uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #51   Report Post  
Old June 4th 16, 12:50 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Mar 2008
Posts: 10,601
Default OT In/Out EU Referendum Straw Poll

And there will many, perhaps many more, who vote to remain, than vote to exit. A wonderful split, because we live in a wonderfully diverse, multicultural and multi-faith country. It's a situation that, much as you'd like to, racists such as you cannot do anything about and what's more you never will be able to do anything about this. This wonderful melting pot, which is the UK is here to stay. Future birth rates alone will ensure that, in, or out, of the EU.

I rather hope the newsgroup racists choke on their own outrage and bile at that fact. 😀

  #52   Report Post  
Old June 4th 16, 12:56 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Mar 2008
Posts: 10,601
Default OT In/Out EU Referendum Straw Poll

Rather than racists like you?

Any day.
  #53   Report Post  
Old June 4th 16, 01:05 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2006
Posts: 6,158
Default OT In/Out EU Referendum Straw Poll

On Saturday, 4 June 2016 12:50:27 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
And there will many, perhaps many more, who vote to remain, than vote to exit. A wonderful split, because we live in a wonderfully diverse, multicultural and multi-faith country. It's a situation that, much as you'd like to, racists such as you cannot do anything about and what's more you never will be able to do anything about this. This wonderful melting pot, which is the UK is here to stay. Future birth rates alone will ensure that, in, or out, of the EU.

I rather hope the newsgroup racists choke on their own outrage and bile at that fact. 😀


No we lived post WWII in a country where faith was dying on its feet
  #54   Report Post  
Old June 4th 16, 01:07 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2006
Posts: 6,158
Default OT In/Out EU Referendum Straw Poll

On Saturday, 4 June 2016 12:51:02 UTC+1, Freddie wrote:
Lawrence Jenkins Wrote in message:
On Saturday, 4 June 2016 11:43:04 UTC+1, Freddie wrote:
Lawrence Jenkins Wrote in message:

As for this nonsense
So everyone in the "Big Pharma" industry has sworn an oath not o let the world know there is a cure for cancer. So all those people funding and doing cancer research are wasting their time.

A bit like everyone in the climate science world has sworn an oath
not to let the world know that they have manipulated the data to
make it appear as if AGW is causing the world to
warm.

Touché

--
Freddie


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/



That did cross my mind Freddie as I wrote the post, there is however an important fundamental difference. The left post war has attacked everything that it deems to have come from capitalism with the pharmaceutical industry really taking some flak. You will note there's many conspiracy dramas about

Drugs industry
Oil Industry
Neil Young's latest clap trap Monsanto and crop type monopoly
GM Foods
Frakking industry

and many more with a constant mantra of a disbelief in what the scientist are telling us coming from that left platform. However the left have thrown its full weight behind AGW because it allows them to use it as a weapon against what it sees as western man made evil capitalism. So nearly very other science is not to be trusted as its represents capitalism but AGW science and its claims are to be trusted as if it was demonstrably provable like gravity-which it is not.

So there is a difference. You know I remember that slob Michael Moore (lies) in one of his films Bowling for Columbine showing the missile manufacturer Lockheed-Martin in the words of Moore, surreptitiously moving their nuclear missiles at night when the local townsfolk were innocently asleep and couldn't see them.

Well the truth was and to quote from Lockheed-Martins and this website

"1. Lockheed-Martin and Nuclear Missiles. Bowling for Columbine contains a sequence filmed at the Lockheed-Martin manufacturing facility, near Columbine. Moore interviews a PR fellow, shows missiles being built, and then asks whether knowledge that weapons of mass destruction were being built nearby might have motivated the Columbine shooters in committing their own mass slaying. After all, if their father worked on the missiles, "What's the difference between that mass destruction and the mass destruction over at Columbine High School?" Moore intones that the missiles with their "Pentagon payloads" are trucked through the town "in the middle of the night while the children are asleep."

Soon after Bowling was released someone checked out the claim, and found that the Lockheed-Martin plant does not build weapons-type missiles; it makes rockets for launching satellites."


It was also said the reason for transporting the missiles at night was to avoid local traffic hold ups during the day.

Now Michael Moore and his lefty ilk are nothing but liars and twisters of the truth in order to back an ideology . Would you trust someone like hiom on AGW climate policy?

Still a conspiracy theory though - lefties or otherwise.

