Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I see that a buoy in the Arctic at 85.9°N 31.0°E reported a temperature of -1°C
early on 9th Feb and +1°C late on 10th Feb. It then went back down to -25°C yesterday. Fascinating times! -- Norman Lynagh Tideswell, Derbyshire 303m a.s.l. http://peakdistrictweather.org @TideswellWeathr |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 13/02/2017 15:47, Norman Lynagh wrote:
I see that a buoy in the Arctic at 85.9°N 31.0°E reported a temperature of -1°C early on 9th Feb and +1°C late on 10th Feb. It then went back down to -25°C yesterday. Fascinating times! The next milestone/millstone is the lowest maximum sea-ice extent for the Arctic that was 14.517 x10^6 sq km, on 25 Feb 2015 (NSIDC method), yesterday it stood at 13.900. Total global sea-ice yesterday was a 38 year "all-time" record minimum. Antarctic sea-ice is likely to be also "all-time" minimum today, reportage tomorrow. The experts don't know what if anything (except climate change) is linking similar tipping-point? events at both poles |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Norman Lynagh" wrote in message ...
I see that a buoy in the Arctic at 85.9°N 31.0°E reported a temperature of -1°C early on 9th Feb and +1°C late on 10th Feb. It then went back down to -25°C yesterday. Fascinating times! ======================== Not at 85N admittedly, but Svarlbard seems to have been significantly above freezing for several days recently. See eg post #2760 at: https://forum.arctic-sea-ice.net/ind...1611.2750.html Seems to be the end of the (relatively) very mild weather in the Arctic for now, but interesting while it lasted. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 13/02/2017 16:20, JohnD wrote:
"Norman Lynagh" wrote in message ... I see that a buoy in the Arctic at 85.9°N 31.0°E reported a temperature of -1°C early on 9th Feb and +1°C late on 10th Feb. It then went back down to -25°C yesterday. Fascinating times! ======================== Not at 85N admittedly, but Svarlbard seems to have been significantly above freezing for several days recently. See eg post #2760 at: https://forum.arctic-sea-ice.net/ind...1611.2750.html Seems to be the end of the (relatively) very mild weather in the Arctic for now, but interesting while it lasted. It sounds really strange to hear of above freezing temperatures that close to the North Pole. Surely it should be like a deep freezer up there at this time of year. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Maybe Norman's already seen this, but some further info on the background to
the buoy data: https://www.theweathernetwork.com/ne...rth-pole/79190 |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 13/02/17 19:23, Adam Lea wrote:
On 13/02/2017 16:20, JohnD wrote: "Norman Lynagh" wrote in message ... I see that a buoy in the Arctic at 85.9°N 31.0°E reported a temperature of -1°C early on 9th Feb and +1°C late on 10th Feb. It then went back down to -25°C yesterday. Fascinating times! ======================== Not at 85N admittedly, but Svarlbard seems to have been significantly above freezing for several days recently. See eg post #2760 at: https://forum.arctic-sea-ice.net/ind...1611.2750.html Seems to be the end of the (relatively) very mild weather in the Arctic for now, but interesting while it lasted. It sounds really strange to hear of above freezing temperatures that close to the North Pole. Surely it should be like a deep freezer up there at this time of year. There's open water about 300nm due south of the buoy whereas it should be about 700nm at this time of year so there's not a great deal of ice to cool down southerly winds. Even so, there would be open water west of Svalbard to near 80N in most winters in the past so, even then it wouldn't be too far from the warming effect of the ocean. This warm spell has pushed the ice northwards in the Svalbard area so keeping the extent of Arctic ice at record low levels but it may also have the effect of reducing the chance of a record low this summer by blocking the outflow of old ice through the Fram Strait. The conditions off the east coast of Greenland remind me more of a typical June and July in the 1960s, which seems to back that up that supposition. However, I still think we're in for a record low this summer in spite of that. -- Graham P Davis, Bracknell, Berks. [Retd meteorologist/programmer] Web-site: http://www.scarlet-jade.com/ Never approach a bull from the front, a horse from the rear, or an idiot from any direction! [Irish proverb] |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, 13 February 2017 15:47:24 UTC, Norman Lynagh wrote:
I see that a buoy in the Arctic at 85.9°N 31.0°E reported a temperature of -1°C early on 9th Feb and +1°C late on 10th Feb. It then went back down to -25°C yesterday. Fascinating times! -- Norman Lynagh Tideswell, Derbyshire 303m a.s.l. http://peakdistrictweather.org @TideswellWeathr Minus 25? Sea temperatures are between 2 and minus 2. It must have got frozen in above the ice. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 13/02/2017 22:46, Graham P Davis wrote:
On 13/02/17 19:23, Adam Lea wrote: On 13/02/2017 16:20, JohnD wrote: "Norman Lynagh" wrote in message ... I see that a buoy in the Arctic at 85.9°N 31.0°E reported a temperature of -1°C early on 9th Feb and +1°C late on 10th Feb. It then went back down to -25°C yesterday. Fascinating times! ======================== Not at 85N admittedly, but Svarlbard seems to have been significantly above freezing for several days recently. See eg post #2760 at: https://forum.arctic-sea-ice.net/ind...1611.2750.html Seems to be the end of the (relatively) very mild weather in the Arctic for now, but interesting while it lasted. It sounds really strange to hear of above freezing temperatures that close to the North Pole. Surely it should be like a deep freezer up there at this time of year. There's open water about 300nm due south of the buoy whereas it should be about 700nm at this time of year I thought nm meant nanometres? -- Paul Hyett, Cheltenham |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 14/02/17 07:21, Vidcapper wrote:
