Never in the Field of Model Conflict
 

Blimey ecmwf and gfs couldn't be any more different than they are currently



GFS 168 http://www.wetterzentrale.de/pics/Rtavn1681.gif stiff westerly

ECMWF 168 http://www.wetterzentrale.de/pics/Recm1681.gif stiff easterly


GFS 192 http://www.wetterzentrale.de/pics/Rtavn1921.gif

ECMWF 192 http://www.wetterzentrale.de/pics/Recm1921.gif

and the never the twain shall meet before the model run ends


Who's right or nearer the truth when it unfolds.

Never in the Field of Model Conflict
 

On Monday, 24 November 2014 12:20:01 UTC, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
Blimey ecmwf and gfs couldn't be any more different than they are currently
GFS 168 http://www.wetterzentrale.de/pics/Rtavn1681.gif stiff westerly

ECMWF 168 http://www.wetterzentrale.de/pics/Recm1681.gif stiff easterly

And just to make your head spin even more - how about the currently available different resolutions of the GFS model...

http://expert-images.weatheronline.c...20406_2406.gif
http://expert-images.weatheronline.c...20406_2406.gif

Never in the Field of Model Conflict
 

On Monday, 24 November 2014 13:54:02 UTC, Richard Dixon wrote:
On Monday, 24 November 2014 12:20:01 UTC, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
Blimey ecmwf and gfs couldn't be any more different than they are currently
GFS 168 http://www.wetterzentrale.de/pics/Rtavn1681.gif stiff westerly

ECMWF 168 http://www.wetterzentrale.de/pics/Recm1681.gif stiff easterly

And just to make your head spin even more - how about the currently available different resolutions of the GFS model...

http://expert-images.weatheronline.c...20406_2406.gif
http://expert-images.weatheronline.c...20406_2406.gif

Aw....... I do like that second one. December the fourth looks very enticing