On Tuesday, 29 September 2015 19:24:45 UTC+1, wrote:
On Tuesday, September 29, 2015 at 7:09:14 PM UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:

Go on, say something utterly foul.....

I bet he won't.
I reckon he's chicken.

Col

That's ruffled his feathers Col.

On Tuesday, September 29, 2015 at 7:06:29 PM UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
On Tuesday, September 29, 2015 at 1:53:53 PM UTC+1, David Mitchell wrote:
I think you have rather missed the point. You took a sarcastic swipe towards Will for using the word 'could'
Col

Actually, as I explained, I didn't do anything of the sort. The vultures missed their mark, by not reading what I'd said.

You know exactly what the point was that you were making,

Yawn. Scroll back and read.

"as I explained". Where have you explained what you meant or why you made such an absurd comment? You haven't. I have asked you to explain and once again in typical Dawlish fashion you have failed to answer a question.

There is no justification for this school-ground behaviour on an adult newsgroup. This is why people challenge you, dislike you and even revert to using foul language.

You have been monitoring this group recently and you will know full well that in the absence of your provocative posts, the contributors have been acting with the sort of behaviour that any decent human being would expect.

Is it any great surprise that as soon as you start you pathetic responses that people respond? Of course not.

When will you ever get the message that you're behaviour is not warranted or wanted here. In fact I'll clarify that, I have no objection to anyone contributing to an open unmoderated forum, provided they make a positive contribution, which you do on occasions.

Just cut out the look at me, look at me crap.

On Wednesday, September 30, 2015 at 10:22:18 AM UTC+1, David Mitchell wrote:
On Tuesday, September 29, 2015 at 7:06:29 PM UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
On Tuesday, September 29, 2015 at 1:53:53 PM UTC+1, David Mitchell wrote:
I think you have rather missed the point. You took a sarcastic swipe towards Will for using the word 'could'
Col

Actually, as I explained, I didn't do anything of the sort. The vultures missed their mark, by not reading what I'd said.

You know exactly what the point was that you were making,

Yawn. Scroll back and read.

"as I explained". Where have you explained what you meant or why you made such an absurd comment? You haven't. I have asked you to explain and once again in typical Dawlish fashion you have failed to answer a question.

There is no justification for this school-ground behaviour on an adult newsgroup. This is why people challenge you, dislike you and even revert to using foul language.

You have been monitoring this group recently and you will know full well that in the absence of your provocative posts, the contributors have been acting with the sort of behaviour that any decent human being would expect.

Is it any great surprise that as soon as you start you pathetic responses that people respond? Of course not.

When will you ever get the message that you're behaviour is not warranted or wanted here. In fact I'll clarify that, I have no objection to anyone contributing to an open unmoderated forum, provided they make a positive contribution, which you do on occasions.

Just cut out the look at me, look at me crap.

Yawn. Still sore about being shown up quite a long time ago now, aren't you?

Now understand this. I'll post how I like, when I like and I won't be in any way influenced by someone like you mitchell. Exactly the same rules for anyone else too. It's newsgroup; not a forum and each individual speaks for themselves, not for others.

Got it now?

On Wednesday, September 30, 2015 at 2:27:32 PM UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
On Wednesday, September 30, 2015 at 10:22:18 AM UTC+1, David Mitchell wrote:
On Tuesday, September 29, 2015 at 7:06:29 PM UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
On Tuesday, September 29, 2015 at 1:53:53 PM UTC+1, David Mitchell wrote:
I think you have rather missed the point. You took a sarcastic swipe towards Will for using the word 'could'
Col

Actually, as I explained, I didn't do anything of the sort. The vultures missed their mark, by not reading what I'd said.

You know exactly what the point was that you were making,

Yawn. Scroll back and read.

"as I explained". Where have you explained what you meant or why you made such an absurd comment? You haven't. I have asked you to explain and once again in typical Dawlish fashion you have failed to answer a question.

There is no justification for this school-ground behaviour on an adult newsgroup. This is why people challenge you, dislike you and even revert to using foul language.

You have been monitoring this group recently and you will know full well that in the absence of your provocative posts, the contributors have been acting with the sort of behaviour that any decent human being would expect..

Is it any great surprise that as soon as you start you pathetic responses that people respond? Of course not.

When will you ever get the message that you're behaviour is not warranted or wanted here. In fact I'll clarify that, I have no objection to anyone contributing to an open unmoderated forum, provided they make a positive contribution, which you do on occasions.

Just cut out the look at me, look at me crap.

Yawn. Still sore about being shown up quite a long time ago now, aren't you?

Now understand this. I'll post how I like, when I like and I won't be in any way influenced by someone like you mitchell. Exactly the same rules for anyone else too. It's newsgroup; not a forum and each individual speaks for themselves, not for others.

Got it now?

Show me where you've shown me up, you live in a world beyond fantasy. Now you're cross because you are totally unable to justify your post or give a rational explanation for it.

I've had it with this group. That's it, enough. If you're going to continue in this vein than what is the point of belonging to something that just deteriorates in mindless slanging matches every time you raise your ugly head..

