I spend a couple of days in London (where the weather was actually gorgeous and Waterloo sunset on Friday was simply magnificent) to see something we haven't seen on a weather chart for months.........the Azores High pushing NE towards us. Cool, as we'd be on that NE limb, but some lovely sunny days, if it achieves outcome.

I would *love* this to be still on the charts tomorrow evening and it not be just a short-lived calm period after the colder plunge which is likely to follow the coming week's wet and windy weather. Could this possibly herald the end of the zonal train?? MetO says "No!" in the 6-15 day forecast. See how the models develop; the Meto has done very well in its 10-day thoughts, throughout the winter; perhaps this time they may not be as accurate.

On Saturday, February 22, 2014 7:59:59 PM UTC, Dawlish wrote:
I spend a couple of days in London (where the weather was actually gorgeous and Waterloo sunset on Friday was simply magnificent) to see something we haven't seen on a weather chart for months.........the Azores High pushing NE towards us. Cool, as we'd be on that NE limb, but some lovely sunny days, if it achieves outcome.



I would *love* this to be still on the charts tomorrow evening and it not be just a short-lived calm period after the colder plunge which is likely to follow the coming week's wet and windy weather. Could this possibly herald the end of the zonal train?? MetO says "No!" in the 6-15 day forecast. See how the models develop; the Meto has done very well in its 10-day thoughts, throughout the winter; perhaps this time they may not be as accurate.

Still there after next weekend on both the gfs and ECM, but in my view, everything ATM post T+240 suggests it won't last and zonal will re-establish itself...........

On Sunday, February 23, 2014 10:15:59 AM UTC, Dawlish wrote:
On Saturday, February 22, 2014 7:59:59 PM UTC, Dawlish wrote:

I spend a couple of days in London (where the weather was actually gorgeous and Waterloo sunset on Friday was simply magnificent) to see something we haven't seen on a weather chart for months.........the Azores High pushing NE towards us. Cool, as we'd be on that NE limb, but some lovely sunny days, if it achieves outcome.







I would *love* this to be still on the charts tomorrow evening and it not be just a short-lived calm period after the colder plunge which is likely to follow the coming week's wet and windy weather. Could this possibly herald the end of the zonal train?? MetO says "No!" in the 6-15 day forecast. See how the models develop; the Meto has done very well in its 10-day thoughts, throughout the winter; perhaps this time they may not be as accurate.



Still there after next weekend on both the gfs and ECM, but in my view, everything ATM post T+240 suggests it won't last and zonal will re-establish itself...........

Tantalising, isn't it, but I would favour a re-establishment of the zonal conditions, after a short, but very pleasant spell of fine and dry weather in the south early next week.

Tantalising, isn't it, but I would favour a re-establishment of the zonal conditions, after a short, but very pleasant spell of fine and dry weather in the south early next week.

Very tantalising. Three days reference now and still not confident enough to forecast. Or is it a forecast, I'm not sure?

On Monday, February 24, 2014 1:25:40 PM UTC, David Mitchell wrote:
Tantalising, isn't it, but I would favour a re-establishment of the zonal conditions, after a short, but very pleasant spell of fine and dry weather in the south early next week.



Very tantalising. Three days reference now and still not confident enough to forecast. Or is it a forecast, I'm not sure?

Good for you. I know you have difficulties with comprehension - and clearly with stalking. *))

Good for you. I know you have difficulties with comprehension - and clearly with stalking. *))

Good for me! For what? Comprehension is only an issue due to your lack of clarity.
Stalking? You sad man. If I had any intention of stalking anyone (which I never would), I can assure you it wouldn't be you. I think you have an issue comprehending the meaning of stalking.

On Tuesday, February 25, 2014 12:14:39 AM UTC, David Mitchell wrote:
Good for you. I know you have difficulties with comprehension - and clearly with stalking. *))



Good for me! For what? Comprehension is only an issue due to your lack of clarity.

Stalking? You sad man. If I had any intention of stalking anyone (which I never would), I can assure you it wouldn't be you. I think you have an issue comprehending the meaning of stalking.

Ah I see. So add up you replies to me and divide them into your total number of posts over the last month. The closer to 1, the closer you become to a stalker. See my point?

On Tuesday, 25 February 2014 07:14:33 UTC, Dawlish wrote:
On Tuesday, February 25, 2014 12:14:39 AM UTC, David Mitchell wrote:

Good for you. I know you have difficulties with comprehension - and clearly with stalking. *))







Good for me! For what? Comprehension is only an issue due to your lack of clarity.



Stalking? You sad man. If I had any intention of stalking anyone (which I never would), I can assure you it wouldn't be you. I think you have an issue comprehending the meaning of stalking.



Ah I see. So add up you replies to me and divide them into your total number of posts over the last month. The closer to 1, the closer you become to a stalker. See my point?

On that basis, that makes you a stalker as well, though it appears to me that you're developing paranoia.

On Tuesday, February 25, 2014 4:53:02 PM UTC, David Mitchell wrote:
On Tuesday, 25 February 2014 07:14:33 UTC, Dawlish wrote:

On Tuesday, February 25, 2014 12:14:39 AM UTC, David Mitchell wrote:



Good for you. I know you have difficulties with comprehension - and clearly with stalking. *))

Good for me! For what? Comprehension is only an issue due to your lack of clarity.

Stalking? You sad man. If I had any intention of stalking anyone (which I never would), I can assure you it wouldn't be you. I think you have an issue comprehending the meaning of stalking.

Ah I see. So add up you replies to me and divide them into your total number of posts over the last month. The closer to 1, the closer you become to a stalker. See my point?



On that basis, that makes you a stalker as well, though it appears to me that you're developing paranoia.

A stalker of whom, on that basis, David? You, on the other hand, are clearly obsessed with me and I'm glad you accept the stalker tag that I've given you.

Do think about your obsession.

It starts off as a vaguely interesting topic and then the nonsense starts. Not just this topic, but any topic. Can anyone tell me what the point of it all is?