The guvnor went along to the RMetS socierty meeting on Saturday. Here is his report

"The Failure & Fraud of Co2 wamism is now clear and getting though to people. The MetOffice are scared.

There were many intersting presentations at the RMetS Meeting on Sat 7th Feb in Uni of Reading but too much time given to MetO warmist propaganda and not enough for discussion.

Sir Piers 1 v RMETS 0

After Stephen Burt on 'Notable features of 2014' which included "warmest ever" claims I pointed out that such claims are incompatible with the observed fact of record world (smoothed Av) amounts of sea Ice and the reason was the dodgy 'adjustments' upwards of temperatures. I said the RMS must distance itself from this delusional nonsense.
The speaker, in standard warmist cherry-picking manner, tried to ignore the Antarctic and said the Arctic showed less ice. I said 'not any more' and anyway we have to compare WORLD with WORLD. He said there was 'good data' and that he "refuted" my claim. In fact of course he failed to refute anything - that requires facts and argument in rebuttal not an empty assertion.
Further info: data Fraud News Report Jan 31st below

Sir Piers 2 v RMETS 0

Penny Tranter (MetO) spoke on floods and storms in the SW England last winter. I wanted to ask her if the MetO wanted to improve their warnings with our advice which gives longer ahead more relaible warnings of extremes, but didnt get a chance.

HATTRICK!!!

Sir Piers 3 v RMETS 0

Dr Chris Holloway (Uni Reading) on ElNino events {as expressed by warming of West Pacific moving East} said for reasons they do not understand the atmosphere in 2014 had NOT responded how it 'should' to same ocean warming and so there had not been the ElNino many expected. I said from the day those expecations were announced WeatherAction had said it would NOT happen (the solar-lunar effects from ABOVE veto-ing their ElNino hope-cast) and that because we are now in a solar driven MIA-Wild-Jet-Stream-Age there will be a reduction of ElNinos for the next 20 years.

Sir Piers 4 v RMETS 0

Nick Miller MO-BBC Weather talked about uncertainties in (eg) storm timings and tracks but did not leave himself enough time to answer many questions. I had wanted to ask him (similarly to Penny Tranter) if the BBC-MO wanted to improve warnings and to point out that ALL the biggest storms of Autumn +Winter 2013-14 were in WeatherAction top Red solar effect (R5/R4) periods and WeatherAction improves on MetOffice warning times and tracks for storms; and Co2 has no observed or model effect on the Jet Stream (their admisison on their own models).
http://www.weatheraction.com/docs/WANews13No46.pdf
http://www.weatheraction.com/docs/WANews13No51.pdf
http://www.weatheraction.com/docs/WANews14No06.pdf

Sir Piers 5 v RMETS 0

Dr Matt Owens Uni Reading talked on Space weather (ie events in the solar wind). I asked if his non-mention of any solar activity - Earth weather connections was a religious reason because he didnt want to upset the CO2 believers in the Uni or if he saw none. He in astounding denial of reality (and observations noticed 50 years ago) said there was no effect on Earth weather from space!!! I then said "Really?" and asked how come then we, WeatherAction, predicted the Sudden Stratospheric warming this year and follwing extra wildness* in the jet stream via our solar-based method. (*none of which the CO2 theory can explain). Info:
http://www.weatheraction.com/docs/WANews15No04.pdf
http://www.weatheraction.com/docs/WANews15No05.pdf
and Jan 15+16 report below