In message ,
Graham Easterling writes


Stick to your thoughts on the bus going to special school.
--


Jim Kewley

Mmm - Not a helpful comment in my opinion - associating racists with
people with a learning disability.
http://www.easterling.freeserve.co.u...lleryhome.html

Graham
Penzance


Fair comment, I shouldn't have said that.

Snag with him is he's not only a racist but seems to be simple as well.

Cheers
--


Jim

In message , Joe Egginton
writes


Kewley will you be so supportive of open immigration, when your wife,
mother or daughter gets raped or groped by the gimmegrants?



Hahahaahahahahahahaahahaha


--


Jim Kewley

When you retire you should do stand up comedy. "Integrity", that really made me laugh!

On Monday, January 25, 2016 at 8:53:58 PM UTC, Col wrote:
On 25/01/2016 11:41, Richard Dixon wrote:
On Monday, 25 January 2016 03:02:01 UTC, Jim Kewley wrote:

I really don't get why so many here allow Dawlish to get up their noses.
He says what he believes, always devoid of personal attacks.

**brushes the "idiot" repeated ad nauseam to Lawrence under the carpet**


And the continuos barbed comments directed at Will.

--
Col

Bolton, Lancashire
160m asl
Snow videos:
http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3QvmL4UWBmHFMKWiwYm_gg

Condemn the racist.

In message ,
Richard Dixon writes
On Monday, 25 January 2016 03:02:01 UTC, Jim Kewley wrote:

I really don't get why so many here allow Dawlish to get up their noses.
He says what he believes, always devoid of personal attacks.

**brushes the "idiot" repeated ad nauseam to Lawrence under the carpet**

Richard

Think you'll find that Lawrence has been somewhat less than charitable
to Dawlish in the past too. Or did you prefer to forget that ?

Anyway I'm keeping out of that particular spat.
--


Jim

On Wednesday, 27 January 2016 02:31:15 UTC, Jim Kewley wrote:
In message ,
Richard Dixon writes
On Monday, 25 January 2016 03:02:01 UTC, Jim Kewley wrote:

I really don't get why so many here allow Dawlish to get up their noses.
He says what he believes, always devoid of personal attacks.

**brushes the "idiot" repeated ad nauseam to Lawrence under the carpet**

Richard

Think you'll find that Lawrence has been somewhat less than charitable
to Dawlish in the past too. Or did you prefer to forget that ?

Anyway I'm keeping out of that particular spat.
--


Jim

To be honest Jim he set out to, and did humiliate me he found my weakest spot (I have many) grammar and punctuation and didn't just point it out he used it whenever he could. Anything I have said to him has been purely retaliation. regardless of my abilities I have opinions and if they disagreed with his all he ever said was 'idiot' almost every remark I've made whether serious, tongue in cheek or attempting to be humorous his response has invariably been idiot.

Although he started his bullying with me others eventually others followed Mike Tullet, Tudor, Martin Dixon................ Oh sod it I really can't be bothered saying anymore. Tudor will go, I'll go and then it will start with someone else. Hey Ho, I'm orf....yet again. But I have to say some took the cowards or unprincipled way out and turn a blind eye to his shenanigans. Good, you can keep ignoring something that is wrong until it affects you and it will. You're welcome to it.

In message ,
Lawrence Jenkins writes
Although he started his bullying with me others eventually others
followed Mike Tullet, Tudor, Martin Dixon................ Oh sod it I
really can't be bothered saying anymore. Tudor will go, I'll go and
then it will start with someone else. Hey Ho, I'm orf....yet again.
But I have to say some took the cowards or unprincipled way out and
turn a blind eye to his shenanigans. Good, you can keep ignoring
something that is wrong until it affects you and it will. You're
welcome to it.

But confronting people like this doesn't work. People have been
confronting Dawlish for years, but he is still here and still behaving
the same way. The only thing that MIGHT work is ignoring him, in the
hope that he'll get bored and go away. We don't know if it will work or
not, as not enough people have tried it.

A killfile makes it a lot easier to ignore someone and not be tempted to
respond to what they post, which is what they are looking for. It's a
mistake to see using one as being cowardly. People come to this
newsgroup because they are interested in the weather, not to have a load
of aggro.
--
John Hall
"Honest criticism is hard to take,
particularly from a relative, a friend,
an acquaintance, or a stranger." Franklin P Jones

On 27/01/2016 19:26, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
On Wednesday, 27 January 2016 02:31:15 UTC, Jim Kewley wrote:
In message ,
Richard Dixon writes
On Monday, 25 January 2016 03:02:01 UTC, Jim Kewley wrote:

I really don't get why so many here allow Dawlish to get up their noses.
He says what he believes, always devoid of personal attacks.

