RSS confirms the lingering heat from the El Nino:

http://data.remss.com/msu/graphics/T..._Sea_v03_3.txt

Temperatures will continue to fall against previous monthly comparators, probably for the rest of 2016 and into 2017. To be expected, but global temperatures are extremely likely to be higher than in previous La Ninas past and will very probably be higher than in many previous El Nino years.

That, deniers, is due to the world having warmed rapidly since 1979 and the only believable reason is that the rise has been due to human activity.

The surface records, back to the 19th Century, will show exactly the same when they are published mid-month.

That, again, deniers (best to repeat as they are not generally very bright), is due to the world having warmed rapidly since the 19th Century and the only believable reason is that the rise has been due to human activity.

On Friday, 8 July 2016 12:22:47 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
RSS confirms the lingering heat from the El Nino:

http://data.remss.com/msu/graphics/T..._Sea_v03_3.txt

Temperatures will continue to fall against previous monthly comparators, probably for the rest of 2016 and into 2017. To be expected, but global temperatures are extremely likely to be higher than in previous La Ninas past and will very probably be higher than in many previous El Nino years.

That, deniers, is due to the world having warmed rapidly since 1979 and the only believable reason is that the rise has been due to human activity.

The surface records, back to the 19th Century, will show exactly the same when they are published mid-month.

That, again, deniers (best to repeat as they are not generally very bright), is due to the world having warmed rapidly since the 19th Century and the only believable reason is that the rise has been due to human activity.

Says the man that when it come to predicting the vote for Brexit spoke out of his exit.

His post said : Its a Remain vote the bookies are never wrong

and the same person who believes that AGW is real and happening now but doesn't have two solar panels to rub together also repeatedly claims 'the science is settled'.

On Saturday, 9 July 2016 01:24:55 UTC+12, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
On Friday, 8 July 2016 12:22:47 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
RSS confirms the lingering heat from the El Nino:

http://data.remss.com/msu/graphics/T..._Sea_v03_3.txt

Temperatures will continue to fall against previous monthly comparators, probably for the rest of 2016 and into 2017. To be expected, but global temperatures are extremely likely to be higher than in previous La Ninas past and will very probably be higher than in many previous El Nino years.

That, deniers, is due to the world having warmed rapidly since 1979 and the only believable reason is that the rise has been due to human activity..

The surface records, back to the 19th Century, will show exactly the same when they are published mid-month.

That, again, deniers (best to repeat as they are not generally very bright), is due to the world having warmed rapidly since the 19th Century and the only believable reason is that the rise has been due to human activity.

Says the man that when it come to predicting the vote for Brexit spoke out of his exit.

His post said : Its a Remain vote the bookies are never wrong

and the same person who believes that AGW is real and happening now but doesn't have two solar panels to rub together also repeatedly claims 'the science is settled'.

Give a rest you odious plonker. So glad you and your halfwit mates won't get traction on the other forum.

On Friday, 8 July 2016 20:54:45 UTC+1, RW wrote:
On Saturday, 9 July 2016 01:24:55 UTC+12, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
On Friday, 8 July 2016 12:22:47 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
RSS confirms the lingering heat from the El Nino:

http://data.remss.com/msu/graphics/T..._Sea_v03_3.txt

Temperatures will continue to fall against previous monthly comparators, probably for the rest of 2016 and into 2017. To be expected, but global temperatures are extremely likely to be higher than in previous La Ninas past and will very probably be higher than in many previous El Nino years.

That, deniers, is due to the world having warmed rapidly since 1979 and the only believable reason is that the rise has been due to human activity.

The surface records, back to the 19th Century, will show exactly the same when they are published mid-month.

That, again, deniers (best to repeat as they are not generally very bright), is due to the world having warmed rapidly since the 19th Century and the only believable reason is that the rise has been due to human activity.

Says the man that when it come to predicting the vote for Brexit spoke out of his exit.

His post said : Its a Remain vote the bookies are never wrong

and the same person who believes that AGW is real and happening now but doesn't have two solar panels to rub together also repeatedly claims 'the science is settled'.

the other forum went thataway

So long and good baaa! Don't open the gate on your weigh-in it might be a Vesty special.

He is Right/Wrong Lawrence so leave the dead sheep alone before you contract a loathsome disease. For as long as they are unwilling to see the mint sauce coming, they are never going to realise how those skewed results are obtained. So just leave it alone and stop upsetting yourself.

On Saturday, July 9, 2016 at 8:19:30 AM UTC+12, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Friday, 8 July 2016 20:54:45 UTC+1, RW wrote:
On Saturday, 9 July 2016 01:24:55 UTC+12, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
On Friday, 8 July 2016 12:22:47 UTC+1, Dawlish wrote:
RSS confirms the lingering heat from the El Nino:

http://data.remss.com/msu/graphics/T..._Sea_v03_3.txt

Temperatures will continue to fall against previous monthly comparators, probably for the rest of 2016 and into 2017. To be expected, but global temperatures are extremely likely to be higher than in previous La Ninas past and will very probably be higher than in many previous El Nino years.

That, deniers, is due to the world having warmed rapidly since 1979 and the only believable reason is that the rise has been due to human activity.

The surface records, back to the 19th Century, will show exactly the same when they are published mid-month.

That, again, deniers (best to repeat as they are not generally very bright), is due to the world having warmed rapidly since the 19th Century and the only believable reason is that the rise has been due to human activity.

Says the man that when it come to predicting the vote for Brexit spoke out of his exit.

His post said : Its a Remain vote the bookies are never wrong

and the same person who believes that AGW is real and happening now but doesn't have two solar panels to rub together also repeatedly claims 'the science is settled'.

the other forum went thataway

So long and good baaa! Don't open the gate on your weigh-in it might be a Vesty special.

He is Right/Wrong Lawrence so leave the dead sheep alone before you contract a loathsome disease. For as long as they are unwilling to see the mint sauce coming, they are never going to realise how those skewed results are obtained. So just leave it alone and stop upsetting yourself.

It's your brain that's skewed - any of the scientists I know has more brainpower in a toe pinky than you have in your whole carcase.

Good one
The idea of you approaching a scientists to measure their body parts made me laugh.

I struck me as exactly the sort of thing you would try to do.