 weeks ago, no- one knows.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Will openly accepts he gets excited and openly accepts that no one including himself could have forecaste what has just happened, the difference with Will and others is the synoptics all the models are throwing up. of they may not come off but at least in the last three winter the synoptics are consistently being produced and so far delivered . I will also say that in ten years of using this group I can't recall anything as exciting as we are seeing now. It is a weather NG and without looking at the rules I doubt there's anything there that says *enthusiasm. excitement, eager expectation and eulogising on potential exceptional circumstatnces are not according to the forum rules-acceptable. So the pair of you-give him and us a break we want to get excited and yes it may all end in tears. Anyhow Tudor's trombone may benefit from so cryogenics.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - errrrrrrrr. No. Not when it is daft. Like I said; calm down. People have just as much right to criticise the ramping as the rampers have to ramp. (I do hate that word, but that's what coldies do when it is cold, or further cold is possible!). No-one can forecast at 2 weeks with any record of reasonable accuracy, so best not to believe the ones that do, even when they are "forecasting" exactly what you want to see forecast. Will = Cold Winter Ramping Dawlish = Global Warming Ramping What's the difference?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The difference is that we've had cold winter ramping and we haven't had any global warming ramping (whatever that is) whatsoever! Have we? I've just pointed out that your second post is purely speculative ramping T, which it is. Nothing more. Nothing whatsoever about GW. The reaction from people when I point this out to them always surprises me, though it's time I stopped being so naive at the depth of feeling against anyone that points out to coldies that they may just be talking b*llocks when they puts his wish for cold into some kind of meteorological hopecast. Nothing wrong factually with anything I said, but it's hard for the coldies to accept that anyone could possibly criticise their hopes and needs for cold to happen. Like I said. Happens every winter. Each to their own, I say. |
#26
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() I thought these comments might start as soon as I pointed out the reality. *(( The reality is the UK is experiencing an exceptional cold spell, the current CET is -2.0c, that is a whopping -7.6c below normal or, to put it another way more than 4 Standard Deviations below the 1971-2009 normal of +4.8c. Someone with a maths degree should be able to calculate the probabilty of this occuring. Philip Eden's CET http://www.climate-uk.com/ Also, there is a thread on TWO comparing this December with previous December Central England Temperatures, worth a look. http://www.theweatheroutlook.com/two...g=posts&t=2200 So I make no appologies for talking about this current cold spell, and suggesting that it may be a once in a liftime event, because I've never experienced such a cold start to December/Winter in my 39 years on this planet. |
#27
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 8, 11:07*am, Dawlish wrote:
On Dec 8, 10:15*am, Teignmouth wrote: On Dec 8, 9:53*am, Dawlish wrote: On Dec 8, 9:23*am, Lawrence13 wrote: On Dec 7, 8:07*pm, Dawlish wrote: On Dec 7, 7:50*pm, "Will Hand" wrote: "Lawrence Jenkins" wrote in message web.com... Some amazing charts tonight there's one synoptic set up showing as Steve Murr said on TWO -a cross polar flow. Now that really does look grotesquely special http://www.meteociel.fr/modeles/ecmw...1-216.GIF?07-0 Mega!!! :-) This winter is going to be historic. Already records are being smashed. Does anyone know where I can get some *really strong* tranquilisers, I'm so excited nowadays looking at the charts and photos I'm shaking? Eskimo Will -- Will, calm down. This ramping is getting silly. It's only 3 weeks since you forecast an average winter and were seeing no signs that it would be as cold as the last one. Now the winter is going to be "historic". Which is correct and what has changed in 3 weeks? The charts show cold out to 10 days. No-one knows what the weather will be like much after that. The winter may indeed be "historic", but as absolutely no-one was forecasting that for the UK 3 weeks ago, why should we believe anyone who is now forecasting it 3 weeks later? What this proves is that either your original forecast is a guess (unless it turns milder by Christmas and stays reasonabley mild with a few colder spells, which it could do, of course) or this spot of ramping is a hopecast. Happens every winter. It's just that this winter, it is presently cold, so we get this silly desperate hoping that we'll see a winter of epic proportions. We may, but at this stage, just like 3 weeks ago, no- one knows.