New Paper. Cherry picking is the main one, but there are others:

http://link.springer.com/article/10..../fulltext.html

New Paper. The people who try to blame GW on the orbital cycles of Jupiter and Saturn have probably been scientifically sectioned by now. *))

On Wednesday, 26 August 2015 14:46:31 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
New Paper. Cherry picking is the main one, but there are others:

http://link.springer.com/article/10..../fulltext.html

New Paper. The people who try to blame GW on the orbital cycles of Jupiter and Saturn have probably been scientifically sectioned by now. *))

A very interesting paper - everyone should read it. Now we need a follow-up, with a sociopolitical and psychological base, on why certain people simply do not like the idea of AGW and for that very poor reason, do not accept it.

Tudor Hughes, Warlingham, Surrey.

On Wednesday, 26 August 2015 16:27:39 UTC+1, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Wednesday, 26 August 2015 14:46:31 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
New Paper. Cherry picking is the main one, but there are others:

http://link.springer.com/article/10..../fulltext.html

New Paper. The people who try to blame GW on the orbital cycles of Jupiter and Saturn have probably been scientifically sectioned by now. *))

A very interesting paper - everyone should read it. Now we need a follow-up, with a sociopolitical and psychological base, on why certain people simply do not like the idea of AGW and for that very poor reason, do not accept it.

Tudor Hughes, Warlingham, Surrey.

Tudor,
Does this fit your bill?
http://c3wales.org/thematic_clusters...change-denial/

Cheers, Alastair.

On Tuesday, 1 September 2015 09:44:56 UTC+1, Alastair wrote:
On Wednesday, 26 August 2015 16:27:39 UTC+1, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Wednesday, 26 August 2015 14:46:31 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
New Paper. Cherry picking is the main one, but there are others:

http://link.springer.com/article/10..../fulltext.html

New Paper. The people who try to blame GW on the orbital cycles of Jupiter and Saturn have probably been scientifically sectioned by now. *))

A very interesting paper - everyone should read it. Now we need a follow-up, with a sociopolitical and psychological base, on why certain people simply do not like the idea of AGW and for that very poor reason, do not accept it.

Tudor Hughes, Warlingham, Surrey.

Tudor,
Does this fit your bill?
http://c3wales.org/thematic_clusters...change-denial/

Cheers, Alastair.



Really Alastair the 'The Climate Change Consortium of Wales ' then written in the Welsh language . Why not another group driven by ideology first and fact second. I see they are funded by the country that the fanatical welsh say they hate.

On Tuesday, 1 September 2015 21:48:11 UTC+1, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
On Tuesday, 1 September 2015 09:44:56 UTC+1, Alastair wrote:
On Wednesday, 26 August 2015 16:27:39 UTC+1, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Wednesday, 26 August 2015 14:46:31 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
New Paper. Cherry picking is the main one, but there are others:

http://link.springer.com/article/10..../fulltext.html

New Paper. The people who try to blame GW on the orbital cycles of Jupiter and Saturn have probably been scientifically sectioned by now. *))

A very interesting paper - everyone should read it. Now we need a follow-up, with a sociopolitical and psychological base, on why certain people simply do not like the idea of AGW and for that very poor reason, do not accept it.

Tudor Hughes, Warlingham, Surrey.

Tudor,
Does this fit your bill?
http://c3wales.org/thematic_clusters...change-denial/

Cheers, Alastair.



Really Alastair the 'The Climate Change Consortium of Wales ' then written in the Welsh language . Why not another group driven by ideology first and fact second. I see they are funded by the country that the fanatical welsh say they hate.

Racist!

On Tuesday, 1 September 2015 22:08:04 UTC+1, Alastair wrote:
On Tuesday, 1 September 2015 21:48:11 UTC+1, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
On Tuesday, 1 September 2015 09:44:56 UTC+1, Alastair wrote:
On Wednesday, 26 August 2015 16:27:39 UTC+1, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Wednesday, 26 August 2015 14:46:31 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
New Paper. Cherry picking is the main one, but there are others:

http://link.springer.com/article/10..../fulltext.html

New Paper. The people who try to blame GW on the orbital cycles of Jupiter and Saturn have probably been scientifically sectioned by now. *))

A very interesting paper - everyone should read it. Now we need a follow-up, with a sociopolitical and psychological base, on why certain people simply do not like the idea of AGW and for that very poor reason, do not accept it.

Tudor Hughes, Warlingham, Surrey.

Tudor,
Does this fit your bill?
http://c3wales.org/thematic_clusters...change-denial/

Cheers, Alastair.



Really Alastair the 'The Climate Change Consortium of Wales ' then written in the Welsh language . Why not another group driven by ideology first and fact second. I see they are funded by the country that the fanatical welsh say they hate.

Racist!

Doesn't matter as I'm Welsh

Mark Steyn:

A *self-described* "right-wing warmonger".

Any background in climate science? Any college education? Hm.

