On Saturday, May 21, 2016 at 4:51:01 PM UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
On Saturday, May 21, 2016 at 4:33:49 PM UTC+1, Graham Easterling wrote:
On Saturday, May 21, 2016 at 6:15:34 AM UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
On Friday, May 20, 2016 at 3:04:59 AM UTC+1, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 18:45:42 UTC+1, Ron Button wrote:
May I suggest that the above could be given his own personal newsgroup
to spew out the endless ravings which the rest of us are subjected too
daily ?

RonB



....The thing is his contributions, though aimiably bonkers, are never nasty or personal. Leave him alone - he's harmless.

Tudor Hughes.

I truly believe you feel you are exactly the same too; harmless, never issuing any nasty or personal contributions. Amazing just how blind one person can be when the direction of the bile, abuse and appalling nastiness and utterly personal comments are to someone you don't like.

Do you really wish me to illustrate (again) what nasty, personal abuse looks like hughes?

I rather think many of your your posts demonstrate nasty personal abuse to perfection. Even the weather orientated ones are always combined with deliberate provocation.

Graham
Penzance

Find anything - and I mean *anything* that approaches the appalling language that hughes has used.

Asking questions with 'denier' in the title, which is exactly what these people are is hardly the same as calling people a c*** - which he has done many times You don't need me to post the whole things do you, because you know exactly what they contain, but I will if you wish. :

If you can't find anything; apologise. Don't try to lie about what I say, compared to foul-mouthed posters like hughes.

I bet you can't find anything and I bet you can't find it within you to apologise. Indeed you probably view this post as 'nasty, personal abuse' don't you?

Indeed I do - feel free to apologise.

Graham
Penzance

On Saturday, May 21, 2016 at 5:22:30 PM UTC+1, Graham Easterling wrote:
On Saturday, May 21, 2016 at 4:51:01 PM UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
On Saturday, May 21, 2016 at 4:33:49 PM UTC+1, Graham Easterling wrote:
On Saturday, May 21, 2016 at 6:15:34 AM UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
On Friday, May 20, 2016 at 3:04:59 AM UTC+1, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 18:45:42 UTC+1, Ron Button wrote:
May I suggest that the above could be given his own personal newsgroup
to spew out the endless ravings which the rest of us are subjected too
daily ?

RonB



....The thing is his contributions, though aimiably bonkers, are never nasty or personal. Leave him alone - he's harmless.

Tudor Hughes.

I truly believe you feel you are exactly the same too; harmless, never issuing any nasty or personal contributions. Amazing just how blind one person can be when the direction of the bile, abuse and appalling nastiness and utterly personal comments are to someone you don't like.

Do you really wish me to illustrate (again) what nasty, personal abuse looks like hughes?

I rather think many of your your posts demonstrate nasty personal abuse to perfection. Even the weather orientated ones are always combined with deliberate provocation.

Graham
Penzance

Find anything - and I mean *anything* that approaches the appalling language that hughes has used.

Asking questions with 'denier' in the title, which is exactly what these people are is hardly the same as calling people a c*** - which he has done many times You don't need me to post the whole things do you, because you know exactly what they contain, but I will if you wish. :

If you can't find anything; apologise. Don't try to lie about what I say, compared to foul-mouthed posters like hughes.

I bet you can't find anything and I bet you can't find it within you to apologise. Indeed you probably view this post as 'nasty, personal abuse' don't you?

Indeed I do - feel free to apologise.

Graham
Penzance

What a pathetically poor response. I knew you'd find nothing to match hughes' appalling foulness - and I knew you wouldn't find the courage to apologise after your 'intervention'. Please feel free to carry on and dig your hole deeper.

Nothing like a bit of leftie internecine banter in a newsgroup (which used to be a good, interesting newsgroup until the warmist nutters infected it), is there, Dullish?

CK

Nothing like a bit of leftie internecine banter in a newsgroup (which used to be a good, interesting newsgroup until the warmist nutters infected it), is there, Dullish?Â*

Can anyone please explain to me the logic behind anyone disagreeing with anything Weatherlawyer, Jumper, Lawrence et al say, immediately bocomes a "leftie". Define a leftie while you're at it.

On Saturday, 21 May 2016 16:33:49 UTC+1, Graham Easterling wrote:
On Saturday, May 21, 2016 at 6:15:34 AM UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
On Friday, May 20, 2016 at 3:04:59 AM UTC+1, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 18:45:42 UTC+1, Ron Button wrote:
May I suggest that the above could be given his own personal newsgroup
to spew out the endless ravings which the rest of us are subjected too
daily ?

RonB



....The thing is his contributions, though aimiably bonkers, are never nasty or personal. Leave him alone - he's harmless.

