uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old January 24th 15, 09:58 AM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,777
Default Mea Culpa

NASA has taken down the server for lunar phases... the whole 6000 year catalogue. I don't know for how long it has been in error but the latest spell is now a volcanic one:
http://astropixels.com/ephemeris/moo...es2001pst.html

I will be even more upset if responsibility is handed over to the morons at Adobe. That seems to be the way that NSA has got them to go. I am, presuming it is the NSA as Adobe is one of the least reliable server servers on the planet as regards security. I don't believe anyone on their company's payroll has any regard for security.

Just me bitching.

The fact remains that I should have been checking their data with at least two other respected websites and have not even considered it (and have never done so as far as I can remember.)

So much for Weatherlawyer on security.
It has been a long time since they put a man on the moon. Since then, of course, their successes have been marred by their spectacular failures. I wonder why.


  #2   Report Post  
Old January 24th 15, 11:42 AM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jun 2010
Posts: 5,545
Default Mea Culpa

On Saturday, January 24, 2015 at 9:58:42 AM UTC, Weatherlawyer wrote:
NASA has taken down the server for lunar phases... the whole 6000 year catalogue. I don't know for how long it has been in error but the latest spell is now a volcanic one:
http://astropixels.com/ephemeris/moo...es2001pst.html

I will be even more upset if responsibility is handed over to the morons at Adobe. That seems to be the way that NSA has got them to go. I am, presuming it is the NSA as Adobe is one of the least reliable server servers on the planet as regards security. I don't believe anyone on their company's payroll has any regard for security.

Just me bitching.

The fact remains that I should have been checking their data with at least two other respected websites and have not even considered it (and have never done so as far as I can remember.)

So much for Weatherlawyer on security.
It has been a long time since they put a man on the moon. Since then, of course, their successes have been marred by their spectacular failures. I wonder why.


I've no idea what you're on about, as usual, but it's rather a good track in my humble opinion https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KG7Bs_BCC5w

Graham
Penzance Lovely sunshine this morning, shades needed down at Perranuthnoe beach cafe, a few disappointed surfers though.
  #3   Report Post  
Old January 24th 15, 02:59 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,777
Default Mea Culpa

On Saturday, 24 January 2015 11:42:23 UTC, Graham Easterling wrote:
On Saturday, January 24, 2015 at 9:58:42 AM UTC, Weatherlawyer wrote:
NASA has taken down the server for lunar phases... the whole 6000 year catalogue. I don't know for how long it has been in error but the latest spell is now a volcanic one:
http://astropixels.com/ephemeris/moo...es2001pst.html

I will be even more upset if responsibility is handed over to the morons at Adobe. That seems to be the way that NSA has got them to go. I am, presuming it is the NSA as Adobe is one of the least reliable server servers on the planet as regards security. I don't believe anyone on their company's payroll has any regard for security.

Just me bitching.

The fact remains that I should have been checking their data with at least two other respected websites and have not even considered it (and have never done so as far as I can remember.)

So much for Weatherlawyer on security.
It has been a long time since they put a man on the moon. Since then, of course, their successes have been marred by their spectacular failures. I wonder why.


I've no idea what you're on about, as usual, but it's rather a good track in my humble opinion https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KG7Bs_BCC5w

Graham
Penzance Lovely sunshine this morning, shades needed down at Perranuthnoe beach cafe, a few disappointed surfers though.


Are you sure?

  #4   Report Post  
Old January 25th 15, 07:00 AM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,777
Default Mea Culpa

I don't know what the feck was happening with my head yesterday but it isn't that uncommon that the cells do things beyond my control.

For some reason, when the NASA database went offline, I managed to grab hold of a completely different set of data and I just went loopy.

Here to make it up to you us a video about scattering light:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?x-yt-c...-ts=1421914688

The lecture starts about half way through about 28 minutes in.
Have fun.
  #5   Report Post  
Old January 25th 15, 09:20 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,777
Default Mea Culpa

2015/01/25 09:21. 5.5 Mb. Northern Molucca Sea
2015/01/23 03:47. 6.8 M. Vanuatu Islands

Presumably it only winds upwards. A 6.8 to a 5.5 could be negative acceleration which on a pin-wheel means a lot. Just something to bear in mind from someone who is very easily confused.


Speaking of which, I remember going to this site that day:
http://astropixels.com/ephemeris/moo...l2001year.html
to check these:
Greatest Annual Lunar Standstills: 2001 to 2100; Opening the phases at the same time then getting distracted to distraction.
Somehow I got mixed up that the time of this phenomenon was a phase:
2015 Jan 18 06:17 -18.577

It is the lowest the moon's maximum declination gets in this cycle. 18.65 two weeks earlier:
Jan 3 17:53 18.650
And the next one is Decmber 2016.

Can this possibly be the reason for the volcanics?
Yes. And not only that but the cold winters we have had:

2008 Mar 1 08:03 -28.030 Feb 16 06:10 28.043
2009 Jan 22 14:02 -27.081 Feb 5 14:55 27.083
2010 Jan 12 08:33 -25.796 Jan 26 21:04 25.783

2011 Jan 2 10:06 -24.242 Jan 16 22:51 24.221
2012 Jan 20 02:12 -22.492 Jan 6 21:46 22.539
2013 Jan 9 15:22 -20.879 Jan 23 05:12 20.816
2014 Jan 27 16:31 -19.396 Jan 13 08:14 19.501
2015 Jan 18 06:17 -18.577 Jan 3 17:53 18.650
2016 Dec 29 03:30 -18.958 Dec 14 21:43 18.937
2017 Dec 19 09:31 -20.062 Dec 5 11:43 20.015
2018 Dec 9 11:12 -21.539 Dec 23 11:48 21.550
2019 Dec 26 20:11 -23.227 Dec 13 20:57 23.226
2020 Dec 15 22:23 -24.879 Dec 3 01:22 24.882

2021 Dec 6 02:25 -26.331 Nov 22 22:43 26.342
2022 Oct 30 01:04 -27.500 Nov 12 14:17 27.497
2023 Oct 20 09:19 -28.305 Oct 5 20:31 28.294

Check out the cold spells in March 2008.
And prepare for cold spells in October 2023.

No hang on... remember mne saying I was easily confused...

Even so I think it worth bearing in mind... nah.. this isn't right they are just the greatest for each year...
Oh bugger it sort it out for yourselves as you troll along.

I'm off.
26 January 2015 looks interesting on the NA-EFS and check out the North Atlantic whilst you are at it. Also the rotation in the North Pacific is back in the realms of Pluto.

That's it, I'm gone.




Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mea Culpa: I got my sums wrong Eeyore sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 1 August 9th 08 08:13 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:16 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 Weather Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Weather"

 

Copyright © 2017