|
**Forecast** High pressure in charge of the UK weather at T+240 on28th November
Probably a better way of phrasing this is to highlight the pressure regime, rather than the wind direction.
**On 28th Nov, at T+240, the UK will be under the influence of an anticyclone. Night frosts will be common, if the skies clear and the east coast may be subject to wintry showers, if there is a flow over the UK from the North Sea, but the main weather type is likely to be cool, with grey skies and generally light winds. ** There will be no gales around the 27th/28th November in the UK, this year. *)) |
**Forecast** High pressure in charge of the UK weather at T+240on 28th November
On Monday, 18 November 2013 20:15:34 UTC, Dawlish wrote:
Probably a better way of phrasing this is to highlight the pressure regime, rather than the wind direction. **On 28th Nov, at T+240, the UK will be under the influence of an anticyclone. Night frosts will be common, if the skies clear and the east coast may be subject to wintry showers, if there is a flow over the UK from the North Sea, but the main weather type is likely to be cool, with grey skies and generally light winds. ** There will be no gales around the 27th/28th November in the UK, this year.. *)) Ah, if may and if. 80% certain about this? |
**Forecast** High pressure in charge of the UK weather at T+240on 28th November
On Monday, November 18, 2013 8:15:34 PM UTC, Dawlish wrote:
Probably a better way of phrasing this is to highlight the pressure regime, rather than the wind direction. **On 28th Nov, at T+240, the UK will be under the influence of an anticyclone. Night frosts will be common, if the skies clear and the east coast may be subject to wintry showers, if there is a flow over the UK from the North Sea, but the main weather type is likely to be cool, with grey skies and generally light winds. ** There will be no gales around the 27th/28th November in the UK, this year. *)) The gales on 27th/28th comment was taken on board by you, obviously. So much for you saying all my comments could be safely ignored |
**Forecast** High pressure in charge of the UK weather at T+240on 28th November
On Monday, November 18, 2013 11:18:29 PM UTC, David Mitchell wrote:
On Monday, 18 November 2013 20:15:34 UTC, Dawlish wrote: Probably a better way of phrasing this is to highlight the pressure regime, rather than the wind direction. **On 28th Nov, at T+240, the UK will be under the influence of an anticyclone. Night frosts will be common, if the skies clear and the east coast may be subject to wintry showers, if there is a flow over the UK from the North Sea, but the main weather type is likely to be cool, with grey skies and generally light winds. ** There will be no gales around the 27th/28th November in the UK, this year. *)) Ah, if may and if. 80% certain about this? *)) |
**Forecast** High pressure in charge of the UK weather at T+240on 28th November
On Monday, November 18, 2013 11:21:35 PM UTC, Jim Cannon wrote:
On Monday, November 18, 2013 8:15:34 PM UTC, Dawlish wrote: Probably a better way of phrasing this is to highlight the pressure regime, rather than the wind direction. **On 28th Nov, at T+240, the UK will be under the influence of an anticyclone. Night frosts will be common, if the skies clear and the east coast may be subject to wintry showers, if there is a flow over the UK from the North Sea, but the main weather type is likely to be cool, with grey skies and generally light winds. ** There will be no gales around the 27th/28th November in the UK, this year. *)) The gales on 27th/28th comment was taken on board by you, obviously. So much for you saying all my comments could be safely ignored I said nothing of the sort. I've said you were an idiot and this (Piers sourced?) guess shows I am entirely correct. |
**Forecast** High pressure in charge of the UK weather at T+240on 28th November
On Tuesday, November 19, 2013 9:42:37 AM UTC, Dawlish wrote:
On Monday, November 18, 2013 11:21:35 PM UTC, Jim Cannon wrote: On Monday, November 18, 2013 8:15:34 PM UTC, Dawlish wrote: Probably a better way of phrasing this is to highlight the pressure regime, rather than the wind direction. **On 28th Nov, at T+240, the UK will be under the influence of an anticyclone. Night frosts will be common, if the skies clear and the east coast may be subject to wintry showers, if there is a flow over the UK from the North Sea, but the main weather type is likely to be cool, with grey skies and generally light winds. ** There will be no gales around the 27th/28th November in the UK, this year. *)) The gales on 27th/28th comment was taken on board by you, obviously. So much for you saying all my comments could be safely ignored I said nothing of the sort. I've said you were an idiot and this (Piers sourced?) guess shows I am entirely correct. Your preoccupation with my idiocy is really quite worrying, Dawlish! And forget the supposition - why dont you just go along to the next WeatherAction meeting next week and ask the man himself. Oh, and perhaps take a bottle of Croft Original with you |
