Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/image...re976by549.jpg
--- Posted via news://freenews.netfront.net/ - Complaints to --- |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 08/12/2011 21:28, Stan Laurel wrote:
http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/image...re976by549.jpg Good heavens! I thought the subject line was a bit dramatic before I looked at the image but it really has blown up, hasn't it! Quite a dramatic picture. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 8, 10:34*pm, Neil
wrote: On 08/12/2011 21:28, Stan Laurel wrote: http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/image...13585_winturbi... Good heavens! I thought the subject line was a bit dramatic before I looked at the image but it really has blown up, hasn't it! Quite a dramatic picture. I thought these things were supposed to have inbuilt brakes? Still at least an exploding turbine cause less damage than an exploing nuclear sub station... |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 8, 10:51*pm, Scott W wrote:
On Dec 8, 10:34*pm, Neil wrote: On 08/12/2011 21:28, Stan Laurel wrote: http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/image...13585_winturbi.... Good heavens! I thought the subject line was a bit dramatic before I looked at the image but it really has blown up, hasn't it! Quite a dramatic picture. I thought these things were supposed to have inbuilt brakes? Still at least an exploding turbine cause less damage than an exploing nuclear sub station... Odd how the camera was posed perfectly and the cameraman was on the spot. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
One down, unfortunately still 1000's left
|
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article
, Weatherlawyer writes: On Dec 8, 10:51*pm, Scott W wrote: On Dec 8, 10:34*pm, Neil wrote: On 08/12/2011 21:28, Stan Laurel wrote: http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/image...13585_winturbi... Good heavens! I thought the subject line was a bit dramatic before I looked at the image but it really has blown up, hasn't it! Quite a dramatic picture. I thought these things were supposed to have inbuilt brakes? Still at least an exploding turbine cause less damage than an exploing nuclear sub station... Odd how the camera was posed perfectly and the cameraman was on the spot. Nowadays, when everyone (except me) seems to have a mobile phone capable of taking pictures, it's not so surprising to get rare events captured as it would have been a few years ago. -- John Hall "The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it." George Bernard Shaw |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 9, 10:24*am, John Hall wrote:
In article , *Weatherlawyer writes: On Dec 8, 10:51*pm, Scott W wrote: On Dec 8, 10:34*pm, Neil wrote: On 08/12/2011 21:28, Stan Laurel wrote: http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/image...13585_winturbi... Good heavens! I thought the subject line was a bit dramatic before I looked at the image but it really has blown up, hasn't it! Quite a dramatic picture. I thought these things were supposed to have inbuilt brakes? Still at least an exploding turbine cause less damage than an exploing nuclear sub station... Odd how the camera was posed perfectly and the cameraman was on the spot. Nowadays, when everyone (except me) seems to have a mobile phone capable of taking pictures, it's not so surprising to get rare events captured as it would have been a few years ago. You still need to be on the ball and be able to work throughan adrenaline rush. Pretty good shooting though. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Scott W" wrote in message
... On Dec 8, 10:34 pm, Neil wrote: On 08/12/2011 21:28, Stan Laurel wrote: http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/image...13585_winturbi... Good heavens! I thought the subject line was a bit dramatic before I looked at the image but it really has blown up, hasn't it! Quite a dramatic picture. I thought these things were supposed to have inbuilt brakes? Still at least an exploding turbine cause less damage than an exploing nuclear sub station... .. It seems to be facing down wind, perhaps there is no reverse gear. Tom .. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 9, 2:13*pm, "Tom Allen" wrote:
"Scott W" wrote in message It seems to be facing down wind, perhaps there is no reverse gear. Maybe the brakes need replacing? |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message
ups.com Weatherlawyer wrote: On Dec 9, 2:13*pm, "Tom Allen" wrote: "Scott W" wrote in message It seems to be facing down wind, perhaps there is no reverse gear. Maybe the brakes need replacing? Apparently the brakes failed causing the turbine to overspeed. -- Visit my weather station at http://homepage.ntlworld.com/m.dixon4/Cumulus/index.htm Believing is the start of everything to come. - Hayley Westenra |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
When the North wind blows........ | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Obama promotes wind turbine technology stolen by espionage | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
FT solves wind turbine UFO problem | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Wind turbine shedding ice | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Local Northampton press "Wind blows roof of school" | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |