On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 18:45:42 UTC+1, Ron Button wrote:
May I suggest that the above could be given his own personal newsgroup
to spew out the endless ravings which the rest of us are subjected too
daily ?

RonB

Why don't you just ignore threads started by Weatherlawyer? That's what I do mostly but I have an occasional look if I want to be amused. Even if he contributes to an existing thread you can pass over it quite easily if you want to. The thing is his contributions, though aimiably bonkers, are never nasty or personal. Leave him alone - he's harmless.

Tudor Hughes.

On Thu, 19 May 2016 19:04:59 -0700 (PDT)
Tudor Hughes wrote:

On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 18:45:42 UTC+1, Ron Button wrote:
May I suggest that the above could be given his own personal
newsgroup to spew out the endless ravings which the rest of us are
subjected too daily ?

RonB

Why don't you just ignore threads started by Weatherlawyer?
That's what I do mostly but I have an occasional look if I want to be
amused. Even if he contributes to an existing thread you can pass
over it quite easily if you want to. The thing is his contributions,
though aimiably bonkers, are never nasty or personal. Leave him
alone - he's harmless.

Tudor Hughes.

Calling someone a '****ing idiot' isn't nasty or personal?

--
Graham P Davis, Bracknell, Berks. [Retd meteorologist/programmer]
http://www.scarlet-jade.com/
I wear the cheese. It does not wear me.
Posted with Claws: http://www.claws-mail.org/

in 437027 20160519 194413 Dave Cornwell wrote:
On 18/05/2016 18:52, Col wrote:
On 18/05/2016 18:45, Ron Button wrote:
May I suggest that the above could be given his own personal newsgroup
to spew out the endless ravings which the rest of us are subjected too
daily ?


Congratulations, you've just given him yet another thread to latch onto.
Just killfile him and be done with it.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am patient with Michael because there may be circumstances of which we
are not aware. The same can't be said for the likes of the now called
Jumper.

I really wish he would (jump, that is).

in 437044 20160520 060023 Graham P Davis wrote:
On Thu, 19 May 2016 19:04:59 -0700 (PDT)
Tudor Hughes wrote:

On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 18:45:42 UTC+1, Ron Button wrote:
May I suggest that the above could be given his own personal
newsgroup to spew out the endless ravings which the rest of us are
subjected too daily ?

RonB

Why don't you just ignore threads started by Weatherlawyer?
That's what I do mostly but I have an occasional look if I want to be
amused. Even if he contributes to an existing thread you can pass
over it quite easily if you want to. The thing is his contributions,
though aimiably bonkers, are never nasty or personal. Leave him
alone - he's harmless.

Tudor Hughes.

Calling someone a '****ing idiot' isn't nasty or personal?

It's almost a compliment in this group.

On 20/05/2016 08:43, Bob Martin wrote:
in 437027 20160519 194413 Dave Cornwell wrote:
On 18/05/2016 18:52, Col wrote:
On 18/05/2016 18:45, Ron Button wrote:
May I suggest that the above could be given his own personal newsgroup
to spew out the endless ravings which the rest of us are subjected too
daily ?


Congratulations, you've just given him yet another thread to latch onto.
Just killfile him and be done with it.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am patient with Michael because there may be circumstances of which we
are not aware. The same can't be said for the likes of the now called
Jumper.

I really wish he would (jump, that is).


So caring you liberals are.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On Friday, 20 May 2016 08:45:32 UTC+1, Bob Martin wrote:
in 437044 20160520 060023 Graham P Davis wrote:
On Thu, 19 May 2016 19:04:59 -0700 (PDT)
Tudor Hughes wrote:

On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 18:45:42 UTC+1, Ron Button wrote:
May I suggest that the above could be given his own personal
newsgroup to spew out the endless ravings which the rest of us are
subjected too daily ?

RonB

Why don't you just ignore threads started by Weatherlawyer?
That's what I do mostly but I have an occasional look if I want to be
amused. Even if he contributes to an existing thread you can pass
over it quite easily if you want to. The thing is his contributions,
though aimiably bonkers, are never nasty or personal. Leave him
alone - he's harmless.

Tudor Hughes.

Calling someone a 'naughty word idiot' isn't nasty or personal?

It's almost a compliment in this group.

Especially if they are too *naughty word* stupid to know.
How about an euphemism, let's have a special one for Dawlish. I like the term wet sheep for him. It seems to suit him.

