Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, January 21, 2016 at 10:24:26 AM UTC+1, dawlish wrote:
http://www.reportingclimatescience.c...n-ice-age.html Idiot. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, 21 January 2016 09:24:26 UTC, dawlish wrote:
http://www.reportingclimatescience.c...n-ice-age.html That is a fairly old idea first proposed by William Ruddiman, but was scornfully dismissed. He is just publishing a new paper with colleagues where he re-investigates the possibilities. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/...00503/abstract |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, 21 January 2016 09:24:26 UTC, dawlish wrote:
http://www.reportingclimatescience.c...n-ice-age.html I've made several posts saying that with any luck humans will add to any natural warming and possibly retard the start of the next glaciation period. By the way we are already in an ice age it started 2.6 million years ago the last 500 thousand years has seen five 90 thousand year time spans of glaciation with our last interglacial being the coolest of all the previous. We are overdue now compared to the past ice core record of the decline into the next glaciation. Lets all hope and pray that the AGW is real and effective enough to buy us time, I doubt it though. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Idiot.
|
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, January 20, 2016 at 8:19:38 PM UTC, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Wednesday, 20 January 2016 20:50:27 UTC, dawlish wrote: Told you he'd do this!!!! it's not fair. On Wednesday, 20 January 2016 19:13:51 UTC, dawlish wrote: Told you he'd do this (on several threads, now) after being poked. on several threads, now In the growth and accidents of vegetation in a swamp there are some circumstances which are of importance to note with a view to the interpretation of the results observed in the Fens. For instance in fine weather there is a constant lifting and floating of the confervoid algae which grow on the muddy bed of the stream. This is brought about by the development of gas under the sun's influence in the thick fibrous growth of the alga. [I think he's talking about you:] The little bubbles give it a silvery gleam and by and by produce sufficient buoyancy in the mass to tear it out and make it rise to the surface dropping fine mud as it goes and thus making the water turbid. Other plants, such as Utricularia, Duckweed, etc., have their period of flotation, and in the "Breaking of the Mere" in Shropshire we have a similar phenomenon. In the "Floating Island" on Derwen****er the same sort of thing is seen with coarser plants. All these processes are going on in the meres and in the streams which meander through the Fens and did so more freely before their reclamation. But besides this, when the top of the spongy peat is raised above the water level and dries by evaporation, then heath, ferns and other plants and at last trees grow on it, until accident submerges it all again. This at once shows why we often find an upper peat with a different group of plant remains resting upon a lower peat with plants that grow under water.. [I bet you are wondering where Weatherlawyer is going to hit you next, you brain dead fool:] The story told by the West Fen trees is quite different from that told by the water-borne and water-worn trunks in the section by Ely station.... This from an era that had never heard of dendochronology. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/4359...3597-h.htm#bog So tell us how easy it was to date those Siberian 12; mutton head. On Thursday, 21 January 2016 16:49:03 UTC, Lawrence Jenkins wrote: My first thought on opening his link was that Dawlish should be pretty good at forecasting weather by now. He already knows in advance what Weatherlawyer is going to say. On Thursday, 21 January 2016 16:49:03 UTC, Lawrence Jenkins wrote: And he knows how to copy and paste. So then I woke up and thought: Hang on. Who posted this? You arse hole Dawlish! On Thursday, 21 January 2016 09:24:26 UTC, dawlish wrote: Told you he'd do this (on several threads, now) after being poked. So predictable. http://www.reportingclimatescience.c...n-ice-age.html I've made several posts saying that with any luck humans will add to any of my slightly interesting posts on natural warming and possibly retards will hasten to copy and paste the start of the next glacial thread. To hear is to obey. By the way we are already in an eeewww... thread 2.6 million years ago (I know as I was there.) The last 500 thousand posts ha ha ha have seen five 900 thousand millibars of glaciation with our last interglacial post being the coolest of all the previous threads. We are overdue now copied to the paste core record of the decline inter-postal era of the next glaciation. Idiot Lets all hope I doubt it through about and prayer that is the Almighty GloW is real and effective enough to buy us time. Not that you would need it if there is a god worth praying to? But it is always a good idea to cover your arse if it fits on top of head so comfortingly. So... Is it too hot or too clod? I must admit though that trying to follow anything Dawlish is rather difficult when he persists in talking while still wearing his brain. But I am all for freeness of speech even if acerbically washed with patent irrigation. Clods included. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The most interesting thing about Dawlish posts is that he has to read them because of a fixation, he has to read them to insert socketry and he has to read the replies to everything he writes.
(Well at least, someone is showing interest.) And at last we can have some real fun with his interminable postiage. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
New data shows CO2 rising BEFORE increases in global temperature | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Target Atmospheric CO2: Where Should Humanity Aim? | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Atmospheric CO2 Increases, Due To Ocean, Rather Than Mankind | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
global warming increases intensity of hurricanes, but does it decrease tornadoes? | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Conjectu Global Warming increases the drying out of the interior of continents | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) |