**Forecast** High pressure in charge of the UK weather at T+240on 28th November
On Monday, November 18, 2013 8:15:34 PM UTC, Dawlish wrote:
Probably a better way of phrasing this is to highlight the pressure regime, rather than the wind direction. **On 28th Nov, at T+240, the UK will be under the influence of an anticyclone. Night frosts will be common, if the skies clear and the east coast may be subject to wintry showers, if there is a flow over the UK from the North Sea, but the main weather type is likely to be cool, with grey skies and generally light winds. ** There will be no gales around the 27th/28th November in the UK, this year.. *)) Nothing in this morning's charts to make me think this forecast will not achieve outcome. |
**Forecast** High pressure in charge of the UK weather at T+240on 28th November
On Tuesday, 19 November 2013 09:49:45 UTC, Jim Cannon wrote:
On Tuesday, November 19, 2013 9:42:37 AM UTC, Dawlish wrote: On Monday, November 18, 2013 11:21:35 PM UTC, Jim Cannon wrote: On Monday, November 18, 2013 8:15:34 PM UTC, Dawlish wrote: Probably a better way of phrasing this is to highlight the pressure regime, rather than the wind direction. **On 28th Nov, at T+240, the UK will be under the influence of an anticyclone. Night frosts will be common, if the skies clear and the east coast may be subject to wintry showers, if there is a flow over the UK from the North Sea, but the main weather type is likely to be cool, with grey skies and generally light winds. ** There will be no gales around the 27th/28th November in the UK, this year. *)) The gales on 27th/28th comment was taken on board by you, obviously. So much for you saying all my comments could be safely ignored I said nothing of the sort. I've said you were an idiot and this (Piers sourced?) guess shows I am entirely correct. Your preoccupation with my idiocy is really quite worrying, Dawlish! And forget the supposition - why dont you just go along to the next WeatherAction meeting next week and ask the man himself. Oh, and perhaps take a bottle of Croft Original with you Knowing him (idiot) he'll probably bring this with him http://tinyurl.com/p33aup4 |
**Forecast** High pressure in charge of the UK weather at T+240on 28th November
On Tuesday, November 19, 2013 10:05:41 AM UTC, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
On Tuesday, 19 November 2013 09:49:45 UTC, Jim Cannon wrote: On Tuesday, November 19, 2013 9:42:37 AM UTC, Dawlish wrote: On Monday, November 18, 2013 11:21:35 PM UTC, Jim Cannon wrote: On Monday, November 18, 2013 8:15:34 PM UTC, Dawlish wrote: Probably a better way of phrasing this is to highlight the pressure regime, rather than the wind direction. **On 28th Nov, at T+240, the UK will be under the influence of an anticyclone. Night frosts will be common, if the skies clear and the east coast may be subject to wintry showers, if there is a flow over the UK from the North Sea, but the main weather type is likely to be cool, with grey skies and generally light winds. ** There will be no gales around the 27th/28th November in the UK, this year. *)) The gales on 27th/28th comment was taken on board by you, obviously.. So much for you saying all my comments could be safely ignored I said nothing of the sort. I've said you were an idiot and this (Piers sourced?) guess shows I am entirely correct. Your preoccupation with my idiocy is really quite worrying, Dawlish! And forget the supposition - why dont you just go along to the next WeatherAction meeting next week and ask the man himself. Oh, and perhaps take a bottle of Croft Original with you Knowing him (idiot) he'll probably bring this with him http://tinyurl.com/p33aup4 You are coming over as obsessed, starting several threads specifically about me and making a fool of yourself. I suggest a break. Come back on the 28th when the accuracy (or not) of this forecast can then be judged. |
**Forecast** High pressure in charge of the UK weather at T+240 on 28th November
Dawlish wrote:
You are coming over as obsessed, starting several threads specifically about me and making a fool of yourself. I suggest a break. Come back on the 28th when the accuracy (or not) of this forecast can then be judged. Obsessed? That's a but rich coming from somebody who repeatedly replies to Lawrence's posts with the word 'idiot'. Why do you persist in doing this, it only serves to make yourself look silly. -- Col Bolton, Lancashire 160m asl Snow videos: http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3QvmL4UWBmHFMKWiwYm_gg |
**Forecast** High pressure in charge of the UK weather at T+240on 28th November
On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 6:48:42 AM UTC, Col wrote:
Dawlish wrote: You are coming over as obsessed, starting several threads specifically about me and making a fool of yourself. I suggest a break. Come back on the 28th when the accuracy (or not) of this forecast can then be judged. Obsessed? That's a but rich coming from somebody who repeatedly replies to Lawrence's posts with the word 'idiot'. Why do you persist in doing this, it only serves to make yourself look silly. -- Col Bolton, Lancashire 160m asl Snow videos: http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3QvmL4UWBmHFMKWiwYm_gg It's a great deal easier than explaining to idiots the same thing, over and over again. For me, here are two idiots on here that post, unfortunately, on a regular basis; larry and cannon. Neither usually deserve more than a single word reply - and yes; they deserve it when they post idiocy. Happy? Probably not, but it's not going to change and I hope you'll wake up in a better mood, Col. *)) |
**Forecast** High pressure in charge of the UK weather at T+240 on 28th November
Dawlish wrote:
On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 6:48:42 AM UTC, Col wrote: Dawlish wrote: You are coming over as obsessed, starting several threads specifically about me and making a fool of yourself. I suggest a break. Come back on the 28th when the accuracy (or not) of this forecast can then be judged. Obsessed? That's a but rich coming from somebody who repeatedly replies to Lawrence's posts with the word 'idiot'. Why do you persist in doing this, it only serves to make yourself look silly. -- Col Bolton, Lancashire 160m asl Snow videos: http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3QvmL4UWBmHFMKWiwYm_gg It's a great deal easier than explaining to idiots the same thing, over and over again. For me, here are two idiots on here that post, unfortunately, on a regular basis; larry and cannon. Neither usually deserve more than a single word reply - and yes; they deserve it when they post idiocy. Wouldn't it be easier just to ignore them, I don't see what you get out of this. Plus, it also gives the impression you can't refute their arguments, now I know you can, so why make it look like you can't? Happy? Probably not, but it's not going to change and I hope you'll wake up in a better mood, Col. *)) Just because I draw attention to your double-standards doesn't mean I am in a bad mood. -- Col Bolton, Lancashire 160m asl Snow videos: http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3QvmL4UWBmHFMKWiwYm_gg |
**Forecast** High pressure in charge of the UK weather at T+240on 28th November
On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 10:56:09 AM UTC, Col wrote:
Dawlish wrote: On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 6:48:42 AM UTC, Col wrote: Dawlish wrote: You are coming over as obsessed, starting several threads specifically about me and making a fool of yourself. I suggest a break. Come back on the 28th when the accuracy (or not) of this forecast can then be judged. Obsessed? That's a but rich coming from somebody who repeatedly replies to Lawrence's posts with the word 'idiot'. Why do you persist in doing this, it only serves to make yourself look silly. -- Col Bolton, Lancashire 160m asl Snow videos: http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3QvmL4UWBmHFMKWiwYm_gg It's a great deal easier than explaining to idiots the same thing, over and over again. For me, here are two idiots on here that post, unfortunately, on a regular basis; larry and cannon. Neither usually deserve more than a single word reply - and yes; they deserve it when they post idiocy. Wouldn't it be easier just to ignore them, I don't see what you get out of this. Plus, it also gives the impression you can't refute their arguments, now I know you can, so why make it look like you can't? Happy? Probably not, but it's not going to change and I hope you'll wake up in a better mood, Col. *)) Just because I draw attention to your double-standards doesn't mean I am in a bad mood. -- Col Bolton, Lancashire 160m asl Snow videos: http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3QvmL4UWBmHFMKWiwYm_gg Why should I ignore them and where exactly are 'double standards' (apart from saying it to two of them, on occasions, of course) *)). Isn't it entirely up to an individual whether and to whom, they reply and as long as it is not abusive, or threatening, there is nothing to stop them saying what they wish, as far as I am aware. PS If you find the term; "Idiot", abusive, threatening, or even bullying, I would imagine almost all the UK population has been guilty at some time. Now threatening physical violence and using foul language in the newsgroup is a different matter, as I'm sure you would agree. |
**Forecast** High pressure in charge of the UK weather at T+240 on 28th November
Dawlish wrote:
