![]() |
Sir Piers crowned HECKLER ROYAL after exposing liars at RMetS meeting
The guvnor went along to the RMetS socierty meeting on Saturday. Here is his report
"The Failure & Fraud of Co2 wamism is now clear and getting though to people. The MetOffice are scared. There were many intersting presentations at the RMetS Meeting on Sat 7th Feb in Uni of Reading but too much time given to MetO warmist propaganda and not enough for discussion. Sir Piers 1 v RMETS 0 After Stephen Burt on 'Notable features of 2014' which included "warmest ever" claims I pointed out that such claims are incompatible with the observed fact of record world (smoothed Av) amounts of sea Ice and the reason was the dodgy 'adjustments' upwards of temperatures. I said the RMS must distance itself from this delusional nonsense. The speaker, in standard warmist cherry-picking manner, tried to ignore the Antarctic and said the Arctic showed less ice. I said 'not any more' and anyway we have to compare WORLD with WORLD. He said there was 'good data' and that he "refuted" my claim. In fact of course he failed to refute anything - that requires facts and argument in rebuttal not an empty assertion. Further info: data Fraud News Report Jan 31st below Sir Piers 2 v RMETS 0 Penny Tranter (MetO) spoke on floods and storms in the SW England last winter. I wanted to ask her if the MetO wanted to improve their warnings with our advice which gives longer ahead more relaible warnings of extremes, but didnt get a chance. HATTRICK!!! Sir Piers 3 v RMETS 0 Dr Chris Holloway (Uni Reading) on ElNino events {as expressed by warming of West Pacific moving East} said for reasons they do not understand the atmosphere in 2014 had NOT responded how it 'should' to same ocean warming and so there had not been the ElNino many expected. I said from the day those expecations were announced WeatherAction had said it would NOT happen (the solar-lunar effects from ABOVE veto-ing their ElNino hope-cast) and that because we are now in a solar driven MIA-Wild-Jet-Stream-Age there will be a reduction of ElNinos for the next 20 years. Sir Piers 4 v RMETS 0 Nick Miller MO-BBC Weather talked about uncertainties in (eg) storm timings and tracks but did not leave himself enough time to answer many questions. I had wanted to ask him (similarly to Penny Tranter) if the BBC-MO wanted to improve warnings and to point out that ALL the biggest storms of Autumn +Winter 2013-14 were in WeatherAction top Red solar effect (R5/R4) periods and WeatherAction improves on MetOffice warning times and tracks for storms; and Co2 has no observed or model effect on the Jet Stream (their admisison on their own models). http://www.weatheraction.com/docs/WANews13No46.pdf http://www.weatheraction.com/docs/WANews13No51.pdf http://www.weatheraction.com/docs/WANews14No06.pdf Sir Piers 5 v RMETS 0 Dr Matt Owens Uni Reading talked on Space weather (ie events in the solar wind). I asked if his non-mention of any solar activity - Earth weather connections was a religious reason because he didnt want to upset the CO2 believers in the Uni or if he saw none. He in astounding denial of reality (and observations noticed 50 years ago) said there was no effect on Earth weather from space!!! I then said "Really?" and asked how come then we, WeatherAction, predicted the Sudden Stratospheric warming this year and follwing extra wildness* in the jet stream via our solar-based method. (*none of which the CO2 theory can explain). Info: http://www.weatheraction.com/docs/WANews15No04.pdf http://www.weatheraction.com/docs/WANews15No05.pdf and Jan 15+16 report below |
Sir Piers crowned HECKLER ROYAL after exposing liars at RMetS meeting
Be you never return to this post when it gets the gales of laughter and opprobrium that it will get.
