"Lawrence Jenkins" wrote in message
...
On Monday, 1 December 2014 18:21:21 UTC, Dawlish wrote:
Guts that you don't have. You know he is an idiot and just won't say
because it would expose you as a hypocrite.

Le Hun, Richard Dixon , Will, Tudor, me , Jim Cannon that list of yours
grows longer by the day. It shows how paranoid you are when you think we
all have it in for you and yet none of us are about as keen on each other
as we are on you.

Infamy! Infamy!
They're all got it infamy!

Carry on, Lawrence.....
--
Col

Bolton, Lancashire
160m asl
Snow videos:
http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3QvmL4UWBmHFMKWiwYm_gg

On Monday, 1 December 2014 21:42:47 UTC, Col wrote:
"Lawrence Jenkins" wrote in message
...
On Monday, 1 December 2014 18:21:21 UTC, Dawlish wrote:
Guts that you don't have. You know he is an idiot and just won't say
because it would expose you as a hypocrite.

Le Hun, Richard Dixon , Will, Tudor, me , Jim Cannon that list of yours
grows longer by the day. It shows how paranoid you are when you think we
all have it in for you and yet none of us are about as keen on each other
as we are on you.

Infamy! Infamy!
They're all got it infamy!

Carry on, Lawrence.....
--
Col

Bolton, Lancashire
160m asl
Snow videos:
http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3QvmL4UWBmHFMKWiwYm_gg

Frying Tonight!!

Idiot.

In article ,
says...

Guts that you don't have. You know he is an idiot and just won't say because it would expose you as a hypocrite.


How on earth would that make me a hypocrite? I don't understand your
reasoning for saying that.





--
Alan LeHun
Reply-to is valid. Add "BPSF" to subject: to bypass spam filters.

In message , Alan
LeHun writes
In article ,
says...

Guts that you don't have. You know he is an idiot and just won't say
because it would expose you as a hypocrite.


How on earth would that make me a hypocrite? I don't understand your
reasoning for saying that.


Dawlish doesn't seem to appreciate that your point is not about whether
or not Lawrence is an idiot, but that continuing to reply with the sole
word "idiot" - when we are all by now well aware that that is his
opinion - achieves nothing beyond reducing the group's signal to noise
ratio. It's clearly water off a duck's back to Lawrence, and is
discourteous to the rest of us reading it as it means that we have
wasted our time reading a post that contains no constructive content.
--
John Hall "Never play cards with a man called Doc.
Never eat at a place called Mom's.
Never sleep with a woman whose troubles
are worse than your own." Nelson Algren

In article ,
says...
How on earth would that make me a hypocrite? I don't understand your
reasoning for saying that.


Dawlish doesn't seem to appreciate that your point is not about whether
or not Lawrence is an idiot, but that continuing to reply with the sole
word "idiot" - when we are all by now well aware that that is his
opinion - achieves nothing beyond reducing the group's signal to noise
ratio. It's clearly water off a duck's back to Lawrence, and is
discourteous to the rest of us reading it as it means that we have
wasted our time reading a post that contains no constructive content.
--


And more so, has the audacity to take a swipe at Will Hand for making a
ROFL post, which is where all this started, really.



I have noticed that threads often drift in this way when Dawlish is
involved, as though he be incapable of following threads. It's like he
takes every post in isolation and replies within the framework of an
imagined context that is drawn from the groups recent history in
general.

And you will be an idiot for not understanding that context.

I blame google groups.


--
Alan LeHun
Reply-to is valid. Add "BPSF" to subject: to bypass spam filters.

"Alan LeHun" wrote in message
...

I have noticed that threads often drift in this way when Dawlish is
involved, as though he be incapable of following threads. It's like he
takes every post in isolation and replies within the framework of an
imagined context that is drawn from the groups recent history in
general.

And you will be an idiot for not understanding that context.

I blame google groups.

I blame the people who respond to his inanity and insults, or just comment
on his behaviour!

Half of the posts in those threads come from them!

Cheers, Alastair.

In article ,
says...

I blame google groups.

I blame the people who respond to his inanity and insults, or just comment
on his behaviour!

Half of the posts in those threads come from them!


Well this was just what we were discussing! I was refering to people
(well, one person at the time) being unable to respond in context. It
was that, that I blame on google groups.

But yes, I do put a lot of effort into not being drawn into these sorts
of threads. I sometimes fail. Sorry.

--
Alan LeHun
Reply-to is valid. Add "BPSF" to subject: to bypass spam filters.

On Tuesday, 2 December 2014 11:09:35 UTC, John Hall wrote:
In message , Alan
LeHun writes
In article ,
says...

Guts that you don't have. You know he is an idiot and just won't say
because it would expose you as a hypocrite.


How on earth would that make me a hypocrite? I don't understand your
reasoning for saying that.


Dawlish doesn't seem to appreciate that your point is not about whether
or not Lawrence is an idiot, but that continuing to reply with the sole
word "idiot" - when we are all by now well aware that that is his
opinion - achieves nothing beyond reducing the group's signal to noise
ratio. It's clearly water off a duck's back to Lawrence, and is
discourteous to the rest of us reading it as it means that we have
wasted our time reading a post that contains no constructive content.
--
John Hall "Never play cards with a man called Doc.
Never eat at a place called Mom's.
Never sleep with a woman whose troubles
are worse than your own." Nelson Algren

Cheers John love you too.

On Tuesday, 2 December 2014 11:09:35 UTC, John Hall wrote:
In message , Alan
LeHun writes
In article ,
says...

Guts that you don't have. You know he is an idiot and just won't say
because it would expose you as a hypocrite.


How on earth would that make me a hypocrite? I don't understand your
reasoning for saying that.


Dawlish doesn't seem to appreciate that your point is not about whether
or not Lawrence is an idiot, but that continuing to reply with the sole
word "idiot" - when we are all by now well aware that that is his
opinion - achieves nothing beyond reducing the group's signal to noise
ratio. It's clearly water off a duck's back to Lawrence, and is
discourteous to the rest of us reading it as it means that we have
wasted our time reading a post that contains no constructive content.
--
John Hall "Never play cards with a man called Doc.
Never eat at a place called Mom's.
Never sleep with a woman whose troubles
are worse than your own." Nelson Algren

By the way John it "isn't water of a ducks back" as you so dismissively comment.