I just found this forecast on this site:

NATIONAL TRENDS FOR WINTER 2011 - ACROSS THE USA

A more detailed forecast is available from any one of our
astrometeorologists featured in the list that follows. Contact and
discuss the options.

The West Coast
A starting point is in the west where abundant rain is in the
forecast. Wet weather is typical in the northwest, but in Los Angeles
- is that a reach, perhaps, but not unknown to have flooding rains.
The models are displaying moisture, not only in the normally dry
regions of California but an extraordinary amount. Too much moisture
in California can bring on mudslides, and not the kind you drink! The
Los Angeles model holds a number of aspects which confirms the
forecast.

Over the Rocky Mtns.
Strong winds build and traverse the region both north and south.
Sporadic rain/snow and freezing temperatures in the northern states
and in the south, more dry conditions than usual, but plenty of wind
activity.

Midwest
North and central states will experience active, fast and turbulent
systems. They form and butt fronts to create a tornado ridden season.
This is not typical weather for winter. The usual cold and snowy
storms will prevail with more see saw temperatures as well.

South central states, Texas, Louisiana and nearby states have a bit
more high pressure systems that will, at times, block and divert the
flow of storms coming from the west. Storms flowing from the gulf are
extreme, more towards the middle of the season.

In general, Florida and the southeast will have the high pressure in
place for the beginning of the season producing milder temperatures.
There is one indication of abnormal warmth which is of concern; too
hot can clash with colder air normal for winter and create destructive
thunderstorms. Normal rainfall totals should be the result for the
entire season.

http://weathersage.com/forecasts/2011winter/#national

She wants 120 dollars for a couple of CDs before I find out how she
makes her predictions.

If it works I suppose it is a cheap insight. I don't begrudge her a
living but I don't think so -not at his time.

On Dec 19, 4:09*am, Weatherlawyer wrote:

http://weathersage.com/forecasts/2011winter/#national

Weatherlawyer, Weathersage - whatever next, Weatherforecaster?

Richard

Reading that stuff is a bit like mental rape ,I'm so glad I killfiled
Weatherlawyer some time ago

RonB

"Richard Dixon" wrote in message
...
On Dec 19, 4:09 am, Weatherlawyer wrote:

http://weathersage.com/forecasts/2011winter/#national

Weatherlawyer, Weathersage - whatever next, Weatherforecaster?

Richard

On Dec 19, 9:52*am, Richard Dixon wrote:
On Dec 19, 4:09*am, Weatherlawyer wrote:

http://weathersage.com/forecasts/2011winter/#national

Weatherlawyer, Weathersage - whatever next, Weatherforecaster?

Well I forecast this snow would stop falling when all on here were
saying their prayers to the great white god.

You don't know what causes weather and all the money supplied to
Meteorology to provide house and feed enormous computers isn't
accomplishing all that much better than us is it?

If a fraction of one percent of what has been spent at the University
of the "Middle East", never mind keeping ice cold and tree rings safe,
had been spent on employing a couple of school leavers to actually try
and understand what we amateurs are doing, even a dolt like you would
be sensible about this stuff.

Only kidding.
There is no way on god's earth He is going to let you see daylight.

I have only just begun to look at what the author of this site has
done so I can't say yea or nay to it. But at least she is trying. What
are you doing?

Has anyone on here besides me actually tried to understand where
weather comes from?
I hear talk of instabilities and all sorts of mumbo jumbo from
scientists. But no insights and little true understandings.

Why not just ignore me?

Have I asked for your assistance?

I have had none from any on here. Absolute zero. Why can't you be
happy with that?
You cesspit.

On Dec 19, 10:43*am, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Dec 19, 9:52*am, Richard Dixon wrote:

On Dec 19, 4:09*am, Weatherlawyer wrote:

http://weathersage.com/forecasts/2011winter/#national

Weatherlawyer, Weathersage - whatever next, Weatherforecaster?

Well I forecast this snow would stop falling when all on here were
saying their prayers to the great white god.

You don't know what causes weather and all the money supplied to
Meteorology to provide house and feed enormous computers isn't
accomplishing all that much better than us is it?

If a fraction of one percent of what has been spent at the University
of the "Middle East", never mind keeping ice cold and tree rings safe,
had been spent on employing a couple of school leavers to actually try
and understand what we amateurs are doing, even a dolt like you would
be sensible about this stuff.

Only kidding.
There is no way on god's earth He is going to let you see daylight.

I have only just begun to look at what the author of this site has
done so I can't say yea or nay to it. But at least she is trying. What
are you doing?

Has anyone on here besides me actually tried to understand where
weather comes from?
I hear talk of instabilities and all sorts of mumbo jumbo from
scientists. But no insights and little true understandings.

Why not just ignore me?

Have I asked for your assistance?

I have had none from any on here. Absolute zero. Why can't you be
happy with that?
You cesspit.

The deluded always believe they are the ones with the answer and
everyone else is wrong. I would imagine most people will ignore you,
or not, as is their wont, but if they reply, it will almost always be
to tell you that you are a silly, deluded individual. If that hurts -
I don't honestly care.

Weatherlawyer wrote:

Have I asked for your assistance?

I have had none from any on here. Absolute zero. Why can't you be
happy with that?
You cesspit.
------------------------
Well I've always thought you may have some problems Michael so have
always taken care not to insult you and respond politely when you
occsionally say something that is comprehensible - but even then you
usually are rude so you are probably right - we should ignore you.
Dave

On 19/12/2011 04:09, Weatherlawyer wrote:
I just found this forecast on this site:

NATIONAL TRENDS FOR WINTER 2011 - ACROSS THE USA

A more detailed forecast is available from any one of our
astrometeorologists featured in the list that follows. Contact and
discuss the options.

Probably works at least as well as the methods your mate Piers Corbyn
uses to separate the red tops from their money. Except that he manages
to get paid for the tripe he feeds them and no-one ever moans when he
gets it wrong. They only remember the rare occasions when he is right.

Regards,
Martin Brown

On Dec 19, 3:08*pm, Dave Cornwell wrote:
Weatherlawyer wrote:
Have I asked for your assistance?

Well I've always thought you may have some problems Michael so have
always taken care not to insult you and respond politely when you
occasionally say something that is comprehensible - but even then you
usually are rude so you are probably right - we should ignore you.

Be my guest, old fruit.
I wasn't asking for pity. I was just pointing out the facts of life to
an idiot.

Pointless I know but why should I have to swallow **** from a cesspit?

As it happens I have been bang on so far and as a case in point may I
point you to my latest forecast:
http://my.opera.com/Weatherlawyer/al...=&perscreen=20

I have never read anything from Piers Morgan except once when someone
on here pointed out in the most negative terms possible how well he
actually made a forecast months in advance. missed by two degrees and
you all fell on him like **** from a shovel.

Two degrees.

You lot can all be described as !¬ing dimwits.

Thanks for being nice to me in the past.
G'byee...

Weatherlawyer wrote in news:a4f4ad31-9c80-438a-
:

Has anyone on here besides me actually tried to understand where
weather comes from.

The sun.

You cesspit.

I think you need a lie down.

Weatherlawyer wrote in
:

Thanks for being nice to me in the past.
G'byee...

Phew - we can come out from behind the sofa now, folks.