Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
NASA has taken down the server for lunar phases... the whole 6000 year catalogue. I don't know for how long it has been in error but the latest spell is now a volcanic one:
http://astropixels.com/ephemeris/moo...es2001pst.html I will be even more upset if responsibility is handed over to the morons at Adobe. That seems to be the way that NSA has got them to go. I am, presuming it is the NSA as Adobe is one of the least reliable server servers on the planet as regards security. I don't believe anyone on their company's payroll has any regard for security. Just me bitching. The fact remains that I should have been checking their data with at least two other respected websites and have not even considered it (and have never done so as far as I can remember.) So much for Weatherlawyer on security. It has been a long time since they put a man on the moon. Since then, of course, their successes have been marred by their spectacular failures. I wonder why. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Saturday, January 24, 2015 at 9:58:42 AM UTC, Weatherlawyer wrote:
NASA has taken down the server for lunar phases... the whole 6000 year catalogue. I don't know for how long it has been in error but the latest spell is now a volcanic one: http://astropixels.com/ephemeris/moo...es2001pst.html I will be even more upset if responsibility is handed over to the morons at Adobe. That seems to be the way that NSA has got them to go. I am, presuming it is the NSA as Adobe is one of the least reliable server servers on the planet as regards security. I don't believe anyone on their company's payroll has any regard for security. Just me bitching. The fact remains that I should have been checking their data with at least two other respected websites and have not even considered it (and have never done so as far as I can remember.) So much for Weatherlawyer on security. It has been a long time since they put a man on the moon. Since then, of course, their successes have been marred by their spectacular failures. I wonder why. I've no idea what you're on about, as usual, but it's rather a good track in my humble opinion https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KG7Bs_BCC5w Graham Penzance Lovely sunshine this morning, shades needed down at Perranuthnoe beach cafe, a few disappointed surfers though. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Saturday, 24 January 2015 11:42:23 UTC, Graham Easterling wrote:
On Saturday, January 24, 2015 at 9:58:42 AM UTC, Weatherlawyer wrote: NASA has taken down the server for lunar phases... the whole 6000 year catalogue. I don't know for how long it has been in error but the latest spell is now a volcanic one: http://astropixels.com/ephemeris/moo...es2001pst.html I will be even more upset if responsibility is handed over to the morons at Adobe. That seems to be the way that NSA has got them to go. I am, presuming it is the NSA as Adobe is one of the least reliable server servers on the planet as regards security. I don't believe anyone on their company's payroll has any regard for security. Just me bitching. The fact remains that I should have been checking their data with at least two other respected websites and have not even considered it (and have never done so as far as I can remember.) So much for Weatherlawyer on security. It has been a long time since they put a man on the moon. Since then, of course, their successes have been marred by their spectacular failures. I wonder why. I've no idea what you're on about, as usual, but it's rather a good track in my humble opinion https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KG7Bs_BCC5w Graham Penzance Lovely sunshine this morning, shades needed down at Perranuthnoe beach cafe, a few disappointed surfers though. Are you sure? |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't know what the feck was happening with my head yesterday but it isn't that uncommon that the cells do things beyond my control.
For some reason, when the NASA database went offline, I managed to grab hold of a completely different set of data and I just went loopy. Here to make it up to you us a video about scattering light: https://www.youtube.com/watch?x-yt-c...-ts=1421914688 The lecture starts about half way through about 28 minutes in. Have fun. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
2015/01/25 09:21. 5.5 Mb. Northern Molucca Sea
2015/01/23 03:47. 6.8 M. Vanuatu Islands Presumably it only winds upwards. A 6.8 to a 5.5 could be negative acceleration which on a pin-wheel means a lot. Just something to bear in mind from someone who is very easily confused. Speaking of which, I remember going to this site that day: http://astropixels.com/ephemeris/moo...l2001year.html to check these: Greatest Annual Lunar Standstills: 2001 to 2100; Opening the phases at the same time then getting distracted to distraction. Somehow I got mixed up that the time of this phenomenon was a phase: 2015 Jan 18 06:17 -18.577 It is the lowest the moon's maximum declination gets in this cycle. 18.65 two weeks earlier: Jan 3 17:53 18.650 And the next one is Decmber 2016. Can this possibly be the reason for the volcanics? Yes. And not only that but the cold winters we have had: 2008 Mar 1 08:03 -28.030 Feb 16 06:10 28.043 2009 Jan 22 14:02 -27.081 Feb 5 14:55 27.083 2010 Jan 12 08:33 -25.796 Jan 26 21:04 25.783 2011 Jan 2 10:06 -24.242 Jan 16 22:51 24.221 2012 Jan 20 02:12 -22.492 Jan 6 21:46 22.539 2013 Jan 9 15:22 -20.879 Jan 23 05:12 20.816 2014 Jan 27 16:31 -19.396 Jan 13 08:14 19.501 2015 Jan 18 06:17 -18.577 Jan 3 17:53 18.650 2016 Dec 29 03:30 -18.958 Dec 14 21:43 18.937 2017 Dec 19 09:31 -20.062 Dec 5 11:43 20.015 2018 Dec 9 11:12 -21.539 Dec 23 11:48 21.550 2019 Dec 26 20:11 -23.227 Dec 13 20:57 23.226 2020 Dec 15 22:23 -24.879 Dec 3 01:22 24.882 2021 Dec 6 02:25 -26.331 Nov 22 22:43 26.342 2022 Oct 30 01:04 -27.500 Nov 12 14:17 27.497 2023 Oct 20 09:19 -28.305 Oct 5 20:31 28.294 Check out the cold spells in March 2008. And prepare for cold spells in October 2023. No hang on... remember mne saying I was easily confused... Even so I think it worth bearing in mind... nah.. this isn't right they are just the greatest for each year... Oh bugger it sort it out for yourselves as you troll along. I'm off. 26 January 2015 looks interesting on the NA-EFS and check out the North Atlantic whilst you are at it. Also the rotation in the North Pacific is back in the realms of Pluto. That's it, I'm gone. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Mea Culpa: I got my sums wrong | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) |