Goodbye.

On Tuesday, 29 September 2015 19:09:14 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
On Tuesday, September 29, 2015 at 4:43:33 PM UTC+1, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Tuesday, 29 September 2015 13:15:07 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
On Monday, September 28, 2015 at 8:13:36 PM UTC+1, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Monday, 28 September 2015 15:41:30 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
On Monday, September 28, 2015 at 2:16:34 PM UTC+1, David Mitchell wrote:
On Monday, September 28, 2015 at 12:43:48 PM UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
On Sunday, September 27, 2015 at 4:14:40 PM UTC+1, Stephen Davenport wrote:
On Sunday, September 27, 2015 at 9:01:07 AM UTC-4, Dawlish wrote:
On Sunday, September 27, 2015 at 9:16:56 AM UTC+1, wrote:
"Dave Cornwell" wrote in message
...
Interesting indeed. Some different patterns for the emerging winter this
year perhaps.

Encouraging yes, but a bit early to say. Could see some sig. snow in
Scotland in October and perhaps even a flurry on high Dartmoor, however, I
would not be surprised to see raging zonality established come November.
Hurricane behaviour could be key as they tend to be game changers in the
Atlantic?

Will
--
http://www.lyneside.demon.co.uk/Hayt...antage_Pro.htm
Will Hand (Haytor, Devon, 1017 feet asl)
---------------------------------------------

'could': what a great word!

========

Like 'potentially'.

Nothing meant in a negative way there, wannabe vultures. You must learn to distinguish when I criticise hubris and hypocrisy, or you'll miss your mark. If I do criticise it; you'll know.

'Could' in science, is just a great word. means absolutely anything.

One rule for one..........and a shame you can't recognise hypocrisy.
A long period of absence from posting, yet one of your first posts is a piece of nit picking childishness. Nothing changes.

Yawn. You got it wrong again, but won't recognise it. As always, I'm the main reason you post here. That fact has been very clear over the past month. Looking back, your very few posts included a decent percentage simply about me. Weird and obsessive, when I don't post. As you say, nothing changes.

Of course I'll post as and when I want and not seek permission from you, mitchell, though as always, you'll dig your hole deeper with your reply.

Here we go again. As soon as you're back there's trouble. There was none while you were away, none at all, as you can verify.

Since when has David Mitchell assumed he could grant you permission to post and since when have you sought permission from him or anyone else on this group? Answer to both - never. You just make things up as an expression of your crushing inferiority complex.

If David Mitchell and many others, including me, have made postings solely about you it is because we are simply not prepared to be the subject of the snide remarks, insults and false accusations that you indulge in and will say so in our various ways.

The idea that some people post here simply because of your presence shows ludicrous self-importance. The opposite is true; people have left this group because of you. You should cover your face in shame but you know no such sentiment.

Now go and plaster your deficiencies over some other group, God help them. Just *not* this one. You're not really one of us, are you, Paul? Well then, **** off.

Tudor Hughes, Warlingham, Surrey.

Oh dear. Mr foul-mouth gets involved. Mainly because he has to, to fuel his obsession. Water and a duck's Yawn again.

Now go back and read what I said.....

I have read ........

Whatever. For you, it is now perfectly OK to tell someone you don't like, for very little reason, to '**** Off' in this newsgroup, or to call them a '****'. If I wasn't here, you'd find someone else, because that is highly likely to be *exactly* what you have been like all your life.

If I ever left this newsgroup, I can assure you that it would not be down to you, hughes.

Go on, say something utterly foul.....

Er, Paul Garvey. Will that do?

Tudor Hughes,

On 30/09/15 14:41, David Mitchell wrote:
On Wednesday, September 30, 2015 at 2:27:32 PM UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
On Wednesday, September 30, 2015 at 10:22:18 AM UTC+1, David Mitchell wrote:
On Tuesday, September 29, 2015 at 7:06:29 PM UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
On Tuesday, September 29, 2015 at 1:53:53 PM UTC+1, David Mitchell wrote:
I think you have rather missed the point. You took a sarcastic swipe towards Will for using the word 'could'
Col

Actually, as I explained, I didn't do anything of the sort. The vultures missed their mark, by not reading what I'd said.

You know exactly what the point was that you were making,

Yawn. Scroll back and read.

"as I explained". Where have you explained what you meant or why you made such an absurd comment? You haven't. I have asked you to explain and once again in typical Dawlish fashion you have failed to answer a question.

There is no justification for this school-ground behaviour on an adult newsgroup. This is why people challenge you, dislike you and even revert to using foul language.

You have been monitoring this group recently and you will know full well that in the absence of your provocative posts, the contributors have been acting with the sort of behaviour that any decent human being would expect.

Is it any great surprise that as soon as you start you pathetic responses that people respond? Of course not.

When will you ever get the message that you're behaviour is not warranted or wanted here. In fact I'll clarify that, I have no objection to anyone contributing to an open unmoderated forum, provided they make a positive contribution, which you do on occasions.

Just cut out the look at me, look at me crap.