--
Freddie


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/


Yes Freddie but some conspiracies do exist. Stalin was particular good at such things. I mean my old neighbour and TGWU leader Jack Jones turned out to be a spy.
  #55   Report Post  
Old June 4th 16, 01:55 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2015
Posts: 608
Default OT In/Out EU Referendum Straw Poll

On Sat, 4 Jun 2016 11:51:19 +0100, "Graham" wrote:


Guys

I can't believe how much drivel I've just waded through. I thought I was on
the wrong newsgroup, for f**ks sake!
Put the political garbage in the bin where it belongs!
Can't we just talk about the weather, or would that be asking too
much.........it IS suppose to be a weather group is it not?

For what it's worth, overcast here with a current temp of 17.8c


Graham (Weston Coyney)


Couldn't agree more, Graham. I'm surprised at some of the people who have been
sucked into this thread. Take it elsewhere, guys. This isn't the place.

--
Norman Lynagh
Tideswell, Derbyshire
303m a.s.l.
http://peakdistrictweather.org


  #56   Report Post  
Old June 4th 16, 03:07 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2009
Posts: 5,538
Default OT In/Out EU Referendum Straw Poll

Lawrence Jenkins Wrote in message:

As for this nonsense
So everyone in the "Big Pharma" industry has sworn an oath not o let the world know there is a cure for cancer. So all those people funding and doing cancer research are wasting their time.

A bit like everyone in the climate science world has sworn an oath
not to let the world know that they have manipulated the data to
make it appear as if AGW is causing the world to
warm.

Touché

--
Freddie


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/
  #57   Report Post  
Old June 4th 16, 03:07 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2009
Posts: 5,538
Default OT In/Out EU Referendum Straw Poll

Lawrence Jenkins Wrote in message:
On Saturday, 4 June 2016 11:43:04 UTC+1, Freddie wrote:
Lawrence Jenkins Wrote in message:

As for this nonsense
So everyone in the "Big Pharma" industry has sworn an oath not o let the world know there is a cure for cancer. So all those people funding and doing cancer research are wasting their time.

A bit like everyone in the climate science world has sworn an oath
not to let the world know that they have manipulated the data to
make it appear as if AGW is causing the world to
warm.

Touché

--
Freddie


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/



That did cross my mind Freddie as I wrote the post, there is however an important fundamental difference. The left post war has attacked everything that it deems to have come from capitalism with the pharmaceutical industry really taking some flak. You will note there's many conspiracy dramas about

Drugs industry
Oil Industry
Neil Young's latest clap trap Monsanto and crop type monopoly
GM Foods
Frakking industry

and many more with a constant mantra of a disbelief in what the scientist are telling us coming from that left platform. However the left have thrown its full weight behind AGW because it allows them to use it as a weapon against what it sees as western man made evil capitalism. So nearly very other science is not to be trusted as its represents capitalism but AGW science and its claims are to be trusted as if it was demonstrably provable like gravity-which it is not.

So there is a difference. You know I remember that slob Michael Moore (lies) in one of his films Bowling for Columbine showing the missile manufacturer Lockheed-Martin in the words of Moore, surreptitiously moving their nuclear missiles at night when the local townsfolk were innocently asleep and couldn't see them.

Well the truth was and to quote from Lockheed-Martins and this website

"1. Lockheed-Martin and Nuclear Missiles. Bowling for Columbine contains a sequence filmed at the Lockheed-Martin manufacturing facility, near Columbine. Moore interviews a PR fellow, shows missiles being built, and then asks whether knowledge that weapons of mass destruction were being built nearby might have motivated the Columbine shooters in committing their own mass slaying. After all, if their father worked on the missiles, "What's the difference between that mass destruction and the mass destruction over at Columbine High School?" Moore intones that the missiles with their "Pentagon payloads" are trucked through the town "in the middle of the night while the children are asleep."

Soon after Bowling was released someone checked out the claim, and found that the Lockheed-Martin plant does not build weapons-type missiles; it makes rockets for launching satellites."


It was also said the reason for transporting the missiles at night was to avoid local traffic hold ups during the day.

Now Michael Moore and his lefty ilk are nothing but liars and twisters of the truth in order to back an ideology . Would you trust someone like hiom on AGW climate policy?

Still a conspiracy theory though - lefties or otherwise.

--
Freddie


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/
  #58   Report Post  
Old June 4th 16, 03:07 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2009
Posts: 5,538
Default OT In/Out EU Referendum Straw Poll

Lawrence Jenkins Wrote in message:
On Saturday, 4 June 2016 12:51:02 UTC+1, Freddie wrote:
Lawrence Jenkins Wrote in message:
On Saturday, 4 June 2016 11:43:04 UTC+1, Freddie wrote:
Lawrence Jenkins Wrote in message:

As for this nonsense
So everyone in the "Big Pharma" industry has sworn an oath not o let the world know there is a cure for cancer. So all those people funding and doing cancer research are wasting their time.