Why should I ignore them and where exactly are 'double standards' (apart from saying it to two of them, on occasions, of course) *)). Isn't it entirely up to an individual whether and to whom, they reply and as long as it is not abusive, or threatening, there is nothing to stop them saying what they wish, as far as I am aware. The 'double-standards' are you picking Lawrence up for starting threads about you then you doing something equally daft as in trotting yound after him calling him an 'idiot' at every opportunity. PS If you find the term; "Idiot", abusive, threatening, or even bullying, I would imagine almost all the UK population has been guilty at some time. Now threatening physical violence and using foul language in the newsgroup is a different matter, as I'm sure you would agree. I don't find the term particulary abusive, I never said that. I just find it tedious to see you use it over and over again. It's pointless, it adds nothing to the discussion so why persist with it? -- Col Bolton, Lancashire 160m asl Snow videos: http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3QvmL4UWBmHFMKWiwYm_gg |
**Forecast** High pressure in charge of the UK weather at T+240on 28th November
On Thursday, November 21, 2013 7:05:38 AM UTC, Col wrote:
Dawlish wrote: Why should I ignore them and where exactly are 'double standards' (apart from saying it to two of them, on occasions, of course) *)). Isn't it entirely up to an individual whether and to whom, they reply and as long as it is not abusive, or threatening, there is nothing to stop them saying what they wish, as far as I am aware. The 'double-standards' are you picking Lawrence up for starting threads about you then you doing something equally daft as in trotting yound after him calling him an 'idiot' at every opportunity. PS If you find the term; "Idiot", abusive, threatening, or even bullying, I would imagine almost all the UK population has been guilty at some time. Now threatening physical violence and using foul language in the newsgroup is a different matter, as I'm sure you would agree. I don't find the term particulary abusive, I never said that. I just find it tedious to see you use it over and over again. It's pointless, it adds nothing to the discussion so why persist with it? -- Col Bolton, Lancashire 160m asl Snow videos: http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3QvmL4UWBmHFMKWiwYm_gg "Tedious", fine. There is all sorts of tediousness on this newsgroup, but it is in the eye of the beholder. People who are abusive and threatening - well we'd never tolerate them. Surely you wouldn't, would you? |
**Forecast** High pressure in charge of the UK weather at T+240on 28th November
On 21/11/2013 09:32, Dawlish wrote:
"Tedious", fine. There is all sorts of tediousness on this newsgroup, but it is in the eye of the beholder. People who are abusive and threatening - well we'd never tolerate them. Surely you wouldn't, would you? Unfortunately a lot of valued posters *have* decided not to tolerate them... -- Paul Hyett, Cheltenham |
**Forecast** High pressure in charge of the UK weather at T+240on 28th November
On 20/11/2013 07:17, Dawlish wrote:
On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 6:48:42 AM UTC, Col wrote: Dawlish wrote: You are coming over as obsessed, starting several threads specifically about me and making a fool of yourself. I suggest a break. Come back on the 28th when the accuracy (or not) of this forecast can then be judged. Obsessed? That's a but rich coming from somebody who repeatedly replies to Lawrence's posts with the word 'idiot'. Why do you persist in doing this, it only serves to make yourself look silly. -- Col Bolton, Lancashire 160m asl Snow videos: http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3QvmL4UWBmHFMKWiwYm_gg It's a great deal easier than explaining to idiots the same thing, over and over again. It may be a better idea have a set of stock rebuttals stored somewhere. Whenever you feel the urge to reply to another idiotic post, cut and paste with the subject line something like ***Automated xxx response*** (where xxx is the subject of the rebuttal), then cut and paste the response, job done. That may make it easier for others to filter out your replies as well, plus you get to challenge the same rubbish over and over again to the point where, just maybe, it may discourage people from posting rubbish. Just a thought. |
**Forecast** High pressure in charge of the UK weather at T+240on 28th November
On Thursday, November 21, 2013 11:16:14 PM UTC, Adam Lea wrote:
On 20/11/2013 07:17, Dawlish wrote: On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 6:48:42 AM UTC, Col wrote: Dawlish wrote: You are coming over as obsessed, starting several threads specifically about me and making a fool of yourself. I suggest a break. Come back on the 28th when the accuracy (or not) of this forecast can then be judged. Obsessed? That's a but rich coming from somebody who repeatedly replies to Lawrence's posts with the word 'idiot'. Why do you persist in doing this, it only serves to make yourself look silly. -- Col Bolton, Lancashire 160m asl Snow videos: http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3QvmL4UWBmHFMKWiwYm_gg It's a great deal easier than explaining to idiots the same thing, over and over again. It may be a better idea have a set of stock rebuttals stored somewhere. Whenever you feel the urge to reply to another idiotic post, cut and paste with the subject line something like ***Automated xxx response*** (where xxx is the subject of the rebuttal), then cut and paste the response, job done. That may make it easier for others to filter out your replies as well, plus you get to challenge the same rubbish over and over again to the point where, just maybe, it may discourage people from posting rubbish. Just a thought. Or I could challenge idiocy when I see it in whatever way I wish, or decide not to, as I wish. *)) |
