Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Neo, it is always difficult to second-guess the models.
However, what the Met Office has been saying in the professional briefings I have attended each morning is that the block will be very stubborn with multiple trough disruptions helping to maintain it. This keeps most rain in the west but means detail is very difficult even at a few days as models struggle with trough disruptions. Len Wood mentioned in another thread that the Rossby wavelengths are such as to maintain persistence and he has been right so far. But, another thing we have been saying is that the block *will* slowly erode with some form of zonality establishing itself by the end of the month, coinciding with your thoughts to an extent. So by December we could well be in a colder NW'ly scenario, how cold is yet to be seen, but cold SSTs in western Atlantic would suggest to me that a mid-Atlantic ridge could build plunging us rapidly into a bitter northerly, note Ny Alesund has been very cold of late. This would also retrogress the Rossby pattern and put us into the more active cold side. Until the high topples and we settle down into a mild zonal winter :-) I didn't say that, I'm still going for a cold and snowy December. Weather and this newsgroup should be fun, enjoy! Will -- |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 18, 9:05*am, "Eskimo Will" wrote:
Neo, it is always difficult to second-guess the models. However, what the Met Office has been saying in the professional briefings I have attended each morning is that the block will be very stubborn with multiple trough disruptions helping to maintain it. This keeps most rain in the west but means detail is very difficult even at a few days as models struggle with trough disruptions. Len Wood mentioned in another thread that the Rossby wavelengths are such as to maintain persistence and he has been right so far. But, another thing we have been saying is that the block *will* slowly erode with some form of zonality establishing itself by the end of the month, coinciding with your thoughts to an extent. So by December we could well be in a colder NW'ly scenario, how cold is yet to be seen, but cold SSTs in western Atlantic would suggest to me that a mid-Atlantic ridge could build plunging us rapidly into a bitter northerly, note Ny Alesund has been very cold of late. This would also retrogress the Rossby pattern and put us into the more active cold side. Until the high topples and we settle down into a mild zonal winter :-) I didn't say that, I'm still going for a cold and snowy December. Weather and this newsgroup should be fun, enjoy! There will be a couple of 6 to 6.5 mag quakes before late sunday morning, one at least judging by the compression on the Canadain charts: http://www.weatheroffice.gc.ca/data/...is/941_100.gif The organisation will clear up on the runs with that. Personally I think the timing is for the birds, so pay attention all you nature lovers. And non-monoculturists. I wonder how digital TV is going to affect avian preponderances? I suppose they will have to put new deposits on higher perches. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 18, 9:15*am, Weatherlawyer wrote:
There will be a couple of 6 to 6.5 mag quakes before late Sunday morning, one at least judging by the compression on the Canadian charts: http://www.weatheroffice.gc.ca/data/...is/941_100.gif The organisation of the runs will clear up with that. Forgot to mention for my fans, some of these charts are stored he http://my.opera.com/Weatherlawyer/bl...omment75029022 Yawl take care now you err. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 18, 9:05*am, "Eskimo Will" wrote:
Neo, it is always difficult to second-guess the models. However, what the Met Office has been saying in the professional briefings I have attended each morning is that the block will be very stubborn with multiple trough disruptions helping to maintain it. This keeps most rain in the west but means detail is very difficult even at a few days as models struggle with trough disruptions. Len Wood mentioned in another thread that the Rossby wavelengths are such as to maintain persistence and he has been right so far. But, another thing we have been saying is that the block *will* slowly erode with some form of zonality establishing itself by the end of the month, coinciding with your thoughts to an extent. So by December we could well be in a colder NW'ly scenario, how cold is yet to be seen, but cold SSTs in western Atlantic would suggest to me that a mid-Atlantic ridge could build plunging us rapidly into a bitter northerly, note Ny Alesund has been very cold of late. This would also retrogress the Rossby pattern and put us into the more active cold side. Until the high topples and we settle down into a mild zonal winter :-) I didn't say that, I'm still going for a cold and snowy December. Weather and this newsgroup should be fun, enjoy! Will -- Hi Will, Thank you for your responses. (And everyone else too). I am familiar with the Met Office thoughts on the next weeks, however, my