A bit like everyone in the climate science world has sworn an oath
not to let the world know that they have manipulated the data to
make it appear as if AGW is causing the world to
warm.

Touché

--
Freddie


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/


That did cross my mind Freddie as I wrote the post, there is however an important fundamental difference. The left post war has attacked everything that it deems to have come from capitalism with the pharmaceutical industry really taking some flak. You will note there's many conspiracy dramas about

Drugs industry
Oil Industry
Neil Young's latest clap trap Monsanto and crop type monopoly
GM Foods
Frakking industry

and many more with a constant mantra of a disbelief in what the scientist are telling us coming from that left platform. However the left have thrown its full weight behind AGW because it allows them to use it as a weapon against what it sees as western man made evil capitalism. So nearly very other science is not to be trusted as its represents capitalism but AGW science and its claims are to be trusted as if it was demonstrably provable like gravity-which it is not.

So there is a difference. You know I remember that slob Michael Moore (lies) in one of his films Bowling for Columbine showing the missile manufacturer Lockheed-Martin in the words of Moore, surreptitiously moving their nuclear missiles at night when the local townsfolk were innocently asleep and couldn't see them.

Well the truth was and to quote from Lockheed-Martins and this website

"1. Lockheed-Martin and Nuclear Missiles. Bowling for Columbine contains a sequence filmed at the Lockheed-Martin manufacturing facility, near Columbine. Moore interviews a PR fellow, shows missiles being built, and then asks whether knowledge that weapons of mass destruction were being built nearby might have motivated the Columbine shooters in committing their own mass slaying. After all, if their father worked on the missiles, "What's the difference between that mass destruction and the mass destruction over at Columbine High School?" Moore intones that the missiles with their "Pentagon payloads" are trucked through the town "in the middle of the night while the children are asleep."

Soon after Bowling was released someone checked out the claim, and found that the Lockheed-Martin plant does not build weapons-type missiles; it makes rockets for launching satellites."


It was also said the reason for transporting the missiles at night was to avoid local traffic hold ups during the day.

Now Michael Moore and his lefty ilk are nothing but liars and twisters of the truth in order to back an ideology . Would you trust someone like hiom on AGW climate policy?

Still a conspiracy theory though - lefties or otherwise.

--
Freddie


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/


some conspiracies do exist

Hahaha I like that :-)


--


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/
  #59   Report Post  
Old June 4th 16, 06:06 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,152
Default OT In/Out EU Referendum Straw Poll

On Saturday, 4 June 2016 11:51:24 UTC+1, Graham wrote:
Guys

I can't believe how much drivel I've just waded through. I thought I was on
the wrong newsgroup, for f**ks sake!


Couldn't agree more. Such an avalanche of shouty nonsense. I get far more meaningful conversations down the pub (The Hope, 48 West Street, Carshalton). Rudeness and rantiness risk ostracism. The booze is a useful lubricant but you don't need a bucketful.

Put the political garbage in the bin where it belongs!
Can't we just talk about the weather, or would that be asking too
much.........it IS suppose to be a weather group is it not?

For what it's worth, overcast here with a current temp of 17.8c


Graham (Weston Coyney)


Quite similar weather here, just a little warmer, max 20°C and quite humid. Cloudy and rather gloomy. A bit "close".

Tudor Hughes, Warlingham, NE Surrey, 557 ft, 169 m.

  #60   Report Post  
Old June 21st 16, 09:00 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,730
Default OT In/Out EU Referendum Straw Poll

On Friday, 3 June 2016 14:05:12 UTC+1, Len Wood wrote:
On Thursday, 2 June 2016 20:00:48 UTC+1, Dave wrote:
I'm interested to gage the thoughts of those that contribute to this news group regarding the upcoming EU Referendum.

In or Out, thoughts please?

------------------------------------------------------------
In out in out
You shake it all about.
You do the hokey cokey
and you turn around,
That's what it's all about.

------------------------------------------------------------


As I said Ron on 3 June.
That's what its all about.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GFS Throwing Out a Straw Life Line on the 18z Lawrence Jenkins uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 6 December 11th 13 10:31 PM
Straw Poll : Global Warming Paul Hyett uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 60 October 2nd 07 07:25 PM
Straw poll: what's more uncomfortable, high temperatures in January or July? [email protected] uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 45 January 26th 06 07:25 PM
Cool Europe Surely a referendum needed lawrence Jenkins uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 1 June 14th 05 11:58 AM
Straw Poll : Hot weather Paul Hyett uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 7 August 8th 03 09:33 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:24 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 Weather Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Weather"

 

Copyright © 2017