Like I said; anything to try to squirm away from your lies.

Instead of this unedifying squirming; apologise to the me and the newsgroup and then we can move on.

On Sunday, February 16, 2014 9:06:12 AM UTC, Dawlish wrote:
Like I said; anything to try to squirm away from your lies.



Instead of this unedifying squirming; apologise to the me and the newsgroup and then we can move on.

Nothing. It's always the same with these people when they come to the end of their lying little lollipops.

On Monday, February 17, 2014 4:34:49 PM UTC, Dawlish wrote:
On Sunday, February 16, 2014 9:06:12 AM UTC, Dawlish wrote:

Like I said; anything to try to squirm away from your lies.







Instead of this unedifying squirming; apologise to the me and the newsgroup and then we can move on.



Nothing. It's always the same with these people when they come to the end of their lying little lollipops.

Before you start opening other threads, pretending that no-one has noticed your lies, or have forgotten them, remember that once you start lying for effect, no-one will believe you when you offer other opinions?

Don't you understand that, larry?

On Monday, 17 February 2014 20:43:27 UTC, Dawlish wrote:
On Monday, February 17, 2014 4:34:49 PM UTC, Dawlish wrote:

On Sunday, February 16, 2014 9:06:12 AM UTC, Dawlish wrote:



Like I said; anything to try to squirm away from your lies.















Instead of this unedifying squirming; apologise to the me and the newsgroup and then we can move on.







Nothing. It's always the same with these people when they come to the end of their lying little lollipops.



Before you start opening other threads, pretending that no-one has noticed your lies, or have forgotten them, remember that once you start lying for effect, no-one will believe you when you offer other opinions?



Don't you understand that, larry?

What do you mean I lied? Are you nuts I quoted you blog leader who made a statement based on a couple of ifs which he well though were feasible so why don't you give it a rest. What was the other GREAT LIE. Oh yes I thought you possibly wanted to bet some years ago (circa 2007) on the next Arctic ice season being even lower, if I recall you backed out.

On Monday, February 17, 2014 9:17:52 PM UTC, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
On Monday, 17 February 2014 20:43:27 UTC, Dawlish wrote:

On Monday, February 17, 2014 4:34:49 PM UTC, Dawlish wrote:



On Sunday, February 16, 2014 9:06:12 AM UTC, Dawlish wrote:







Like I said; anything to try to squirm away from your lies.































Instead of this unedifying squirming; apologise to the me and the newsgroup and then we can move on.















Nothing. It's always the same with these people when they come to the end of their lying little lollipops.







Before you start opening other threads, pretending that no-one has noticed your lies, or have forgotten them, remember that once you start lying for effect, no-one will believe you when you offer other opinions?







Don't you understand that, larry?



What do you mean I lied? Are you nuts I quoted you blog leader who made a statement based on a couple of ifs which he well though were feasible so why don't you give it a rest. What was the other GREAT LIE. Oh yes I thought you possibly wanted to bet some years ago (circa 2007) on the next Arctic ice season being even lower, if I recall you backed out.

You lied twice. You've had it explained clearly t you how and why. You lied about what Fergus Brown said and about what I said. The fact that you won't accept that you lied for effect and won't offer any apology says so much about you.

On Monday, 17 February 2014 23:23:26 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
On Monday, February 17, 2014 9:17:52 PM UTC, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:

On Monday, 17 February 2014 20:43:27 UTC, Dawlish wrote:



On Monday, February 17, 2014 4:34:49 PM UTC, Dawlish wrote:







On Sunday, February 16, 2014 9:06:12 AM UTC, Dawlish wrote:















Like I said; anything to try to squirm away from your lies.































































Instead of this unedifying squirming; apologise to the me and the newsgroup and then we can move on.































Nothing. It's always the same with these people when they come to the end of their lying little lollipops.















Before you start opening other threads, pretending that no-one has noticed your lies, or have forgotten them, remember that once you start lying for effect, no-one will believe you when you offer other opinions?















Don't you understand that, larry?







What do you mean I lied? Are you nuts I quoted you blog leader who made a statement based on a couple of ifs which he well though were feasible so why don't you give it a rest. What was the other GREAT LIE. Oh yes I thought you possibly wanted to bet some years ago (circa 2007) on the next Arctic ice season being even lower, if I recall you backed out.



You lied twice. You've had it explained clearly t you how and why. You lied about what Fergus Brown said and about what I said. The fact that you won't accept that you lied for effect and won't offer any apology says so much about you.