forecast is not for the acrual weather, but just for the changing path of the models bias and outcomes. Yes, I am still going for the models pointing ever more to a colder scenario during the end Nov/early Dec, so in weather forecasting terms, the 4 to 10 day outlook will be progressively cooler as from that time. Forecasting can only be done reliably from 12 to 48 hours in my experience. Seat of pants forecasting is what we call it in the trade. Sometimes it can be more difficult to get the next 4 hours right, let alone anything weeks ahead. Far better for forecasters to add value to the model itself in many "long term" cases, as this time of year always brings out the Crystal ball hogging "gypsy" forecasters, many of whom have a biased "Dickensian" view of how winter should pan out. Yes, Dawlish is correct, it is mild now, and looks mild for some days yet, but that is not what I am about. I am predicting a swing in "model outcomes" to a more cool outlook, then becoming decidedly cold. Various outlying "tubes" of most models are now becoming less inclined to mild conditions for us in the UK, and as you point out, some signs of the rossby changes you mention are starting to take effect in a few places. I may not be correct, in fact I know I'm not 100 correct already, but I do try to do the best I can with the data and vast experience that I have. I do have the best advanced training in Meteorology under my belt, various Model interpretation, computer and mathematical modelling, a couple of good degrees in Maths and Physics with Chemistry, one in a Technical design BA subject, and over 2 decades experience in the right area. Added to that I hold a good position in my career, and am respected in my field. I have numerous big hobbies too including Astronomy and Geology. Heck, I might even try and become a forecaster, rather than a guesser. I may continue in here, I may not, but anyone who knows how it all works will say it is a hard and sometimes dangerous thing to forecast weeks in advance. Maybe it is more satisfying to me to see what I think the models will turn their attention too instead. Forecasting is one thing, borrowing someone else's forecast is quite another. I never do the latter. Neo |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Neo" wrote in message
... On Nov 18, 9:05 am, "Eskimo Will" wrote: Neo, it is always difficult to second-guess the models. However, what the Met Office has been saying in the professional briefings I have attended each morning is that the block will be very stubborn with multiple trough disruptions helping to maintain it. This keeps most rain in the west but means detail is very difficult even at a few days as models struggle with trough disruptions. Len Wood mentioned in another thread that the Rossby wavelengths are such as to maintain persistence and he has been right so far. But, another thing we have been saying is that the block *will* slowly erode with some form of zonality establishing itself by the end of the month, coinciding with your thoughts to an extent. So by December we could well be in a colder NW'ly scenario, how cold is yet to be seen, but cold SSTs in western Atlantic would suggest to me that a mid-Atlantic ridge could build plunging us rapidly into a bitter northerly, note Ny Alesund has been very cold of late. This would also retrogress the Rossby pattern and put us into the more active cold side. Until the high topples and we settle down into a mild zonal winter :-) I didn't say that, I'm still going for a cold and snowy December. Weather and this newsgroup should be fun, enjoy! Will -- Hi Will, Thank you for your responses. (And everyone else too). I am familiar with the Met Office thoughts on the next weeks, however, my forecast is not for the acrual weather, but just for the changing path of the models bias and outcomes. Yes, I am still going for the models pointing ever more to a colder scenario during the end Nov/early Dec, so in weather forecasting terms, the 4 to 10 day outlook will be progressively cooler as from that time. Forecasting can only be done reliably from 12 to 48 hours in my experience. Seat of pants forecasting is what we call it in the trade. Sometimes it can be more difficult to get the next 4 hours right, let alone anything weeks ahead. Far better for forecasters to add value to the model itself in many "long term" cases, as this time of year always brings out the Crystal ball hogging "gypsy" forecasters, many of whom have a biased "Dickensian" view of how winter should pan out. Yes, Dawlish is correct, it is mild now, and looks mild for some days yet, but that is not what I am about. I am predicting a swing in "model outcomes" to a more cool outlook, then becoming decidedly cold. Various outlying "tubes" of most models are now becoming less inclined to mild conditions for us in the UK, and as you point out, some signs of the rossby changes you mention are starting to take effect in a few places. I may not be correct, in fact I know I'm not 100 correct already, but I do try to do the best I can with the data and vast experience