On 13/02/2017 22:46, Graham P Davis wrote: On 13/02/17 19:23, Adam Lea wrote: On 13/02/2017 16:20, JohnD wrote: "Norman Lynagh" wrote in message ... I see that a buoy in the Arctic at 85.9°N 31.0°E reported a temperature of -1°C early on 9th Feb and +1°C late on 10th Feb. It then went back down to -25°C yesterday. Fascinating times! ======================== Not at 85N admittedly, but Svarlbard seems to have been significantly above freezing for several days recently. See eg post #2760 at: https://forum.arctic-sea-ice.net/ind...1611.2750.html Seems to be the end of the (relatively) very mild weather in the Arctic for now, but interesting while it lasted. It sounds really strange to hear of above freezing temperatures that close to the North Pole. Surely it should be like a deep freezer up there at this time of year. There's open water about 300nm due south of the buoy whereas it should be about 700nm at this time of year I thought nm meant nanometres? I was going to type 'NM' but made the mistake of Googling to check. The top reference I saw gave 'nm' as the abbreviation. Now I've had another look and this is what Wikipedia says: ++++ There is no internationally agreed symbol. M is used as the abbreviation for the nautical mile by the International Hydrographic Organization and by the International Bureau of Weights and Measures. NM is used by the International Civil Aviation Organization. nm (the SI symbol for the nanometer) is used by the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. nmi is used by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers and the United States Government Publishing Office. ++++ Considering the nautical mile is based on a numerical system that dates back to Babylonian times, you'd think someone might have come up with an agreed standard by now. ;-) -- Graham P Davis, Bracknell, Berks. [Retd meteorologist/programmer] Web-site: http://www.scarlet-jade.com/ Never approach a bull from the front, a horse from the rear, or an idiot from any direction! [Irish proverb] |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Graham P Davis wrote:
On 14/02/17 07:21, Vidcapper wrote: On 13/02/2017 22:46, Graham P Davis wrote: On 13/02/17 19:23, Adam Lea wrote: On 13/02/2017 16:20, JohnD wrote: "Norman Lynagh" wrote in message ... I see that a buoy in the Arctic at 85.9°N 31.0°E reported a temperature of -1°C early on 9th Feb and +1°C late on 10th Feb. It then went back down to -25°C yesterday. Fascinating times! ======================== Not at 85N admittedly, but Svarlbard seems to have been significantly above freezing for several days recently. See eg post #2760 at: https://forum.arctic-sea-ice.net/ind...1611.2750.html Seems to be the end of the (relatively) very mild weather in the Arctic for now, but interesting while it lasted. It sounds really strange to hear of above freezing temperatures that close to the North Pole. Surely it should be like a deep freezer up there at this time of year. There's open water about 300nm due south of the buoy whereas it should be about 700nm at this time of year I thought nm meant nanometres? I was going to type 'NM' but made the mistake of Googling to check. The top reference I saw gave 'nm' as the abbreviation. Now I've had another look and this is what Wikipedia says: ++++ There is no internationally agreed symbol. M is used as the abbreviation for the nautical mile by the International Hydrographic Organization and by the International Bureau of Weights and Measures. NM is used by the International Civil Aviation Organization. nm (the SI symbol for the nanometer) is used by the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. nmi is used by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers and the United States Government Publishing Office. ++++ Considering the nautical mile is based on a numerical system that dates back to Babylonian times, you'd think someone might have come up with an agreed standard by now. ;-) Just to confuse the issue further, in the Units and Terminology section in the Admiralty Sailing Directions (Pilots) it states that 'Distances are expressed in sea miles of 60 to a degree of latitude'. In the body of the text they then simply refer to 'miles'. In reports that I write in a marine context I normally refer only to 'miles'. In that context it is implicit that I mean 'nautical miles'. This is consistent with how distances are referred to by mariners i.e. 'miles' means 'nautical miles'. The reason is that distances in nautical miles can easily be measured using the latitude scale on navigation charts. -- Norman Lynagh Tideswell, Derbyshire 303m a.s.l. http://peakdistrictweather.org @TideswellWeathr |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
warm spike overnight | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Joe gives his explanation concerning the current NH Ice spike | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
...Arctic Sea Ice is Going Fast....Very Fast! | alt.talk.weather (General Weather Talk) | |||
Global Warming renamed (and explained) as Post 1980 Temperature Spike | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
I predict a very very very cold winter ! ! ! ! ! | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) |