piers never returns to any of his posts following the ridicule that they always get. |
Sir Piers crowned HECKLER ROYAL after exposing liars at RMetS meeting
On Sunday, February 8, 2015 at 9:59:33 PM UTC, Dawlish wrote:
Be you never return to this post when it gets the gales of laughter and opprobrium that it will get. piers never returns to any of his posts following the ridicule that they always get. well Jim Cannon returns to this one cos he know his guvnors RIGHT! EVERY TIME!!! |
Sir Piers crowned HECKLER ROYAL after exposing liars at RMetS meeting
On Sunday, February 8, 2015 at 10:26:25 PM UTC, Malcolm wrote:
In article , Jim Cannon writes I wanted to ask her if the MetO wanted to improve their warnings with our advice which gives longer ahead more relaible warnings of extremes, but didnt get a chance. HATTRICK!!! Sir Piers 3 v RMETS 0 So, if one wants to ask a question but doesn't get a chance, that counts as a win. How very revealing of Mr Corbyn's methods. In my book that counts as a WIN!!!. The society should make enought TIME for questions. They didnt and never do cos theyre TERRIFIED people are going to question there global warning dogma. The pubic are waking up to this FACT!!!!!!! |
Sir Piers crowned HECKLER ROYAL after exposing liars at RMetS meeting
On Sunday, 8 February 2015 20:41:57 UTC, Jim Cannon wrote:
The guvnor went along to the RMetS socierty meeting on Saturday. Here is his report "The Failure & Fraud of Co2 wamism is now clear and getting though to people. The MetOffice are scared. There were many intersting presentations at the RMetS Meeting on Sat 7th Feb in Uni of Reading but too much time given to MetO warmist propaganda and not enough for discussion. Sir Piers 1 v RMETS 0 After Stephen Burt on 'Notable features of 2014' which included "warmest ever" claims I pointed out that such claims are incompatible with the observed fact of record world (smoothed Av) amounts of sea Ice and the reason was the dodgy 'adjustments' upwards of temperatures. I said the RMS must distance itself from this delusional nonsense. The speaker, in standard warmist cherry-picking manner, tried to ignore the Antarctic and said the Arctic showed less ice. I said 'not any more' and anyway we have to compare WORLD with WORLD. He said there was 'good data' and that he "refuted" my claim. In fact of course he failed to refute anything - that requires facts and argument in rebuttal not an empty assertion. Further info: data Fraud News Report Jan 31st below Sir Piers 2 v RMETS 0 Penny Tranter (MetO) spoke on floods and storms in the SW England last winter. I wanted to ask her if the MetO wanted to improve their warnings with our advice which gives longer ahead more relaible warnings of extremes, but didnt get a chance. HATTRICK!!! Sir Piers 3 v RMETS 0 Dr Chris Holloway (Uni Reading) on ElNino events {as expressed by warming of West Pacific moving East} said for reasons they do not understand the atmosphere in 2014 had NOT responded how it 'should' to same ocean warming and so there had not been the ElNino many expected. I said from the day those expecations were announced WeatherAction had said it would NOT happen (the solar-lunar effects from ABOVE veto-ing their ElNino hope-cast) and that because we are now in a solar driven MIA-Wild-Jet-Stream-Age there will be a reduction of ElNinos for the next 20 years. Sir Piers 4 v RMETS 0 Nick Miller MO-BBC Weather talked about uncertainties in (eg) storm timings and tracks but did not leave himself enough time to answer many questions. I had wanted to ask him (similarly to Penny Tranter) if the BBC-MO wanted to improve warnings and to point out that ALL the biggest storms of Autumn +Winter 2013-14 were in WeatherAction top Red solar effect (R5/R4) periods and WeatherAction improves on MetOffice warning times and tracks for storms; and Co2 has no observed or model effect on the Jet Stream (their admisison on their own models). http://www.weatheraction.com/docs/WANews13No46.pdf http://www.weatheraction.com/docs/WANews13No51.pdf http://www.weatheraction.com/docs/WANews14No06.pdf Sir Piers 5 v RMETS 0 Dr Matt Owens Uni Reading talked on Space weather (ie events in the solar wind). I asked if his non-mention of any solar activity - Earth weather connections was a religious reason because he didnt want to upset the CO2 believers in the Uni or if he saw none. He in astounding denial of reality (and observations noticed 50 years ago) said there was no effect on Earth weather from space!!! I then said "Really?" and asked how come then we, WeatherAction, predicted the Sudden Stratospheric warming this year and follwing extra wildness* in the jet stream via our solar-based method. (*none of which the CO2 theory can explain). Info: http://www.weatheraction.com/docs/WANews15No04.pdf http://www.weatheraction.com/docs/WANews15No05.pdf and Jan 15+16 report below Get in there my son. |
Sir Piers crowned HECKLER ROYAL after exposing liars at RMetS meeting
On Sunday, 8 February 2015 22:26:25 UTC, Malcolm wrote:
In article , Jim Cannon writes I wanted to ask her if the MetO wanted to improve their warnings with our advice which gives longer ahead more relaible warnings of extremes, but didnt get a chance. HATTRICK!!! Sir Piers 3 v RMETS 0 So, if one wants to ask a question but doesn't get a chance, that counts as a win. How very revealing of Mr Corbyn's methods. -- Malcolm Are you and Dawlish joined at the lip? My post will remain in perpetuity |
Sir Piers crowned HECKLER ROYAL after exposing liars at RMetS meeting
On Sunday, February 8, 2015 at 10:55:01 PM UTC, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