**brushes the "idiot" repeated ad nauseam to Lawrence under the carpet**

Richard

Think you'll find that Lawrence has been somewhat less than charitable
to Dawlish in the past too. Or did you prefer to forget that ?

Anyway I'm keeping out of that particular spat.
--


Jim

To be honest Jim he set out to, and did humiliate me he found my weakest spot (I have many) grammar and punctuation and didn't just point it out he used it whenever he could. Anything I have said to him has been purely retaliation. regardless of my abilities I have opinions and if they disagreed with his all he ever said was 'idiot' almost every remark I've made whether serious, tongue in cheek or attempting to be humorous his response has invariably been idiot.

Although he started his bullying with me others eventually others followed Mike Tullet, Tudor, Martin Dixon................ Oh sod it I really can't be bothered saying anymore. Tudor will go, I'll go and then it will start with someone else. Hey Ho, I'm orf....yet again. But I have to say some took the cowards or unprincipled way out and turn a blind eye to his shenanigans. Good, you can keep ignoring something that is wrong until it affects you and it will. You're welcome to it.


As Tudor said dullish is a A1, first rate, gold plated count!

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On Monday, January 25, 2016 at 10:27:40 PM UTC, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
On Monday, 25 January 2016 19:02:15 UTC, dawlish wrote:
On Monday, January 25, 2016 at 6:55:59 PM UTC, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Monday, 25 January 2016 06:55:36 UTC, dawlish wrote:
I'm someone you don't like Hughes.

I'm sure there should be a comma after "like" otherwise your posting makes no sense at all. Considering your status as head of OFCOMMA I find this rather surprising but I'd temporarily forgotten about your innate hypocrisy. It happens with age, y'know. Anyway, I'll put one in for you. Tappity-tapitty tap. There it is. Ah! I can now see what you're saying and can only reply that I'm pretty mainstream in that respect.
Just a thought; why do you bowl me these donkey-drops?

Tudor Hughes.

Difficult to get away from this one, hughes; isn't it?:

**No, hughes is going to step in and call you a pompous patronising arrogant ****er. Paul ****ing Garvey, **** of the decade, destroyer of forums, at least those unable to sluice him out. Meteorological dilettante out of his depth. Friendless phony. Bull****ter of the first order. You're in the right job, aren't you, ****-face? I've never seen such an avalanche of waffle.
I've got other places to go but you haven't, have you, you ill-mannered ****? Ever thought why, thunder****? (I am indebted to a USW member for this splendid epithet, le mot juste).
If these discussions took place in real life you'd tone it down quite a lot, I reckon, or you'd be in A&E in no time, you ****ty little coward. But no big fist is going to come shooting out of a screen, is it, worm?
People often ask "what's the matter with him". Nothing wrong with him, he's just a complete ****.

Tudor Hughes.**

How this will haunt you. Leave; your integrity is shot.



At least Tudor has integrity, unlike you.

Find something I have said that matches the integrity of this:

'No, hughes is going to step in and call you a pompous patronising arrogant ****er. Paul ****ing Garvey, **** of the decade, destroyer of forums, at least those unable to sluice him out. Meteorological dilettante out of his depth. Friendless phony. Bull****ter of the first order. You're in the right job, aren't you, ****-face? I've never seen such an avalanche of waffle.
I've got other places to go but you haven't, have you, you ill-mannered ****? Ever thought why, thunder****? (I am indebted to a USW member for this splendid epithet, le mot juste).
If these discussions took place in real life you'd tone it down quite a lot, I reckon, or you'd be in A&E in no time, you ****ty little coward. But no big fist is going to come shooting out of a screen, is it, worm?
People often ask "what's the matter with him". Nothing wrong with him, he's just a complete ****.

Mind, you; your own integrity, larry, has approached that of hughes on many occasions.

On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 12:29:12 -0000, dawlish wrote:

On Friday, January 22, 2016 at 11:58:23 AM UTC, jumper wrote:
Many people in this NG have killfiled me, because they believe the
[snip]

.... and you reposted it in its entirety? Gosh, thanks mate, because I
hadn't seen this rubbish had you not reposted it.

--
Using Opera Mail: http://www.opera.com/computer/mail