Described by the Boston Phoenix as "the most toxic right-wing pundit you've never heard of" with ""a shrill, mocking tone of moral certainty that consigns those who disagree with him to the status of appeasers or even terrorists; and a willingness to distort, misrepresent, and omit facts in order to advance his argument."

And from his own mouth: "Now I don't consider myself a big credentialed expert or anything. I simply looked at a graph Michael E Mann hadn't been anywhere near and drew the obvious conclusion. Gave it two minutes' thought, if that."

Two minutes thought, if that.



Stephen.

On Wednesday, 2 September 2015 00:34:56 UTC+1, Stephen Davenport wrote:
Mark Steyn:

A *self-described* "right-wing warmonger".

Any background in climate science? Any college education? Hm.

Described by the Boston Phoenix as "the most toxic right-wing pundit you've never heard of" with ""a shrill, mocking tone of moral certainty that consigns those who disagree with him to the status of appeasers or even terrorists; and a willingness to distort, misrepresent, and omit facts in order to advance his argument."

And from his own mouth: "Now I don't consider myself a big credentialed expert or anything. I simply looked at a graph Michael E Mann hadn't been anywhere near and drew the obvious conclusion. Gave it two minutes' thought, if that."

Two minutes thought, if that.



Stephen.

No he has no back ground in Science and that's why he was never made the chair of the IPCC unlike the Pachurri who if I remember correctly although he had a fantastic back ground in science-a railway engineer, he is now an expert in finding a place to park his choo choo train whether its wanted in a particular tunnel or not.

However Stephen Mark's book is chocced full of remarks and criticisms of Mann by Mann's fellow scientist. The scientific content of the book isn't Mark Steyn, its Mann's pier group and is therefore untouchable.

Mark Steyn toxic? He fought under great pressure the Canadian governmental machine and the totally intolerant of everyone else's actions bar their own Islamic Canadian caliphate and thanks god he won. But if you feel he is toxic because he is against stuff like this

http://www.memritv.org/clip/en/4558.htm

Then thankfully that makes you a prophet as you advocate such behaviour and Mark a racist fascist because he doesn't.

On Tuesday, 1 September 2015 22:22:27 UTC+1, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
On Tuesday, 1 September 2015 22:08:04 UTC+1, Alastair wrote:
On Tuesday, 1 September 2015 21:48:11 UTC+1, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
On Tuesday, 1 September 2015 09:44:56 UTC+1, Alastair wrote:
On Wednesday, 26 August 2015 16:27:39 UTC+1, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Wednesday, 26 August 2015 14:46:31 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
New Paper. Cherry picking is the main one, but there are others:

http://link.springer.com/article/10..../fulltext.html

New Paper. The people who try to blame GW on the orbital cycles of Jupiter and Saturn have probably been scientifically sectioned by now. *))

A very interesting paper - everyone should read it. Now we need a follow-up, with a sociopolitical and psychological base, on why certain people simply do not like the idea of AGW and for that very poor reason, do not accept it.

Tudor Hughes, Warlingham, Surrey.

Tudor,
Does this fit your bill?
http://c3wales.org/thematic_clusters...change-denial/

Cheers, Alastair.



Really Alastair the 'The Climate Change Consortium of Wales ' then written in the Welsh language . Why not another group driven by ideology first and fact second. I see they are funded by the country that the fanatical welsh say they hate.

Racist!

Doesn't matter as I'm Welsh

May not matter to you, but my grandson is Welsh and I find it offenesive.

On Wednesday, 2 September 2015 11:43:58 UTC+1, Alastair wrote:
On Tuesday, 1 September 2015 22:22:27 UTC+1, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
On Tuesday, 1 September 2015 22:08:04 UTC+1, Alastair wrote:
On Tuesday, 1 September 2015 21:48:11 UTC+1, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
On Tuesday, 1 September 2015 09:44:56 UTC+1, Alastair wrote:
On Wednesday, 26 August 2015 16:27:39 UTC+1, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Wednesday, 26 August 2015 14:46:31 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
New Paper. Cherry picking is the main one, but there are others:

http://link.springer.com/article/10..../fulltext.html

New Paper. The people who try to blame GW on the orbital cycles of Jupiter and Saturn have probably been scientifically sectioned by now. *))

A very interesting paper - everyone should read it. Now we need a follow-up, with a sociopolitical and psychological base, on why certain people simply do not like the idea of AGW and for that very poor reason, do not accept it.

Tudor Hughes, Warlingham, Surrey.

Tudor,
Does this fit your bill?
http://c3wales.org/thematic_clusters...change-denial/

Cheers, Alastair.



Really Alastair the 'The Climate Change Consortium of Wales ' then written in the Welsh language . Why not another group driven by ideology first and fact second. I see they are funded by the country that the fanatical welsh say they hate.

Racist!

Doesn't matter as I'm Welsh

May not matter to you, but my grandson is Welsh and I find it offenesive.



Actually what is it you find offensive ?