On Sunday, 8 February 2015 20:41:57 UTC, Jim Cannon wrote: The guvnor went along to the RMetS socierty meeting on Saturday. Here is his report "The Failure & Fraud of Co2 wamism is now clear and getting though to people. The MetOffice are scared. There were many intersting presentations at the RMetS Meeting on Sat 7th Feb in Uni of Reading but too much time given to MetO warmist propaganda and not enough for discussion. Sir Piers 1 v RMETS 0 After Stephen Burt on 'Notable features of 2014' which included "warmest ever" claims I pointed out that such claims are incompatible with the observed fact of record world (smoothed Av) amounts of sea Ice and the reason was the dodgy 'adjustments' upwards of temperatures. I said the RMS must distance itself from this delusional nonsense. The speaker, in standard warmist cherry-picking manner, tried to ignore the Antarctic and said the Arctic showed less ice. I said 'not any more' and anyway we have to compare WORLD with WORLD. He said there was 'good data' and that he "refuted" my claim. In fact of course he failed to refute anything - that requires facts and argument in rebuttal not an empty assertion.. Further info: data Fraud News Report Jan 31st below Sir Piers 2 v RMETS 0 Penny Tranter (MetO) spoke on floods and storms in the SW England last winter. I wanted to ask her if the MetO wanted to improve their warnings with our advice which gives longer ahead more relaible warnings of extremes, but didnt get a chance. HATTRICK!!! Sir Piers 3 v RMETS 0 Dr Chris Holloway (Uni Reading) on ElNino events {as expressed by warming of West Pacific moving East} said for reasons they do not understand the atmosphere in 2014 had NOT responded how it 'should' to same ocean warming and so there had not been the ElNino many expected. I said from the day those expecations were announced WeatherAction had said it would NOT happen (the solar-lunar effects from ABOVE veto-ing their ElNino hope-cast) and that because we are now in a solar driven MIA-Wild-Jet-Stream-Age there will be a reduction of ElNinos for the next 20 years. Sir Piers 4 v RMETS 0 Nick Miller MO-BBC Weather talked about uncertainties in (eg) storm timings and tracks but did not leave himself enough time to answer many questions. I had wanted to ask him (similarly to Penny Tranter) if the BBC-MO wanted to improve warnings and to point out that ALL the biggest storms of Autumn +Winter 2013-14 were in WeatherAction top Red solar effect (R5/R4) periods and WeatherAction improves on MetOffice warning times and tracks for storms; and Co2 has no observed or model effect on the Jet Stream (their admisison on their own models). http://www.weatheraction.com/docs/WANews13No46.pdf http://www.weatheraction.com/docs/WANews13No51.pdf http://www.weatheraction.com/docs/WANews14No06.pdf Sir Piers 5 v RMETS 0 Dr Matt Owens Uni Reading talked on Space weather (ie events in the solar wind). I asked if his non-mention of any solar activity - Earth weather connections was a religious reason because he didnt want to upset the CO2 believers in the Uni or if he saw none. He in astounding denial of reality (and observations noticed 50 years ago) said there was no effect on Earth weather from space!!! I then said "Really?" and asked how come then we, WeatherAction, predicted the Sudden Stratospheric warming this year and follwing extra wildness* in the jet stream via our solar-based method. (*none of which the CO2 theory can explain). Info: http://www.weatheraction.com/docs/WANews15No04.pdf http://www.weatheraction.com/docs/WANews15No05.pdf and Jan 15+16 report below Get in there my son. Thanx lawrence!!! The TRUTH will OUT evenually |
Sir Piers crowned HECKLER ROYAL after exposing liars at RMetSmeeting
On 08/02/2015 20:41, Jim Cannon wrote:
The guvnor went along to the RMetS socierty meeting on Saturday. Here is his report "The Failure & Fraud [snip incoherent denier rant] of the Grand Charlatan and his sock puppet are clear for all to see. Interesting that he counts failing to ask a question as "success" that is much like the self professed successes of his so called forecasts. -- Regards, Martin Brown |
Sir Piers crowned HECKLER ROYAL after exposing liars at RMetS meeting
On Monday, February 9, 2015 at 7:50:50 PM UTC, Malcolm wrote:
In article , Martin Brown writes On 08/02/2015 20:41, Jim Cannon wrote: The guvnor went along to the RMetS socierty meeting on Saturday. Here is his report "The Failure & Fraud [snip incoherent denier rant] of the Grand Charlatan and his sock puppet are clear for all to see. Interesting that he counts failing to ask a question as "success" that is much like the self professed successes of his so called forecasts. It smacks of desperation t be believed, but in fact as the opposite effect. -- On the contrary Malcolm!! The gaffer collared a few NEW subscribers after the meeting exasperated RMETS members who are tired of being lied to and are looking for better VALUE for money from WeatherAction |
Sir Piers crowned HECKLER ROYAL after exposing liars at RMetSmeeting
On 09/02/2015 20:32, Jim Cannon wrote:
On Monday, February 9, 2015 at 7:50:50 PM UTC, Malcolm wrote: In article , Martin Brown writes On 08/02/2015 20:41, Jim Cannon wrote: The guvnor went along to the RMetS socierty meeting on Saturday. Here is his report "The Failure & Fraud [snip incoherent denier rant] of the Grand Charlatan and his sock puppet are clear for all to see. Interesting that he counts failing to ask a question as "success" that is much like the self professed successes of his so called forecasts. It smacks of desperation t be believed, but in fact as the opposite effect. It is quite funny to see Loose Cannon struggle to put a brave face on the Grand Charlatan's various weather "forecasting" schemes failing. On the contrary Malcolm!! The gaffer collared a few NEW subscribers after the meeting exasperated RMETS members who are tired of being lied to and are looking for better VALUE for money from WeatherAction ROFL - A fool and his money are soon parted! Rain or go dark before morning "predictions" convey no information. More fool anyone dumb enough to pay for them - CAVEAT EMPTOR!!! -- Regards, Martin Brown |
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:44 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 WeatherBanter.co.uk