You really are pathetic.

On Monday, 17 February 2014 22:23:26 UTC, Dawlish wrote:
On Monday, February 17, 2014 9:17:52 PM UTC, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:

On Monday, 17 February 2014 20:43:27 UTC, Dawlish wrote:



On Monday, February 17, 2014 4:34:49 PM UTC, Dawlish wrote:







On Sunday, February 16, 2014 9:06:12 AM UTC, Dawlish wrote:















Like I said; anything to try to squirm away from your lies.































































Instead of this unedifying squirming; apologise to the me and the newsgroup and then we can move on.































Nothing. It's always the same with these people when they come to the end of their lying little lollipops.















Before you start opening other threads, pretending that no-one has noticed your lies, or have forgotten them, remember that once you start lying for effect, no-one will believe you when you offer other opinions?















Don't you understand that, larry?







What do you mean I lied? Are you nuts I quoted you blog leader who made a statement based on a couple of ifs which he well though were feasible so why don't you give it a rest. What was the other GREAT LIE. Oh yes I thought you possibly wanted to bet some years ago (circa 2007) on the next Arctic ice season being even lower, if I recall you backed out.



You lied twice. You've had it explained clearly t you how and why. You lied about what Fergus Brown said and about what I said. The fact that you won't accept that you lied for effect and won't offer any apology says so much about you.




Paul.........I'm sorry THAT YOU THINK I LIED HA HA.

On Wednesday, 19 February 2014 08:51:06 UTC, matt_sykes wrote:
On Monday, 17 February 2014 23:23:26 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:

On Monday, February 17, 2014 9:17:52 PM UTC, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:



On Monday, 17 February 2014 20:43:27 UTC, Dawlish wrote:







On Monday, February 17, 2014 4:34:49 PM UTC, Dawlish wrote:















On Sunday, February 16, 2014 9:06:12 AM UTC, Dawlish wrote:































Like I said; anything to try to squirm away from your lies.































































































































Instead of this unedifying squirming; apologise to the me and the newsgroup and then we can move on.































































Nothing. It's always the same with these people when they come to the end of their lying little lollipops.































Before you start opening other threads, pretending that no-one has noticed your lies, or have forgotten them, remember that once you start lying for effect, no-one will believe you when you offer other opinions?































Don't you understand that, larry?















What do you mean I lied? Are you nuts I quoted you blog leader who made a statement based on a couple of ifs which he well though were feasible so why don't you give it a rest. What was the other GREAT LIE. Oh yes I thought you possibly wanted to bet some years ago (circa 2007) on the next Arctic ice season being even lower, if I recall you backed out.







You lied twice. You've had it explained clearly t you how and why. You lied about what Fergus Brown said and about what I said. The fact that you won't accept that you lied for effect and won't offer any apology says so much about you.



You really are pathetic.

He does go on Matt he reminds me of a cross between Eric Honecker , a Camden traffic Warden and a large dose of social worker .

On Wednesday, February 19, 2014 6:29:27 PM UTC, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
On Monday, 17 February 2014 22:23:26 UTC, Dawlish wrote:

You lied twice. You've had it explained clearly t you how and why. You lied about what Fergus Brown said and about what I said. The fact that you won't accept that you lied for effect and won't offer any apology says so much about you.

Paul.........I'm sorry THAT YOU THINK I LIED HA HA.

You are a pretty foul piece of lying work, aren't you? Why on earth do you think that anyone would take your views seriously when you do this?

On Wednesday, 19 February 2014 19:14:45 UTC, Dawlish wrote:
On Wednesday, February 19, 2014 6:29:27 PM UTC, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:

On Monday, 17 February 2014 22:23:26 UTC, Dawlish wrote:



You lied twice. You've had it explained clearly t you how and why. You lied about what Fergus Brown said and about what I said. The fact that you won't accept that you lied for effect and won't offer any apology says so much about you.



Paul.........I'm sorry THAT YOU THINK I LIED HA HA.



You are a pretty foul piece of lying work, aren't you? Why on earth do you think that anyone would take your views seriously when you do this?

Pauly baby, why do you get your knickers in such a twist; I mean a "foul piece of lying work" ". Come on you know full well Fergus was painting a picture saying that if certain conditions fell into place -which he believed possibly might then the arctic ice could have well disappeared . Read your mates words and his conclusion. Where does me 'lying' come into this. For gawd sake just accept the truth and move on.