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Will openly accepts he gets excited and openly accepts that no one including himself could have forecaste what has just happened, the difference with Will and others is the synoptics all the models are throwing up. of they may not come off but at least in the last three winter the synoptics are consistently being produced and so far delivered . I will also say that in ten years of using this group I can't recall anything as exciting as we are seeing now. It is a weather NG and without looking at the rules I doubt there's anything there that says *enthusiasm. excitement, eager expectation and eulogising on potential exceptional circumstatnces are not according to the forum rules-acceptable. So the pair of you-give him and us a break we want to get excited and yes it may all end in tears. Anyhow Tudor's trombone may benefit from so cryogenics.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - errrrrrrrr. No. Not when it is daft. Like I said; calm down. People have just as much right to criticise the ramping as the rampers have to ramp. (I do hate that word, but that's what coldies do when it is cold, or further cold is possible!). No-one can forecast at 2 weeks with any record of reasonable accuracy, so best not to believe the ones that do, even when they are "forecasting" exactly what you want to see forecast. Will = Cold Winter Ramping Dawlish = Global Warming Ramping What's the difference?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The difference is that we've had cold winter ramping and we haven't had any global warming ramping (whatever that is) whatsoever! Have we? I've just pointed out that your second post is purely speculative ramping T, which it is. Nothing more. Nothing whatsoever about GW. The reaction from people when I point this out to them always surprises me, though it's time I stopped being so naive at the depth of feeling against anyone that points out to coldies that they may just be talking b*llocks when they puts his wish for cold into some kind of meteorological hopecast. Nothing wrong factually with anything I said, but it's hard for the coldies to accept that anyone could possibly criticise their hopes and needs for cold to happen. Like I said. Happens every winter. Each to their own, I say. Dawlish you are always ramping global warming with your hottest month or 3rd hottest month on record etc etc etc, or is it your twin brother posting on your behalf? It's nice to have the other side of the fence view now and again. |
#28
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 8, 11:24*am, Teignmouth wrote:
On Dec 8, 11:07*am, Dawlish wrote: On Dec 8, 10:15*am, Teignmouth wrote: On Dec 8, 9:53*am, Dawlish wrote: On Dec 8, 9:23*am, Lawrence13 wrote: On Dec 7, 8:07*pm, Dawlish wrote: On Dec 7, 7:50*pm, "Will Hand" wrote: "Lawrence Jenkins" wrote in message web.com... Some amazing charts tonight there's one synoptic set up showing as Steve Murr said on TWO -a cross polar flow. Now that really does look grotesquely special http://www.meteociel.fr/modeles/ecmw...1-216.GIF?07-0 Mega!!! :-) This winter is going to be historic. Already records are being smashed. Does anyone know where I can get some *really strong* tranquilisers, I'm so excited nowadays looking at the charts and photos I'm shaking? Eskimo Will -- Will, calm down. This ramping is getting silly. It's only 3 weeks since you forecast an average winter and were seeing no signs that it would be as cold as the last one. Now the winter is going to be "historic". Which is correct and what has changed in 3 weeks? The charts show cold out to 10 days. No-one knows what the weather will be like much after that. The winter may indeed be "historic", but as absolutely no-one was forecasting that for the UK 3 weeks ago, why should we believe anyone who is now forecasting it 3 weeks later? What this proves is that either your original forecast is a guess (unless it turns milder by Christmas and stays reasonabley mild with a few colder spells, which it could do, of course) or this spot of ramping is a hopecast. Happens every winter. It's just that this winter, it is presently cold, so we get this silly desperate hoping that we'll see a winter of epic proportions. We may, but at this stage, just like 3 weeks ago, no- one knows.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Will openly accepts he gets excited and openly accepts that no one including himself could have forecaste what has just happened, the difference with Will and others is the synoptics all the models are throwing up. of they may not come off but at least in the last three winter the synoptics are consistently being produced and so far delivered . I will also say that in ten years of using this group I can't recall anything as exciting as we are seeing now. It is a weather NG and without looking at the rules I doubt there's anything there that says *enthusiasm. excitement, eager expectation and eulogising on potential exceptional circumstatnces are not according to the forum rules-acceptable. So the pair of you-give him and us a break we want to get excited and yes it may all end in tears. Anyhow Tudor's trombone may benefit from so cryogenics.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - errrrrrrrr. No. Not when it is daft. Like I said; calm down. People have just as much right to criticise the ramping as the rampers have to ramp. (I do hate that word, but that's what coldies do when it is cold, or further cold is possible!). No-one can forecast at 2 weeks with any record of reasonable accuracy, so best not to believe the ones that do, even when they are "forecasting" exactly what you want to see forecast. Will = Cold Winter Ramping Dawlish = Global Warming Ramping What's the difference?