The guvnor went along to the RMetS socierty meeting on Saturday. Here is his report

"The Failure & Fraud of Co2 wamism is now clear and getting though to people. The MetOffice are scared.

There were many intersting presentations at the RMetS Meeting on Sat 7th Feb in Uni of Reading but too much time given to MetO warmist propaganda and not enough for discussion.

Sir Piers 1 v RMETS 0

After Stephen Burt on 'Notable features of 2014' which included "warmest ever" claims I pointed out that such claims are incompatible with the observed fact of record world (smoothed Av) amounts of sea Ice and the reason was the dodgy 'adjustments' upwards of temperatures. I said the RMS must distance itself from this delusional nonsense.
The speaker, in standard warmist cherry-picking manner, tried to ignore the Antarctic and said the Arctic showed less ice. I said 'not any more' and anyway we have to compare WORLD with WORLD. He said there was 'good data' and that he "refuted" my claim. In fact of course he failed to refute anything - that requires facts and argument in rebuttal not an empty assertion.
Further info: data Fraud News Report Jan 31st below

Sir Piers 2 v RMETS 0

Penny Tranter (MetO) spoke on floods and storms in the SW England last winter. I wanted to ask her if the MetO wanted to improve their warnings with our advice which gives longer ahead more relaible warnings of extremes, but didnt get a chance.

HATTRICK!!!

Sir Piers 3 v RMETS 0

Dr Chris Holloway (Uni Reading) on ElNino events {as expressed by warming of West Pacific moving East} said for reasons they do not understand the atmosphere in 2014 had NOT responded how it 'should' to same ocean warming and so there had not been the ElNino many expected. I said from the day those expecations were announced WeatherAction had said it would NOT happen (the solar-lunar effects from ABOVE veto-ing their ElNino hope-cast) and that because we are now in a solar driven MIA-Wild-Jet-Stream-Age there will be a reduction of ElNinos for the next 20 years.

Sir Piers 4 v RMETS 0

Nick Miller MO-BBC Weather talked about uncertainties in (eg) storm timings and tracks but did not leave himself enough time to answer many questions. I had wanted to ask him (similarly to Penny Tranter) if the BBC-MO wanted to improve warnings and to point out that ALL the biggest storms of Autumn +Winter 2013-14 were in WeatherAction top Red solar effect (R5/R4) periods and WeatherAction improves on MetOffice warning times and tracks for storms; and Co2 has no observed or model effect on the Jet Stream (their admisison on their own models).
http://www.weatheraction.com/docs/WANews13No46.pdf
http://www.weatheraction.com/docs/WANews13No51.pdf
http://www.weatheraction.com/docs/WANews14No06.pdf

Sir Piers 5 v RMETS 0

Dr Matt Owens Uni Reading talked on Space weather (ie events in the solar wind). I asked if his non-mention of any solar activity - Earth weather connections was a religious reason because he didnt want to upset the CO2 believers in the Uni or if he saw none. He in astounding denial of reality (and observations noticed 50 years ago) said there was no effect on Earth weather from space!!! I then said "Really?" and asked how come then we, WeatherAction, predicted the Sudden Stratospheric warming this year and follwing extra wildness* in the jet stream via our solar-based method. (*none of which the CO2 theory can explain). Info:
http://www.weatheraction.com/docs/WANews15No04.pdf
http://www.weatheraction.com/docs/WANews15No05.pdf
and Jan 15+16 report below

Be you never return to this post when it gets the gales of laughter and opprobrium that it will get.

piers never returns to any of his posts following the ridicule that they always get.

On Sunday, February 8, 2015 at 9:59:33 PM UTC, Dawlish wrote:
Be you never return to this post when it gets the gales of laughter and opprobrium that it will get.

piers never returns to any of his posts following the ridicule that they always get.

well Jim Cannon returns to this one cos he know his guvnors RIGHT! EVERY TIME!!!

On Sunday, 8 February 2015 20:41:57 UTC, Jim Cannon wrote:
The guvnor went along to the RMetS socierty meeting on Saturday. Here is his report

"The Failure & Fraud of Co2 wamism is now clear and getting though to people. The MetOffice are scared.

There were many intersting presentations at the RMetS Meeting on Sat 7th Feb in Uni of Reading but too much time given to MetO warmist propaganda and not enough for discussion.

Sir Piers 1 v RMETS 0

After Stephen Burt on 'Notable features of 2014' which included "warmest ever" claims I pointed out that such claims are incompatible with the observed fact of record world (smoothed Av) amounts of sea Ice and the reason was the dodgy 'adjustments' upwards of temperatures. I said the RMS must distance itself from this delusional nonsense.
The speaker, in standard warmist cherry-picking manner, tried to ignore the Antarctic and said the Arctic showed less ice. I said 'not any more' and anyway we have to compare WORLD with WORLD. He said there was 'good data' and that he "refuted" my claim. In fact of course he failed to refute anything - that requires facts and argument in rebuttal not an empty assertion.
Further info: data Fraud News Report Jan 31st below

Sir Piers 2 v RMETS 0

Penny Tranter (MetO) spoke on floods and storms in the SW England last winter. I wanted to ask her if the MetO wanted to improve their warnings with our advice which gives longer ahead more relaible warnings of extremes, but didnt get a chance.

HATTRICK!!!

Sir Piers 3 v RMETS 0

Dr Chris Holloway (Uni Reading) on ElNino events {as expressed by warming of West Pacific moving East} said for reasons they do not understand the atmosphere in 2014 had NOT responded how it 'should' to same ocean warming and so there had not been the ElNino many expected. I said from the day those expecations were announced WeatherAction had said it would NOT happen (the solar-lunar effects from ABOVE veto-ing their ElNino hope-cast) and that because we are now in a solar driven MIA-Wild-Jet-Stream-Age there will be a reduction of ElNinos for the next 20 years.

Sir Piers 4 v RMETS 0

Nick Miller MO-BBC Weather talked about uncertainties in (eg) storm timings and tracks but did not leave himself enough time to answer many questions. I had wanted to ask him (similarly to Penny Tranter) if the BBC-MO wanted to improve warnings and to point out that ALL the biggest storms of Autumn +Winter 2013-14 were in WeatherAction top Red solar effect (R5/R4) periods and WeatherAction improves on MetOffice warning times and tracks for storms; and Co2 has no observed or model effect on the Jet Stream (their admisison on their own models).
http://www.weatheraction.com/docs/WANews13No46.pdf
http://www.weatheraction.com/docs/WANews13No51.pdf
http://www.weatheraction.com/docs/WANews14No06.pdf

Sir Piers 5 v RMETS 0

Dr Matt Owens Uni Reading talked on Space weather (ie events in the solar wind). I asked if his non-mention of any solar activity - Earth weather connections was a religious reason because he didnt want to upset the CO2 believers in the Uni or if he saw none. He in astounding denial of reality (and observations noticed 50 years ago) said there was no effect on Earth weather from space!!! I then said "Really?" and asked how come then we, WeatherAction, predicted the Sudden Stratospheric warming this year and follwing extra wildness* in the jet stream via our solar-based method. (*none of which the CO2 theory can explain). Info:
http://www.weatheraction.com/docs/WANews15No04.pdf
http://www.weatheraction.com/docs/WANews15No05.pdf
and Jan 15+16 report below

Get in there my son.

On Sunday, February 8, 2015 at 10:55:01 PM UTC, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
On Sunday, 8 February 2015 20:41:57 UTC, Jim Cannon wrote:
The guvnor went along to the RMetS socierty meeting on Saturday. Here is his report

"The Failure & Fraud of Co2 wamism is now clear and getting though to people. The MetOffice are scared.

There were many intersting presentations at the RMetS Meeting on Sat 7th Feb in Uni of Reading but too much time given to MetO warmist propaganda and not enough for discussion.

