|
Yes I know its a Cliche; But You Really Can't Make This Stuff Up
A Guardian AGW luvvie, with away over the top previous on AGW, is stuck in a scientific expedition vessel trapped off Antarctica in sea ice caused by the effects of AGW the subsequent melting land based ice. Og course see ice is much more impervious to melting than land based ice regardless of any latitude problems.
But hold on there's mo The biggest producers globally of Wind turbines, which are manufactured from the energy produced by the biggest utiliser of coal!!!!, has chugged its way to help break free from the non existent imaginary Antarctic ice, the Russian passenger ship MV Akademik Shokalskiy, has now found that the sea ice caused by Antarctic ice cap melting, thus creating sea ice that is impervious to melting, is so thick that the Chinese Ice breaker cannot actually break through!!!!!!! From Yahoo "The group became stuck when unexpected weather forced their ship into heavy ice and since becoming stranded have sat through an intense blizzard which appears to have increased the build up of ice around them. One of the scientists onboard, Chris Turney, said the team had been attempting to update the scientific records made by Mawson's group a century ago -- records which he said have become crucial in charting signs of global warming." Good work Chris. Oh the irony, eh? http://news.yahoo.com/rescue-underwa...015038322.html Maybe the wind turbines have tipped the climate balance and the ice is a result of less planned CO2. Nah , can't be. The best climate brains in the world all 97% of them have already told us that sea ice in the SH is growing because the land ice is melting and we all know that land ice melts much faster than see ice due to the 13th law of thermodynamics as explained by professor Dawkins and an Islamist Cleric |
Yes I know its a Cliche; But You Really Can't Make This Stuff Up
in 390945 20131228 010302 Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
A Guardian AGW luvvie, with away over the top previous on AGW, is stuck in= a scientific expedition vessel trapped off Antarctica in sea ice caused by= the effects of AGW the subsequent melting land based ice. Og course see i= ce is much more impervious to melting than land based ice regardless of any= latitude problems. Are you sure about that? |
Yes I know its a Cliche; But You Really Can't Make This Stuff Up
On Saturday, 28 December 2013 13:58:47 UTC, Malcolm wrote:
In article , Bob Martin writes in 390945 20131228 010302 Lawrence Jenkins wrote: A Guardian AGW luvvie, with away over the top previous on AGW, is stuck in= a scientific expedition vessel trapped off Antarctica in sea ice caused by= the effects of AGW the subsequent melting land based ice. Og course see i= ce is much more impervious to melting than land based ice regardless of any= latitude problems. Are you sure about that? In the arctic, the sea ice and the land ice have both been melting fast and I've not read a scientific study that suggests that one is "more impervious to melting" than the other. Maybe Lawrence can provide us with the evidence. -- Malcolm I'm more curious to know why some folk with you included have requested your posts to be removed after , what was it, six weeks? Why? |
Yes I know its a Cliche; But You Really Can't Make This Stuff Up
On Saturday, 28 December 2013 08:39:14 UTC, Bob Martin wrote:
in 390945 20131228 010302 Lawrence Jenkins wrote: A Guardian AGW luvvie, with away over the top previous on AGW, is stuck in= a scientific expedition vessel trapped off Antarctica in sea ice caused by= the effects of AGW the subsequent melting land based ice. Og course see i= ce is much more impervious to melting than land based ice regardless of any= latitude problems. Are you sure about that? No, it was meant to be inebriated irony served on the rocks of sarcasm. We are being fed the line that the ice is melting on the Antarctic land mass but the melt water than freezes more readily on the sea sitting on top of the salt water. The whole affair sums up the AGW really, a determined dogma despite reality. The scientific consensus of 99.9999999 % who are telling us that AGW will melt all the global ice are bang on target in my humble opinion and is further evidence that Climate science is going to the dogmas. |
Yes I know its a Cliche; But You Really Can't Make This Stuff Up
On Saturday, 28 December 2013 13:58:47 UTC, Malcolm wrote:
In article , Bob Martin writes in 390945 20131228 010302 Lawrence Jenkins wrote: A Guardian AGW luvvie, with away over the top previous on AGW, is stuck in= a scientific expedition vessel trapped off Antarctica in sea ice caused by= the effects of AGW the subsequent melting land based ice. Og course see i= ce is much more impervious to melting than land based ice regardless of any= latitude problems. Are you sure about that? In the arctic, the sea ice and the land ice have both been melting fast and I've not read a scientific study that suggests that one is "more impervious to melting" than the other. Maybe Lawrence can provide us with the evidence. -- Malcolm I was being mischievously sarcastic. The whole affair of a team of 'climate' scientist sponsored I believe in part by the Guardian and BBC, going to the Southern oceans in a bid to show that AGW is reducing the ice and then getting stuck in that very ice that is supposed to be disappearing is another prime example of 'big oil and the Tobacco industry' entrapment if you ask me. The swine's. |
Yes I know its a Cliche; But You Really Can't Make This StuffUp
On Sat, 28 Dec 2013 06:42:14 -0800 (PST)
Lawrence Jenkins wrote: We are being fed the line that the ice is melting on the Antarctic land mass but the melt water than freezes more readily on the sea sitting on top of the salt water. The whole affair sums up the AGW really, a determined dogma despite reality. Yes, and I was the one who started feeding that line. What is it about it don't you understand? -- Graham P Davis, Bracknell, Berks. Mail: 'newsman' not 'newsboy'. 'Do your bit for climate change this holiday period by restricting your intake at festive mealtimes to four Brussels sprouts or less.' @3WhitehallPlace |
Yes I know its a Cliche; But You Really Can't Make This Stuff Up
On Saturday, 28 December 2013 17:12:36 UTC, Malcolm wrote:
In article , Lawrence Jenkins writes On Saturday, 28 December 2013 13:58:47 UTC, Malcolm wrote: In article , Bob Martin writes in 390945 20131228 010302 Lawrence Jenkins wrote: A Guardian AGW luvvie, with away over the top previous on AGW, is stuck in= a scientific expedition vessel trapped off Antarctica in sea ice caused by= the effects of AGW the subsequent melting land based ice. Og course see i= ce is much more impervious to melting than land based ice regardless of any= latitude problems. Are you sure about that? In the arctic, the sea ice and the land ice have both been melting fast and I've not read a scientific study that suggests that one is "more impervious to melting" than the other. Maybe Lawrence can provide us with the evidence. I'm more curious to know why some folk with you included have requested your posts to be removed after , what was it, six weeks? Oh look. A diversionary tactic. Instead of responding to my request, you ask a completely unrelated question of me. Why? Yes, why did you instead of answering my request? -- Malcolm Not diversionary at all. But why six days what are you afraid off? |
Yes I know its a Cliche; But You Really Can't Make This Stuff Up
On Saturday, 28 December 2013 01:03:02 UTC, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
A Guardian AGW luvvie, with away over the top previous on AGW, is stuck in a scientific expedition vessel trapped off Antarctica in sea ice caused by the effects of AGW the subsequent melting land based ice. Og course see ice is much more impervious to melting than land based ice regardless of any latitude problems. But hold on there's mo The biggest producers globally of Wind turbines, which are manufactured from the energy produced by the biggest utiliser of coal!!!!, has chugged its way to help break free from the non existent imaginary Antarctic ice, the Russian passenger ship MV Akademik Shokalskiy, has now found that the sea ice caused by Antarctic ice cap melting, thus creating sea ice that is impervious to melting, is so thick that the Chinese Ice breaker cannot actually break through!!!!!!! From Yahoo "The group became stuck when unexpected weather forced their ship into heavy ice and since becoming stranded have sat through an intense blizzard which appears to have increased the build up of ice around them. One of the scientists onboard, Chris Turney, said the team had been attempting to update the scientific records made by Mawson's group a century ago -- records which he said have become crucial in charting signs of global warming." Good work Chris. Oh the irony, eh? http://news.yahoo.com/rescue-underwa...015038322.html Maybe the wind turbines have tipped the climate balance and the ice is a result of less planned CO2. Nah , can't be. The best climate brains in the world all 97% of them have already told us that sea ice in the SH is growing because the land ice is melting and we all know that land ice melts much faster than see ice due to the 13th law of thermodynamics as explained by professor Dawkins and an Islamist Cleric Blimey the Chinese Ice breaker has given up, the disappearing Antarctic sea ice is just too thick to breakthrough, their last hope is an Australian ice breaker -Australian......strewth who'd have thought the aussies had issues with Ice. Fair Dinkum to em though. Anyhow if that can't break through then its an air lift to get the passengers off the entombed ship. http://www.theguardian.com/world/vid...peration-video |
Yes I know its a Cliche; But You Really Can't Make This Stuff Up
On Saturday, December 28, 2013 9:47:25 PM UTC, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
On Saturday, 28 December 2013 01:03:02 UTC, Lawrence Jenkins wrote: A Guardian AGW luvvie, with away over the top previous on AGW, is stuck in a scientific expedition vessel trapped off Antarctica in sea ice caused by the effects of AGW the subsequent melting land based ice. Og course see ice is much more impervious to melting than land based ice regardless of any latitude problems. But hold on there's mo The biggest producers globally of Wind turbines, which are manufactured from the energy produced by the biggest utiliser of coal!!!!, has chugged its way to help break free from the non existent imaginary Antarctic ice, the Russian passenger ship MV Akademik Shokalskiy, has now found that the sea ice caused by Antarctic ice cap melting, thus creating sea ice that is impervious to melting, is so thick that the Chinese Ice breaker cannot actually break through!!!!!!! From Yahoo "The group became stuck when unexpected weather forced their ship into heavy ice and since becoming stranded have sat through an intense blizzard which appears to have increased the build up of ice around them. One of the scientists onboard, Chris Turney, said the team had been attempting to update the scientific records made by Mawson's group a century ago -- records which he said have become crucial in charting signs of global warming." Good work Chris. Oh the irony, eh? http://news.yahoo.com/rescue-underwa...015038322.html Maybe the wind turbines have tipped the climate balance and the ice is a result of less planned CO2. Nah , can't be. The best climate brains in the world all 97% of them have already told us that sea ice in the SH is growing because the land ice is melting and we all know that land ice melts much faster than see ice due to the 13th law of thermodynamics as explained by professor Dawkins and an Islamist Cleric Blimey the Chinese Ice breaker has given up, the disappearing Antarctic sea ice is just too thick to breakthrough, their last hope is an Australian ice breaker -Australian......strewth who'd have thought the aussies had issues with Ice. Fair Dinkum to em though. Anyhow if that can't break through then its an air lift to get the passengers off the entombed ship. http://www.theguardian.com/world/vid...peration-video errrrrrrrr so? |
Yes I know its a Cliche; But You Really Can't Make This Stuff Up
|
Yes I know its a Cliche; But You Really Can't Make This Stuff Up
On Sunday, 29 December 2013 00:15:56 UTC, Alan LeHun wrote:
In article , says... The scientific consensus of 99.9999999 % who are telling us that AGW will melt all the global ice I think it's about 0.0000001% who might claim that, but then you would have nothing to whinge about. Best to just make it up as you go along.... -- Alan LeHun Reply-to is valid. Add "BPSF" to subject: to bypass spam filters. Alan if you believe that then you need to change your medication. |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 03:53 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 WeatherBanter.co.uk