**Forecast** High pressure in charge of the UK weather at T+240on 28th November
On Monday, November 18, 2013 8:15:34 PM UTC, Dawlish wrote:
Probably a better way of phrasing this is to highlight the pressure regime, rather than the wind direction. **On 28th Nov, at T+240, the UK will be under the influence of an anticyclone. Night frosts will be common, if the skies clear and the east coast may be subject to wintry showers, if there is a flow over the UK from the North Sea, but the main weather type is likely to be cool, with grey skies and generally light winds. ** There will be no gales around the 27th/28th November in the UK, this year.. *)) I doubt whether this forecast won't achieve outcome now (must be one of the easier forecasts, again, I suppose?). It also looks as if the HP will extend beyond the 28th, but possibly not to T+240, unless the models (especially the GEM) show more agreement than they do this morning. My confidence in that happening is not high enough. Would this be a "difficult" time to forecast, or does anyone feel that the 10-day forecast for 3rd December is another easy one? |
**Forecast** High pressure in charge of the UK weather at T+240on 28th November
On Saturday, 23 November 2013 09:30:57 UTC, Dawlish wrote:
On Monday, November 18, 2013 8:15:34 PM UTC, Dawlish wrote: Probably a better way of phrasing this is to highlight the pressure regime, rather than the wind direction. **On 28th Nov, at T+240, the UK will be under the influence of an anticyclone. Night frosts will be common, if the skies clear and the east coast may be subject to wintry showers, if there is a flow over the UK from the North Sea, but the main weather type is likely to be cool, with grey skies and generally light winds. ** There will be no gales around the 27th/28th November in the UK, this year. *)) I doubt whether this forecast won't achieve outcome now (must be one of the easier forecasts, again, I suppose?). It also looks as if the HP will extend beyond the 28th, but possibly not to T+240, unless the models (especially the GEM) show more agreement than they do this morning. My confidence in that happening is not high enough. Would this be a "difficult" time to forecast, or does anyone feel that the 10-day forecast for 3rd December is another easy one? IDIOT |
**Forecast** High pressure in charge of the UK weather at T+240 on 28th November
Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
On Saturday, 23 November 2013 09:30:57 UTC, Dawlish wrote: Would this be a "difficult" time to forecast, or does anyone feel that the 10-day forecast for 3rd December is another easy one? IDIOT Lawrence, please don't lower yourself to his level. -- Col Bolton, Lancashire 160m asl Snow videos: http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3QvmL4UWBmHFMKWiwYm_gg |
**Forecast** High pressure in charge of the UK weather at T+240on 28th November
On Saturday, 23 November 2013 12:46:12 UTC, Col wrote:
Lawrence Jenkins wrote: On Saturday, 23 November 2013 09:30:57 UTC, Dawlish wrote: Would this be a "difficult" time to forecast, or does anyone feel that the 10-day forecast for 3rd December is another easy one? IDIOT Lawrence, please don't lower yourself to his level. -- Col Bolton, Lancashire 160m asl Snow videos: http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3QvmL4UWBmHFMKWiwYm_gg It was a test run, just trying it out. |
**Forecast** High pressure in charge of the UK weather at T+240 on 28th November
Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
It was a test run, just trying it out. It worked. -- Col Bolton, Lancashire 160m asl Snow videos: http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3QvmL4UWBmHFMKWiwYm_gg |
**Forecast** High pressure in charge of the UK weather at T+240on 28th November
On Saturday, November 23, 2013 9:30:57 AM UTC, Dawlish wrote:
On Monday, November 18, 2013 8:15:34 PM UTC, Dawlish wrote: Probably a better way of phrasing this is to highlight the pressure regime, rather than the wind direction. **On 28th Nov, at T+240, the UK will be under the influence of an anticyclone. Night frosts will be common, if the skies clear and the east coast may be subject to wintry showers, if there is a flow over the UK from the North Sea, but the main weather type is likely to be cool, with grey skies and generally light winds. ** There will be no gales around the 27th/28th November in the UK, this year. *)) I doubt whether this forecast won't achieve outcome now (must be one of the easier forecasts, again, I suppose?). It also looks as if the HP will extend beyond the 28th, but possibly not to T+240, unless the models (especially the GEM) show more agreement than they do this morning. My confidence in that happening is not high enough. Would this be a "difficult" time to forecast, or does anyone feel that the 10-day forecast for 3rd December is another easy one? I think I was right not to have confidence enough to forecast yesterday. The chances of high pressure dominating the UK weather in 10 days, on 4th Dec are under 80% for me. The situation for a European High (Bartlett) sending mild South-Westerlies over the UK, I would give a lower probability that that. |
**Forecast** High pressure in charge of the UK weather at T+240on 28th November
On Monday, November 18, 2013 8:15:34 PM UTC, Dawlish wrote:
Probably a better way of phrasing this is to highlight the pressure regime, rather than the wind direction. **On 28th Nov, at T+240, the UK will be under the influence of an anticyclone. Night frosts will be common, if the skies clear and the east coast may be subject to wintry showers, if there is a flow over the UK from the North Sea, but the main weather type is likely to be cool, with grey skies and generally light winds. ** There will be no gales around the 27th/28th November in the UK, this year.. *)) A good forecast. Not cold enough for witty showers, but cool and grey characterises much of the UK's weather today. |
**Forecast** High pressure in charge of the UK weather at T+240on 28th November
On Thursday, 28 November 2013 21:47:03 UTC, Dawlish wrote:
On Monday, November 18, 2013 8:15:34 PM UTC, Dawlish wrote: Probably a better way of phrasing this is to highlight the pressure regime, rather than the wind direction. **On 28th Nov, at T+240, the UK will be under the influence of an anticyclone. Night frosts will be common, if the skies clear and the east coast may be subject to wintry showers, if there is a flow over the UK from the North Sea, but the main weather type is likely to be cool, with grey skies and generally light winds. ** There will be no gales around the 27th/28th November in the UK, this year. *)) A good forecast. Not cold enough for witty showers, but cool and grey characterises much of the UK's weather today. "witty shower" Funny weather we've been having lately |
**Forecast** High pressure in charge of the UK weather at T+240 on 28th November
Why do I get the feeling this High to the south and south west is going stick around for a long time and give us a really boring winter with the same old sh*te day after day, week after week!! Wouldn't mind if we saw the sun every now and again, fat chance this week. Graham |
**Forecast** High pressure in charge of the UK weather at T+240 on 28th November
In article ,
Graham writes: Why do I get the feeling this High to the south and south west is going stick around for a long time and give us a really boring winter with the same old sh*te day after day, week after week!! Because you're a natural pessimist? :) Wouldn't mind if we saw the sun every now and again, fat chance this week. Yes, it's been very gloomy here as well for the last few days. -- John Hall "He crams with cans of poisoned meat The subjects of the King, And when they die by thousands G.K.Chesterton: Why, he laughs like anything." from "Song Against Grocers" |
**Forecast** High pressure in charge of the UK weather at T+240on 28th November
On Thursday, 28 November 2013 22:37:55 UTC, Graham wrote:
Why do I get the feeling this High to the south and south west is going stick around for a long time and give us a really boring winter with the same old sh*te day after day, week after week!! Wouldn't mind if we saw the sun every now and again, fat chance this week. Graham Because although we've been spoilt in recent years that is usually the norm.. |
**Forecast** High pressure in charge of the UK weather at T+240 on 28th November
Because you're a natural pessimist? :) Ah help is at hand though John! Mr Dawlish hints at the atlantic weather coming back after a short cold spell with a few witty showers, so at least we should see some sun in between the bands of rain:) Graham |
**Forecast** High pressure in charge of the UK weather at T+240on 28th November
On Friday, November 29, 2013 9:29:45 PM UTC, Graham wrote:
Because you're a natural pessimist? :) Ah help is at hand though John! Mr Dawlish hints at the atlantic weather coming back after a short cold spell with a few witty showers, so at least we should see some sun in between the bands of rain:) Graham Only a mention Graham. I have no great confidence in what the weather will hold in 10 days ATM, with the model output as it stands this morning. |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 12:05 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 WeatherBanter.co.uk