Ah well it seems a shame to spoil a confessional by starting with a few choice words. So let's have one of my poems shall we?
https://weatherlawyer.wordpress.com/...state-of-mind/

On Friday, May 20, 2016 at 3:04:59 AM UTC+1, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 18:45:42 UTC+1, Ron Button wrote:
May I suggest that the above could be given his own personal newsgroup
to spew out the endless ravings which the rest of us are subjected too
daily ?

RonB



.....The thing is his contributions, though aimiably bonkers, are never nasty or personal. Leave him alone - he's harmless.

Tudor Hughes.

I truly believe you feel you are exactly the same too; harmless, never issuing any nasty or personal contributions. Amazing just how blind one person can be when the direction of the bile, abuse and appalling nastiness and utterly personal comments are to someone you don't like.

Do you really wish me to illustrate (again) what nasty, personal abuse looks like hughes?

On Saturday, 21 May 2016 06:15:34 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
On Friday, May 20, 2016 at 3:04:59 AM UTC+1, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 18:45:42 UTC+1, Ron Button wrote:
May I suggest that the above could be given his own personal newsgroup
to spew out the endless ravings which the rest of us are subjected too
daily ?

RonB



....The thing is his contributions, though aimiably bonkers, are never nasty or personal. Leave him alone - he's harmless.

Tudor Hughes.

I truly believe you feel you are exactly the same too; harmless, never issuing any nasty or personal contributions. Amazing just how blind one person can be when the direction of the bile, abuse and appalling nastiness and utterly personal comments are to someone you don't like.

Do you really wish me to illustrate (again) what nasty, personal abuse looks like hughes?

I don't know what which Hughes you are referring to or why. Bile, abuse, appalling nastiness and utterly personal comments to someone you don't like called hughes, is it?

Isn't it time you stopped avoiding the questions posed to you?

On Saturday, May 21, 2016 at 6:15:34 AM UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
On Friday, May 20, 2016 at 3:04:59 AM UTC+1, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 18:45:42 UTC+1, Ron Button wrote:
May I suggest that the above could be given his own personal newsgroup
to spew out the endless ravings which the rest of us are subjected too
daily ?

RonB



....The thing is his contributions, though aimiably bonkers, are never nasty or personal. Leave him alone - he's harmless.

Tudor Hughes.

I truly believe you feel you are exactly the same too; harmless, never issuing any nasty or personal contributions. Amazing just how blind one person can be when the direction of the bile, abuse and appalling nastiness and utterly personal comments are to someone you don't like.

Do you really wish me to illustrate (again) what nasty, personal abuse looks like hughes?

I rather think many of your your posts demonstrate nasty personal abuse to perfection. Even the weather orientated ones are always combined with deliberate provocation.

Graham
Penzance

On Saturday, May 21, 2016 at 4:33:49 PM UTC+1, Graham Easterling wrote:
On Saturday, May 21, 2016 at 6:15:34 AM UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
On Friday, May 20, 2016 at 3:04:59 AM UTC+1, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 18:45:42 UTC+1, Ron Button wrote:
May I suggest that the above could be given his own personal newsgroup
to spew out the endless ravings which the rest of us are subjected too
daily ?

RonB



....The thing is his contributions, though aimiably bonkers, are never nasty or personal. Leave him alone - he's harmless.

Tudor Hughes.

I truly believe you feel you are exactly the same too; harmless, never issuing any nasty or personal contributions. Amazing just how blind one person can be when the direction of the bile, abuse and appalling nastiness and utterly personal comments are to someone you don't like.

Do you really wish me to illustrate (again) what nasty, personal abuse looks like hughes?

I rather think many of your your posts demonstrate nasty personal abuse to perfection. Even the weather orientated ones are always combined with deliberate provocation.

Graham
Penzance

Find anything - and I mean *anything* that approaches the appalling language that hughes has used.

Asking questions with 'denier' in the title, which is exactly what these people are is hardly the same as calling people a c*** - which he has done many times You don't need me to post the whole things do you, because you know exactly what they contain, but I will if you wish. :

If you can't find anything; apologise. Don't try to lie about what I say, compared to foul-mouthed posters like hughes.

I bet you can't find anything and I bet you can't find it within you to apologise. Indeed you probably view this post as 'nasty, personal abuse' don't you?