Sir Piers 1 v RMETS 0

After Stephen Burt on 'Notable features of 2014' which included "warmest ever" claims I pointed out that such claims are incompatible with the observed fact of record world (smoothed Av) amounts of sea Ice and the reason was the dodgy 'adjustments' upwards of temperatures. I said the RMS must distance itself from this delusional nonsense.
The speaker, in standard warmist cherry-picking manner, tried to ignore the Antarctic and said the Arctic showed less ice. I said 'not any more' and anyway we have to compare WORLD with WORLD. He said there was 'good data' and that he "refuted" my claim. In fact of course he failed to refute anything - that requires facts and argument in rebuttal not an empty assertion..
Further info: data Fraud News Report Jan 31st below

Sir Piers 2 v RMETS 0

Penny Tranter (MetO) spoke on floods and storms in the SW England last winter. I wanted to ask her if the MetO wanted to improve their warnings with our advice which gives longer ahead more relaible warnings of extremes, but didnt get a chance.

HATTRICK!!!

Sir Piers 3 v RMETS 0

Dr Chris Holloway (Uni Reading) on ElNino events {as expressed by warming of West Pacific moving East} said for reasons they do not understand the atmosphere in 2014 had NOT responded how it 'should' to same ocean warming and so there had not been the ElNino many expected. I said from the day those expecations were announced WeatherAction had said it would NOT happen (the solar-lunar effects from ABOVE veto-ing their ElNino hope-cast) and that because we are now in a solar driven MIA-Wild-Jet-Stream-Age there will be a reduction of ElNinos for the next 20 years.

Sir Piers 4 v RMETS 0

Nick Miller MO-BBC Weather talked about uncertainties in (eg) storm timings and tracks but did not leave himself enough time to answer many questions. I had wanted to ask him (similarly to Penny Tranter) if the BBC-MO wanted to improve warnings and to point out that ALL the biggest storms of Autumn +Winter 2013-14 were in WeatherAction top Red solar effect (R5/R4) periods and WeatherAction improves on MetOffice warning times and tracks for storms; and Co2 has no observed or model effect on the Jet Stream (their admisison on their own models).
http://www.weatheraction.com/docs/WANews13No46.pdf
http://www.weatheraction.com/docs/WANews13No51.pdf
http://www.weatheraction.com/docs/WANews14No06.pdf

Sir Piers 5 v RMETS 0

Dr Matt Owens Uni Reading talked on Space weather (ie events in the solar wind). I asked if his non-mention of any solar activity - Earth weather connections was a religious reason because he didnt want to upset the CO2 believers in the Uni or if he saw none. He in astounding denial of reality (and observations noticed 50 years ago) said there was no effect on Earth weather from space!!! I then said "Really?" and asked how come then we, WeatherAction, predicted the Sudden Stratospheric warming this year and follwing extra wildness* in the jet stream via our solar-based method. (*none of which the CO2 theory can explain). Info:
http://www.weatheraction.com/docs/WANews15No04.pdf
http://www.weatheraction.com/docs/WANews15No05.pdf
and Jan 15+16 report below

Get in there my son.

Thanx lawrence!!! The TRUTH will OUT evenually

On 08/02/2015 20:41, Jim Cannon wrote:
The guvnor went along to the RMetS socierty meeting on Saturday. Here is his report

"The Failure & Fraud

[snip incoherent denier rant]

of the Grand Charlatan and his sock puppet are clear for all to see.

Interesting that he counts failing to ask a question as "success" that
is much like the self professed successes of his so called forecasts.

--
Regards,
Martin Brown

On Monday, February 9, 2015 at 7:50:50 PM UTC, Malcolm wrote:
In article , Martin Brown
writes
On 08/02/2015 20:41, Jim Cannon wrote:
The guvnor went along to the RMetS socierty meeting on Saturday. Here
is his report

"The Failure & Fraud

[snip incoherent denier rant]

of the Grand Charlatan and his sock puppet are clear for all to see.

Interesting that he counts failing to ask a question as "success" that
is much like the self professed successes of his so called forecasts.

It smacks of desperation t be believed, but in fact as the opposite
effect.

--
On the contrary Malcolm!! The gaffer collared a few NEW subscribers after the meeting exasperated RMETS members who are tired of being lied to and are looking for better VALUE for money from WeatherAction

On 09/02/2015 20:32, Jim Cannon wrote:
On Monday, February 9, 2015 at 7:50:50 PM UTC, Malcolm wrote:
In article , Martin Brown
writes
On 08/02/2015 20:41, Jim Cannon wrote:
The guvnor went along to the RMetS socierty meeting on Saturday. Here
is his report

"The Failure & Fraud

[snip incoherent denier rant]

of the Grand Charlatan and his sock puppet are clear for all to see.