Yawn. Still sore about being shown up quite a long time ago now, aren't you?

Now understand this. I'll post how I like, when I like and I won't be in any way influenced by someone like you mitchell. Exactly the same rules for anyone else too. It's newsgroup; not a forum and each individual speaks for themselves, not for others.

Got it now?

Show me where you've shown me up, you live in a world beyond fantasy. Now you're cross because you are totally unable to justify your post or give a rational explanation for it.

I've had it with this group. That's it, enough. If you're going to continue in this vein than what is the point of belonging to something that just deteriorates in mindless slanging matches every time you raise your ugly head.

Goodbye.


Don't let it win again. The fairies devised the filter / killfile
especially so that we can remove the excrement before it reaches the screen.


--
AS
pour encourager les autres

On Wednesday, September 30, 2015 at 2:41:04 PM UTC+1, David Mitchell wrote:
On Wednesday, September 30, 2015 at 2:27:32 PM UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
On Wednesday, September 30, 2015 at 10:22:18 AM UTC+1, David Mitchell wrote:
On Tuesday, September 29, 2015 at 7:06:29 PM UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
On Tuesday, September 29, 2015 at 1:53:53 PM UTC+1, David Mitchell wrote:
I think you have rather missed the point. You took a sarcastic swipe towards Will for using the word 'could'
Col

Actually, as I explained, I didn't do anything of the sort. The vultures missed their mark, by not reading what I'd said.

You know exactly what the point was that you were making,

Yawn. Scroll back and read.

"as I explained". Where have you explained what you meant or why you made such an absurd comment? You haven't. I have asked you to explain and once again in typical Dawlish fashion you have failed to answer a question.

There is no justification for this school-ground behaviour on an adult newsgroup. This is why people challenge you, dislike you and even revert to using foul language.

You have been monitoring this group recently and you will know full well that in the absence of your provocative posts, the contributors have been acting with the sort of behaviour that any decent human being would expect.

Is it any great surprise that as soon as you start you pathetic responses that people respond? Of course not.

When will you ever get the message that you're behaviour is not warranted or wanted here. In fact I'll clarify that, I have no objection to anyone contributing to an open unmoderated forum, provided they make a positive contribution, which you do on occasions.

Just cut out the look at me, look at me crap.

Yawn. Still sore about being shown up quite a long time ago now, aren't you?

Now understand this. I'll post how I like, when I like and I won't be in any way influenced by someone like you mitchell. Exactly the same rules for anyone else too. It's newsgroup; not a forum and each individual speaks for themselves, not for others.

Got it now?

Show me where you've shown me up, you live in a world beyond fantasy. Now you're cross because you are totally unable to justify your post or give a rational explanation for it.

I've had it with this group. That's it, enough. If you're going to continue in this vein than what is the point of belonging to something that just deteriorates in mindless slanging matches every time you raise your ugly head.

Goodbye.

Many of us have felt the same way David, I'd really hate to see someone else join the long line of decent people driven away by Dawlish.

Bloody hell, it didn't take him long to destroy the peace!

Graham
Penzance - Sunny, warm Breezy.

On Wednesday, 30 September 2015 14:41:04 UTC+1, David Mitchell wrote:
I've had it with this group. That's it, enough. If you're going to continue in this vein than what is the point of belonging to something that just deteriorates in mindless slanging matches every time you raise your ugly head.

Goodbye.

Surely not, David? I'll be the only one left in NE England!
Can you not ignore people like that? It's easily done. There are a few people in life that are really annoying. Just pay them no attention - they really don't like that at all!!
"For who can bear to feel himself forgotten?" WH Auden.

Ken
Copley
Teesdale

On Friday, 25 September 2015 18:27:01 UTC+1, xmetman wrote:
On Friday, 25 September 2015 17:55:16 UTC+1, wrote:
On Friday, September 25, 2015 at 1:08:12 PM UTC+1, Dave Cornwell wrote:
On 24/09/2015 22:05, Joe Egginton wrote:
On 24/09/2015 20:03, Dawlish wrote:
Dry in most areas and potentially warmer than average in the daytime
on 4th Oct. If skies clear, cool nights. A very nice end to Sept,
start to Oct and extending to the middle of the first week.


The Idiot Is Back!

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
----------------------------------------
Don't be so hard on yourself!

I like the way he had to later clarify it was Dawlish he was talking about. it would be an easy mistake to make that he was talking about himself

Col

Getting back to the anticyclonic easterlies...

The pattern for the 29th of September is almost unique as far as I can see if today's GFS is correct at T+96, with a high in the central North sea (1041 hPa) and a deepening low (975 hPa) SW of Iceland.

I've checked the Lamb Weather Types for some form of analog for this type of situation for the end of September without any luck. The central north Atlantic (45N 25W) were the negative SST anomalies are lie under the influence of high pressure as well.

The pattern was correct that the GFS suggested, although the low might have been overdone a bit.

You'll be back, because you've flounced. people who do that are looking for sympathy, not leaving. Others have said exactly the same and still post.

That really is idiotic.