Tudor Hughes.

I truly believe you feel you are exactly the same too; harmless, never issuing any nasty or personal contributions. Amazing just how blind one person can be when the direction of the bile, abuse and appalling nastiness and utterly personal comments are to someone you don't like.

Do you really wish me to illustrate (again) what nasty, personal abuse looks like hughes?

I rather think many of your your posts demonstrate nasty personal abuse to perfection. Even the weather orientated ones are always combined with deliberate provocation.

Says the man who thinks sea surface temperatures will cause water levels to rise. But you are right I should be kinder to the hard of thinking. Should I apologise to you for being an idiot?

On Saturday, 21 May 2016 18:51:26 UTC+1, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Saturday, 21 May 2016 16:33:49 UTC+1, Graham Easterling wrote:
On Saturday, May 21, 2016 at 6:15:34 AM UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
On Friday, May 20, 2016 at 3:04:59 AM UTC+1, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 18:45:42 UTC+1, Ron Button wrote:
May I suggest that the above could be given his own personal newsgroup
to spew out the endless ravings which the rest of us are subjected too
daily ?

RonB



....The thing is his contributions, though aimiably bonkers, are never nasty or personal. Leave him alone - he's harmless.

Tudor Hughes.

I truly believe you feel you are exactly the same too; harmless, never issuing any nasty or personal contributions. Amazing just how blind one person can be when the direction of the bile, abuse and appalling nastiness and utterly personal comments are to someone you don't like.

Do you really wish me to illustrate (again) what nasty, personal abuse looks like hughes?

I rather think many of your your posts demonstrate nasty personal abuse to perfection. Even the weather orientated ones are always combined with deliberate provocation.

Says the man who thinks sea surface temperatures will cause water levels to rise. But you are right I should be kinder to the hard of thinking. Should I apologise to you for being an idiot?

Well it comes to something when a thread dedicated to me gets out of hand. I think I have had enough of all of this. There is an especially interesting series of linestorms, SSWs and solar activity preceding a plinian eruption due, so I dare say I can better spend my time elsewhere. Thank you all for your interest in me.

On Saturday, May 21, 2016 at 7:25:58 PM UTC+1, Freddie wrote:
Dawlish Wrote in message:
On Saturday, May 21, 2016 at 4:33:49 PM UTC+1, Graham Easterling wrote:
On Saturday, May 21, 2016 at 6:15:34 AM UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
On Friday, May 20, 2016 at 3:04:59 AM UTC+1, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 18:45:42 UTC+1, Ron Button wrote:
May I suggest that the above could be given his own personal newsgroup
to spew out the endless ravings which the rest of us are subjected too
daily ?

RonB



....The thing is his contributions, though aimiably bonkers, are never nasty or personal. Leave him alone - he's harmless.

Tudor Hughes.

I truly believe you feel you are exactly the same too; harmless, never issuing any nasty or personal contributions. Amazing just how blind one person can be when the direction of the bile, abuse and appalling nastiness and utterly personal comments are to someone you don't like.

Do you really wish me to illustrate (again) what nasty, personal abuse looks like hughes?

I rather think many of your your posts demonstrate nasty personal abuse to perfection. Even the weather orientated ones are always combined with deliberate provocation.

Graham
Penzance

Find anything - and I mean *anything* that approaches the appalling language that hughes has used.

Asking questions with 'denier' in the title, which is exactly what these people are is hardly the same as calling people a c*** - which he has done many times You don't need me to post the whole things do you, because you know exactly what they contain, but I will if you wish. :

If you can't find anything; apologise. Don't try to lie about what I say, compared to foul-mouthed posters like hughes.

I bet you can't find anything and I bet you can't find it within you to apologise. Indeed you probably view this post as 'nasty, personal abuse' don't you?

You don't need to swear to be nasty and personally abusive. You do
it time after time.

--
Freddie
--


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

Yes, Freddie. The difficult questions I ask of people are sibabusive aren't they? 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Dawlish Wrote in message:
On Saturday, May 21, 2016 at 4:33:49 PM UTC+1, Graham Easterling wrote:
On Saturday, May 21, 2016 at 6:15:34 AM UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
On Friday, May 20, 2016 at 3:04:59 AM UTC+1, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 18:45:42 UTC+1, Ron Button wrote:
May I suggest that the above could be given his own personal newsgroup
to spew out the endless ravings which the rest of us are subjected too
daily ?

RonB



....The thing is his contributions, though aimiably bonkers, are never nasty or personal. Leave him alone - he's harmless.

Tudor Hughes.