Interesting that he counts failing to ask a question as "success" that
is much like the self professed successes of his so called forecasts.

It smacks of desperation t be believed, but in fact as the opposite
effect.

It is quite funny to see Loose Cannon struggle to put a brave face on
the Grand Charlatan's various weather "forecasting" schemes failing.

On the contrary Malcolm!! The gaffer collared a few NEW subscribers after the meeting
exasperated RMETS members who are tired of being lied to and are
looking for better
VALUE for money from WeatherAction

ROFL - A fool and his money are soon parted!

Rain or go dark before morning "predictions" convey no information.

More fool anyone dumb enough to pay for them - CAVEAT EMPTOR!!!

--
Regards,
Martin Brown

On 09/02/2015 20:32, Jim Cannon wrote:
On Monday, February 9, 2015 at 7:50:50 PM UTC, Malcolm wrote:
In article , Martin Brown
writes
On 08/02/2015 20:41, Jim Cannon wrote:
The guvnor went along to the RMetS socierty meeting on Saturday. Here
is his report

"The Failure & Fraud

[snip incoherent denier rant]

of the Grand Charlatan and his sock puppet are clear for all to see.

Interesting that he counts failing to ask a question as "success" that
is much like the self professed successes of his so called forecasts.

It smacks of desperation t be believed, but in fact as the opposite
effect.

--
On the contrary Malcolm!! The gaffer collared a few NEW subscribers after the meeting exasperated RMETS members who are tired of being lied to and are looking for better VALUE for money from WeatherAction

Can you please leave out the commercials?

On Tuesday, February 10, 2015 at 8:11:59 AM UTC, Malcolm wrote:
In article , Jim
Cannon writes
On Monday, February 9, 2015 at 7:50:50 PM UTC, Malcolm wrote:
In article , Martin Brown
writes
On 08/02/2015 20:41, Jim Cannon wrote:
The guvnor went along to the RMetS socierty meeting on Saturday. Here
is his report

"The Failure & Fraud

[snip incoherent denier rant]

of the Grand Charlatan and his sock puppet are clear for all to see.

Interesting that he counts failing to ask a question as "success" that
is much like the self professed successes of his so called forecasts.

It smacks of desperation t be believed, but in fact as the opposite
effect.

--
On the contrary Malcolm!! The gaffer collared a few NEW subscribers
after the meeting exasperated RMETS members who are tired of being lied
to and are looking for better VALUE for money from WeatherAction

As I have your attention, Jim, please could you ask Piers what went
wrong with this piece of his forecasting, issued on December 9th 2014:

"The massive storm (map below for 10th 12noon) now heading for Britain
and Ireland 9/10th bringing blizzard conditions for most parts and
damaging gales or storms in all parts is essentially our top active
period 5-8th extended a day or two.
"This will then develop to set up the more Northerly VERY SEVERE
SNOW AND BLIZZARD BLAST WITH EXTREME COLD AND GALES for the following
period Friday 12th to Tue 16th . This was always forecast by
WeatherAction (from 100days ahead with detail 27days ahead) to be more
extreme and severe then 5-8th and that looks like what is going to hit.
"This will probably be the most extreme 5 days of snow blizzards and
and gales in Britain and Ireland for 100 years, being more severe than
the worst events of December 2010 (which were also correctly forecast by
WeatherAction)."

Over to you, Jim Cannon.

Are you a subscriber Malcolm? If so, and you are not 100% HAPPY with the service, you have the right to return your subscription. On the EXTREMELY rare occasion subs are unhappy weatheraction can take action. At the moment their are one or two taking our vastly reduced rate in view of any snow disappointment.
Which is MORE than you can say for the Met Office! Every time they get a forecast wrong we dont get tax rebates do we! The amount of times theyve dropped a clanger I think wed all be MILLIONAIRES LOL!!!