The failed charlytans squobble over non existent SSWs that NEVER were cumming while Sir Piers who correctly forsore this cold spell.
http://www.weatheraction.com/

On Monday, January 5, 2015 2:26:30 AM UTC, Jim Cannon wrote:
The failed charlytans squobble over non existent SSWs that NEVER were cumming while Sir Piers who correctly forsore this cold spell.
http://www.weatheraction.com/

This is a cold spell?

Jim Cannon wrote:
The failed charlytans squobble over non existent SSWs that NEVER were cumming while Sir Piers who correctly forsore this cold spell.
http://www.weatheraction.com/
-----------------------------------------------------
One cold day in the East and no snow is a cold spell? I can't use the
Pythonesque "This is getting silly" though as it already was.

On 05/01/2015 09:53, Dave Cornwell wrote:
Jim Cannon wrote:
The failed charlytans squobble over non existent SSWs that NEVER were
cumming while Sir Piers who correctly forsore this cold spell.
http://www.weatheraction.com/

What is certain is that there is no greater charlatan than the Great
Weather Charlatan and his devoted illiterate sock puppet Loose Cannon.

-----------------------------------------------------
One cold day in the East and no snow is a cold spell? I can't use the
Pythonesque "This is getting silly" though as it already was.

There was some sleety snow falling in fog at the highest point on the
trans Pennine M62 on Saturday but it wasn't sticking at 3C ambient.
Curiously it was actually falling as rain on the Manchester side
although the air temperature had fallen to 1C according the the cars
outside thermometer. Manchester clearly has the power to make it rain!

--
Regards,
Martin Brown

In message , Jim
Cannon writes
The failed charlytans squobble over non existent SSWs that NEVER were
cumming

They might get excited about possible SSW, but surely not /that/
excited!
--
I'm not paid to implement the recognition of irony.
(Taken, with the author's permission, from a LiveJournal post)

"Jim Cannon" wrote in message
...
The failed charlytans squobble over non existent SSWs that NEVER were
cumming while Sir Piers who correctly forsore this cold spell.
http://www.weatheraction.com/

One can only assume that judging by the chaotic lay out of this page ,his
mind must be similar, therefore any attempts at forecasting
should be ignored at best or treated with total bewilderment by any self
respecting weather enthusiast, like the current 'cold spell'
or the 5 foot of snow beggars belief.
If anybody actually pays for this drivel they have my deepest sympathy.
Happy New Year


RonB

On Monday, 5 January 2015 12:07:33 UTC, ron button wrote:
"Jim Cannon" wrote in message
...
The failed charlytans squobble over non existent SSWs that NEVER were
cumming while Sir Piers who correctly forsore this cold spell.
http://www.weatheraction.com/

One can only assume that judging by the chaotic lay out of this page ,his
mind must be similar

Ha! I've always thought that. A mind full of unintelligible acronyms and luminous yellow highlighting in a dense, Arial Black italic font. What a benchmark for clarity he sets. It's this total lack of clarity that I guess also allows for his unique verification of the work - e.g. "The Germans stole our snow".

Richard

On 05/01/15 02:26, Jim Cannon wrote:
The failed charlytans squobble over non existent SSWs that NEVER were cumming while Sir Piers who correctly forsore this cold spell.
http://www.weatheraction.com/

I don't think I've ever seen someone try to end a sentence in the midst
of a subordinate clause before.

(I can't do a weather update as I'm not there.)


MS

John Hall wrote:
In message , Jim
Cannon writes
The failed charlytans squobble over non existent SSWs that NEVER were
cumming

They might get excited about possible SSW, but surely not /that/ excited!
--------------------------
John ! :-)

On Monday, January 5, 2015 12:13:52 PM UTC, Richard Dixon wrote:
On Monday, 5 January 2015 12:07:33 UTC, ron button wrote:
"Jim Cannon" wrote in message
...
The failed charlytans squobble over non existent SSWs that NEVER were
cumming while Sir Piers who correctly forsore this cold spell.
http://www.weatheraction.com/

One can only assume that judging by the chaotic lay out of this page ,his
mind must be similar

Ha! I've always thought that. A mind full of unintelligible acronyms and luminous yellow highlighting in a dense, Arial Black italic font. What a benchmark for clarity he sets. It's this total lack of clarity that I guess also allows for his unique verification of the work - e.g. "The Germans stole our snow".

Richard

I saw the History of Everything at the weekend. I wonder what Stephen Hawking makes of this particular fellow astrophysicist? It beggars belief