I truly believe you feel you are exactly the same too; harmless, never issuing any nasty or personal contributions. Amazing just how blind one person can be when the direction of the bile, abuse and appalling nastiness and utterly personal comments are to someone you don't like.

Do you really wish me to illustrate (again) what nasty, personal abuse looks like hughes?

I rather think many of your your posts demonstrate nasty personal abuse to perfection. Even the weather orientated ones are always combined with deliberate provocation.

Graham
Penzance

Find anything - and I mean *anything* that approaches the appalling language that hughes has used.

Asking questions with 'denier' in the title, which is exactly what these people are is hardly the same as calling people a c*** - which he has done many times You don't need me to post the whole things do you, because you know exactly what they contain, but I will if you wish. :

If you can't find anything; apologise. Don't try to lie about what I say, compared to foul-mouthed posters like hughes.

I bet you can't find anything and I bet you can't find it within you to apologise. Indeed you probably view this post as 'nasty, personal abuse' don't you?

You don't need to swear to be nasty and personally abusive. You do
it time after time.

--
Freddie
--


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

On Saturday, 21 May 2016 06:15:34 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
On Friday, May 20, 2016 at 3:04:59 AM UTC+1, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 18:45:42 UTC+1, Ron Button wrote:
May I suggest that the above could be given his own personal newsgroup
to spew out the endless ravings which the rest of us are subjected too
daily ?

RonB



....The thing is his contributions, though aimiably bonkers, are never nasty or personal. Leave him alone - he's harmless.

Tudor Hughes.

I truly believe you feel you are exactly the same too; harmless, never issuing any nasty or personal contributions. Amazing just how blind one person can be when the direction of the bile, abuse and appalling nastiness and utterly personal comments are to someone you don't like.

Do you really wish me to illustrate (again) what nasty, personal abuse looks like hughes?

My post, to which you replied, was a fairly mild suggestion to Ron Button (not you, Ron Button) as to how to deal with Weatherlawyer and you have jumped down my throat on a matter that doesn't even involve you. Why? Bloody obvious why. You saw the words "nasty" and "personal" and immediately thought "he means me". Too right he does, matey, but he doesn't state it. He relies on your guilt complex to confirm that you are aware of the prevailing sentiment but too arrogant to do anything about it or to admit it directly.
As to foul language it has been pointed out further down this thread that you have an ability to be extremely unpleasant without resorting to effing and blinding, a misogynistic talent, and are conflating the two. And how can you drive a car without using the C-word occasionally? I can't. It gets really difficult if there's somebody else in the car, quite apart from not being able to fart properly.
You need to evolve into an adult and acquire some self-confidence and a sense of humour. Then you may see yourself as others see you.

Tudor Hughes.

Dawlish Wrote in message:
On Saturday, May 21, 2016 at 7:25:58 PM UTC+1, Freddie wrote:
Dawlish Wrote in message:
On Saturday, May 21, 2016 at 4:33:49 PM UTC+1, Graham Easterling wrote:
On Saturday, May 21, 2016 at 6:15:34 AM UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
On Friday, May 20, 2016 at 3:04:59 AM UTC+1, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 May 2016 18:45:42 UTC+1, Ron Button wrote:
May I suggest that the above could be given his own personal newsgroup
to spew out the endless ravings which the rest of us are subjected too
daily ?

RonB



....The thing is his contributions, though aimiably bonkers, are never nasty or personal. Leave him alone - he's harmless.

Tudor Hughes.

I truly believe you feel you are exactly the same too; harmless, never issuing any nasty or personal contributions. Amazing just how blind one person can be when the direction of the bile, abuse and appalling nastiness and utterly personal comments are to someone you don't like.

Do you really wish me to illustrate (again) what nasty, personal abuse looks like hughes?

I rather think many of your your posts demonstrate nasty personal abuse to perfection. Even the weather orientated ones are always combined with deliberate provocation.

Graham
Penzance

Find anything - and I mean *anything* that approaches the appalling language that hughes has used.

Asking questions with 'denier' in the title, which is exactly what these people are is hardly the same as calling people a c*** - which he has done many times You don't need me to post the whole things do you, because you know exactly what they contain, but I will if you wish. :

If you can't find anything; apologise. Don't try to lie about what I say, compared to foul-mouthed posters like hughes.

I bet you can't find anything and I bet you can't find it within you to apologise. Indeed you probably view this post as 'nasty, personal abuse' don't you?

You don't need to swear to be nasty and personally abusive. You do
it time after time.

--
Freddie
--


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

Yes, Freddie. The difficult questions I ask of people are sibabusive aren't they? ????????????????

It's been said before - it ain't what you say, it's the way that
you say it....

--


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/