that I have. I do have the best advanced training in Meteorology under my belt, various Model interpretation, computer and mathematical modelling, a couple of good degrees in Maths and Physics with Chemistry, one in a Technical design BA subject, and over 2 decades experience in the right area. Added to that I hold a good position in my career, and am respected in my field. I have numerous big hobbies too including Astronomy and Geology. Heck, I might even try and become a forecaster, rather than a guesser. I may continue in here, I may not, but anyone who knows how it all works will say it is a hard and sometimes dangerous thing to forecast weeks in advance. Maybe it is more satisfying to me to see what I think the models will turn their attention too instead. Forecasting is one thing, borrowing someone else's forecast is quite another. I never do the latter. Neo ================= OK cheers Neo. We in the Met Office rely on ensembles a lot and they have been consistent in flagging a colder NW ly or even northerly as we go into Dec. That is a change you too expect I think. A lot of data are not available publicly though (e.g. Met Office model ensembles). The MetO also run 4km and 1.5km resolution models to get detailed evolutions over the UK, particulaly for extreme rainfall events (again not publicly available). You don't say where you got your "advanced training" from? I used to teach meteorology and forecasting, were you one of my students? :-) -- http://www.lyneside.demon.co.uk/Hayt...antage_Pro.htm Will Hand (Haytor, Devon, 1017 feet asl) --------------------------------------------- |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 18, 10:48*am, "Eskimo Will" wrote:
"Neo" wrote in message ... On Nov 18, 9:05 am, "Eskimo Will" wrote: Neo, it is always difficult to second-guess the models. However, what the Met Office has been saying in the professional briefings I have attended each morning is that the block will be very stubborn with multiple trough disruptions helping to maintain it. This keeps most rain in the west but means detail is very difficult even at a few days as models struggle with trough disruptions. Len Wood mentioned in another thread that the Rossby wavelengths are such as to maintain persistence and he has been right so far. But, another thing we have been saying is that the block *will* slowly erode with some form of zonality establishing itself by the end of the month, coinciding with your thoughts to an extent. So by December we could well be in a colder NW'ly scenario, how cold is yet to be seen, but cold SSTs in western Atlantic would suggest to me that a mid-Atlantic ridge could build plunging us rapidly into a bitter northerly, note Ny Alesund has been very cold of late. This would also retrogress the Rossby pattern and put us into the more active cold side. Until the high topples and we settle down into a mild zonal winter :-) I didn't say that, I'm still going for a cold and snowy December. Weather and this newsgroup should be fun, enjoy! Will -- Hi Will,Thankyouforyour responses. (And everyone else too). I am familiar with the Met Office thoughts on the next weeks, however,my forecast is not for the acrual weather, but just for the changingpath of the models bias and outcomes. Yes, I am still going for the models pointing ever more to a colderscenario during the end Nov/early Dec, so in weather forecasting terms, the 4 to 10 day outlook will be progressively cooler as fromthattime. Forecasting can only be done reliably from 12 to 48 hours in myexperience.. Seatof pants forecasting is whatwe call it in the trade. Sometimes it can be more difficult to get the next 4 hours right, let alone anything weeks ahead. Far better for forecasters to add value to the model itself in many "long term" cases, as this time of year always brings out the Crystalball hogging "gypsy" forecasters, many of whomhavea biased "Dickensian" view of how winter should pan out. Yes, Dawlish is correct, it is mild now, and looks mild for some daysyet, but thatis not whatI am about. I am predicting a swing in "model outcomes" to a more cool outlook, then becoming decidedly cold. Various outlying "tubes" of most models are now becoming less inclinedto mild conditions for us in the UK, and asyoupoint out, some signsof the rossby changesyoumention are starting to take effect in a few places. I may not be correct, in fact I know I'm not 100 correctalready, but I do try to do the best I can with the data and vastexperience thatIhave.I dohavethe best advanced training in Meteorology under my belt,various Model interpretation, computer and mathematical modelling, acouple of good degrees in Maths and Physics with Chemistry, one in a Technical design BA subject, and over 2 decades experience in theright area. Added to thatI hold a good position in my career, and am respected in my field.Ihavenumerous big hobbies too including Astronomy and Geology.Heck, I might even try and become a forecaster, rather than a guesser. I may continue in here, I may not, but anyone who knows how it all works will say it is a hard and