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The difference is that we've had cold winter ramping and we haven't had any global warming ramping (whatever that is) whatsoever! Have we? I've just pointed out that your second post is purely speculative ramping T, which it is. Nothing more. Nothing whatsoever about GW. The reaction from people when I point this out to them always surprises me, though it's time I stopped being so naive at the depth of feeling against anyone that points out to coldies that they may just be talking b*llocks when they puts his wish for cold into some kind of meteorological hopecast. Nothing wrong factually with anything I said, but it's hard for the coldies to accept that anyone could possibly criticise their hopes and needs for cold to happen. Like I said. Happens every winter. Each to their own, I say. Dawlish you are always ramping global warming with your hottest month or 3rd hottest month on record etc etc etc, or is it your twin brother posting on your behalf? It's nice to have the other side of the fence view now and again.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I often report facts about global temperatures from the 5 temperature series and changes in ENSO from NOAA and the Aussie BOM. No-one can "ramp" GW. It's just global temperatures. The changes in those global temperatures over time show trends. The current trend shows warming over a long period and that requires scientific explanation. Like you with the current cold spell, I make no apolgies for talking about them. Nor should we. However, this thread has nothing to do with GW! OOz keeps it cold out to 10 days and the gfs and other models concur. Brrrrrrr. |
#29
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 8, 11:19*am, Teignmouth wrote:
I thought these comments might start as soon as I pointed out the reality. *(( The reality is the UK is experiencing an exceptional cold spell, the current CET is -2.0c, that is a whopping -7.6c below normal or, to put it another way more than 4 Standard Deviations below the 1971-2009 normal of +4.8c. Someone with a maths degree should be able to calculate the probabilty of this occuring. Philip Eden's CEThttp://www.climate-uk.com/ Also, there is a thread on TWO comparing this December with previous December Central England Temperatures, worth a look.http://www.theweatheroutlook.com/two...spx?g=posts&t=... So I make no appologies for talking about this current cold spell, and suggesting that it may be a once in a liftime event, because I've never experienced such a cold start to December/Winter in my 39 years on this planet. You don't have to make "apologies". Everyone is talking about the current cold spell - mainly because it is bloody cold! *)) |
#30
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 8, 11:24*am, Teignmouth wrote:
Dawlish you are always ramping global warming with your hottest month or 3rd hottest month on record etc etc etc, or is it your twin brother posting on your behalf? It's nice to have the other side of the fence view now and again. My two-penneth. Was lucky enough to see Tim Palmer talk at a meeting a month or so ago now. Probably the best weather/climate speaker there is IMHO. Anyhow - he showed a very nice couple of slides that counter the oft-quoted argument: "If we can't forecast the weather beyond about 5 days, how can we forecast the climate"? He went on to show the ideas of chaos, attractors, and how the atmosphere flips between various states. His point is that chaos won't necessarily influence longer-term trends and forecasts, even though it is inherent in the results. His point is that the flip-flop of chaos into various states will change and thus the atmosphere under climate change is likely to remain in one of the states more often than pre-climate change. The way I see this is that, although we might, for example flip to more hot summers, this doesn't rule out the "flop" of winters like this one (or the one last year). I also think personally there are shorter-timescale modulations that lead to what we've seen in the past 3-5 years of quieter winters that modulate this change. I also believe that there is more value in seasonal forecasts than some place on here - which is why so much research goes into them. As per an earlier post, a vastly improved stratospheric resolution has improved the longer-term forecasts the Met Office provide, so it doesn't surprise me that they stuck their neck out in their month ahead forecast on the web going back way when if they saw a strong signal for cold. Much like the climate modelling flip/flop comments related to Tim Palmer's talk above - I believe chaos ruins the chances of forecasting minutiae in the short-to-medium range up to 7-10 days, but not the chance of forecasting *trends* over seasons. Richard |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ECM 12z | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
12Z ECM | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
ECM 12Z slightly less bad? | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
12z ECM - high pressure pulling back east? | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
ecm | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |