uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21   Report Post  
Old February 9th 14, 03:01 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2006
Posts: 6,158
Default Dawlish sea wall = Not AGW

On Sunday, 9 February 2014 08:21:33 UTC, Malcolm wrote:
In article ,

Lawrence Jenkins writes

On Sunday, 9 February 2014 01:14:47 UTC, Adam Lea wrote:






Someone talking ******** on Usenet, what a surprise - NOT.




Adam we are entering a massive cooling phase-come to terms with it.




Lawrence, that is as much nonsense as the article Joe posted here. It's

time you came to terms with the fact that we are NOT "entering a massive

cooling phase". If so, why was 2013 the 6th warmest year since records

began in 1880?



--

Malcolm


Nope on what I know , deducting the AGW bandwagon nonsense and using the science of the ice core samples, I truly believe global cooling is our future; that is my opinion and you are entitled to rubbish it as I am to hold it.

  #22   Report Post  
Old February 9th 14, 03:08 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2006
Posts: 6,158
Default Dawlish sea wall = Not AGW

On Sunday, 9 February 2014 09:35:20 UTC, Graham Easterling wrote:


And why the last decade was easily the warmest on record and why the two warmest years on record both fell into that decade and why current global temperatures are close to record values, despite ENSO neutral conditions and the PDO being negative and.........etc. etc. etc.




Most people will know my views on AGW, but blaming a few gales and a very wet winter on it are ludicrous. A few months ago the long run of quiet winter's was blamed on AGW (reduction of N-S temperature gradient etc.)



Interesting perspective here http://magicseaweed.com/news/the-50-year-storm/6070/



Also, in Penzance



E.g Gales in Penzance



1993 13

1994 14

1995 13

1996 16

1997 14

1998 22!

1999 15



then

2008 1

2009 4

2010 2

2012 2

2013 2

2014 5 so far



So which were due to AGW, 1993-1998, 2008-2013, or 2014? All apparently.



I believe global warming could become a serious problem but please step back a bit and get agrip of the bigger picture!



THere's plenty of s**t spoken, by people who should know better, on both sides of the argument



Graham

Penzance



If I'm correct the period of the late 14th Century and onwards which in western Europe at least heralded the falling temperatures into the 'LIA was marked by a long period of frequent rain deluges with storms.



  #23   Report Post  
Old February 9th 14, 03:18 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jul 2010
Posts: 193
Default Dawlish sea wall = Not AGW

On 09/02/2014 08:09, Dawlish wrote:

Note the words "......is likely", in the first sentence. No scientist of
Julia's stature would currently link a particular event, like the UK
storms, or the cold in the USA, or any one the plethora of extreme weather
events to climate change, but all know the state of play - "there is no
evidence to counter the basic premise a warmer world will lead to more
intense daily and hourly rain events."

Now go on, denier, try do the usual denier ad hominem on the excellent,
world-renowned climate scientist who has, hopefully, provided some education
for you.


'World-renowned climate scientist' sounds wonderful, but the only people
who are aware of her existence are pretty much other climate
scientists - 99% of Brits have no idea who she is.

Or attack me - but I really don't care; all I do is to show you the actual
science. Actually, no-one cares whether you learn from it, or whether you
continue to get your science from denier blogs, or from "David" on UK.railway. *))


"all I do is to show you the actual science". I must have missed that.

--

Brian W Lawrence
Wantage
Oxfordshire
  #24   Report Post  
Old February 9th 14, 03:28 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2006
Posts: 6,158
Default Dawlish sea wall = Not AGW

On Sunday, 9 February 2014 15:18:21 UTC, Brian Lawrence wrote:
On 09/02/2014 08:09, Dawlish wrote:



Note the words "......is likely", in the first sentence. No scientist of


Julia's stature would currently link a particular event, like the UK


storms, or the cold in the USA, or any one the plethora of extreme weather


events to climate change, but all know the state of play - "there is no


evidence to counter the basic premise a warmer world will lead to more


intense daily and hourly rain events."




Now go on, denier, try do the usual denier ad hominem on the excellent,


world-renowned climate scientist who has, hopefully, provided some education


for you.




'World-renowned climate scientist' sounds wonderful, but the only people

who are aware of her existence are pretty much other climate

scientists - 99% of Brits have no idea who she is.



Or attack me - but I really don't care; all I do is to show you the actual


science. Actually, no-one cares whether you learn from it, or whether you


continue to get your science from denier blogs, or from "David" on UK.railway. *))




"all I do is to show you the actual science". I must have missed that.



--



Brian W Lawrence

Wantage

Oxfordshire


There comes a time when ordinary people can see that the King really is in his birthday suit. All the sophistry of the flunkies just falls on deaf ears as the scales fall from the eyes of the common folk and see as clear as day.
  #25   Report Post  
Old February 9th 14, 03:29 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2006
Posts: 6,158
Default Dawlish sea wall = Not AGW

On Sunday, 9 February 2014 10:21:26 UTC, Dave Cornwell wrote:
"A massive colloid period" is coming"

----------------------------------------------------

I imgagine all those fine particulates might cause some cooling ;-)



I blame Chuck Berry with no Particulate Place to Go.


  #26   Report Post  
Old February 9th 14, 03:38 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2006
Posts: 6,158
Default Dawlish sea wall = Not AGW

On Sunday, 9 February 2014 08:46:13 UTC, Dawlish wrote:
On Sunday, February 9, 2014 8:21:33 AM UTC, Malcolm wrote:

In article ,




Lawrence Jenkins writes




On Sunday, 9 February 2014 01:14:47 UTC, Adam Lea wrote:












Someone talking ******** on Usenet, what a surprise - NOT.








Adam we are entering a massive cooling phase-come to terms with it.








Lawrence, that is as much nonsense as the article Joe posted here. It's




time you came to terms with the fact that we are NOT "entering a massive




cooling phase". If so, why was 2013 the 6th warmest year since records




began in 1880?








--




Malcolm




And why the last decade was easily the warmest on record and why the two warmest years on record both fell into that decade and why current global temperatures are close to record values, despite ENSO neutral conditions and the PDO being negative and.........etc. etc. etc.



However, a climate denier like larry is capable of convincing himself of anything. "A massive colloid period" is coming. On current evidence, that's just laughable - but then again, so are larry's views on climate change.



Warmest in our records . We do know this however

In such a tiny space of time the last 2000 years saw without any argument a very warm periods where grapes were grown , Greenland was farmed and then the LIA . We know temperatures fluctuated by a couple of degrees without any influence from human co2. We also know from the ice core samples that this current inter glacial is not only one of the coolest but well overdue to end.

We also know that the global human condition up until about 200 years ago was wretched with low life expectancy and abject misery for most thirty odd years that we lived. I look at the past misery before harnessing fossil fuels on a vast scale, I look at the ice core temperature cores for the last 600 thousand years and I say hallelujah. Without energy harnessed from fossil fuels live would hardly be worth living.
  #27   Report Post  
Old February 9th 14, 04:34 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Mar 2007
Posts: 364
Default Dawlish sea wall = Not AGW

On Sunday, 9 February 2014 10:35:20 UTC+1, Graham Easterling wrote:


And why the last decade was easily the warmest on record and why the two warmest years on record both fell into that decade and why current global temperatures are close to record values, despite ENSO neutral conditions and the PDO being negative and.........etc. etc. etc.




Most people will know my views on AGW, but blaming a few gales and a very wet winter on it are ludicrous. A few months ago the long run of quiet winter's was blamed on AGW (reduction of N-S temperature gradient etc.)



Interesting perspective here http://magicseaweed.com/news/the-50-year-storm/6070/



Also, in Penzance



E.g Gales in Penzance



1993 13

1994 14

1995 13

1996 16

1997 14

1998 22!

1999 15



then

2008 1

2009 4

2010 2

2012 2

2013 2

2014 5 so far



So which were due to AGW, 1993-1998, 2008-2013, or 2014? All apparently.



I believe global warming could become a serious problem but please step back a bit and get agrip of the bigger picture!



THere's plenty of s**t spoken, by people who should know better, on both sides of the argument



Graham

Penzance



Here here! There is too much **** spoken in the name of GW, so much in fact we have totally lost sight of the original science and turned it into a joke.

Time to get back to discussing the raw facts IMO.
  #28   Report Post  
Old February 9th 14, 05:23 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Mar 2008
Posts: 10,601
Default Dawlish sea wall = Not AGW

On Sunday, February 9, 2014 3:18:21 PM UTC, Brian Lawrence wrote:
On 09/02/2014 08:09, Dawlish wrote:



Note the words "......is likely", in the first sentence. No scientist of


Julia's stature would currently link a particular event, like the UK


storms, or the cold in the USA, or any one the plethora of extreme weather


events to climate change, but all know the state of play - "there is no


evidence to counter the basic premise a warmer world will lead to more


intense daily and hourly rain events."




Now go on, denier, try do the usual denier ad hominem on the excellent,


world-renowned climate scientist who has, hopefully, provided some education


for you.




'World-renowned climate scientist' sounds wonderful, but the only people

who are aware of her existence are pretty much other climate

scientists - 99% of Brits have no idea who she is.



Or attack me - but I really don't care; all I do is to show you the actual


science. Actually, no-one cares whether you learn from it, or whether you


continue to get your science from denier blogs, or from "David" on UK.railway. *))




"all I do is to show you the actual science". I must have missed that.



--



Brian W Lawrence

Wantage

Oxfordshire


Then read what I post about climate science, in response to these idiots, more accurately, dear boy.
  #29   Report Post  
Old February 9th 14, 05:27 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Mar 2008
Posts: 10,601
Default Dawlish sea wall = Not AGW

On Sunday, February 9, 2014 3:38:57 PM UTC, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
On Sunday, 9 February 2014 08:46:13 UTC, Dawlish wrote:

On Sunday, February 9, 2014 8:21:33 AM UTC, Malcolm wrote:




In article ,








Lawrence Jenkins writes








On Sunday, 9 February 2014 01:14:47 UTC, Adam Lea wrote:
























Someone talking ******** on Usenet, what a surprise - NOT.
















Adam we are entering a massive cooling phase-come to terms with it.
















Lawrence, that is as much nonsense as the article Joe posted here. It's








time you came to terms with the fact that we are NOT "entering a massive








cooling phase". If so, why was 2013 the 6th warmest year since records








began in 1880?
















--








Malcolm








And why the last decade was easily the warmest on record and why the two warmest years on record both fell into that decade and why current global temperatures are close to record values, despite ENSO neutral conditions and the PDO being negative and.........etc. etc. etc.








However, a climate denier like larry is capable of convincing himself of anything. "A massive colloid period" is coming. On current evidence, that's just laughable - but then again, so are larry's views on climate change.






Warmest in our records . We do know this however



In such a tiny space of time the last 2000 years saw without any argument a very warm periods where grapes were grown , Greenland was farmed and then the LIA . We know temperatures fluctuated by a couple of degrees without any influence from human co2. We also know from the ice core samples that this current inter glacial is not only one of the coolest but well overdue to end.



We also know that the global human condition up until about 200 years ago was wretched with low life expectancy and abject misery for most thirty odd years that we lived. I look at the past misery before harnessing fossil fuels on a vast scale, I look at the ice core temperature cores for the last 600 thousand years and I say hallelujah. Without energy harnessed from fossil fuels live would hardly be worth living.


The ridiculous; "tiny space of time" denier crock. Just hilarious.

Why does every single National science academy on earth feel that the present period shows anomalous warming and that the warming has very little to do with the last 2000 years.

They're all stupid, I suppose and they don't know anything..........but you and yours know ever so much more; don't you? Read the avalanche of science and it will explain this to you. Ignore the avalanche of science and focus on any tiny little part which might appear to back the denier cause, without any real scrutiny, like the OP and you can convince yourself of anything - as I've said.
  #30   Report Post  
Old February 9th 14, 06:01 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jul 2010
Posts: 193
Default Dawlish sea wall = Not AGW

On 09/02/2014 17:23, Dawlish wrote:
On Sunday, February 9, 2014 3:18:21 PM UTC, Brian Lawrence wrote:
On 09/02/2014 08:09, Dawlish wrote:



Note the words "......is likely", in the first sentence. No scientist of
Julia's stature would currently link a particular event, like the UK
storms, or the cold in the USA, or any one the plethora of extreme weather
events to climate change, but all know the state of play - "there is no
evidence to counter the basic premise a warmer world will lead to more
intense daily and hourly rain events."


Now go on, denier, try do the usual denier ad hominem on the excellent,
world-renowned climate scientist who has, hopefully, provided some education
for you.


'World-renowned climate scientist' sounds wonderful, but the only people
who are aware of her existence are pretty much other climate
scientists - 99% of Brits have no idea who she is.

Or attack me - but I really don't care; all I do is to show you the actual
science. Actually, no-one cares whether you learn from it, or whether you
continue to get your science from denier blogs, or from "David" on UK.railway. *))


"all I do is to show you the actual science". I must have missed that.


Then read what I post about climate science, in response to these idiots, more accurately, dear boy.


Nope, I won't be wasting my time doing that.



--

Brian W Lawrence
Wantage
Oxfordshire


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AGW Sceptics Asked To Provide Weather Information for the Akademikslopski, the AGW Jolly stuck in sea ice. Lawrence Jenkins uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 5 January 1st 14 02:45 PM
Wall to wall wave pic from last weekend [email protected] uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 3 July 4th 13 07:14 PM
20C, wall-to-wall sunshine, light winds..........perfect. Dawlish uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 5 June 7th 13 09:28 AM
[WR] Wall-to-wall Sunshine Anne Burgess uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 0 February 22nd 10 09:53 AM
What happened to my 'Wall to wall sunshine'? Ridge Runner uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 13 February 7th 08 08:46 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 Weather Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Weather"

 

Copyright © 2017