sometimes dangerous thing to forecastweeks in advance. Maybe it is more satisfying to me to see whatIthink the models will turn theirattention too instead. Forecasting is one thing, borrowing someone else's forecast is quite another. I neverdo the latter. Neo ================= OK cheers Neo. We in the Met Office rely on ensembles a lot and theyhave been consistent in flagging a colder NW ly or even northerly as we go intoDec. Thatis a changeyoutoo expect I think. A lot of data are not available publicly though (e.g. Met Office model ensembles). The MetO also run 4km and 1.5km resolution models to get detailed evolutions over the UK,particulaly for extreme rainfall events (again not publicly available).Youdon't say whereyougotyour "advanced training" from? I used to teachmeteorology and forecasting, wereyouone of my students? :-) --http://www.lyneside.demon.co.uk/Haytor/automatic/Current_Vantage_Pro.htm Will Hand (Haytor, Devon, 1017 feet asl) --------------------------------------------- Or were you one of my students Neo? :-) Where did you study for your degrees? No need to answer if you don't want to. A lot of people on this ng want to remain as anonymous as possible. That's OK, as long as we all try to remain courteous to each other. Len Wood Wembury, SW Devon, 83 m asl ------------------------------------------------------ |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 18, 10:34*am, Neo wrote:
On Nov 18, 9:05*am, "Eskimo Will" wrote: Neo, it is always difficult to second-guess the models. However, what the Met Office has been saying in the professional briefings I have attended each morning is that the block will be very stubborn with multiple trough disruptions helping to maintain it. This keeps most rain in the west but means detail is very difficult even at a few days as models struggle with trough disruptions. Len Wood mentioned in another thread that the Rossby wavelengths are such as to maintain persistence and he has been right so far. But, another thing we have been saying is that the block *will* slowly erode with some form of zonality establishing itself by the end of the month, coinciding with your thoughts to an extent. So by December we could well be in a colder NW'ly scenario, how cold is yet to be seen, but cold SSTs in western Atlantic would suggest to me that a mid-Atlantic ridge could build plunging us rapidly into a bitter northerly, note Ny Alesund has been very cold of late. This would also retrogress the Rossby pattern and put us into the more active cold side. Until the high topples and we settle down into a mild zonal winter :-) I didn't say that, I'm still going for a cold and snowy December. Weather and this newsgroup should be fun, enjoy! Will -- Hi Will, Thank you for your responses. (And everyone else too). I am familiar with the Met Office thoughts on the next weeks, however, my forecast is not for the acrual weather, but just for the changing path of the models bias and outcomes. Yes, I am still going for the models pointing ever more to a colder scenario during the end Nov/early Dec, so in weather forecasting terms, the 4 to 10 day outlook will be progressively cooler as from that time. Forecasting can only be done reliably from 12 to 48 hours in my experience. Seat of pants forecasting is what we call it in the trade. Sometimes it can be more difficult to get the next 4 hours right, let alone anything weeks ahead. Far better for forecasters to add value to the model itself in many "long term" cases, as this time of year always brings out the Crystal ball hogging "gypsy" forecasters, many of whom have a biased "Dickensian" view of how winter should pan out. Yes, Dawlish is correct, it is mild now, and looks mild for some days yet, but that is not what I am about. I am predicting a swing in "model outcomes" to a more cool outlook, then becoming decidedly cold. Various outlying "tubes" of most models are now becoming less inclined to mild conditions for us in the UK, and as you point out, some signs of the rossby changes you mention are starting to take effect in a few places. I may not be correct, in fact I know I'm not 100 correct already, but I do try to do the best I can with the data and vast experience that I have. I do have the best advanced training in Meteorology under my belt, various Model interpretation, computer and mathematical modelling, a couple of good degrees in Maths and Physics with Chemistry, one in a Technical design BA subject, and over 2 decades experience in the right area. Added to that I hold a good position in my career, and am respected in my field. I have numerous big hobbies too including Astronomy and Geology. Heck, I might even try and become a forecaster, rather than a guesser. I may continue in here, I may not, but anyone who knows how it all works will say it is a hard and sometimes dangerous thing to forecast weeks in advance. Maybe it is more satisfying to me to see what I think the models will turn their attention too instead. Forecasting is one thing, borrowing someone else's forecast is quite another. I never do the latter. Neo- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - What a nice post. Look forward to more. In my experience, forecasting can be done with 80% accuracy as to the general picture, on occasions, at 10 days. At present, I feel this is one of those times. they don't occur that often. Most of the time, forecasting at that distance is inaccurate and the MetO's 6-15 day precis is probably written by the tea boy in his spare time, the use it is to anyone past 10 days. *)) Seasonal forecasting is inaccurate; illustrated well by the MetO pulling out of public forecasting at that distance and no-one has believably demonstrated better accuracy than the MetO. PS I'd love to know what the "best advanced training in Meteorology" is and what the "vast experience" is that you have! I'm sure some others would too.Would you like to share that? Paul |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
the MetO's 6-15 day precis is probably written by the
tea boy in his spare time, the use it is to anyone past 10 days. *)) It gives an indication of the thinking at the time, based on the data available at the time. It's a bit insulting to say "probably written by the tea boy". Better to stick with "not much use past 10 days". illustrated well by the MetO pulling out of public forecasting at that distance. Not true. MetO still forecast at that distance, and it's available to all. -- Freddie Bayston Hill Shropshire 102m AMSL http://www.hosiene.co.uk/weather/cumulus/ |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 18, 11:56*am, Len Wood wrote:
On Nov 18, 10:48*am, "Eskimo Will" wrote: "Neo" wrote in message .... On Nov 18, 9:05 am, "Eskimo Will" wrote: Neo, it is always difficult to second-guess the models. However, what the Met Office has been saying in the professional briefings I have attended each morning is that the block will be very stubborn with multiple trough disruptions helping to maintain it. This keeps most rain in the west but means detail is very difficult even at a few days as models struggle with trough disruptions. Len Wood mentioned in another thread that the Rossby wavelengths are such as to maintain persistence and he has been right so far. But, another thing we have been saying is that the block *will* slowly erode with some form of zonality establishing itself by the end of the month, coinciding with your thoughts to an extent. So by December we could well be in a colder NW'ly scenario, how cold is yet to be seen, but cold SSTs in western Atlantic would suggest to me that a mid-Atlantic ridge could build plunging us rapidly into a bitter northerly, note Ny Alesund has been very cold of late. This would also retrogress the Rossby pattern and put us into the more active cold side. Until the high topples and we settle down into a mild zonal winter :-) I didn't say that, I'm still going for a cold and snowy December. Weather and this newsgroup should be fun, enjoy! Will -- Hi Will,Thankyouforyour responses. (And everyone else too). I am familiar with the Met Office thoughts on the next weeks, however,my forecast is not for the acrual weather, but just for the changingpath of the models bias and outcomes. Yes, I am still going for the models pointing ever more to a colderscenario during the end Nov/early Dec, so in weather forecasting terms, the 4 to 10 day outlook will be progressively cooler as fromthattime. Forecasting can only be done reliably from 12 to 48 hours in myexperience. Seatof pants forecasting is whatwe call it in the trade. Sometimes it can be more difficult to get the next 4 hours right, let alone anything weeks ahead. Far better for forecasters to add value to the model itself in many "long term" cases, as this time of year always brings out the Crystalball hogging "gypsy" forecasters, many of whomhavea biased "Dickensian" view of how winter should pan out. Yes, Dawlish is correct, it is mild now, and looks mild for some daysyet, but thatis not whatI am about. I am predicting a swing in "model outcomes" to a more cool outlook, then becoming decidedly cold. Various outlying "tubes" of most models are now becoming less inclinedto mild conditions for us in the UK, and asyoupoint out, some signsof the rossby changesyoumention are starting to take effect in a few places. I may not be correct, in fact I know I'm not 100 correctalready, but I do try to do the best I can with the data and vastexperience thatIhave.I dohavethe best advanced training in Meteorology under my belt,various Model interpretation, computer and mathematical modelling, acouple of good degrees in Maths and Physics with Chemistry, one in a Technical design BA subject, and over 2 decades experience in theright area. Added to thatI hold a good position in my career, and am respected in my field.Ihavenumerous big hobbies too including Astronomy and Geology.Heck, I might even try and become a forecaster, rather than a guesser. I may continue in here, I may not, but anyone who knows how it all works will say it is a hard and sometimes dangerous thing to forecastweeks in advance. Maybe it is more satisfying to me to see whatIthink the models will turn theirattention too instead. Forecasting is one thing, borrowing someone else's forecast is quite another. I neverdo the latter. Neo ================= OK cheers Neo. We in the Met Office rely on ensembles a lot and theyhave been consistent in flagging a colder NW ly or even northerly as we go intoDec. Thatis a changeyoutoo expect I think. A lot of data are not available publicly though (e.g. Met Office model ensembles). The MetO also run 4km and 1.5km resolution models to get detailed evolutions over the UK,particulaly for extreme rainfall events (again not publicly available).Youdon't say whereyougotyour "advanced training" from? I used to teachmeteorology and forecasting, wereyouone of my students? :-) --http://www.lyneside.demon.co.uk/Haytor/automatic/Current_Vantage_Pro.htm Will Hand (Haytor, Devon, 1017 feet asl) --------------------------------------------- Or were you one of my students Neo? :-) Where did you study for your degrees? No need to answer if you don't want to. A lot of people on this ng want to remain as anonymous as possible. That's OK, as long as we all try to remain courteous to each other. Len Wood Wembury, SW Devon, 83 m asl ------------------------------------------------------ My place of work and identity will remain anonymous due to my employment contract. Also, I was sponsored by my employer so many years ago to study, and I morally owe it to them. Will, I am familiar with the Met Office ensembles, 1.5 (UKV) and 4KM models, just as much as the coarse Global output. All very good tools, but at the moment, no more than that...tools....the important boundary layer will always confuse and confound even the best high resolution array, with its topography, geology, agriculture, and localised variance in water vapour etc....especially in areas like the UK with it's almost unique set of airmass influences and off continent Maritime position. Moisture handling of the model routines is very complex, more so near to the ground or sea surfaces. The WAFC forecasts are all very good regarding quality and reliability, more especially above FL050-100, the models do a very good job there in the 12-36 hour period on the whole. I prefer to concentrate on how the models fluctuate in the longer term and see how real events can flip the decisions that they make from day to day, run to run. The weather type is more important to me than the specifics at that sort of range. Lamb scenarios are often a good guide, defining the types expected in the later frames of model runs....but you still need the human factor I think. Good luck everyone, with the weather, you will need tons of it. Neo |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Eskimo Will" wrote:
Neo, it is always difficult to second-guess the models. However, what the Met Office has been saying in the professional briefings I have attended each morning is that the block will be very stubborn with multiple trough disruptions helping to maintain it. This keeps most rain in the west but means detail is very difficult even at a few days as models struggle with trough disruptions. Len Wood mentioned in another thread that the Rossby wavelengths are such as to maintain persistence and he has been right so far. But, another thing we have been saying is that the block *will* slowly erode with some form of zonality establishing itself by the end of the month, coinciding with your thoughts to an extent. So by December we could well be in a colder NW'ly scenario, how cold is yet to be seen, but cold SSTs in western Atlantic would suggest to me that a mid-Atlantic ridge could build plunging us rapidly into a bitter northerly, note Ny Alesund has been very cold of late. This would also retrogress the Rossby pattern and put us into the more active cold side. Until the high topples and we settle down into a mild zonal winter :-) I didn't say that, I'm still going for a cold and snowy December. Weather and this newsgroup should be fun, enjoy! Interesting stuff, thanks Will. I'm a complete novice at this stuff. Is the high pressure over central Europe blocking the west-to-east flow, meaning that we get more southerly winds instead? Would an early indication of possible cold weather for the UK be the disappearance of that high pressure over Europe? Cheers, John. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The Models will all change their long term ideas in the next 3 to 4 days. | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Climate Models and Their Evaluation - Executive Summary | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
How often do UKMO update their forecast on their website | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Climatologists discover Biblical Flood in their Climate Models | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
What ambulance chasing lawyer did Belfort hire to further harass one of their employees? Can anyone provide their name and information? This guy must not have any work, or be desperate for business! I bet he is telling Belfort that they have such | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) |